being super game
he spotlight is on as the prepare for their biggest game of the season in the . Under the leadership of head coach , the Buffaloes have made a . From a dismal 1-11 record in 2022 to a 9-3 record this season, Colorado finished ranked 23rd in the nation and has a chance to secure its . Leading the way is Sanders, the team's standout quarterback and in the upcoming NFL Draft. With by his side, Sanders has cemented his place as one of college football's brightest stars, making today's game a pivotal moment in his career. A Clear Cleats Hint Toward the Giants? has not only caught the attention of NFL scouts, but has also fueled speculation about his future team. The , sitting at a , are in desperate need of a quarterback to rebuild their franchise. The , and their struggles this season have made them the likely holders of the first overall pick. Sanders recently caused a stir among fans with a cryptic comment: " Today, Sanders posted a picture of , giving a strong indication of his interest in joining the team. While from Miami is also in the conversation, to be the first overall pick. In his two seasons at Colorado, , cementing himself as one of the top quarterbacks in college football. In 2023, he completed 69.3% of his passes for 3,230 yards, , and only 3 interceptions. He followed that up with an even , improving his completion percentage to 74.2% while throwing for 3,926 yards, , and 8 interceptions. Despite taking 90 sacks over two seasons, Sanders maintained his composure and showed his ability to perform under pressure. Regardless of the outcome of the , his draft stock is unlikely to be affected, as his consistent performances have already proven his readiness for the next level. Can Sanders Save the Giants? The have endured a decade of mediocrity, with only and just The franchise, once a powerhouse, has struggled to find a consistent quarterback to lead them back to prominence since the departure of in 2018. could be the game-changer the Giants desperately need. With a proven track record, a Hall of Fame father, and the ability to handle pressure, with untapped potential into a contender. The question remains: Giants fans are hoping he's the answer they've been waiting for, besides the roster isn't as bad as their record is, but as of right now they're just tanking to get the first overall pick, which is why I don't see them winning any of their last two games against either the Colts or Eagles.
ATLANTA (AP) — Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer who tried to restore virtue to the White House after the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, then rebounded from a landslide defeat to become a global advocate of human rights and democracy, has died. He was 100 years old . The Carter Center said the 39th president died Sunday afternoon, more than a year after entering hospice care , at his home in Plains, Georgia, where he and his wife, Rosalynn, who died in November 2023, lived most of their lives. The center said he died peacefully, surrounded by his family. A moderate Democrat, Carter ran for president in 1976 as a little-known Georgia governor with a broad grin, effusive Baptist faith and technocratic plans for efficient government. His promise to never deceive the American people resonated after Richard Nixon’s disgrace and U.S. defeat in southeast Asia. “If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter said. Carter’s victory over Republican Gerald Ford, whose fortunes fell after pardoning Nixon, came amid Cold War pressures, turbulent oil markets and social upheaval over race, women’s rights and America’s role in the world. His achievements included brokering Mideast peace by keeping Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at Camp David for 13 days in 1978. But his coalition splintered under double-digit inflation and the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran. His negotiations ultimately brought all the hostages home alive, but in a final insult, Iran didn’t release them until the inauguration of Ronald Reagan, who had trounced him in the 1980 election. Humbled and back home in Georgia, Carter said his faith demanded that he keep doing whatever he could, for as long as he could, to try to make a difference. He and Rosalynn co-founded The Carter Center in 1982 and spent the next 40 years traveling the world as peacemakers, human rights advocates and champions of democracy and public health. Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, Carter helped ease nuclear tensions in North and South Korea, avert a U.S. invasion of Haiti and negotiate cease-fires in Bosnia and Sudan. By 2022, the center had monitored at least 113 elections around the world. Carter was determined to eradicate guinea worm infections as one of many health initiatives. Swinging hammers into their 90s, the Carters built homes with Habitat for Humanity. The common observation that he was better as an ex-president rankled Carter. His allies were pleased that he lived long enough to see biographers and historians revisit his presidency and declare it more impactful than many understood at the time. Propelled in 1976 by voters in Iowa and then across the South, Carter ran a no-frills campaign. Americans were captivated by the earnest engineer, and while an election-year Playboy interview drew snickers when he said he “had looked on many women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times,” voters tired of political cynicism found it endearing. The first family set an informal tone in the White House, carrying their own luggage, trying to silence the Marine Band’s traditional “Hail to the Chief" and enrolling daughter, Amy, in public schools. Carter was lampooned for wearing a cardigan and urging Americans to turn down their thermostats. But Carter set the stage for an economic revival and sharply reduced America's dependence on foreign oil by deregulating the energy industry along