www vipph fun

www vipph fun EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (AP) — Malik Nabers said calling the New York Giants “soft” after Sunday's embarrassing loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers was a mistake, although the star rookie receiver still plans to speak out when he thinks it's necessary. After talking with coach Brian Daboll and general manager Joe Schoen and watching video of the Giants' 30-7 defeat , Nabers said Tuesday that "soft” was a poor choice of words. “I don’t think it was really soft. I think it was just a lack of technique,” Nabers said. “We were playing our butts off, we just lacked technique.” The Giants (2-9) trailed 23-0 at halftime and had run only 19 plays on offense. Nabers was not targeted in first the half but still finished with a team-high six catches for 64 yards. The No. 6 overall pick in the draft, Nabers said his rant after the game — in which he said the Giants' quarterbacks weren't to blame for the team's poor performance — was just the competitor in him talking. “That’s just how I’m wired. That’s just who I am,” he said. “I just don’t like losing. If I feel like if I had an opportunity to help the team win, I’m going to express that.” Story continues below video Nabers said not being targeted in the opening half was tough because his body is prepared to play and not doing anything throws him off his game. “You’re not getting involved early, then you’re not getting the feel of the ball, you’re not getting hit,” Nabers said. “After football plays as an offense, after you get hit, you’re like, ‘All right, I’m ready to go.’” Nabers has a team-high 67 catches, the most by a player in his first nine NFL games. He said he sees himself as a resource, someone who can change the game for the Giants. “I’m not going to just sit back just because I’m a younger guy and not speak on how I feel,” Nabers said. “They want me to speak up. They feel like my energy helps the offense, in a way, to be explosive. So, of course, I’m going to speak up if something doesn’t go my way. That’s just how I am.” AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nflThese Biorobots Are About To Walk Like Earth’s First Land AnimalsBefore Thursday night's game in Detroit, a Lions fan from the group that carried the flag onto the field for the national anthem broke free to taunt Packers players, prompting coach Matt LaFleur to get involved. Eventually, game officials separated the fan from LaFleur and Packers players. “ ,” LaFleur said after the game. “He was talking junk to our players, giving them the throat slash sign, I’m trying to de-escalate it and then he gets in my face. I thought it was pretty unsportsmanlike. I’ve never seen that. I’ve been on many fields and usually they police that much better. I thought it was an arrogant fan that wanted to get in part of the action, and I would like to see security or something step in there and get him out of there. Because he shouldn’t be doing that.” The fan, a Lions season-ticket holder, . He was largely unrepentant about the situation. He said he's done it before. He also said he was asked to return to his seat before the anthem happened, and that right before halftime he was asked to leave. "The moment — I got caught up in it," he said. "I do feel a little bit like I may have embarrassed some fans and maybe the organization and stuff. But that is not my intentions at all. I absolutely love the team and, yeah, I'm sad that it worked out this way. But I'm glad we got the win. I'm glad we got the win. We swept them. That's two!" He hasn't heard from the Lions as to whether there will be any other repercussions. Per a team spokesman, the Lions had no comment on the situation. It's one thing for fans in the stands to give opposing players and coaches the business. For the few who get the privilege to be on the field before the game, it's fair to expect that they set certain behaviors aside. It's safe to say that, if the Lions host the Packers in the playoffs, the fan won't be carrying the flag before the game. If he's even allowed into Ford Field at all.

AP News Summary at 11:27 a.m. ESTGhana counts ballots after tight presidential race

ZANU PF Mashonaland East province has echoed calls from other provinces for an extension of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office beyond 2028, suggesting that the Constitution be amended to facilitate the move. Addressing party members at an inter-district meeting in Goromonzi, ZANU PF Mashonaland East provincial chairperson Daniel Garwe reaffirmed the province’s unwavering support for President Mnangagwa. He highlighted that this stance was unanimously agreed upon during the 21st National People’s Conference held in Bulawayo. “On the last day of the conference, all committees, through their chairpersons, submitted their resolutions,” Garwe said. “When the resolutions were read, the one calling for President Mnangagwa to lead Zimbabwe until 2030 stood out and received unanimous approval. No one opposed it, and the entire gathering celebrated the resolution.” He elaborated that despite some initial commentary from senior members, the resolution remained a clear expression of the party’s will. Garwe urged party members to remain steadfast in their support for the President, noting that the party’s Vision 2030 aligns with President Mnangagwa’s leadership. He emphasised that the Constitution, while guiding the nation, is subject to amendments when necessary to reflect the people’s aspirations. “Others might be confused as to what to follow, as the President said he is a constitutionalist, and it is true,” he said. “However, the Constitution is a living document that can be amended to align with the vision set for the nation. Vision 2030 is God-given, and the Constitution does not contradict it.” He also encouraged members to avoid factionalism and premature campaigning, reiterating the importance of loyalty to the party and its leadership. Garwe urged the party faithful to stay united and focused on ZANU PF’s broader goals, discouraging divisive tendencies. He assured them that chanting slogans like “ED 2030” was not prohibited and represented their collective resolve to see the vision through under President Mnangagwa’s guidance. “Let us follow the Constitution, but also ensure we create an environment where the President can remain compliant and continue to lead the nation towards Vision 2030,” Garwe added. ZANU PF’s continued calls for constitutional amendments to extend President Mnangagwa’s leadership reflect the party’s commitment to consolidating support for its long-term developmental goals. However, the proposed changes could reignite debates on governance and constitutionalism within Zimbabwe’s political landscape.

Mark Few likes No. 3 Gonzaga’s toughness after win over future Pac-12 ‘partner’ SDSU

5 Relatively Secure And Cheap Dividend Stocks For December 2024: Yields Up To 9% - Seeking AlphaTownsquare to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conferences

All Races Lead To the Strip: Rock ‘N’ Roll® Running Series Las Vegas Announces Registration Is Open for the World’s Largest Run Party

HARRISONBURG, Va. (AP) — Bryce Lindsay had 18 points in James Madison's 78-61 win against Utah Valley on Saturday night. Lindsay added five rebounds for the Dukes (6-4). Xavier Brown scored 12 points and added seven assists. AJ Smith went 4 of 6 from the field (2 for 3 from 3-point range) to finish with 10 points, while adding seven rebounds and three steals. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get updates and player profiles ahead of Friday's high school games, plus a recap Saturday with stories, photos, video Frequency: Seasonal Twice a week

They say a “word” is more than just a string of letters or sounds laced together. It is the building block of communication, a basin for thought, culture and identity. Words carry meaning, evoke emotions and create connections. They are central to everything from casual conversations to academic discourse, from literature to social media posts. Words are the pivotal means through which we express ideas, feelings and intentions. In their conventional form, words are often precise, well-constructed and capable of conveying nuance. Each word holds import, and its meaning is understood within a shared cultural and linguistic context. However, as technology is reshaping how we communicate, the way we use words has also transformed. Shortened words and acronyms, such as “omg” (oh my god), and “brb” (be right back), began as ways to save time and space in digital communication. With character limits on early text messaging platforms and the desire for quick exchanges, people found shortcuts that allowed them to express complex emotions and ideas with fewer characters. Over time, these abbreviations became a part of popular culture, spilling over into everyday speech and even formal writing. What is more is that contemporary times have introduced a new wave of such expressions. Terms like “fomo” (fear of missing out) and “yolo” (you only live once) have become banal, often used by Gen Z to convey sentiments in a catchy and epigrammatic way. Social media platforms like Twitter, Instagram and TikTok thrive on quick, amusing content and the language used within these spaces reflects that need for brevity. But beyond the internet’s influence, language in the real world has also been shortened for convenience. Think of how words like “hashtag” and “adulting” have entered the common lexicon, or how “Netflix and chill” has become a permeating phrase for casual encounters. Even in the professional realm, “ASAP” (As Soon As Possible) and “FYI” (For Your Information) are now part of everyday office conversation. The rise of short forms can be seen as a progressive development in some ways. First, they are efficient. In a world where time is usually in short supply, being able to convey a thought or sentiment in a few characters can be incredibly valuable. Shortened language allows for quick communication, which is particularly vital in fast-paced settings such as the business world, emergency situations and online discourse. Moreover, these compressed forms can make communication more accessible. They bridge generational gaps, allowing Gen Z to connect in ways that are relevant to their time. These forms also democratize language, making it easier for people from different linguistic backgrounds or literacy levels to engage with digital spaces. Despite these benefits, there are valid concerns about the impact of truncated language on the depth and richness of communication. The more frequently people use abbreviations, the less they may engage with the full complexity of language. Shortened forms, by nature, lack the subtlety and precision of fully articulated words. As people rely more on acronyms, emojis and shorthand, the vocabulary used in everyday speech and writing may shrink, limiting the ability to express complex ideas or emotions. Furthermore, in academic and professional settings, the need for precision and thorough explanation makes the use of shorthand inappropriate and potentially unprofessional. Besides, the use of reductions can marginalize those who are not familiar with contemporary slang or the specific codes of a particular group. The reliance on internet reductions or regional slang may exclude people who do not have the same cultural context or familiarity with certain terms, creating a divide between those who are “in the know” and those who are not. Perhaps, the rise of contracted words and acronyms is neither entirely good nor bad. It reflects how language evolves in response to the needs of a fast-changing world. It promotes efficiency and accessibility. But it also erodes the depth and precision that are vital for rich creative communication. The key lies in balance. Compressed language should be used prudently, reserving its place for informal communication, while warranting that creative, nuanced language remains a bedrock of formal and thoughtful discourse. The challenge moving forward is to accept the gains of linguistic innovation without sacrificing the richness that language offers as a tool for connection, expression and understanding.

