p777 slot

Coloradans are now purchasing electric vehicles at a higher rate than any other state, according to a new report from the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management. The report compared electric vehicle sales across the United States in the third quarter of 2024, and showed Colorado surpassing California to reach the highest electric vehicle market share in the country. The report claimed that electric vehicles made up 25.3% of all new vehicles sold in Colorado this quarter. Eighty-two percent of the electric vehicles were fully electric, while the remaining 18% were plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. In October, the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association released a report that showed Colorado’s electric vehicle market share grew from 16.1% in the second quarter of 2024 to 21.9% in the third. The report found that hybrid and plug-in vehicles had a 15.9% market share for the first nine months of the year, up from 12.5% in 2023. The report claims this made Colorado second in the nation for electric vehicle sales during those nine months. Matthew Groves, CEO of the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association, said that while the association believes the trend in this latest report from the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, it is uncertain of the methodology and therefore, its conclusion. “We knew this day would come, and we welcome it. We just want to be able to properly quantify the success,” Groves said. As of Nov. 7, Colorado had 156,281 electric vehicles and 5,561 public charging ports (both Level 2 and DCFC), according to a dashboard created by Atlas Public Policy in partnership with the Colorado Energy Office . This was an increase of around 3.32% from Oct. 7. The dashboard utilizes data from state vehicle registration, the U.S. Department of Energy, ChargePoint, EV Connect and the U.S. Census Bureau. Statewide, this equates to about 27 electric vehicles per 1,000 people. Adoption in some of the resort communities across Colorado’s Interstate 70 mountain corridor is among the highest in the state. Based on the November data, Pitkin County has 53 electric vehicles per 1,000 residents, making it the highest in the state. Boulder County had around 50 electric vehicles per 1,000 residents, and Denver County had 42. Eagle and Summit counties had 33 and 35 per 1,000 residents, respectively. These mountain communities also have a high ratio of charging ports. Statewide, there is less than one Level 2 port — the most common electric vehicle charger in Colorado — per 1,000 residents. In Summit County, there were around 5.5 of these same chargers per 1,000 people. In Pitkin County, there were 4.6 per 1,000 people. Gov. Jared Polis and the Colorado Energy Office shared both aforementioned reports in a news release in early December, indicating that the high adoption in Colorado is due to a lot of upside in the state. “Between investments in charging infrastructure and generous incentives to bring down purchase and lease costs, our commitment to making electric vehicles an affordable and reliable option for Coloradans is paying off,” said Will Tour, the office’s executive director, in a statement. Groves agreed that the state’s vehicle purchase incentives are heavily influencing this adoption. “It’s what separates us from other states. You can lease multiple brands of (electric vehicles) for cheaper than an Uber ride to the airport,” Groves said. Colorado’s Energy Office currently offers a $5,000 tax credit for electric vehicle purchases in addition to rebates for income-qualified residents to trade in old or high-emitting vehicles as well as incentives and grants for charging infrastructure. The federal government also offers a $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicle purchases as well as a credit for at-home charging stations. Many local municipalities and utility providers — including Holy Cross Energy , Xcel Energy , Black Hills Energy , Yampa Valley Electric Association , the town of Vail and more — offer incentives and rebates for the vehicles and charging infrastructure. The ability to stack these various incentives has led to adoption in mountain communities, said Gina McCrackin, Eagle County’s Climate Action Collaborative manager at Walking Mountains. Colorado’s deployment and investment in public charging infrastructure, including at multifamily developments, has also contributed to this rise as has residents’ attitude, McCrackin added. “Generally, our culture here and our political climate is quite progressive, and so that certainly influences the appetite to adopt in the first place,” McCrackin said. While tax credits and incentives are abundant for Coloradans today, the future is likely to bring some uncertainty. The federal $7,500 electrical vehicle tax credit — created under President Joe Biden’s administration — is one of many climate-related expenses that President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to eliminate . In 2025, Colorado’s tax credit for electric vehicles will drop from $5,000 to $3,500 as part of planned decreases meant to stagger as adoption increases. Groves said he expects “some regression in 2025.” For electric vehicle adoption to continue to increase, Groves said electric vehicles need to rival traditional internal combustion engine vehicles in both performance and cost. On performance, Groves said “we’re hitting the fulcrum” where electric vehicles are becoming competitive. On cost, however, it’s the rebates that were “bridging that delta,” he said. Despite the pending state decrease and federal uncertainty, there’s hope for future adoption in Colorado. “I think the state of Colorado will