lodigame 777 login
KORE Announces NYSE Acceptance of Plan to Regain Listing ComplianceIf you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. Lenovo’s Legion Go handheld gaming PC cost $700 , and while you can get one , there have been rumors about a revised Legion Go S that starts at about $399. has a hold of some seemingly genuine renderings of what the upcoming cheaper device will look like. A for the “Legion Go S 8ARP1” indicated the cheaper machine will have AMD’s Rembrandt APU inside. While it’s based on a new Ryzen Z2 platform, points out the chip will have Zen 3-plus cores that aren’t as powerful as the current generation Z1 Extreme with Zen 4 cores inside the current Legion Go. From the images, it looks like the Legion Go S will have RGB lights, two USB-C ports up top with none on the bottom, a circular D-Pad instead of the four-way version like on the regular Legion Go, and nub mouse as opposed to the other model’s trackpad. The Legion Go S leak shows it will come in a white colorway with non-removable grips and triggers that resemble Asus ROG Ally. The has removable controller grips, like the Nintendo Switch’s Joy-Con controllers. /
More funds to support steel workers and businessesWho Is Warren Stephens: Net Worth, Family, Prison Scandal, and Trump's Pick for UK Ambassador
During a recent visit to the Wiregrass, U.S. Sen. Katie Britt, center, met with Enterprise City Administrator Johnathan Tullos, left, and Enterprise Mayor Bill Cooper. “I love my state, I believe in my state, I love this nation–every bit of that is worth fighting for,” said U.S. Sen. Katie Britt on a recent 13th and Park podcast with Adam Goodman. Britt joined Goodman to discuss her priorities in the upcoming Trump Administration, her bipartisan legislation to address our youth mental health crisis, and how she continues to fight for Alabamians in the United States Senate. “I love my state, I believe in my state, I love this nation. Every bit of that is worth fighting for, every bit of that is worth staying up and studying and asking additional questions and saying, ‘Well, what if we did this, would this help more people?’ Those are the questions I’m going to continue to ask, because those are the people I’m working for,” she said. In the interview, Britt spoke about what Americans can expect in the next four years following their overwhelming vote to send President Donald J. Trump back to the White House and elect Republican majorities to the United States Senate and the House of Representatives. “On day one, you’re going to see President Trump come in. He is going to undo so many of the harmful policies and positions that Joe Biden has put in place, starting with the border, moving into energy, making sure that we’re not only just energy independent, but we’re actually energy dominant, knowing that doesn’t just drive down cost here, but it allows us to be able to provide energy to our allies so that they don’t have to depend on our adversaries. “We’ve got to go back to a place where our allies respect us, and our enemies fear us. You’re going to see Donald Trump restore the strength that our men and women in uniform deserve, that respect that they deserve. And I think that you will also see him hold other countries accountable, not take us for granted. “We’re going to build America back; we’re going to make America work again. And that’s what America wants. We want to be that shining beacon on the hill, but we want the government to get out of the way and give us an opportunity to thrive,” she added. Britt specifically highlighted one of her top priorities in the upcoming Congress, securing our southern border, and the critical ability to work alongside President Trump and Congressional Republicans to enact conservative, commonsense solutions to our current border crisis. “We are clearly a nation of immigrants. We are also a nation of laws. And the lawlessness has affected every community, every corner of our nation. It’s time to regain that stability and security that we as Americans maybe at some point took for granted but now understand how important it is . . . a nation without borders is not a nation at all. “Whether it’s the fentanyl overdoses——when you’re looking at young women that have lost their lives and or have been the victim of migrants who have come here illegally—we have to make sure now we have an opportunity to secure our border. And that goes to making sure that we have physical and technological barriers on our southern border to prevent those from coming here illegally and make sure that we’re actually doing what we’re supposed to when it comes to interior enforcement. For far too long, people have looked away from that. (Americans) deserve better, and we owe them some results.” Britt also discussed why she and Senator John Fetterman (D-Pa.) came together to introduce legislation this September. Their bill, the Stop the Scroll Act, would create a mental health warning label requirement for social media platforms to ensure all users are aware of the potential mental health risks posed by social media usage and are provided access to mental health resources. The Senators led this bipartisan legislation to codify Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy’s recommendation for a warning label to be placed on social media platforms. “We are parents first, lawmakers second, but being [a] parent informs so much of what we bring to the table and the prism in which we look through something at,” Britt said. “Raising kids in this environment is very different than when we grew up, not having social media, not having the internet at your fingertips at all times, it’s different and it’s challenging for our kids. “Not only is this not a Democrat or Republican issue, it’s also an American issue,” she added. ‘We think that the more parents learn and the more tools that we give them, the more guardrails we’re able to put up, we believe that will give more opportunity for the next generation to thrive.” Britt said she is a strong advocate for mental health legislation—working across the aisle with her colleagues to find commonsense solutions to protect our nation’s youth while holding social media platforms accountable. She spoke on the importance of finding common ground with her Democratic colleagues on this issue and others to create real, long-lasting change for Americans. “There are a number of things that Democrats and Republicans disagree upon. And yes, you have heard a lot about those in this election cycle. And I think we all stand firmly and implanted in our values and ideas. But there are opportunities, and there are many of us who see each other as people—for John (Fetterman) and I to come together and to think about how we can help others, and in particular, what can we be doing to help this next generation, that I mean statistically showing is really struggling in how to deal with this, the easy thing is to do nothing,” Britt said. “John and I believe that’s not an option. “You’ve got a lot of different players in this space, a lot of people who want the status quo to continue, that seem to care more about the dollars that they’re making versus the lives they could make a difference in,” Britt added. “I think if we continue to speak, continue to speak loudly, ultimately change is inevitable. And I am proud to be alongside John Fetterman trying to make that change happen.” Be the first to know Get local news delivered to your inbox! Staff Writer {{description}} Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
