genie in a bottle meaning

Arihant Foundations secures funding from CaratLane foundersBusiness and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said Donald Trump’s plans were ‘the big question facing global trading relationships’. The UK is prepared for “all eventualities” if Donald Trump slaps import tariffs on goods from Britain, Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said. The US president-elect has already announced plans to hit China, Canada and Mexico with tariffs as part of his efforts to crack down on illegal immigration and drugs. But he has indicated he is prepared to use tariffs far more widely as part of his plan to protect American industry. Mr Trump has suggested he wants to increase tariffs on goods imported from around the world by 10% or 20%, rising to 60% on items from China. The UK could retaliate in the form of tariffs targeted at symbolically important US products such as whiskey, blue jeans and motorbikes – hitting brands like Jack Daniel’s, Levi’s and Harley-Davidson – as Britain and the European Union did during trade wars in Mr Trump’s first term in the White House. Mr Reynolds would not be drawn on what actions he would take but insisted the UK was prepared. He told the Commons Business and Trade Committee: “This is the big question facing global trading relationships.” The UK should be an advocate for “open, transparent, free trading relationships around the world”, he said. “Yes, it’s true to say, if any country imposed tariffs on UK companies exporting, it would hurt our companies. “But let’s also remember that it also hurts the consumers in whatever country are being asked to pay those tariffs. And there’s an inflationary pressure, there’s an impact on the cost of living.” The Cabinet minister acknowledged that a 20% tariffs on goods exported to the US would result in a “not insignificant” impact on UK economic growth. Asked if the Government had options ready to respond to tariffs from Mr Trump, the minister said: “I wouldn’t want to speculate, but the committee should assume that all eventualities have been prepared for.” The options in any dispute would be to do nothing, retaliate or negotiate. Asked if retaliatory tariffs on goods such as Harley-Davidson bikes were already prepared, the Trade Secretary said: “You would expect this department to prepare for every eventuality. But I think we should just be a little bit sensitive at this stage about speculating about how we would respond to something which hasn’t happened.” Mr Reynolds said the trade deficits with the US in relation to other European countries did not apply to the UK so Mr Trump might not feel the need to act in the same way as he would with other nations. He said: “There are a whole range of areas where we, as a country, I think could and should – if we could do it – welcome closer trading relationships with the US. “The US is a fundamental ally of ours. We have an incredibly strong trading relationship as it stands, and when I look to areas like services, technology, critical minerals, if there was the opportunity to work more closely together, I don’t think anyone should turn around immediately and say ‘not interested in that’.” He acknowledged there were “challenges” in seeking a closer trading relationship, or even a free-trade deal, which would have knock-on impacts with other important markets for the UK in the EU and China. “I don’t see the need at this stage to rule anything out or in, but to be realistic about where our national interest lies and being frank with the committee about the fact that any negotiation in any major principal market that we might do has to be considered not in isolation, but its relationship to other key markets, and what the consequences of that negotiation would mean for business and trade in those areas.” But he insisted he did not see the coming years as a “binary choice” between trading more closely with the US or EU.genie in a bottle meaning 。

SATURDAY'S BOWL GAMESOur community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Jacqueline Jossa has hinted at more drama to come on EastEnders . Earlier this week, fans of the BBC soap were left in shock as Cindy Beale (portrayed by Michelle Collins) was brutally attacked with a shovel on Christmas Day, leaving her in a medically-induced coma. Among the suspects is Lauren Branning, played by Jacqueline, 32, who had revealed Cindy's affair with Junior Knight (Micah Balfour) at the Queen Vic just before the attack occurred in Albert Square. The revelation left Cindy's partner Ian Beale (Adam Woodyatt) and her family devastated, while her ex-husband George Knight (Colin Salmon) was also taken aback by Cindy and his son Junior's secret antics. Reflecting on how her character "ruined" Christmas once again - mirroring when she exposed her father Max Branning's affair with Stacey Slater back in 2007 - Jacqueline shared a post on her Instagram Story on Thursday. She also hinted that fans will love what's coming up on the show. In the post, she said: "Thank you for the DMs and kind words. I love being back on the square causing much chaos. I love slipping Lauren's boots on and ruining Christmas hehehe. Watching with my family and having them all guessing along etc will never get old and I'm extremely proud. I always say it and will continue to. I bloody love EastEnders." She also gave her fans a tantalising glimpse into what's to come, hinting on her social media: "Wait till you see what's in store for the next few months ... as you guys know it's the 40th anniversary [in] Feb 2025 and it's EPIC!" She expressed her gratitude by saying, "I wish I could message every one that's messaged or commented or DMed etc. I just wanted to say thank you. It doesn't go unnoticed and I really appreciate it. Thank you.", reports the Mirror . Adding a cheeky festive touch, she signed off with: "Merry Christmas ... if anyone has any huge family secrets they need to be exposed, you know where I am." Linking back to an earlier post from the same day, Jacqueline shared snaps of herself in a wintery Albert Square, teasing: "Lauren Branning up to her old tricks again. My girl Lauren does love a Christmas reveal." She playfully concluded with a cliffhanger, asking her followers: "Who hit Cindy then? ".