with airlines, trains and trucking. He established the departments of Energy and Education, appointed record numbers of women and nonwhites to federal posts, preserved millions of acres of Alaskan wilderness and pardoned most Vietnam draft evaders. Emphasizing human rights , he ended most support for military dictators and took on bribery by multinational corporations by signing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. He persuaded the Senate to ratify the Panama Canal treaties and normalized relations with China, an outgrowth of Nixon’s outreach to Beijing. But crippling turns in foreign affairs took their toll. When OPEC hiked crude prices, making drivers line up for gasoline as inflation spiked to 11%, Carter tried to encourage Americans to overcome “a crisis of confidence.” Many voters lost confidence in Carter instead after the infamous address that media dubbed his “malaise" speech, even though he never used that word. After Carter reluctantly agreed to admit the exiled Shah of Iran to the U.S. for medical treatment, the American Embassy in Tehran was overrun in 1979. Negotiations to quickly free the hostages broke down, and then eight Americans died when a top-secret military rescue attempt failed. Carter also had to reverse course on the SALT II nuclear arms treaty after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979. Though historians would later credit Carter's diplomatic efforts for hastening the end of the Cold war, Republicans labeled his soft power weak. Reagan’s “make America great again” appeals resonated, and he beat Carter in all but six states. Born Oct. 1, 1924, James Earl Carter Jr. married fellow Plains native Rosalynn Smith in 1946, the year he graduated from the Naval Academy. He brought his young family back to Plains after his father died, abandoning his Navy career, and they soon turned their ambitions to politics . Carter reached the state Senate in 1962. After rural white and Black voters elected him governor in 1970, he drew national attention by declaring that “the time for racial discrimination is over.” Carter published more than 30 books and remained influential as his center turned its democracy advocacy onto U.S. politics, monitoring an audit of Georgia’s 2020 presidential election results. After a 2015 cancer diagnosis, Carter said he felt “perfectly at ease with whatever comes.” “I’ve had a wonderful life,” he said. “I’ve had thousands of friends, I’ve had an exciting, adventurous and gratifying existence.” Contributors include former AP staffer Alex Sanz in Atlanta.
Families enjoy unique programming at Ottawa museums over holiday breakSturm Graz Vs Girona, UEFA Champions League: Michel's La Liga Side Aiming To Carry Domestic Form
WonderFi and Kraken Canada each break $2-billion CAD mark for assets under custodyBERNAMA-DPA – Banning smartphones in schools significantly enhances students’ social well-being, according to a recent meta-analysis of five international studies. “The children feel happier and enjoy school more because they spend their breaks talking and playing with each other,” explained co-author of the analysis and Professor of School Pedagogy at the University of Augsburg, Germany Klaus Zierer. Published in the Switzerland-based journal Education Sciences, the analysis looked at studies from Norway, Sweden, Spain, England and the Czech Republic. If students use their smartphone and social media in school, they’re exposed to the risk of cyberbullying there too, Zierer noted. “So a smartphone ban makes school a safe space against it.” A smartphone ban may also have a positive effect on academic performance, he said, although this was difficult to measure in the studies that were examined. “A smartphone ban alone won’t improve learning, of course,” remarked Zierer, but said it at least eliminates disruptions to students’ concentration caused by surreptitiously looking at the devices during class. While Zierer believes smartphones have no place at all in primary school, he said the older that children become, the greater their personal responsibility and media literacy need to be. “The key is to oversee a ban so that it’s not just a rigid framework, but eventually makes checks unnecessary.” BARCELONA (AP) – Try saying “no” when a child asks for a smartphone. What comes after, parents everywhere can attest, begins with some variation of, “Everyone has one. Why can’t I?” But what if no preteen in sight has one – and what if having a smartphone was weird? That’s the endgame of an increasing number of parents across Europe who are concerned by evidence that smartphone use among young kids jeopardises their safety and mental health – and share the conviction that there’s strength in numbers. From Spain to Britain and Ireland, parents are flooding WhatsApp and Telegram groups with plans not just to keep smartphones out of schools, but to link arms and refuse to buy young kids the devices before – or even into – their teenage years. After being inspired by a conversation in a Barcelona park with other mums, Elisabet García Permanyer started a chat group last fall to share information on the perils of Internet access for children with families at her kids’ school. The group, called ‘Adolescence Free of Mobile Phones’, quickly expanded and now includes over 10,000 members. The most engaged parents are pushing for fellow parents to agree not to get their kids smartphones until they are 16. After organising online, they facilitate real-world talks among concerned parents to further their crusade. “When I started this, I just hoped I would find four other families who thought like me, but it took off and kept growing, growing and growing,” García Permanyer said. “My goal was to try to join forces with other parents so we could push back the point when smartphones arrive. I said, ‘I am going to try so that my kids are not the only ones who don’t have one’.” It isn’t just parents. Police and public health experts were sounding the alarm about a spike of violent and pornographic videos watched by children via handheld devices. Spain’s government took note of the momentum and banned smartphones entirely from elementary schools in January. Now they can only be turned on in high school, which starts at age 12, if a teacher deems it necessary for an educational activity. The movement in Britain gained steam this year after the mother of 16-year-old Brianna Ghey, who was killed by two teenagers last year, began demanding that kids under 16 be blocked from accessing social media on smartphones. “It feels like we all know (buying smartphones) is a bad decision for our kids, but that the social norm has not yet caught up,” Daisy Greenwell, a Suffolk, England-area mother of three kids under age 10, posted to her Instagram earlier this year. “What if we could switch the social norm so that in our school, our town, our country, it was an odd choice to make to give your child a smartphone at 11? What if we could hold off until they’re 14, or 16?” She and a friend, Clare Reynolds, set up a WhatsApp group called Parents United for a Smartphone-Free Childhood, with three people on it. Within four days, 2,000 people had joined the group, requiring Greenwell and Reynolds to split off dozens of groups by locality. Now there’s a chat group for every British county. Parents rallying to ban smartphones from young children have a long way to go to change what’s considered “normal”. By the time they’re 12, most children have smartphones, statistics from all three countries show. In Spain, a quarter of children have a cellphone by age 10, and almost half by 11. At 12, this share rises to 75 per cent. British media regulator Ofcom said 55 per cent of kids in the United Kingdom (UK) owned a smartphone between ages eight and 11, with the figure rising to 97 per cent at age 12. Parents and schools that have succeeded in flipping the paradigm in their communities told The Associated Press (AP) the change became possible the moment they understood that they were not alone. In Greystones, Ireland, that moment came after all eight primary school principals in town signed and posted a letter last year that discouraged parents from buying their students smartphones. Then the parents themselves voluntarily signed written pledges, promising to refrain from letting their young kids have the devices. “The discussion went away almost overnight,” said Christina Capatina, 38, a Greystones parent of two preteen daughters who signed the pledge and says there were almost no smartphones in schools this academic year. Something like a consensus has built for years among institutions, governments, parents and others that smartphone use by children is linked to bullying, suicidal ideation, anxiety and loss of concentration necessary for learning. China moved last year to limit children’s use of smartphones, while France has in place a ban on smartphones in schools for kids aged six to 15. The push to control smartphones in Spain comes amid a surge in cases of children viewing online pornography, sharing videos of sexual violence, or creating “deep fake” pornographic images of female classmates using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Spain’s government said that 25 per cent of kids 12 and under and 50 per cent of kids 15 and under have been exposed to online pornography. The dangers have produced school bans on smartphones and online safety laws. But those don’t address what kids do in off hours. “What I try to emphasise to other principals is the importance of joining up with the school next door to you,” said Principal of St Patrick’s National School Rachel Harper, one of the eight in Greystones to encourage parents to refrain from smartphones for their kids. “There’s a bit more strength that way, in that all the parents in the area are talking about it.” The home isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic offered a firsthand glimpse of their kids staring at screens and getting clever about hiding what they were seeing there – and what was finding them. But if the kids can’t have smartphones, are the parents cutting back their own online time? That’s tough, multiple parents said, because they’re managing families and work online.
None
College football bowl projections for Week 14: Is Ohio State-Texas safest CFP title game pick? | Sporting News
During an interview with FOX 11 Los Angeles host Elex Michaelson released on Friday, former California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) stated that President Joe Biden “was slowing down, no question. And I don’t think it was a newsflash that, when you get in your 80s, a lot of people fall by the wayside.” And Biden “definitely had some deterioration there.” Brown said, “Well, look, he was slowing down, no question. And I don’t think it was a newsflash that, when you get in your 80s, a lot of people fall by the wayside. I keep in good touch with my high school class, and half of them are dead — more than half. And a lot of them were slowing down. So, that’s just where you are. And I think Joe was around, he stayed, he won. But he definitely had some deterioration there. And that didn’t help. And you just — you’ve got to be vigorous, when you’re — especially, when you see all that war going on, you’re looking for a lot of energy in the leader, and, for all the various reasons of age and health, Joe couldn’t portray that in the way that people wanted. And Trump, for all his foibles, and all the things he does, from the lies to the philandering, to the this and the that, he’s got an energy, and he’s a phenomenon, he’s a force. And that was powerful.” Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
HFSC Leaders Seek Federal Study of AI’s Impact on Financial ServicesFrom Maui to the Caribbean, Thanksgiving tournaments a beloved part of college basketball
- Previous: bbb super game
- Next: being super game download