The Facebook and Instagram owner says its defences were able to prevent AI-driven misinformation operations from gaining an online foothold. Despite fears that artificial intelligence (AI) could influence the outcome of elections around the world, the United States technology giant Meta said it detected little impact across its platforms this year. That was in part due to defensive measures designed to prevent coordinated networks of accounts, or bots, from grabbing attention on Facebook, Instagram and Threads, Meta president of global affairs Nick Clegg told reporters on Tuesday. “I don’t think the use of generative AI was a particularly effective tool for them to evade our trip wires,” Clegg said of actors behind coordinated disinformation campaigns. In 2024, Meta says it ran several election operations centres around the world to monitor content issues, including during elections in the US, Bangladesh, Brazil, France, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the European Union. Most of the covert influence operations it has disrupted in recent years were carried out by actors from Russia, Iran and China, Clegg said, adding that Meta took down about 20 “covert influence operations” on its platform this year. Russia was the number one source of those operations, with 39 networks disrupted in total since 2017, followed by Iran with 31, and China with 11. Overall, the volume of AI-generated misinformation was low and Meta was able to quickly label or remove the content, Clegg said. That was despite 2024 being the biggest election year ever, with some 2 billion people estimated to have gone to the polls around the world, he noted. “People were understandably concerned about the potential impact that generative AI would have on elections during the course of this year,” Clegg told journalists. In a statement, he said that “any such impact was modest and limited in scope”. AI content, such as deepfake videos and audio of political candidates, was quickly exposed and failed to fool public opinion, he added. In the month leading up to Election Day in the US, Meta said it rejected 590,000 requests to generate images of President Joe Biden, then-Republican candidate Donald Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz. In an article in The Conversation, titled The apocalypse that wasn’t , Harvard academics Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders wrote: “There was AI-created misinformation and propaganda, even though it was not as catastrophic as feared.” However, Clegg and others have warned that disinformation has moved to social media and messaging websites not owned by Meta, especially TikTok , where some studies have found evidence of fake AI-generated videos featuring politically related misinformation. Public concerns In a Pew survey of Americans earlier this year, nearly eight times as many respondents expected AI to be used for mostly bad purposes in the 2024 election as those who thought it would be used mostly for good. In October, Biden rolled out new plans to harness AI for national security as the global race to innovate the technology accelerates. Biden outlined the strategy in a first-ever AI-focused national security memorandum (NSM) on Thursday, calling for the government to stay at the forefront of “safe, secure and trustworthy” AI development. Meta has itself been the source of public complaints on various fronts, caught between accusations of censorship and the failure to prevent online abuses. Earlier this year, Human Rights Watch accused Meta of silencing pro-Palestine voices amid increased social media censorship since October 7. Meta says its platforms were mostly used for positive purposes in 2024, to steer people to legitimate websites with information about candidates and how to vote. While it said it allows people on its platforms to ask questions or raise concerns about election processes, “we do not allow claims or speculation about election-related corruption, irregularities, or bias when combined with a signal that content is threatening violence”. Clegg said the company was still feeling the pushback from its efforts to police its platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in some content being mistakenly removed. “We feel we probably overdid it a bit,” he said. “While we’ve been really focusing on reducing prevalence of bad content, I think we also want to redouble our efforts to improve the precision and accuracy with which we act on our rules.” Republican concerns Some Republican lawmakers in the US have questioned what they say is censorship of certain viewpoints on social media. President-elect Donald Trump has been especially critical , accusing its platforms of censoring conservative viewpoints. In an August letter to the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he regretted some content take-downs the company made in response to pressure from the Biden administration. In Clegg’s news briefing, he said Zuckerberg hoped to help shape President-elect Donald Trump’s administration on tech policy, including AI. Clegg said he was not privy to whether Zuckerberg and Trump discussed the tech platform’s content moderation policies when Zuckerberg was invited to Trump’s Florida resort last week. “Mark is very keen to play an active role in the debates that any administration needs to have about maintaining America’s leadership in the technological sphere ... and particularly the pivotal role that AI will play in that scenario,” he said.Alberta to end use of photo radar on provincial highways, at speed-on-green cameras
- Previous: lodi 921
- Next: lodigame register