One of the most important issues for Congress next year is tax reform. The main changes in Donald Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were legislated to expire at the end of 2025. If the law is extended, as Trump and many Republicans would like, federal revenue will be reduced by $4 trillion or more over the next decade. Budget deficits would surge and the outlook for public debt would shift from bad to dire. This is not the only threat to fiscal prudence. During his campaign, Trump promised a variety of further tax cuts, such as lowering the corporate rate from 21 percent to 15 percent, and exempting tips and overtime pay from income tax. His plan to raise tariffs, supposing it takes effect, would make barely a dent in the revenue shortfall but would throttle economic growth. It’s all too plausible that Democrats and Republicans in Congress will strike a deal that combines an extended Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other tax cuts with higher spending on transfers and other outlays. Public debt already stands at roughly 100 percent of gross domestic product. It’s on track to exceed 120 percent by 2034, even if the tax bill is allowed to expire and Congress enacts no new spending programs. Any so-called compromise that lowers taxes and raises spending is a formula for imminent breakdown. One consolation is that the tax law’s scheduled expiration puts reform back on the legislative agenda. Another is that Scott Bessent, Trump’s nominee for Treasury secretary, might be a moderating influence, as many investors hope. Ideally, Congress and the administration would undertake a thorough review aiming to broaden the tax base, close loopholes, simplify the code, and encourage work and investment. It’s been 40 years since the last such comprehensive reform, which quickly unraveled. Another ambitious effort is long overdue. Even a relatively modest package could move the tax structure in the right direction while, crucially, starting to get borrowing back under control. Given the dual need to improve the system and raise revenue, parts of the tax law are worth preserving — and indeed expanding. Most notably, the law simplified the code for most taxpayers while broadening the base by increasing the standard personal deduction and narrowing the scope of itemized deductions. These changes should be taken further. For instance, rather than capping the deduction for state and local taxes, eliminate it; cut the deduction for mortgage interest and plan, over time, to phase it out. To make the system fairer, close notorious loopholes such as the treatment of unrealized capital gains at death. It’s essential to strike a balance that promotes growth while raising revenue. So increase the tax rate on corporate profits to 25 percent from 21 percent — still lower than pre-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and roughly in line with other countries — while allowing more generous treatment of investment spending and full expensing of outlays on research and experimentation. The net effect would be unambiguously pro-growth. The cuts in personal tax rates were the costliest part of the tax bill, and they should be allowed to expire. That, together with a judicious narrowing of deductions and other improvements, would raise overall revenue. Such changes wouldn’t solve the fiscal problem at a stroke, but they’d help. Is such a deal politically realistic? There’d be no disguising that this kind of reform, in the aggregate, constitutes higher taxes. That’s simply unavoidable. Efforts to control spending are essential, but demographic pressure, vital public investments and the growing cost of national defense make it certain that curbing deficits will have to rely, in large part, on greater revenue. For too many years, Washington has resolved to ignore this reality. Sooner or later, the bill will come due — and the longer Congress delays, the bigger it will be.

Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 27.12.2024

The funeral of former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh was held with full state honors at Delhi's Nigambodh Ghat. Political leaders, including President Droupadi Murmu, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi, paid their respects. However, political controversy erupted over the location of his memorial. Congress accused the government of dishonoring Dr. Singh and demanded a memorial at a suitable site, as BJP clarified that a cabinet decision was made and the process would take time. Rahul Gandhi linked the issue to Sikh community sentiments, claiming the government disrespected Dr. Singh. The debate became a political battleground, with parties like Congress, AAP, and others criticizing BJP over the handling of the memorial and respect for Dr. Singh.

Eddy Grant And Donald Trump Settle Copyright Lawsuit Over Use Of ‘Electric Avenue’ In Campaign VideoPrincipal Financial Group Inc. cut its position in shares of UDR, Inc. ( NYSE:UDR – Free Report ) by 4.7% in the third quarter, Holdings Channel.com reports. The firm owned 351,832 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 17,338 shares during the quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc.’s holdings in UDR were worth $15,952,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Several other hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Activest Wealth Management bought a new stake in UDR in the third quarter worth about $27,000. UMB Bank n.a. purchased a new stake in shares of UDR during the second quarter valued at $33,000. Brooklyn Investment Group purchased a new stake in shares of UDR during the third quarter valued at $33,000. Rothschild Investment LLC bought a new position in shares of UDR in the second quarter worth about $35,000. Finally, Quest Partners LLC purchased a new stake in UDR in the 2nd quarter valued at about $37,000. 97.84% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors. UDR Stock Performance UDR opened at $43.41 on Friday. The firm has a 50 day moving average of $44.25 and a two-hundred day moving average of $43.25. The firm has a market capitalization of $14.32 billion, a PE ratio of 117.33, a P/E/G ratio of 12.34 and a beta of 0.87. The company has a current ratio of 5.91, a quick ratio of 5.91 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.69. UDR, Inc. has a 12-month low of $34.19 and a 12-month high of $47.55. UDR Dividend Announcement Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth Several research firms have recently weighed in on UDR. BNP Paribas started coverage on shares of UDR in a research note on Wednesday, September 11th. They set an “outperform” rating and a $49.00 price target for the company. Royal Bank of Canada lowered their target price on UDR from $46.00 to $45.00 and set a “sector perform” rating for the company in a report on Tuesday, November 5th. UBS Group raised their price target on UDR from $48.00 to $52.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Thursday, September 12th. Barclays assumed coverage on shares of UDR in a research note on Tuesday, December 17th. They issued an “overweight” rating and a $50.00 price objective for the company. Finally, Evercore ISI boosted their price objective on shares of UDR from $42.00 to $43.00 and gave the stock an “in-line” rating in a research note on Monday, September 9th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have issued a hold rating and eight have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat, UDR currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $46.00. Check Out Our Latest Stock Report on UDR UDR Company Profile ( Free Report ) UDR, Inc (NYSE: UDR), an S&P 500 company, is a leading multifamily real estate investment trust with a demonstrated performance history of delivering superior and dependable returns by successfully managing, buying, selling, developing and redeveloping attractive real estate communities in targeted U.S. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding UDR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for UDR, Inc. ( NYSE:UDR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for UDR Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for UDR and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Green Data Center (GDC) Market to grow by USD 202.4 Billion from 2024-2028, driven by rising electricity costs and AI redefining the market landscape - Technavio

A stroke changed a teacher’s life. How a new electrical device is helping her moveHe is not yet in power but President-elect Donald Trump rattled much of the world with an off-hours warning of stiff tariffs on close allies and China -- a loud hint that Trump-style government by social media post is coming back. With word of these levies against goods imported from Mexico, Canada and China, Trump sent auto industry stocks plummeting, raised fears for global supply chains and unnerved the world's major economies. For Washington-watchers with memories of the Republican's first term, the impromptu policy volley on Monday evening foreshadowed a second term of startling announcements of all manner, fired off at all hours of the day from his smartphone. "Donald Trump is never going to change much of anything," said Larry Sabato, a leading US political scientist and director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics. "You can expect in the second term pretty much what he showed us about himself and his methods in the first term. Social media announcements of policy, hirings and firings will continue." The first of Trump's tariff announcements -- a 25 percent levy on everything coming in from Mexico and Canada -- came amid an angry rebuke of lax border security at 6:45 pm on Truth Social, Trump's own platform. The United States is bound by agreements on the movement of goods and services brokered by Trump in a free trade treaty with both nations during his first term. But Trump warned that the new levy would "remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country" -- sowing panic from Ottawa to Mexico City. Seconds later, another message from the incoming commander-in-chief turned the focus on Chinese imports, which he said would be hit with "an additional 10% Tariff, above any additional Tariffs." The consequences were immediate. Almost every major US automaker operates plants in Mexico, and shares in General Motors and Stellantis -- which produce pickup trucks in America's southern neighbor -- plummeted. Canada, China and Mexico protested, while Germany called on its European partners to prepare for Trump to impose hefty tariffs on their exports and stick together to combat such measures. The tumult recalls Trump's first term, when journalists, business leaders and politicians at home and abroad would scan their phones for the latest pronouncements, often long after they had left the office or over breakfast. During his first four years in the Oval Office, the tweet -- in those days his newsy posts were almost exclusively limited to Twitter, now known as X -- became the quasi-official gazette for administration policy. The public learned of the president-elect's 2020 Covid-19 diagnosis via an early-hours post, and when Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani was assassinated on Trump's order, the Republican confirmed the kill by tweeting a US flag. The public and media learned of numerous other decisions big and small by the same source, from the introduction of customs duties to the dismissal of cabinet secretaries. It is not a communication method that has been favored by any previous US administration and runs counter to the policies and practices of most governments around the world. Throughout his third White House campaign, and with every twist and turn in his various entanglements with the justice system, Trump has poured his heart out on Truth Social, an app he turned to during his 20-month ban from Twitter. In recent days, the mercurial Republican has even named his attorney general secretaries of justice and health via announcements on the network. "He sees social media as a tool to shape and direct the national conversation and will do so again," said political scientist Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University professor. cjc/ft/dw/bjt

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — An online spat between factions of Donald Trump's supporters over immigration and the tech industry has thrown internal divisions in his political movement into public display, previewing the fissures and contradictory views his coalition could bring to the White House. The rift laid bare the tensions between the newest flank of Trump's movement — wealthy members of the tech world including billionaire Elon Musk and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy and their call for more highly skilled workers in their industry — and people in Trump's Make America Great Again base who championed his hardline immigration policies. The debate touched off this week when Laura Loomer , a right-wing provocateur with a history of racist and conspiratorial comments, criticized Trump’s selection of Sriram Krishnan as an adviser on artificial intelligence policy in his coming administration. Krishnan favors the ability to bring more skilled immigrants into the U.S. Loomer declared the stance to be “not America First policy” and said the tech executives who have aligned themselves with Trump were doing so to enrich themselves. Much of the debate played out on the social media network X, which Musk owns. Loomer's comments sparked a back-and-forth with venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks , whom Trump has tapped to be the “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar." Musk and Ramaswamy, whom Trump has tasked with finding ways to cut the federal government , weighed in, defending the tech industry's need to bring in foreign workers. It bloomed into a larger debate with more figures from the hard-right weighing in about the need to hire U.S. workers, whether values in American culture can produce the best engineers, free speech on the internet, the newfound influence tech figures have in Trump's world and what his political movement stands for. Trump has not yet weighed in on the rift, and his presidential transition team did not respond to a message seeking comment. Musk, the world's richest man who has grown remarkably close to the president-elect , was a central figure in the debate, not only for his stature in Trump's movement but his stance on the tech industry's hiring of foreign workers. Technology companies say H-1B visas for skilled workers, used by software engineers and others in the tech industry, are critical for hard-to-fill positions. But critics have said they undercut U.S. citizens who could take those jobs. Some on the right have called for the program to be eliminated, not expanded. Born in South Africa, Musk was once on an a H-1B visa himself and defended the industry's need to bring in foreign workers. “There is a permanent shortage of excellent engineering talent," he said in a post. “It is the fundamental limiting factor in Silicon Valley.” Trump's own positions over the years have reflected the divide in his movement. His tough immigration policies, including his pledge for a mass deportation, were central to his winning presidential campaign. He has focused on immigrants who come into the U.S. illegally but he has also sought curbs on legal immigration , including family-based visas. As a presidential candidate in 2016, Trump called the H-1B visa program “very bad” and “unfair” for U.S. workers. After he became president, Trump in 2017 issued a “Buy American and Hire American” executive order , which directed Cabinet members to suggest changes to ensure H-1B visas were awarded to the highest-paid or most-skilled applicants to protect American workers. Trump's businesses, however, have hired foreign workers, including waiters and cooks at his Mar-a-Lago club , and his social media company behind his Truth Social