South Korea's president survives an impeachment attempt over martial law

How Trump’s bet on voters electing him managed to silence some of his legal woesThe 2024 BMW i7 eDrive50 EV all electric RWD sedan

Overall, the four issues put to the vote on November 24 were of somewhat limited interest to the Swiss population abroad. At most, the two reforms to tenancy law concerned people who still own property in Switzerland and rent it out, or tenants who want to sublet while abroad. The really surprising thing about the Swiss Abroad was their high backing for the proposed motorway expansion, according to an October survey: at that time, 60% of the diaspora were in favour – 10 percentage points more than the Swiss population overall. By the time of the second survey a few weeks later, intentions had declined overall, but the pattern was the same: support for the motorway projects among the Swiss Abroad was still higher (50%) than among Swiss-resident citizens (47%). The analysis of how the diaspora actually voted in the final ballot is still to come; but the fact that it seemed – for once – to be less environmentally-conscious than the population at home is in itself remarkable. A few possible explanations: during occasional visits back to Switzerland, the Swiss Abroad might be more aware of any changes, and they might then compare what they see with the situation in their country of residence. Perhaps some Swiss Abroad find Swiss motorways to be more congested than those they use on a daily basis elsewhere. In general, there is a larger political trend towards a loss of interest in ecological issues, with people giving more priority to safety and prosperity. Are the Swiss Abroad set to follow this trend even faster than the population at home? If true, it would mark a paradigm shift. But for the moment, when it comes to the Swiss Abroad voting habits, we can’t see anything more than two oscillations on a seismograph; it would take a lot more to trace a definite line. Faced by a proposal coming from the authorities, opponents of the motorway expansion plans were not in an easy position. The “yes” camp also had more resources at its disposal for the campaign: over CHF4 million ($4.47 million), the highest budget for a ballot item declared in 2024, according to provisional figures External link from the Swiss Federal Audit Office and an analysis by the University of Bern. Opponents had CHF2.7 million. Some 93% of newspaper advertisements concerning the motorway vote were in favour of it. The opposition were also faced with a Swiss electorate traditionally reluctant to restrict car traffic and which has – until now – almost always supported the development of road infrastructure; the exception was the Alpine Initiative , 30 years ago. And yet on Sunday a majority of voters said “stop”. In this context, it’s interesting to note that expertise prevailed, which is not so often the case. Opponents of the plan, backed by transport specialists (350 of whom spoke out External link against the project), succeeded in getting across the counter-intuitive – but scientific – argument that increasing motorway capacity would eventually lead to just as much or even more traffic jams. The government, for its part, failed to provide factual accuracy on a number of points. In particular, it was accused of withholding information on the real environmental and health impact of transport, of not being transparent about the consequences of the project for fuel prices External link , and of peddling misleading arguments about road safety. This may have instilled doubt in an electorate that was initially sympathetic to his cause. The proposed plan for standardised financing of outpatient and inpatient healthcare services began the campaign with two major handicaps: its complexity and its lack of transparency. Not only was the idea by government and parliament difficult for voters to understand, but the impact it was unclear. Worse still, supporters and opponents had a diametrically opposed view of what it would mean: the former promised a reduction in health insurance premiums, while the latter denounced a sell-out project that would even cause premiums to rise. All the ingredients were therefore in place for the project to suffer the same fate as the reform of occupational pensions, shot down by voters in September. However, there was another decisive factor: a growing number of Swiss households, which bear a quarter of healthcare costs, are struggling with constantly rising premiums. Despite the uncertainties, the promise of lower insurance bills was enough to win over a majority. Any parliamentary bill has to be drawn up on the basis of a minimum amount of consensus if it is to have any chance of surviving the threat of being challenged to referendum. This implicit rule of Swiss semi-direct democracy was not respected by parliament – during the previous legislature – in September 2023, when it decided on two changes to tenancy law: to ease rules around landlords terminating leases early in order to use the property for their own purposes, and to tighten conditions around subletting. At the time, even the right-wing majority government opposed this reform, deeming the current rules to be sufficient. Forced by law to campaign in favour of the two issues, Economics Minister Guy Parmelin did the minimum. Similarly unconvinced, Swiss voters on Sunday said no. In a country where 60% of the population are renters, the attempt to force through new rules was seen as another sign of how disconnected parliament is from the reality of most people’s lives. The housing shortage, particularly acute in major Swiss cities, puts tenants at a disadvantage compared with property owners. Although the reforms proposed by the conservative camp may have seemed pragmatic, the powerful tenants’ lobby Asloca, with the help of left-wing parties, managed to narrowly swing the vote in their favour. Switzerland is renowned for the high level of trust enjoyed by its authorities. However, it is currently experiencing a crisis of confidence: for the first time, more people distrust the government (47%) than trust it (42%), according to the gfs.bern polling institute. The “no” vote on motorway expansion is yet another setback for the government and parliament, after having already lost in two major public votes this year. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the public were largely supportive of governmental policy. However, confidence started to erode as the health measures ended. The climate of mistrust has since had an influence on voters’ opinion, which was clear during referendum campaign: over time, the tendency to vote “no” increased for all four issues, an unusual pattern for projects proposed by the government. There are several reasons for this. A turning point was when voters accepted the introduction of a 13th annual pension payment in March – against the government’s advice. Since then, there has been much talk about the authorities not understanding the concerns of the population. The rejection in September of a reform of the occupational pension system, after the news of miscalculations in financial forecasts for the Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance system, both dealt a further blow to public confidence in the institutions. Left-wing parties and unions are riding a wave of ballot box success. The Social Democrats have come out on top in nine of the 12 popular votes so far in the current legislature. The left marked a first victory at the beginning of the year with the 13th pension payment, followed by the rejection of the occupational pension reform. Pierre-Yves Maillard, a Social Democrat parliamentarian who also heads the Swiss Trade Union Federation, has played a central role. This time however, political heavyweight Maillard, the Social Democrats, and the trade unions suffered defeat on the uniform financing of healthcare services. However, the results of the other three projects confirm the trend: while the left doesn’t always get its way in parliament and government, it is increasingly successful with people’s initiatives and referendums. Given that they often challenge parliamentary bills at the ballot box, the left-wing parties are supplanting the right-wing Swiss People’s Party as something of a national opposition party. This is no accident. There is a clear desire on the left to focus on mobilising support at the ballot box. It is worth noting that while the Swiss electorate swung rightwards in the 2023 federal elections, it has tended to favour the left in votes held during the current legislature – good news for the left, but a trend that also risks creating deadlocks in parliament. The traditional consensus-driven approach in Swiss politics does not exactly correspond to this opposition party mechanism. The growing polarisation in politics can also be seen in Switzerland. Parties furthest away from the centre of the political spectrum are becoming more forceful and more noticeable in how they express their views. The close results this Sunday confirm the trend. In the case of the motorway expansion and the proposed changes to tenancy law, the mobilisation of the left had an effect and brought people to the polls. Acceptance of the healthcare financing project meanwhile shows that parliament still knows how to find the famous Swiss compromise. However, during the campaign, the left-right divide also became much more pronounced. Edited by Mark Livingston; translated by DeepL/dos

LAS VEGAS — There are three races remaining in the Formula 1 season and Max Verstappen of Red Bull is close to a fourth consecutive world championship, which can wrap up Saturday night at the Las Vegas Grand Prix. All is not smooth sailing headed into this final month of racing: "It was a bit of a surprise, I think, for everybody," said Mercedes driver George Russell, a GPDA director. "It's a hell of a lot of pressure now onto the new race director (with) just three races left. Often, as drivers, we probably feel like we're the last to find out this sort of information." The Andretti team is expected to receive F1 approval to join the grid, albeit without Michael Andretti, who has scaled back his role dramatically since the IndyCar season ended in September. Many drivers, particularly seven-time champion Lewis Hamilton, have been at odds with FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem since his election following the 2021 season finale. In the GDPA statement, they reminded the sanctioning body "our members are adults" who don't need lectures and fines on foul language or jewelry bans, and simply want fair and consistent race control. There's been no response from Ben Sulayem, and won't be this weekend since he does not attend the LVGP. He will be at Qatar and the finale in Abu Dhabi next month. Hamilton doesn't think all the behind-the-scenes changes will be a fan topic as the season comes to a close. But he noted that consistency from race control is all the drivers have asked for, while throwing his support behind Domenicali and the job Maffei has done in growing F1 since Liberty took over. "I really hope Stefano is not leaving because he's been so instrumental in changes and progress to this whole thing," Hamilton said. "And he knows the sport as well as anyone. But all good things do come to an end, and whoever they put into place, I just hope they are like-minded. But sometimes you have to shake the trees." That's just what happened with the surprise departure of race director Wittich. Although drivers have been unhappy with race officiating this season and held a private GPDA meeting in Mexico City, Russell said they had no prior warning Wittich was out. The race director is the referee each weekend and Wittich has been in charge since 2022, when Michael Masi was fired following the controversial 2021 season-ending, championship-altering finale at Abu Dhabi. Now the man in charge for the final three races is Rui Marques, the Formula 2 and Formula 3 race director. Las Vegas, which overcame multiple stumbling blocks in last year's debut before putting on one of the best races of the season, is a difficult place to start. Verstappen can win his fourth title by simply scoring three points more than Lando Norris of McLaren. "It's a bit weird with three races to go to do that," Verstappen said. "It doesn't matter if you're positive or negative about certain things. I thought in Brazil there was definitely room for improvement, for example. It's still a bit weird having to now then deal with a different race director." Charles Leclerc of Ferrari wondered why the move was made with only three races to go. "To do it so late in the season, at such a crucial moment of the season, it could have probably been managed in a better way," he said. The drivers have consistently asked for clearer guidelines in the officiating of races, specifically regarding track limits and racing rules. The drivers have no idea how Marques will officiate, highlighting a disconnect between the competitors and Ben Sulaymen's FIA. "We just want to be transparent with the FIA and have this dialogue that is happening," Russell said. "And I think the departure of Niels is also a prime example of not being a part of these conversations." The GDPA statement made clear the drivers do not think their voice is being heard. "If we feel we're being listened to, and some of the changes that we are requesting are implemented, because ultimately we're only doing it for the benefit of the sport, then maybe our confidence will increase," Russell said. "But I think there's a number of drivers who feel a bit fed up with the whole situation. It only seems to be going in the wrong direction." He also said the relationship between the drivers and the FIA seems fractured. "Sometimes just hiring and firing is not the solution," he said. "You need to work together to improve the problem." Norris, who has battled Verstappen this year with mixed officiating rulings, said "obviously things are not running as smoothly as what we would want." Marques has his first driver meeting ahead of Thursday night's two practice sessions and then three weeks to prove to the competitors he is up for the job. Carlos Sainz Jr., who will leave Ferrari for Williams at the end of the season, hopes the drama doesn't distract from the momentum F1 has built over the last five years. "I think Formula 1 is in a great moment right now and all these rumors, I think in every team, every job, there's job changes," he said. "It's not big drama. I'm a big fan of the people you mentioned, they've done an incredible job in Formula 1 and Formula 1 is what it is thanks to these people. But it's just so emotional, especially the Stefano one. The only one that has a real effect is the race director. But I think if he does a good job, it should be transparent and nothing big." Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Lucretia Hughes Veterans for America First interview with General Chris 'Mookie' Walker gets almost 5 million views VFAF