continue to be supportive of EV adoption because they have to be,” McCrackin said. “They have really ambitious climate action goals, and I don’t see the state of Colorado stalling out on continuing to promote EV adoption and provide incentives for doing so.” As part of its ambitious climate goals, Colorado’s Energy Office has a goal to have 940,000 electric vehicles on the road by 2030 as the state moves to hit net-zero emissions by 2050 . Groves noted that amid federal uncertainty, “Colorado has discovered a pathway to success.” “We should pursue it until the wheels fall off,” he added. “Maybe we’re all wrong and the rebates aren’t why consumers are buying. If that’s true, we’d look pretty silly to back off our strategy just because the money is drying up.” Josh Chetwynd, the director of climate communications for the state of Colorado, said in an emailed statement that regardless of changes, “consumers in Colorado and across the country have made it clear: electric vehicles are here to stay and demand will continue to grow.” “While removing the federal electric vehicle tax credit would increase costs for families and individuals who want cleaner, more affordable transportation options, we expect demand for EVs to remain high, especially as the market continues to become more competitive, driving the costs of EVs down even more,” Chetwynd added. Outside of funding, time will support continued adoption, according to Groves. “Five years ago, you might not have known anyone who drove electric, you might not have taken a test drive, or you might not have had a selection in your manufacturer of choice,” he said. “Today, we’ve probably flipped all three of those.” McCrackin said she remains hopeful that electric vehicle adoption will continue as education increases and local municipalities and communities in Colorado continue to invest and subsidize electric vehicles and infrastructure. “We can continue to lean on the programs and incentives that we have now,” McCrackin said. “I think it’ll just be more pushing from an education and logic-based standpoint onto consumers and the public because we can’t lean on the very large federal incentives that are likely to go away.” This includes remaining opportunities around transitioning business and government fleets to electric, which can have exponential impacts, McCrackin added. In Eagle County, Walking Mountains has led initiatives to support electric vehicle infrastructure at multifamily housing developments , to familiarize consumers with the vehicles and more, she added. “In the absence of this awesome backbone that we’ve had over the last four years for climate funding ... leaning into the state and then local governments, as well as local coalition building, is going to be more important than ever if we desire to keep the momentum on our progress that we want to keep,” McCrackin said. “There’s definitely progress and momentum, and I think we will continue to see that rise.”Matt Gaetz says he won’t return to Congress next year after withdrawing name for attorney generalBy JOSH BOAK WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump loved to use tariffs on foreign goods during his first presidency. But their impact was barely noticeable in the overall economy, even if their aftershocks were clear in specific industries. The data show they never fully delivered on his promised factory jobs. Nor did they provoke the avalanche of inflation that critics feared. This time, though, his tariff threats might be different . The president-elect is talking about going much bigger — on a potential scale that creates more uncertainty about whether he’ll do what he says and what the consequences could be. “There’s going to be a lot more tariffs, I mean, he’s pretty clear,” said Michael Stumo, the CEO of Coalition for a Prosperous America, a group that has supported import taxes to help domestic manufacturing. The president-elect posted on social media Monday that on his first day in office he would impose 25% tariffs on all goods imported from Mexico and Canada until those countries satisfactorily stop illegal immigration and the flow of illegal drugs such as fentanyl into the United States. Those tariffs could essentially blow up the North American trade pact that Trump’s team negotiated during his initial term. Chinese imports would face additional tariffs of 10% until Beijing cracks down on the production of materials used in making fentanyl, Trump posted. Business groups were quick to warn about rapidly escalating inflation , while Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said she would counter the move with tariffs on U.S. products. House Democrats put together legislation to strip a president’s ability to unilaterally apply tariffs this drastic, warning that they would likely lead to higher prices for autos, shoes, housing and groceries. Sheinbaum said Wednesday that her administration is already working up a list of possible retaliatory tariffs “if the situation comes to that.” “The economy department is preparing it,” Sheinbaum said. “If there are tariffs, Mexico would increase tariffs, it is a technical task about what would also benefit Mexico,” she said, suggesting her country would impose targeted import duties on U.S. goods in sensitive areas. House Democrats on Tuesday introduced a bill that would require congressional approval for a president to impose tariffs due to claims of a national emergency, a largely symbolic action given Republicans’ coming control of both the House and Senate. “This legislation would enable Congress to limit this sweeping emergency authority and put in place the necessary Congressional oversight before any president – Democrat or Republican – could indiscriminately raise costs on the American people through tariffs,” said Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash. But for Trump, tariffs are now a tested tool that seems less politically controversial even if the mandate he received in November’s election largely involved restraining inflation. The tariffs he imposed on China in his first term were continued by President Joe Biden, a Democrat who even expanded tariffs and restrictions on the world’s second largest economy. Biden administration officials looked at removing Trump’s tariffs in order to bring down inflationary pressures, only to find they were unlikely to help significantly. Tariffs were “so new and unique that it freaked everybody out in 2017,” said Stumo, but they were ultimately somewhat modest. Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines at the start of 2018, moves that might have pushed up prices in those sectors even though they also overlapped with plans to open washing machine plants in Tennessee and South Carolina. His administration also levied tariffs on steel and aluminum, including against allies. He then increased tariffs on China, leading to a trade conflict and a limited 2020 agreement that failed to produce the promised Chinese purchases of U.S. goods. Still, the dispute changed relations with China as more U.S. companies looked for alternative suppliers in other countries. Economic research also found the United States may have sacrificed some of its “soft power” as the Chinese population began to watch fewer American movies. The Federal Reserve kept inflation roughly on target, but factory construction spending never jumped in a way that suggested a lasting gain in manufacturing jobs. Separate economic research found the tariff war with China did nothing economically for the communities hurt by offshoring, but it did help Trump and Republicans in those communities politically. When Trump first became president in 2017, the federal government collected $34.6 billion in customs, duties and fees. That sum more than doubled under Trump to $70.8 billion in 2019, according to Office of Management and Budget records. While that sum might seem meaningful, it was relatively small compared to the overall economy. America’s gross domestic product is now $29.3 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The total tariffs collected in the United States would equal less than 0.3% of GDP. The new tariffs being floated by Trump now are dramatically larger and there could be far more significant impacts. If Mexico, Canada, and China faced the additional tariffs proposed by Trump on all goods imported to the United States, that could be roughly equal to $266 billion in tax collections, a number that does not assume any disruptions in trade or retaliatory moves by other countries. The cost of those taxes would likely be borne by U.S. families, importers and domestic and foreign companies in the form of higher prices or lower profits. Former Biden administration officials said they worried that companies could piggyback on Trump’s tariffs — if they’re imposed — as a rationale to raise their prices, just as many companies after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 boosted food and energy costs and gave several major companies the space to raise prices, according to their own earnings calls with investors. But what Trump didn’t really spell out is what might cause him to back down on tariffs and declare a victory. What he is creating instead with his tariff threats is a sense of uncertainty as companies and countries await the details to figure out what all of this could mean. “We know the key economic policy priorities of the incoming Trump administration, but we don’t know how or when they will be addressed,” said Greg Daco, chief U.S. economist at EY-Parthenon. AP writer Mark Stevenson contributed to this report from Mexico City.The benefits of "Organic Tanking'' are very real. And the people who run the Dallas Cowboys know it, which helped inform some of the roster moves made in advance of Sunday in Washington ... site of one of the most circus-like outcomes in NFL history. The Cowboys defeated the Washington Commanders 34-26 in Week 12 of the 2024 NFL season, thus ending a five-game drought. ... and causing a lot of observers to say the same thing about this sort of "accidental'' anti-tanking win. That is ... "The Cowboys are so bad they can't even tank right!'' This game was a snooze-fest in the first half, but 41 of the 60 game's total points scored come in a fourth-quarter flurry, which special-teams heroics and long-distance dial-ups the order of the stretch run. In fact, 38 points were scored in the final 5:16 of action. And why? Why did Dallas, which entered the game with a lowly 3-7 record and an eye on improving its lot in next April's NFL Draft, find the heart to eventually take a 20-9 lead with just over five minutes remaining? And then find a way to do it again when kick returner KaVontae Turpin took one to the house for a 99-yard TD to go up 27-17? And then find a way to do it again when special-teamer Juanyeh Thomas grabbed an onside kick and ran it to the end zone for a second kick-return TD? Related: No Tank You! How'd Cowboys Shock Commanders in Bizarre Upset? Answer: Because even though the franchise needed to lose ... the players are not conditioned that way. That, really, defines what we call "Organic Tanking.'' It's about letting the outcome happen and accepting it. Or, in the case of Cooper Rush and Micah Parsons and the rest of the Cowboys, not letting the negative outcome happen and not accepting it. Related: Cowboys Shock Commanders in All-Time Wild Finishp777 slot 。

FBI Director Wray says he intends to resign before Trump takes office in JanuaryFox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com. This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255). A former OpenAI employee and whistleblower, Suchir Balaji, was recently found dead in his apartment in San Francisco, California . The San Francisco Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has identified Balaji, 26, as the deceased person, according to the San Jose Mercury News . The manner of death has been ruled suicide. The medical examiner said it had notified Balaji's family. LISA KUDROW BEGAN TO FEAR AI AFTER SEEING TOM HANKS MOVIE The OpenAI ChatGPT logo is seen on a mobile phone in this photo illustration on May 30, 2023, in Warsaw, Poland. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images) Balaji was found dead in his Buchanan Street apartment on November 26, a spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department told the outlet. First responders were called to his home to perform a wellness check, and no evidence of foul play was found during the initial probe. "We are devastated to learn of this incredibly sad news today and our hearts go out to Suchir’s loved ones during this difficult time," a spokesperson for OpenAI told Fox News Digital. This comes after Balaji, an AI researcher , raised concerns about OpenAI breaking copyright law in an interview with The New York Times in October. A man is seen using the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence chat website in this illustration photo on July 18, 2023. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images) Balaji resigned from OpenAI after working there for nearly four years when he learned the technology would bring more harm than good to society, he told the newspaper, noting that his main concern was the way the company allegedly used copyright data, stating that he believed its practices were damaging to the internet. "I was at OpenAI for nearly 4 years and worked on ChatGPT for the last 1.5 of them," Balaji wrote in October on the social media platform X. "I initially didn't know much about copyright, fair use, etc. but became curious after seeing all the lawsuits filed against GenAI companies." WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)? The OpenAI logo is arranged on a laptop in Beijing, China, on Friday, Feb. 24, 2023. (Bloomberg via Getty Images) CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "When I tried to understand the issue better, I eventually came to the conclusion that fair use seems like a pretty implausible defense for a lot of generative AI products, for the basic reason that they can create substitutes that compete with the data they’re trained on," his post continued. OpenAI and Microsoft are currently facing several lawsuits from media outlets who accuse OpenAI of breaking copyright law. Fox News Digital has reached out to the medical examiner and San Francisco Police . Fox News' Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.

Tech Turbulence: NVIDIA and Market Indices Face ChallengesLightchain AI (LCAI) Is the Next Ripple (XRP) for 2025

Furious Leicester owner hauls players in for showdown talks over Christmas party and Steve Cooper sackingSANTA CLARA, Calif. (AP) — After three straight losses, including back-to-back blowouts , the San Francisco 49ers needed a get-right game. The Chicago Bears helped provide just that. Brock Purdy carved up Chicago's defense to lead San Francisco to its best offensive output of the season and the defense dominated the Bears in a 38-13 win Sunday that looked a lot more like the team that went to the Super Bowl last season than the one that has struggled in 2024. “I think just the biggest thing was just getting some energy and momentum,” Purdy said. “This league is hard. It’s tough. If you don’t have momentum or energy and belief within a building, it can be really tough.” The problem for San Francisco (6-7) is it might be too late to salvage its playoff hopes. Three blown fourth-quarter leads to division rivals and the lopsided losses at Green Bay and Buffalo the previous two weeks leave the Niners two games out of the playoffs with only four games to go. They might need to win out to get back to the postseason for a fourth straight season, and even then they could need some help because their three division losses will make it tough to win any tiebreakers in the tightly packed NFC West. “If we win every single game, I think we’ve put ourselves in a very good position to either win the division or somehow sneak our way into playoff contention,” tight end George Kittle said. “I thought everyone’s focused on this one week. ... Forget the whole season whether you’ve played like crap the entire season, whether you’ve had missed opportunities, or whether you have a bunch of touchdowns. Whatever it is, flush all that and just focus on this one game.” Big plays. The Niners repeatedly gashed the Bears for big plays as the passing game looked as good as it has all season. Purdy had eight completions go for at least 20 yards — tied for the most in any game for the 49ers since at least 1991 — with Kittle catching four of them, Isaac Guerendo two and one each for Deebo Samuel and Jauan Jennings. Kickoffs. Jake Moody attempted two line-drive kicks as San Francisco tried to pin Chicago deep instead of allowing a touchback. But both kicks landed shy of the landing zone at the 20, giving the Bears the ball at the 40. DL Yetur Gross-Matos. The Niners have been struggling to generate a pass rush with Nick Bosa sidelined, but Gross-Matos made a big impact on Sunday. He had a career-high three sacks in the game after coming into the game with just one this season. S Ji'Ayir Brown. The second-year safety lost his starting job with the return of Talanoa Hufanga from a wrist injury. Brown played 15 defensive snaps in a spot role and was beat on a TD pass to Rome Odunze in his limited action. Guerendo has a sprained foot and will be evaluated later this week to see if he can play. ... OL Ben Bartch will likely go on IR after suffering a high ankle sprain Sunday. ... LB Dre Greenlaw could return this week for the first time since tearing his Achilles tendon in the Super Bowl. ... DL Nick Bosa (hip, oblique) and LT Trent Williams (ankle) will be evaluated this week but there is no timeline on when they will return. ... LG Aaron Banks cleared the concussion protocol and should play this week. ... LB Dee Winters (ankle), S Malik Mustapha (chest, shoulder) and LB Demetrius Flannigan-Fowles are day-to-day. 305 — The 49ers outgained the Bears by 305 yards in the first half for the ninth best advantage in a first half since at least 1991. The 319 yards for San Francisco were the most by any team in a first half this season and the 4 yards allowed were the fewest. The 49ers host the Los Angeles Rams on Thursday night. AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/NFL

NoneIndia News | Ex-AAP Convener Anjali Damania Forms Political Party

NEW YORK, Dec. 09, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Protara Therapeutics, Inc. TARA ("Protara"), a clinical-stage company developing transformative therapies for the treatment of cancer and rare diseases, today announced that it has commenced an underwritten public offering of shares of its common stock or, in lieu of issuing common stock to certain investors, pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of its common stock. All of the shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to be sold in the proposed offering will be offered by Protara. In addition, Protara expects to grant the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase additional shares of common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The proposed offering is subject to market and other conditions, and there can be no assurance as to whether or when the offering may be completed, or the actual size or terms of the offering. Protara intends to use the net proceeds received from the offering to fund the clinical development of TARA-002, as well as the development of other clinical programs. Protara may also use the net proceeds from the offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes. TD Cowen, Cantor, LifeSci Capital, Oppenheimer & Co. and Scotiabank are acting as joint book-running managers of the proposed offering. The shares of common stock and the pre-funded warrants will be issued pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-275290) that was declared effective on November 14, 2023 by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The offering is being made only by means of a preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. A preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompany prospectus relating to the offering will be filed with the SEC and will be available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov . Copies of the preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompany prospectus relating to the offering, when available, may be obtained from the offices of TD Securities (USA) LLC, 1 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017, by email at TD.ECM_Prospectus@tdsecurities.com or by telephone at (855) 495-9846; Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., 110 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Capital Markets, or by email at prospectus@cantor.com; or LifeSci Capital LLC, 1700 Broadway, 40th Floor, New York, New York 10019, or by email at compliance@lifescicapital.com . Before investing in the offering, interested parties should read the preliminary prospectus supplement and related prospectus for this offering, the documents incorporated by reference therein and the other documents Protara has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The final terms of the offering will be disclosed in a final prospectus supplement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the applicable securities laws of such state or jurisdiction. Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are "forward looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Protara may, in some cases, use terms such as "predicts," "believes," "potential," "proposed," "continue," "designed," "estimates," "anticipates," "expects," "plans," "intends," "may," "could," "might," "will," "should" or other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to, statements regarding the timing, size and completion of the proposed public offering as well as the expected use of proceeds related thereto are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results, developments and events may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including: Protara's ability to complete the offering on the proposed terms, or at all, changes in market conditions, and Protara's expectations related to the use of proceeds from the proposed offering. Additional important factors to be considered in connection with forward-looking statements, including additional risks and uncertainties, are described more fully under the caption "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in Protara's filings and reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made. Protara undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of the receipt of new information, the occurrence of future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Company Contact: Justine O'Malley Protara Therapeutics Justine.OMalley@protaratx.com 646-817-2836 © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.