m lhuillier philcoa
In a world increasingly reliant on technology, Microsoft has unveiled a new AI-powered feature for Windows 11 called “Recall.” Designed to help users “remember” everything they’ve seen on their PCs, Recall has sparked both excitement and concern among tech enthusiasts and privacy advocates alike. This article delves into the intricacies of Microsoft Recall, examining its potential benefits, privacy implications, and the broader debate surrounding AI and data collection. What is Microsoft Recall? Announced during a Microsoft AI event , Recall is a feature that captures snapshots of your active window every few seconds, recording your activities within Windows for up to three months. This data is then analyzed by the on-device Neural Processing Unit (NPU) and an AI model to extract information and create a searchable index. Users can browse through their snapshot history or utilize human language queries to search for specific information. Why is Recall Causing a Stir? While the ability to effortlessly recall past information seems appealing, the implications of constant activity monitoring have raised significant privacy concerns. Critics argue that Recall represents a massive invasion of privacy, with the potential for misuse and abuse. How Does Recall Work? Recall operates by leveraging the power of on-device AI. The NPU and AI model work in tandem to analyze the captured snapshots, extracting relevant information and organizing it into a searchable index. This allows users to quickly and easily find information they may have seen days, weeks, or even months ago. Privacy Concerns and Microsoft’s Response The primary concern surrounding Recall is the potential for privacy violations. Critics argue that the constant capture of screen snapshots could inadvertently record sensitive information, such as passwords, financial details, or personal conversations. Microsoft has attempted to address these concerns by emphasizing that all Recall data is stored locally on the user’s device in an encrypted format. They also highlight that users have complete control over the feature, including the ability to enable or disable it and choose which apps it can capture snapshots from. The Broader Debate: AI and Data Collection Recall is not an isolated incident but rather a reflection of the growing trend of AI integration and data collection in technology. As AI becomes more sophisticated, companies are increasingly utilizing user data to personalize experiences and improve their products. However, this raises questions about the balance between innovation and privacy. My Personal Experience with Recall (or Similar Technologies) While I haven’t personally used Microsoft Recall yet, I have experimented with other AI-powered tools that utilize personal data to enhance productivity and organization. For instance, I’ve used note-taking apps that employ AI to categorize and summarize my notes, making it easier to find the information I need. These experiences have highlighted the potential benefits of AI while also underscoring the importance of responsible data handling and user privacy. The Future of Recall and AI in Windows It remains to be seen how Recall will be received by the wider Windows user base. If successful, it could pave the way for more AI-powered features in future Windows versions. However, Microsoft will need to address the privacy concerns and ensure users feel comfortable with the level of data collection involved. Microsoft Recall represents a significant step forward in AI integration within the Windows operating system. While the feature offers undeniable benefits in terms of information retrieval and productivity, it also raises valid concerns about privacy and data security. As AI continues to evolve and become more ingrained in our digital lives, it is crucial for companies like Microsoft to prioritize user privacy and ensure transparency in their data collection practices. Only then can we fully embrace the potential of AI without compromising our fundamental right to privacy.From a 10-year-old to a Muppet to a president-elect, NYSE bell-ringers range from famous to obscure
Mexico has been taking a bashing lately for allegedly serving as a conduit for Chinese parts and products into North America, and officials here are afraid a re-elected Donald Trump or politically struggling Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau could try to leave their country out of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Mexico’s ruling Morena party is so afraid of losing the trade deal that President Claudia Sheinbaum said Friday the government has gone on a campaign to get companies to replace Chinese parts with locally made ones. “We have a plan with the aim of substituting these imports that come from China, and producing the majority of them in Mexico, either with Mexican companies or primarily North American companies,” Sheinbaum said. While Sheinbaum claimed Mexico had been working on that effort since t he 2021 global supply chain crisis — when factories around the world were stalled by a lack of parts and particularly computer chips from Asia — it appears to be an uphill battle. Even the United States has faced big challenges in moving chip production back home despite billions in subsidies and incentives. Mexico gained tens of thousands of jobs when U.S. and foreign automakers moved their plants to Mexico under the free trade pact to take advantage of much lower wages. But the idea that Chinese parts — or even whole cars — could be piggybacking on that arrangement to further hollow out the U.S. auto industry has enraged some people north of the border. So Mexico is scrambling with private companies to get them to move parts production here. “Next year, God willing, we are going to start making microchips in Mexico,” Mexican Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said on Thursday. “Of course they’re not yet the most advanced chips, but we are going to start producing them here.” Mexico’s nationalistic ruling party, which is normally very resistant to being seen as bending to U.S. demands, is scrambling in other ways, too. The ruling party is in the process of eliminating a half-dozen independent regulatory and oversight agencies that were established by former presidents. That includes the anti-monopoly, transparency and energy regulatory bodies. Together with reforms that will make all judges stand for election in Mexico, that has sparked concern in the U.S. and Canada. Countries are required under the agreement to have some independent agencies, in part to protect foreign investors. For example, they could prevent a government from approving a monopoly for a state-owned company that could force competitors out of the market. So ruling-party legislators are actually re-writing the proposed laws to exactly mimic the minimum accepted requirements under the trade accord. “What is being done is to create a reform so that its almost exactly equal to what exists in the United States, so we can clear that up,” Ebrard said. It’s all part of a very legalistic defense of the trade accord, signed in 2018 and approved in 2019. Mexico hopes the rules of the agreement would prevent the U.S. or Canada from simply walking away when the trade pact comes up for review in 2026. Experts agree, saying that totally abandoning the accord is unlikely. Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis of the financial group Banco Base notes that if a country is dissatisfied with the trade agreement during the periodic reviews, like in 2026, there is a clause in the pact that says they can ask for a review each year to work out a solution, and keep doing that for a decade while the agreement remains in force. “That is, they wouldn’t be able to get out until 2036,” Siller said. “I think they will play hardball with Mexico in the 2026 review.” Like any marriage, when the pact no longer works for one party, it may still drag on for years but it’s death by a thousand cuts. C.J. Mahoney. who served as deputy U.S. trade representative in Trump’s first administration, said in a talk for the Texas-based Baker Institute in September that the United States probably wouldn’t end the trade agreement. But with growingly vocal critics of the pact it could hold up renewing it for years. “The costs of not renewing immediately are actually quite relatively low,” Mahoney said. “I think the inclination to just kick the can down the road will be pretty strong.” Because many companies won’t make big investments in production facilities without certainty, that could be a serious if not fatal blow to the pact. How much does Mexico actually buy from China? Mexican officials say they have fewer imports of Chinese parts and products than the United States does. But given the enormous size difference between the two countries’ economies, it is a true but weak argument. In July, the U.S. imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum shipped from Mexico that were made elsewhere, in an attempt to stop China from avoiding import taxes by routing goods through Mexico. It includes a 25% tariff on steel not melted or poured in Mexico and a 10% tariff on aluminum. Sen. Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, has called for stopping Mexican steel imports, saying “the alarming rise in Chinese steel and aluminum coming into the country through Mexico ... is unsustainable and a threat to American jobs, as well as our economy and national security.” In the end, Mexico may be forced to crack down on Chinese imports, but it won’t be easy. “Reducing the dependence on Chinese imports is not going to be achieved in the short or medium term,” said José María Ramos, a professor of public administration at the Colegio de la Frontera Norte in Tijuana.President Joe Biden mourns Jimmy Carters death, orders official state funeral to honor him
S Korea's Leadership Crisis In The Hands Of Constitutional Court
Jimmy Carter has died at 100; longest-lived U.S. presidentThese retailers will be closed on Thanksgiving this year
Citius Pharmaceuticals stock hits 52-week low at $0.16AP News Summary at 2:05 p.m. EST
West Virginia knocks off No. 3 Gonzaga in overtime
VICTORIA - A Vancouver Island First Nation whose people were the first to greet European explorers in the region almost 250 years ago is taking British Columbia to court, seeking title to its traditional territories and financial compensation. The Mowachaht/Muchalaht First Nation filed a claim Thursday in B.C. Supreme Court seeking a return of decision-making, resource and ecological stewardship, said Chief Mike Maquinna, a descendent of the former Chief Maquinna who met British explorer Capt. James Cook in 1776. Crown-authorized forest industry activities approved by the province without the consent of the Mowachaht/Muchalaht First Nation have resulted in cultural, economic and environmental impacts, he said at a news conference on Thursday. “Our people, the Mowachaht/Muchalaht, have endured many hardships since first meeting Capt. Cook, who was the explorer who first came into our territory,” said Maquinna. “As a result of the explorations of our territory, the natural resources of our lands have been taken. We want to correct rights and wrongs here and hopefully as time goes on this will show that Mowachaht/Muchalaht has been infringed upon since time of contact.” Capt. Cook and Chief Maquinna met in March 1776 at the traditional Mowachaht/Muchalaht whale-hunting village of Yuquot, later named Friendly Cove by Cook. The Parks Canada website says Yuquot was designated a national historic site in 1923 as the ancestral home of the First Nation, which was continuously occupied for more than 4,300 years and the centre of their social, political and economic world. The Parks Canada website says the village became the capital for all 17 tribes of the Nootka Sound region. Maquinna said the province has been acting as the sole decision-making authority in the Gold River-Tahsis areas of northern Vancouver Island, especially with regards to the forest resource, without the consent of his nation. Hereditary Chief Jerry Jack said the claim seeks title to about 430,000 hectares of land on the northwest coast of Vancouver Island and an amount of financial compensation to be determined by the court. “It is common knowledge we were here long before Capt. Cook and now we have to go to court and definitively prove that,” he said. “I don’t like that we have to prove that we owned it before he showed up to my territory, to my beach.” The land title case does not make any claims against private land owners, homeowners or recreational hunting and fishing operators, said Jack. Premier David Eby said the B.C. government prefers negotiated land-claims settlements rather than become involved in lengthy, expensive court cases, but the Mowachaht/Muchalaht have the right to take that route. “We have no problem with them doing that,” he said at an unrelated news conference in Langley. “We’d rather sit down and find a path forward.” The 15-page notice of claim seeks declarations that the First Nation has Aboriginal title to its lands and that B.C.‘s Forest Act and Land Act will no longer apply to Mowachaht/Muchalaht lands once title is declared. Jack said the nation decided against pursuing formal treaty talks with the federal and provincial government years ago and has been planning the land title court case “for many decades.” This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 12, 2024. Note to readers: This is a corrected story. The Mowachaht/Muchalalaht First Nation previously said it sought title to about 66,000 hectares of land. The First Nation now says it is seeking title to about 430,000 hectares of land.Houston, you have a problem - the Texans are pretenders. After seemingly righting the ship last Monday night with a convincing 34-10 win over the Dallas Cowboys, the Texans lost to the 2-8 Tennessee Titans at home and gave up 32 points in the process. Now, they have lost three of their last four games, dropping their own record to 7-5 and making things much harder on themselves than they need to be. And while they will almost certainly still win the AFC East, the bigger goal is a run to the Super Bowl, and this does not look like a team capable of making such a run. The Texans allowed Will Levis to throw for over 11 yards per attempt and two scores while Tony Pollard racked up 119 yards on five yards per carry. And even when it seemed they were on their way to coming back from a 17-7 deficit and coming out of Week 12 with an 8-4 record, their own ineptitude got in the way. Jimmie Ward seemed swing all momentum back in the favor of Houston with a pick-six at the tail end of the third quarter to put the Texans up 24-23, which was followed by a quick four-play-and-punt drive from the Titans. The Texans got another break when the Titans fumbled a punt following a three-and-out and set them up in plus territory. However, they settled for a field goal, which was immediately followed by a 70-yard touchdown pass from Levis to Chig Okonkwo on the Titans' first play on eht ensuing drive. The Texans had a chance to tie the game late in the fourth, but Ka'imi Fairbairn shanked a 28-yard field goal. And on their last gasp with less than two minutes left, C.J. Stroud took a safety to officially put the game out of reach. And speaking of Stroud, his play has been the most concerning part of this stretch. He threw two interceptions in the loss, and has five in his last three games, Overall this season, he has just 12 touchdown passes to seven interceptions and his 54.5 QBR ranks 23rd in the NFL. On top of that, Houston's pass protection has been abysmal this season, with Stroud being sacked 35 times. And in a conference when you have to get through the Chiefs, Bills, Ravens, and defensively-strong wildcards like the Steelers and Chargers, this Texans team has a lot to get right before January if they want to have any shot of playing in New Orleans come February.
Manchester United teammates Rasmus Hojlund and Amad Diallo exchanged words after the final whistle of a 2-1 victory on Thursday. And manager Ruben Amorin has no problem with it. “For me, it’s a very, very good sign,” Amorin said after his team beat Viktoria Plzen to stay unbeaten in the Europa League. Hojlund scored two goals and hoped for a centering pass from Diallo to go for a hat trick in the final minutes. The Denmark striker didn't get the pass, though. Viktoria had been pushing forward looking for an equalizer, which created space for United counters. On another break shortly afterward, Hojlund opted to keep the ball. The pair then had a heated post-game exchange. “We need to feel something,” Amorin said. “If we need to fight each other, it's like a family. When you don't care, you don't do nothing. When you care — you fight with your brother, with your mother, your father.” AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccerLuke Humphries defeats Luke Littler to retain Players Championship Finals title
KENNESAW, Ga. (AP) — Adrian Wooley and Simeon Cottle each scored 32 points and Kennesaw State beat Brewton-Parker 112-77 on Sunday. Wooley added eight rebounds and eight assists for the Owls (8-5). Cottle went 11 of 16 from the field (8 for 13 from 3-point range) to add 32 points. Braedan Lue went 5 of 8 from the field (2 for 3 from 3-point range) to finish with 14 points. Dre Burroughs finished with 25 points for the Barons. Brewton-Parker got 20 points and seven rebounds from Tommy J Tisdale III. Kennesaw State took the lead with 15:42 left in the first half and did not give it up. The score was 57-31 at halftime, with Cottle racking up 16 points. Kennesaw State extended its lead to 83-38 during the second half, fueled by a 10-0 scoring run. Wooley scored a team-high 19 points in the second half as their team closed out the win. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .
- Previous: www phlove com login
- Next:
