gstar288 login

Senators Looking To Acquire A Defenseman - prohockeyrumors.comOur community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Strictly Come Dancing enthusiasts were swift to voice their grievances just moments into today's episode. The BBC's Latin and ballroom contest returns with a fresh instalment, following the sparkle and spectacle of Blackpool, which witnessed singer and television personality Wynne Evans exit the competition after a dance-off with Montell Douglas. This week, the remaining seven celebrities - including Chris McCausland and Dianne Buswell, Jamie Borthwick and Michelle Tsiakkas, JB Gill and Lauren Oakley, Montell Douglas and Johannes Radebe, Pete Wicks and Jowita Przystal, Sarah Hadland and Vito Coppola and Tasha Ghouri and Alijaz Skorjanec - will showcase their individual routines in their pairs as well as participate in the danceathon. However, viewers seem to have the same gripe about Pete Wicks' performance as he took centre stage to kick off the show. As the episode got underway, one viewer posted: "Losing the will to live at Pete still being here. This is a week 3 dance. Absolutely no progression #Strictly," while another chimed in: "Every week I play a game of "which song are they going to murder this time? We have found an early contender for tonight #Strictly.", reports the Mirror . A third commented: "Crikey, the singers are being drowned out by the music, but based on what I can hear, that might be a good thing for this one. Poor Pete, it's all I can focus on. #Strictly," with a fourth adding: "They are murdering this song. And the song doesn't go with Pete's dance, it feels off #Strictly." Viewers took to social media to express their displeasure at the song choices for the tango routines on Strictly, as one viewer posted: "This music doesn't go with the tango #strictly," while another said: "This is a terrible song for a Tango. #strictly." A further comment read: "Weird choice of music for a tango. #strictly." In the latest turn of events on the BBC dance programme, Wynne Evans and his partner Katya Jones were voted off after falling short in the dance-off. He said at the time: "It's been wonderful, I've got to say. I feel like it's what Strictly is all about. If I can come and do Strictly and last until week nine, then anybody can get out there and dance and have a brilliant time. "Strictly is such a brilliant family, such a precious family, that I want everybody here in this room and at home to look after it for the generations to come because it is a wonderful, wonderful thing." Katya Jones also spoke fondly of their time together, saying: "To be honest with you, the smile hasn't left my face since the first day of our training, since the day we got partnered up. You have made this experience so joyous and so full of laughter for me. I'm sure everybody was jealous because you're the kind of guy that everybody wants in their life. You bring light, you bring laughter, you bring charisma, you fill up every room you walk into with those qualities." Meanwhile, Pete managed to escape the danger zone last week, despite facing critique for his rendition of 'I'm Too Sexy' during the show's Blackpool segment. *Strictly Come Dancing airs weekends on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.gstar288 login 。

By Hannah Fry, Los Angeles Times (TNS) Every day millions of people share more intimate information with their accessories than they do with their spouse. Wearable technology — smartwatches, smart rings, fitness trackers and the like — monitors body-centric data such as your heart rate, steps taken and calories burned, and may record where you go along the way. Like Santa Claus, it knows when you are sleeping (and how well), it knows when you’re awake, it knows when you’ve been idle or exercising, and it keeps track of all of it. People are also sharing sensitive health information on health and wellness apps , including online mental health and counseling programs. Some women use period tracker apps to map out their monthly cycle. These devices and services have excited consumers hoping for better insight into their health and lifestyle choices. But the lack of oversight into how body-centric data are used and shared with third parties has prompted concerns from privacy experts, who warn that the data could be sold or lost through data breaches, then used to raise insurance premiums, discriminate surreptitiously against applicants for jobs or housing, and even perform surveillance. The use of wearable technology and medical apps surged in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, but research released by Mozilla on Wednesday indicates that current laws offer little protection for consumers who are often unaware just how much of their health data are being collected and shared by companies. “I’ve been studying the intersections of emerging technologies, data-driven technologies, AI and human rights and social justice for the past 15 years, and since the pandemic I’ve noticed the industry has become hyper-focused on our bodies,” said Mozilla Foundation technology fellow Júlia Keserű, who conducted the research. “That permeates into all kinds of areas of our lives and all kinds of domains within the tech industry.” The report “From Skin to Screen: Bodily Integrity in the Digital Age” recommends that existing data protection laws be clarified to encompass all forms of bodily data. It also calls for expanding national health privacy laws to cover health-related information collected from health apps and fitness trackers and making it easier for users to opt out of body-centric data collections. Researchers have been raising alarms about health data privacy for years. Data collected by companies are often sold to data brokers or groups that buy, sell and trade data from the internet to create detailed consumer profiles. Body-centric data can include information such as the fingerprints used to unlock phones, face scans from facial recognition technology, and data from fitness and fertility trackers, mental health apps and digital medical records. One of the key reasons health information has value to companies — even when the person’s name is not associated with it — is that advertisers can use the data to send targeted ads to groups of people based on certain details they share. The information contained in these consumer profiles is becoming so detailed, however, that when paired with other data sets that include location information, it could be possible to target specific individuals, Keserű said. Location data can “expose sophisticated insights about people’s health status, through their visits to places like hospitals or abortions clinics,” Mozilla’s report said, adding that “companies like Google have been reported to keep such data even after promising to delete it.” A 2023 report by Duke University revealed that data brokers were selling sensitive data on individuals’ mental health conditions on the open market. While many brokers deleted personal identifiers, some provided names and addresses of individuals seeking mental health assistance, according to the report. In two public surveys conducted as part of the research, Keserű said, participants were outraged and felt exploited in scenarios where their health data were sold for a profit without their knowledge. “We need a new approach to our digital interactions that recognizes the fundamental rights of individuals to safeguard their bodily data, an issue that speaks directly to human autonomy and dignity,” Keserű said. “As technology continues to advance, it is critical that our laws and practices evolve to meet the unique challenges of this era.” Consumers often take part in these technologies without fully understanding the implications. Last month, Elon Musk suggested on X that users submit X-rays, PET scans, MRIs and other medical images to Grok, the platform’s artificial intelligence chatbot, to seek diagnoses. The issue alarmed privacy experts, but many X users heeded Musk’s call and submitted health information to the chatbot. While X’s privacy policy says that the company will not sell user data to third parties, it does share some information with certain business partners. Gaps in existing laws have allowed the widespread sharing of biometric and other body-related data. Health information provided to hospitals, doctor’s offices and medical insurance companies is protected from disclosure under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , known as HIPAA, which established federal standards protecting such information from release without the patient’s consent. But health data collected by many wearable devices and health and wellness apps don’t fall under HIPAA’s umbrella, said Suzanne Bernstein, counsel at Electronic Privacy Information Center. “In the U.S. because we don’t have a comprehensive federal privacy law ... it falls to the state level,” she said. But not every state has weighed in on the issue. Washington, Nevada and Connecticut all recently passed laws to provide safeguards for consumer health data. Washington, D.C., in July introduced legislation that aimed to require tech companies to adhere to strengthened privacy provisions regarding the collection, sharing, use or sale of consumer health data. In California, the California Privacy Rights Act regulates how businesses can use certain types of sensitive information, including biometric information, and requires them to offer consumers the ability to opt out of disclosure of sensitive personal information. “This information being sold or shared with data brokers and other entities hypercharge the online profiling that we’re so used to at this point, and the more sensitive the data, the more sophisticated the profiling can be,” Bernstein said. “A lot of the sharing or selling with third parties is outside the scope of what a consumer would reasonably expect.” Health information has become a prime target for hackers seeking to extort healthcare agencies and individuals after accessing sensitive patient data. Health-related cybersecurity breaches and ransom attacks increased more than 4,000% between 2009 and 2023, targeting the booming market of body-centric data, which is expected to exceed $500 billion by 2030, according to the report. “Nonconsensual data sharing is a big issue,” Keserű said. “Even if it’s biometric data or health data, a lot of the companies are just sharing that data without you knowing, and that is causing a lot of anxiety and questions.” ©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

5 common misconceptions about women and entrepreneurshipAmritsar: Congress functionary Navjot Singh Sidhu said on Thursday he would “fulfill any duty assigned by the party”, adding it’s for the high command to answer about his return to “active politics”. The cricketer-turned-politician, who was responding to questions at a press meet at his residence, said he had never left Amritsar. The former Punjab Congress chief said while he had been involved in comedy shows, laughter challenges and cricket, he had always remained “true to my principles”. After his wife Navjot Kaur won her battle against cancer, Sidhu, along with her, has resumed his political activities following a prolonged hiatus. While speaking about his wife — ‘Noni’s cancer journey’ — Sidhu, accompanied by Kaur, shared tips on how to prevent cancer, stressing the importance of “living a healthy lifestyle”. Sidhu highlighted the benefits of incorporating almond milk and coconut milk into one’s diet, while advising people to switch to healthier oils, drink clean water and eat vegetables free from pesticides. The couple also offered to share cancer recovery tips with anyone interested, extending their support to those seeking guidance. He said he once believed if he couldn't manage his own family, he would be incapable of bringing justice to the world. The former Amritsar MP said everyone around him was like a family, with his primary focus initially being the care of his wife. We also published the following articles recently When AR Rahman had said his wife Saira Banu would get frustrated and angry initially in their marriage: 'I did tell her...' Music maestro AR Rahman and his wife Saira Banu have decided to part ways after 29 years of marriage. The composer, requesting privacy, shared his feelings about the separation and heartbreak. In a past interview, Rahman had described their arranged marriage, revealing how his mother found Saira after initially meeting her sister. The Great Indian Kapil Show: Navjot Singh Sidhu gets emotional sharing his wife's Cancer struggle; says 'devi maa se ek hi baat mangi ki tu meri lele jaan, isko bacha le' On The Great India Kapil Show, cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu opened up about the challenging period when his wife, Navjot Kaur Sidhu, battled cancer. He revealed Kaur's decision to shield him from the diagnosis while he was incarcerated, highlighting her strength and resilience. Navjot Singh Sidhu opens up on leaving The Kapil Sharma Show; Reflects on other cast member's exit: 'The bouquet fell apart' After a long silence, Navjot Singh Sidhu has finally addressed his departure from "The Kapil Sharma Show," alluding to political reasons as a contributing factor. Despite the controversy, Sidhu expressed his hope for a reunion of the original cast and praised Kapil Sharma's talent.Green Bay Packers Legend Brett Favre Reveals Bold Take About Aaron Rodgers