haha777 promo code september 2024

haha777 promo code september 2024 Is Outlook down? Thousands of Microsoft 365 users report outage issues

AP News Summary at 3:39 p.m. ESTMusk heads to US Congress to discuss slashing government costsPlayers Era Festival organizers betting big NIL is future of college tourneysRegtech Market Market , 33% of Growth to Originate from North America, Technavio

Aus billionaire Gina Rinehart closer to opening contentious coal mine in AlbertaBoston police arrest two in connection with drone flights encroaching on Logan Airport

NYT Strands today — hints, spangram and answers for game #264 (Friday, November 22 2024)

When pro-European forces won in Moldova in November, their victory only passed by the slimmest of margins. A concerted Russian influence campaign was potentially behind it. A new government has formed in Moldova. Re-elected in early November, the pro-European President Maia Sandu has replaced only the ministers in charge of Interior, Agriculture and Infrastructure. Interior Minister Adrian Efros had earlier announced his resignation after it emerged that Moscow had used activists and hackers to interfere in the elections. In the summer, Maia Sandu's lead looked confident and everyone expected a strong Yes vote in the EU accession referendum. In both cases, the margin of victory for the pro-Western forces was tiny. Most young people in Moldova align themselves with Europe, but why then did 49% of the population vote against the EU? International observers say the answer lies in Russia and its annexed state, the breakaway Transnistrian republic. The border dividing Moldova into two parts is not recognised by the international community, yet it has stood for 34 years. The Transnistrian Republic has its own currency, number plates and, of course, flag. In the capital Tiraspol, time has stood still since the break-up of the Soviet Union. The monochrome of Lenin and Marx monuments is broken only by a statue of Harry Potter. 2,000 Russian soldiers stationed Transnistria ensure that things are done according to Moscow's wishes. That is why, in this part of Moldova, Russia's invasion of Ukraine can only be referred to as a defensive war or a special military operation. Those who express opposition to the war often find themselves behind bars. This is what happened to Viktor Plescanov, the country's best-known political prisoner. In 2022, the 50-year-old engineer hung a Ukrainian flag on his terrace and posted "Freedom for Ukraine" on his social media, only to be confronted by the authorities shortly afterwards. In September 2022, he was sentenced to three years and two months in prison without trial on terrorism charges. "The conditions in prison were hellish. It was like the 19th century. This is not Europe," explained Viktor, who at one point gave up and attempted suicide. He also showed on his arm exactly where he had tried to slit his wrists. Meanwhile, his wife, Oxana went from embassy to embassy recruiting supporters and telling Viktor Plescanov's story to the world. Eventually, under pressure from the OSCE and the US Ambassador in Chisinau, the Transnistrian leader Vadim Krasnozelsky pardoned Plescanov. But dozens of political prisoners remain in Tiraspol jails. This could be a serious obstacle to Moldova's EU accession, because if Moldovans were to join the integration process, Russian and Ukrainian separatists would come with them, something Brussels would prefer to avoid.Celtic 1-1 Club Brugge PLAYER RATINGS: Which defender shone on a tough night? Whose passback opened the scoring? Who called his team together for a pep talk? By PAUL FORSYTH Published: 22:59, 27 November 2024 | Updated: 22:59, 27 November 2024 e-mail View comments Daizen Maeda's stunning equaliser earned Celtic a valuable point in a Champions League match against Club Brugge that could easily have got away from them. Brendan Rodgers ' side, who fell behind when Cameron Carter-Vickers' blind passback trundled past Kasper Schmeichel, looked distinctly second-best before half-time. But they dug deep after the interval and drew level when Maeda chopped inside his marker to shape a right-foot shot inside the far post. Celtic never reached the standards set against RB Leipzig last month, but they showed plenty of character. And their eight points from five matches keeps them on course to reach the playoffs. In the circumstances, it was a welcome point against an impressive Brugge side. Paul Forsyth analyses the individual performances. Daizen Maeda celebrates scoring a stunning equaliser for Celtic against Club Brugge Cameron Carter-Vickers can't believe that his blind passback has given Brugge the lead Trusty was Celtic's best player, reading the game well and dealing with the counter-attack Kasper Schmeichel - 7 Showed leadership by calling his team-mates together after the opening goal. Fingertip save denied De Cuyper. Alistair Johnston - 6 Unable to get forward easily, a lot of his work was defensive. Couldn’t quite provide the overlaps Kuhn needed. Cameron Carter-Vickers - 6 A nervy start culminated in his own goal. Wrongly assuming Schmeichel was behind him, he passed back without looking. Auston Trusty - 8 Needed all his pace when Brugge countered. Read the game well and covered when the defence was stretched. Greg Taylor - 6 Unable to make any impact in the first half. Did more work infield after the break, but was subbed on the hour. Arne Engels - 5 Too often posted missing when Celtic needed midfielders to show for the ball. Didn’t do enough defensively. Callum McGregor - 6.5 Often exposed by those around him, especially when Brugge turned the ball over. Influence grew as the game went on. Reo Hatate - 6 Not quite assertive enough when Celtic needed midfielders to stand up, but came close with a left-foot shot. Nicolas Kuhn - 7 Took too long to get involved but when he did, he was Celtic’s best attacking outlet. Drifted inside dangerously. Kyogo Furuhashi - 6 An early half-chance aside, had few sights of goal. A diligent back line had the measure of his movement. Daizen Maeda - 7.5 Properly tested by the right-back, who engaged him in a fascinating tussle. Chopped inside to score a stunner. SUBSTITUTES Bernardo (Engels, 59min), Valle (Taylor, 59), Idah (Furuhashi, 76), Forres t (Maeda, 76), Yang (Kuhn 87) Not used: Sinisalo, Scales, Palma, McCowan, Nawrocki, Ralston, Welsh. Brendan Rodgers - 6 Got a response from his team after a passive first half. CLUB BRUGGE (4-3-3) Mignolet 6; Seyes 7, Mechele 7, Ordonez 6, De Cuyper 7; Jashari 6, Vanaken 7, Onyedika 7; Skov Olsen 7 (Talbi 76), Jutgla 8 (Vermant 76), Tzolis 7 (Nielsen 90). Referee: G Kabakov (Bul) 6 Champions League Celtic Share or comment on this article: Celtic 1-1 Club Brugge PLAYER RATINGS: Which defender shone on a tough night? Whose passback opened the scoring? Who called his team together for a pep talk? e-mail Add comment

Palantir Technologies ( PLTR -3.72% ) has seemingly become the market leader in developing and deploying artificial intelligence (AI) software in the real world. After working with government agencies in its earlier years, Palantir is thriving in the commercial sector, especially after launching its AIP platform for AI applications. Its accelerating revenue growth and juicy profit margins have fueled tremendous investment returns of nearly 400% over the past year. That's why pointing you to C3.ai ( AI -4.26% ) , another AI software stock, instead might seem counterintuitive. However, it makes sense when you consider all aspects of an investment, including the price you pay . Here is why C3.ai is poised to outperform Palantir stock in 2025. Palantir's excellence doesn't offset a ridiculous price tag I'm not here to argue against Palantir's fundamentals. It's a fantastic business that's gaining momentum on AI tailwinds. Revenue growth is accelerating as enterprises flock to Palantir's AIP platform . The company's U.S. commercial customer count grew an impressive 77% year over year in Q3 to 321. Palantir's software has a remarkable range, from assisting in military missions to running hospitals. The roughly 20,000 large businesses in the U.S. alone represent a tremendous market opportunity. Additionally, Palantir is growing profitably, evidenced by its consistently increasing Rule of 40 score. The Rule of 40 adds a company's percentage revenue growth to its free cash flow margin rate. Anything 40 or above is considered good, so Palantir's 68% in Q3 is stellar. But a company and its stock aren't the same. Palantir's stock has soared to bubble-like valuations by almost any metric. Its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio is over 74, and its forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is over 216 today (its trailing P/E is 411). The business grew revenue by 30% year over year in Q3. Meanwhile, analysts estimate that Palantir will grow earnings by an average of 28% annually over the long term. These growth rates don't come close to justifying Palantir's current valuation, meaning the stock likely reflects at least several years of future growth. Buying at these levels will probably produce subpar results until the stock's valuation makes more sense. C3.ai is growing on AI tailwinds but falls short in key areas. No, C3.ai isn't on Palantir's level. The company is a direct competitor to Palantir. It also offers AI software applications to government agencies and enterprises for various applications. Interestingly enough, C3.ai is enjoying similar AI tailwinds and following a growth trajectory like Palantir's. Revenue grew by almost 29% in C3.ai's latest quarter, close to Palantir's: AI Operating Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts Where C3.ai falls short is the company's bottom line. Palantir is wonderfully profitable, generating $980 million in free cash flow over the past year on $2.6 billion in revenue (36% of revenue). The company is also consistently GAAP profitable and was added to the S&P 500 earlier this year. Meanwhile, C3.ai has burned over $58 million in cash over the past four quarters on $346 million in revenue. Even worse, its $274 million in trailing-12-month GAAP net losses are a gulf the business must close on, thanks mainly to high stock-based compensation amounting to nearly two-thirds of its revenue. C3.ai over Palantir? Why it's possible in 2025. Still, I like C3.ai over Palantir in 2025, despite its flaws. Why? Because it trades at a fraction of the valuation: AI PS Ratio data by YCharts Two similar companies are growing at comparable rates. Does profitability alone justify one trading at nearly five times the valuation of the other? More importantly, C3.ai's financials are improving. The company's cash burn bottomed out at over $200 million in early 2023 and has improved to just over $58 million over the past four quarters. Additionally, C3.ai has a healthy balance sheet with $730 million and zero debt. If the business generates cash flow in 2025 and shrinks its net losses, the market could recognize the improvement and reward C3.ai with a higher valuation. Still, even if the valuation remains unchanged, growing 30% will likely translate to solid investment returns. On the other hand, Palantir's stock price could fall if its steep valuation begins to crack due to disappointing earnings or shakiness in the broader market. Palantir is the better business and preferred stock when the valuation makes sense. But while Palantir trades on cloud nine, C3.ai is a sneaky contrarian stock idea for 2025 and is likely the better short-term pick.

Xiaomi 14T Pro Xiaomi’s T series of phones fit a recognisable part of a smartphone manufacturer's portfolio. T phones look to bring as many of the key features from the high-end flagship range but at a more affordable price. Every smartphone is a balance of priorities, but the so-called “flagship killer” space of high specifications against lower price While the flagships can push specifications and capabilities to a greater extent, Xiaomi needs to focus tightly on where it wants to invest the bill of materials. Having spent time with a Xiaomi 14T Pro review unit, three areas that have picked up that focus are the display, the camera, and the all-important for 2024 and beyond AI features. The Xiaomi 14T Pro Display At 6.67 inches, the AMOLED display dominates the handset. With the vertical edges and just a slight chamfer, the overall feel is reminiscent of several Android smartphones. The curve to the rear edge is more pronounced; Xiamoi calls this a 3D Curved Back, following other smartphone manufacturers by branding as many of the touches on the phone as possible. Xiaomi 14T Pro Thus, we get "CrystalRes AMOLED Technology” powering the AMOLED display. The numbers tell the story, though; it runs at 2712x1200 pixels (446 pixels per inch) and has a refresh rate of up to 144Hz for smooth scrolling and impressive graphics handling for mobile gaming. Mystery Drones Over New Jersey And Nearby States: Mayorkas Says ‘We Are On It’—But No Known Foreign Involvement (Updating) Gmail Account Deletion Warning—Act Now To Save Your Email In 2025 WWE Saturday Night’s Main Event Results: Drew McIntyre Defeats Sami Zayn That fast refresh is probably the key feature. It’s variable. This can be left to change automatically, or you can lock it to a slower rate of 60Hz to improve battery life, leaving the smooth scrolling and animations behind for more time with your phone. One thing the screen doesn’t have much of is glare, the peak brightness of 4,000 nits contributes to the readability in sunlight. The display ratio of 20:9 matches the likes of the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro, but is slightly narrower than Samsung’s Galaxy S25 family. There are still some app compatibility issues here, with landscape views offering thin black bars on either side of the main display... which means the thin bezels are obscured by the pixels but does mean that the selfie camera isn’t in view when watching videos. Leica And The Xiaomi 14T Pro It’s impossible to miss the Leica Optics lens at the rear of the Xiaomi 14T Pro. Three lenses, plus some sensors and LED flash, are arranged in a 2x2 layout on a raised square island. It echoes the curved edges with many 90-degree profiles seen in the rest of the handset. Xiaomi 14T Pro Lens-wise, the main camera comes with a common mix of lenses: a 50MP LightFusion primary sensor, a 50MP telephoto lens with 2.6x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultra-wide lens. One thing prevalent on more expensive handsets that is missing here is a folded “periscope” optical zoom. That limits the extreme zoom capability, although that feels like one of the compromises made to get better imagery with subjects closer to the smartphone. Alongside the hardware, the Leica partnership offers two Leice photographic styles, Leica filters, and a Leica portrait mode as part of the package. There’s even a shutter sound designed to replicate the sound of a mechanical shutter on a Leica camera. Those two filters, vibrant or authentic, address one of the long-standing differences between smartphones depending on their regional releases... will the camera software bias towards a more vibrant color, or a more authentic color. Here, you can switch between the two options with a touch on an icon in the camera app. It’s still not perfect in terms of color reproduction; the vibrancy is still there; authentic still feels a touch too over-eager for genuine authenticity, but the camera delivers some sharp images in close spaces and out to middle distance. For the mid-range market, this is an above-average camera. Android And The Xiaomi 14T Pro HyperOS is Xiaomi’s flavour of Android. The global version does have support for Google Play Services, so you have the likes of Gmail, Chrome and YouTube, as Android users expect. Xiaomi 14T Pro HyperOS biases towards a simple UI without overloading the user with too many settings or options. They are there, so power users must go through another layer of dialog boxes. The look and feel of the software is very much focused on large curved corners. This takes up a lot of space around information, and I found myself wanting more information on the screen, but I can see the impact of this look in making the 14T Pro feel less threatening. That’s helped by a less than fanatical implementation of artificial intelligence. As with almost every smartphone manufacturer, AI is an ever-present “new feature” in the software. Xiaomi hasn’t overpowered the environment with AI at every corner, but it is there. Out of the box the handset is set to use Google Gemini instead of Google Assistant, and several AI features in the camera app to help you take, edit, and select the best picture possibl Much like the UI, AI is there if you dig into the settings and dialogs if you want it. Xiaomi’s current AI suite is not as extensive as those from Google and Samsung, so this implementation feels a bit behind the curve. More AI tools are coming in future updates, at this point you can make a fair AI comparison between devices. Conclusions The Xiaomi 14T Pro is an iterative update to last year’s 13T Pro, and the small steps forward, while attractive, don’t feel enough to force an upgrade. Those coming to the mid-range after two or more years with their current handset will find much more to like. The camera has clearly been a priority, and while optical zoom has been sacrificed, the camera makes up for it with a much more robust capability for personal and group pictures. The screen’s refresh rate creates a feeling of smoothness and accuracy that belies the price of the handsets, and HyperOS strips back the complexity of Android without removing it. Xiaomi 14T Pro The Xiaomi 14T Pro is missing some features you would expect to see on premium smartphones. The battery life is less than you would expect for 5000mAh. Neither is a fast charger in the box, but that’s becoming standard at the highest end, so maybe it is a perfect echo of a flagship? It’s a classic flagship-killer, not a flagship. That makes it a very strong performer in the mid-range space and deserves your consideration. Disclaimer: Xiaomi provided a Xiaomi 14T Pro for review purposes.