fb777 slots login philippines
The last two weeks of 2024 are chock full of entertaining opportunities. From Christmas and Hanukkah to Kwanza and New Year's, chances are you're going to see more people in your home in the next few days than any other time this year. I hosted Christmas dinner and with it came the reminder that I am not a clean and tidy entertainer. Eggnog was spilled, my path through the house was easily trackable as I carried a ham-laden platter, mud was tracked in from seemingly everywhere. Thankfully I had a secret weapon in my cleaning arsenal that made all of these things nothing more than a few seconds of inconvenience. The Dyson WashG1 is a powered mop that completely eliminates the need to vacuum before you clean up your floor. What Is It? Surprisingly simple in operation, the WashG1 is an upright powered mop that uses a pair of counter-rotating mop rollers that clean themselves as they remove spills and hard debris from your floor in one pass. Surprisingly, for a company that prides itself on vacuum suction, the WashG1 relies on agitation from the rollers rather than suction to clean your floors. The 64,000 filament microfiber mops are scraped clean as they run, sluicing off debris and dirty water, ensuring the mop touching the floor is perpetually clean. The company tested a large number of real spills (far beyond the industry standard of dried mustard, tartar sauce, and coffee) on a black floor using UV light to ensure the WashG1 was legitimately passing every test. The best part of using the Wash GI is that you don't have to clean your floor before you clean your floor. Hard debris (like the nut shells left all over your kitchen floor by that one uncle that insists nutcrackers are functional, not decorative) is captured in a pull-out tray in-between the two rollers. At the end of a cleaning session, all you have to do is slide it out and dump the gunk that's been captured by the filter. Meanwhile, dirty water is separated out. Just unclip the central water module, unscrew the dirty water reservoir, and dump it out. The WashG1 uses a small motor to create negative pressure to siphon dirty water up from the tray. The smaller motor translates to a long run time on a single charge. The water tanks are prominent and easily visible when operating so you don't have to guess if you need more clean water or to empty the dirty water. How Well Does It Work? The WashG1 feels awkward in hand at first, but once you start the mop rollers, it easily glides across the floor, mopping up the water that it puts down. The amount of water is controllable via a handy button and the full-color LCD screen keeps you informed on what the machine is doing or needs. The head swivels easily into just about any spot. The handle swings horizontally with the brush head so it's a cinch to clean under furniture. I also really appreciate that you can lock the mop in an upright position. It makes it much easier when you have to stop mid-task to take care of something (as opposed to having to prop the handle and hope it doesn't fall). When you're done cleaning, there's no need to disassemble the mop rollers, Just run a self-cleaning cycle. I was concerned that there would be mildew growth (a problem I've encountered with powered mops, that don't have drying bases) but those fears were unfounded. Whenever I needed the WashG1, it was ready to grab and press into action. Not having to vacuum beforehand does mean that the debris tray will fill up. You'll want to make sure you clean it out every time. The mopping module pulls out easily as well for occasional cleaning. Dyson recommends you do this every third use. I find that I need to do it at least every other run because I have a lot of pet and person hair floating around my home. What's nice is that the WashG1's screen walks you through the manual cleaning process whenever you start a self-cleaning cycle. Is It Worth It? At $699 it's in line with comparable products from Tineco and Roborock. And while other companies have more gimmicks, like heated drying or heated/ozonated water, I appreciate the fact that Dyson's focused on making the WashG1 a deeply effective machine without adding on additional tech. If you have hard floors, the WashG1 is an unfussy, impressive performer that will keep your floors pristine no matter what you throw at them. Learn more on the Dyson website .Investing in a quality tablet can help make your life a bit more convenient, fill in for a laptop and let you read e-books or stream shows on the go. If you're in the market for a new tablet, you'll want to take advantage of the Black Friday tablet deals going on now. One of the best deals is on the latest Amazon Fire tablet, which is currently heavily discounted during the Amazon Black Friday sale . Right now, can currently nab the Fire Tablet 8 for just $55 , which is absurd as it only launched recently. Available in either a black , emerald or hibiscus color, the 8-inch tablet comes with an HD display, 3GB of memory and 32GB of storage as well as a 13-hour battery life. It's ideal for streaming the latest shows, scrolling the web, messaging friends on social media or playing games via the App Store or Google Play . The thin and durable tablet also sports a 5-megapixel rear-facing camera. It's a basic everyday tablet that is designed to do the simple things well. And Alexa is there to help. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money . Considering the Fire HD 8 only launched recently, it's a pretty great way to get the latest tech for less. Want to check out the competitors? We've tested the best tablets from Apple, Samsung and, of course, Amazon, pitting their strengths and weaknesses against one another. It's a great time to upgrade with the holiday season right around the corner. Once you're done tablet shopping, check out the rest of our Black Friday coverage to find more ways to save this week. Why this deal matters This is the lowest price we've ever seen on the new Amazon Fire HD 8. This is an incredibly well-rounded tablet for just $55, and it's a great gifting option for students, readers or those who like to stream on the go.As we enter the shortest days of the year here’s the history of light bulbs
In the ‘00s, The Smashing Pumpkins frontman Billy Corgan looked at the disruptive nature of early social media platform MySpace and saw the death of the record label. It didn’t exactly work out that way — not with MySpace, not with Facebook, not with TikTok. In fact, the major music companies became adept at using these platforms to break artists and perpetuate their market power; if there’s a breakout song on TikTok, labels rush into an old-fashioned bidding war. While social media certainly disrupted the music business, it didn’t uproot the traditional record label model. There have been numerous other game-changers over the years that failed — on their own, at least — to radically alter how major labels do business, including independent distribution. After TuneCore launched in 2006, major labels continued to sign artists and own their intellectual property, albeit to broader “360” deals that incorporated more than recorded music rights. Nor did the advent of streaming by itself reshape the structure of major record labels. The artists with the most streaming success are involved with major labels in one way or another, be it a traditional record contract, a joint venture or, in rare cases like Taylor Swift , a distribution deal. Corgan may have misjudged social media’s sole impact on record labels, but he wasn’t entirely wrong about its ultimate influence. When combined, social media, independent distribution and streaming form a potent combination that has changed the balance of power and induced major labels to change how they promote music around the world. This dynamic isn’t exactly new, but it was never clearer than in 2024. This year, major labels have increasingly embraced the role of being service providers to those parties who prefer to remain independent and retain ownership of their intellectual property. A few years ago, Universal Music Group (UMG) was pouring money into superstar acquisitions such as Bob Dylan ’s and Sting ’s song catalogs. More recently, the company has been focusing on its artist services model. In the last three months alone, UMG acquired indie label group [PIAS] and agreed to acquire Downtown Music Holdings for $775 million, though the proposed deal has encountered opposition from the independent music community and will need to pass regulatory scrutiny before being finalized. The company also purchased Outdustry — which has an artist- and label-services arm that focuses on China, India and other high-growth emerging markets — and bought a stake in Chord Music Partners, giving UMG distribution and publishing administration duties for the more than 60,000 songs in the investment vehicle’s catalog. In fact, 2024 played out much like UMG CEO Lucian Grainge said it would. His January memo predicted the company would continue to expand globally and offer labels outside of mature markets a “full suite of artist services” while “acquiring local labels, catalogs and artist services businesses.” To be fair, UMG was already on that path: In 2022, it acquired m-theory’s artist services company and installed its founders, JT Myers and Nat Pastor , as co-CEOs of Virgin Music Group to expand Virgin’s independent music division globally. Warner Music Group (WMG) appears to have sensed the shifting landscape, too, as there has been a noticeable shift in messaging during Robert Kyncl ’s tenure as the company’s CEO. In the Stephen Cooper era, WMG was the music community’s leading investor in Web3 startups. In contrast, Kyncl has chosen to focus on expanding WMG’s footprint globally. WMG briefly signaled its interest in acquiring Believe in March and April after the French company announced a CEO-led effort to take the company private . Notably, Believe has a global label services business and a presence in developing markets that take advantage of the “glocalization” of local markets and global streaming platforms’ ability to help music travel across borders. WMG ultimately passed on pursuing Believe, but Kyncl has followed his peers’ interest in emerging markets, purchasing stakes in Indian companies Divo and Global Music Junction. The service model isn’t an entirely original approach. Grainge wrote that UMG is “creating the blueprint for the labels of the future,” but UMG is doing what major music companies have always done: following trends and buying independent companies that established a particular market. Sony Music already bought into the service model with The Orchard and AWAL, the latter purchased in 2022 for $430 million. Independents such as Believe, OneRPM and Symphonic Distribution have become established players by combining distribution and artist services, while investors have poured money into independents such as Create Music Group — which this year raised $165 million at a $1 billion valuation — and gamma, which is backed by $1 billion. But the well-established blueprint was never more of a hot commodity than in 2024. In the music business, nothing signifies the relevance of a business model like the major labels’ desire to buy it and integrate it into their systems — especially when the largest music companies feel they have no choice. The holy trinity of social media, independent distribution and global streaming platforms has given artists an alternative to the much-derided major label record contract. Artists who want to own their intellectual property and have more creative control have never had more of the tools necessary to be independent. That includes financing options, such as advances from well-funded independents or royalty advances from a new breed of financial services companies. When there’s no need for radio promotion and shelf space at brick-and-mortar retailers, the independent model looks a lot more attractive — not only for artists but for the major labels that have become increasingly keen on buying into it. Ironically, the major labels’ acceptance of the independents’ business model means the music business is becoming less independent. Trade groups such as the Association of Independent Music and IMPALA quickly spoke out against UMG’s agreement to purchase Downtown, just as they did with Sony Music’s purchase of AWAL. U.K. regulators ultimately concluded that AWAL was a “relatively small player” and that the deal did not substantially reduce competition. Time will tell if competition watchdogs feel the same about UMG’s much larger purchase of Downtown. In any case, the independents have proved that artist and label services businesses are a good fit for the modern music business. The next step was always going to be consolidation.
By Tom Hals (Reuters) -Arm Holdings’ lawsuit against Qualcomm ended in a mistrial on Friday, with a jury delivering a mixed verdict that found for Qualcomm on a crucial issue, saying Qualcomm had properly licensed its central processor chips. Arm’s shares were down 1.8% in extended trading after the news, and Qualcomm’s shares were up 1.8%. The outcome means the case could be tried again in the future. Judge Maryellen Noreika, who presided over the case in U.S. federal court in Delaware, encouraged Arm and Qualcomm to mediate their dispute. “I don’t think either side had a clear victory or would have had a clear victory if this case is tried again,” Noreika told the parties. After more than nine hours of deliberations over two days, the eight-person jury in U.S. federal court could not reach a unanimous verdict on the question of whether Nuvia, a startup that Qualcomm purchased for $1.4 billion in 2021, breached the terms of its license with Arm. But the jury found that Qualcomm did not breach Nuvia’s license with Arm. The jury also found that Qualcomm’s chips created using Nuvia technology, which have been central to Qualcomm’s push into the personal computer market, are properly licensed under its own agreement with Arm, clearing the way for Qualcomm to continue selling them. “The jury has vindicated Qualcomm’s right to innovate and affirmed that all the Qualcomm products at issue in the case are protected by Qualcomm’s contract with Arm,” Qualcomm said in a statement. Arm did not immediately return Reuters requests for comment. “My biggest worry was what happens to the future roadmap if they no longer have access to Nuvia (computing) cores,” Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said. “At this point, that risk is a lot closer to being off the table.” (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware and Max Cherney in San Francisco; writing by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Leslie Adler, Chizu Nomiyama and Pooja Desai) Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
- Previous:
- Next: fb777 app download for android