app has used the the H-1B program for highly skilled workers. During his 2024 campaign for president, as he made immigration his signature issue, Trump said immigrants in the country illegally are “poisoning the blood of our country" and promised to carry out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history. But in a sharp departure from his usual alarmist message around immigration generally, Trump told a podcast this year that he wants to give automatic green cards to foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. “I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country," he told the “All-In" podcast with people from the venture capital and technology world. Those comments came on the cusp of Trump's budding alliance with tech industry figures, but he did not make the idea a regular part of his campaign message or detail any plans to pursue such changes.Barclays PLC boosted its position in Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. ( NYSE:FBRT – Free Report ) by 22.0% in the third quarter, according to its most recent filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 136,534 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 24,633 shares during the period. Barclays PLC owned about 0.17% of Franklin BSP Realty Trust worth $1,784,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Other hedge funds also recently made changes to their positions in the company. State Street Corp boosted its position in Franklin BSP Realty Trust by 3.6% during the third quarter. State Street Corp now owns 3,359,241 shares of the company’s stock worth $45,059,000 after purchasing an additional 116,589 shares during the period. Strong Tower Advisory Services lifted its position in Franklin BSP Realty Trust by 28.7% in the third quarter. Strong Tower Advisory Services now owns 1,055,160 shares of the company’s stock valued at $13,780,000 after purchasing an additional 235,548 shares during the last quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. grew its stake in shares of Franklin BSP Realty Trust by 13.0% in the third quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. now owns 1,026,290 shares of the company’s stock worth $13,403,000 after purchasing an additional 117,745 shares during the last quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp boosted its holdings in Franklin BSP Realty Trust by 5.9% in the second quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp now owns 702,184 shares of the company’s stock valued at $8,848,000 after acquiring an additional 39,000 shares in the last quarter. Finally, 1832 Asset Management L.P. grew its holdings in shares of Franklin BSP Realty Trust by 55.6% during the 2nd quarter. 1832 Asset Management L.P. now owns 700,000 shares of the company’s stock worth $8,820,000 after acquiring an additional 250,000 shares during the period. 59.87% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors. Analyst Ratings Changes Several analysts recently commented on FBRT shares. Raymond James increased their price objective on shares of Franklin BSP Realty Trust from $15.00 to $15.50 and gave the company a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, September 19th. Janney Montgomery Scott initiated coverage on shares of Franklin BSP Realty Trust in a research note on Thursday, December 12th. They set a “buy” rating and a $16.00 target price on the stock. Four research analysts have rated the stock with a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and an average target price of $15.50. Franklin BSP Realty Trust Stock Down 0.5 % Shares of FBRT opened at $12.68 on Friday. The business has a fifty day moving average of $12.97 and a 200 day moving average of $13.01. The company has a market cap of $1.04 billion, a PE ratio of 15.46 and a beta of 1.40. The company has a quick ratio of 90.45, a current ratio of 90.45 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.67. Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. has a 52-week low of $11.99 and a 52-week high of $14.11. Franklin BSP Realty Trust Announces Dividend The firm also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, January 10th. Shareholders of record on Tuesday, December 31st will be paid a $0.355 dividend. The ex-dividend date is Tuesday, December 31st. This represents a $1.42 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 11.20%. Franklin BSP Realty Trust’s payout ratio is 173.17%. About Franklin BSP Realty Trust ( Free Report ) Benefit Street Partners operates as a self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT). BSP earns income from investing in a leveraged portfolio of residential mortgage pass-through securities consisting almost exclusively of adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) securities issued and guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises, either Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) (together, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)), or by an agency of the federal government, Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae). Read More Five stocks we like better than Franklin BSP Realty Trust Profitably Trade Stocks at 52-Week Highs S&P 500 ETFs: Expense Ratios That Can Boost Your Long-Term Gains What is the S&P/TSX Index? How AI Implementation Could Help MongoDB Roar Back in 2025 EV Stocks and How to Profit from Them Hedge Funds Boost Oil Positions: Is a Major Rally on the Horizon? Receive News & Ratings for Franklin BSP Realty Trust Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Franklin BSP Realty Trust and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .