filipino fishing
LUANDA, Angola (AP) — President Joe Biden’s long-delayed trip to Africa had many of the hallmarks of a traditional state visit: There was a 12-shot cannon salute. A series of warm handshakes with Angolan President João Lourenço. Celebratory music. Photo opportunities. But another issue overshadowed the visit. When reporters tried to question the president about why he gave his son Hunter a far-reaching pardon after repeatedly saying he would not do so, Biden tried to brush aside the questions. He gestured toward Lourenço and laughed, declaring, “Welcome to America.” Biden saluted Lourenço for his efforts to bolster stronger U.S. relations, declared that Africa and its booming youth population would shape the world’s future and even indulged his love of trains by championing a major railway project that his administration says could change the way the entire continent does business. Some takeaways from the president’s visit: (Don’t) meet the press Biden offered the joke about America before his meeting with Lourenço, and he answered a question on Tuesday about the political situation in South Korea, saying only that he’d not been briefed — something that was rectified moments later when advisers filled him in on what was happening as the motorcade sped away from a site where he’d given a speech. Other than that, Biden went the entire trip, which began Sunday night and included two brief stopovers in Cape Verde in addition to Angola, dodging reporters. He did similar during last month’s six-day visit to South America . Biden’s press secretary tried to explain the pardon decision Since Biden announced his pardon decision shortly before climbing aboard Air Force One bound for Africa, it fell to White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre to spend nearly half an hour offering long and awkward answers to uncomfortable questions aboard the aircraft hours later. Biden said in a statement explaining the pardon that, while he believed in the justice system, he also felt that politics had infected the cases against his son and “enough was enough.” Jean-Pierre maintained that he wasn’t trying to have it both ways. “I don’t think it’s a contradiction,” she said. “Two things could be true. You can believe in the Department of Justice system, and you could also believe that the process was infected politically.” She also bristled when it was suggested that such complaints about the Department of Justice smacked of President-elect Donald Trump’s promises to dismantle the “deep state” of federal bureaucrats that he’s said for years are out to unfairly undermine him and fellow top Republicans. ‘All in on Africa’ — with time running out During his meeting with Lourenço at the presidential palace, Biden said, “The United States is all in on Africa,” and extolled how strong Angolan relations were with Washington. His administration has invested billions in Angola, with the centerpiece being promoting the Lobito Corridor, a vast project to revitalize supply chains by refurbishing 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) of train lines in Angola, Zambia and Congo. Given where Angola was barely a generation ago, the alliance is in many ways remarkable. An oil-rich nation on Africa’s southwest coast, Angola achieved independence from Portugal in 1975, but spent subsequent years embroiled in civil war, which often featured proxy fighting between U.S.-backed forces and those allied with the Soviet Union. Even today, the country’s red and black flag features a yellow machete and half-cog, an insignia resembling the Soviet hammer and sickle. But Biden leaves office on Jan. 20, and Lourenço, like many leaders of African nations, has already begun suggesting that he’s looking toward a Trump-dominated future. Biden administration officials say they’re hopeful Trump and top Republicans will continue a business-friendly approach to investing in Africa that includes continuing to support the Lobito Corridor. Now the Africa policy will be up to Trump Biden lauded Lourenço for helping boost his country’s relationship with the United States, and he said the youth of Africa would change the world. He also visited the country’s national slavery museum, stressing how Angola and the United States — which were once linked by the horrors of enslaved human beings, now could increasingly be linked by economic opportunity. But if Biden came to Angola hoping to cement his foreign policy legacy in this country and throughout Africa, it will actually fall to Trump — the man he beat in the 2020 election and spent much of 2024 running against before bowing out of the race in July — to see it through. ___After a proposed constitutional amendment that would have given the Utah Legislature free rein to repeal or amend voter-approved ballot initiatives went up in flames earlier this year, Republican lawmakers are weighing how to, in their eyes, keep measures in check. Nothing is settled upon yet, but options range from raising the signature threshold for ballot measures to requiring 60% approval for some measures. After the Utah Supreme Court unanimously ruled in July that legislators could not repeal or rewrite voter-passed initiatives , Republican legislative leaders issued dire warnings that Utah would see a tsunami of ballot initiatives fueled by out-of-state money. Others warned of attempts to legalize recreational marijuana, gambling and expanding abortion. Lawmakers thought they had solved the issue during a special session in August, where they pushed through Amendment D , essentially reversing the court’s ruling and asserting their power to revise initiatives. But the plan was derailed when the justices struck Amendment D from the ballot , ruling the wording on the ballot was deceptive and lawmakers failed to publish the amendment in newspapers, as the Utah Constitution requires. Since constitutional amendments have to be ratified by voters in a general election, legislators cannot take another run at Amendment D until 2026, forcing Republican leaders to look for other options to keep control over lawmaking in the state. Groups considering launching an initiative, meantime, are keeping a close eye on the proposals, knowing that changes in the upcoming legislative session could dramatically impact the outlook for any 2026 initiative effort. Barbara Stallone, executive director of People4Utah, a group considering an initiative to create open, multi-party primaries with the top two vote-getters advancing to the general election, regardless of party, said her group is “committed to ensuring that Utahns retain their constitutional right to reform their government.” “Some of the proposals that we have heard about for the 2025 session appear to encroach on those rights,” she said. “We are following all of these proposals closely and will ensure that Utahns’ voices are heard throughout the legislative process.” (Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, discusses the constitutional amendment over citizen initiatives after it passed the house and the Senate, on Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2024. Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Cottonwood Heights, the incoming Senate majority leader, told The Salt Lake Tribune that discussions are in the early stages and no plan has been settled upon, several options have been floated. The simplest tactic would be to increase the number of signatures initiative supporters have to gather to get a question on the ballot. Currently, that number is 8% of the number of registered voters at the time of the most recent election, meaning the number initiative backers will be shooting for will increase to about 148,000, up from the current requirement of 134,298 , with specific targets in at least 26 of the state’s 29 Senate districts. That is assuming legislators don’t push the bar higher. “Some of those options have been discussed,” Cullimore said. “My concern, without looking into this legally, is if that gets challenged, would the court see that as an undue burden on this [initiative] right?” If the courts think the Legislature has made it too hard to get an initiative approved, judges could see that as infringing on the public’s right to make law via the initiative process and strike it down. Of the 24 states that allow ballot initiatives, Utah has one of — if not the — most challenging signature requirements according to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures. Cullimore thinks there might be a better argument for requiring initiatives to win approval in a majority of legislative districts, rather than just a simple majority of voters. The logic, he said, is that for the Legislature to pass a law it needs support from a majority of the members representing their legislative districts. “That might carry more legal weight,” he said, “and might make the initiative more representative of Utah if there’s a requirement like that.”. In 2018, when voters approved three ballot initiatives — legalizing medical marijuana , expanding Medicaid for low-income Utahns and creating the non-partisan redistricting commission — all by relatively narrow margins. The Medicaid expansion initiative, which passed 53% to 47%, won support in a majority of legislative districts . The Better Boundaries initiative passed by just a few thousand votes and won a majority in just Salt Lake, Summit, Grand and Carbon counties. Another option is increasing the percentage of voters that would need to support an initiative from 50% to 60%. Rep. Jason Kyle, R-Huntsville, has previously sponsored legislation to require the 60% threshold on initiatives that require a tax increase. That bill passed the Utah House last year and stalled in the Senate. Cullimore said it’s possible it could be expanded beyond just tax issues. Eleven states require a supermajority for constitutional amendments or certain ballot measures . In the last election, for example, 57% of Florida voters supported an amendment dealing with abortion rights, but it fell short of the 60% mark needed for approval. In Utah, a constitutional amendment approved in 1998 requires a two-thirds majority to pass any ballot initiative limiting hunting. Part of the language that was a major selling point for the Legislature’s Amendment D was a ban on foreign interests spending money on Utah ballot initiatives. Rep. Candace Pierucci, R-Herriman, appears aiming to accomplish that goal with a bill file she has opened. Neither Kyle nor Pierucci responded to messages about their plans for the upcoming session. Other states that have ventured down that road have faced court challenges. In September, a federal judge in Ohio blocked that state’s prohibition on foreign influence of ballot initiatives, but in October the appeals court overturned that decision in a 2-1 ruling , meaning, at least for now, the ban is in place. Rep. Andrew Stoddard, D-Murray, has also opened a bill file to address initiatives. He said his bill, while still being drafted, would lower the signature requirement and ban “dark money” — funds spent on campaigns whose donors are not reported — from the process. (Jeffrey D. Allred | Pool) Attorney Tyler Green speaks to the court as Mormon Women for Ethical Government and the League of Women Voters oppose the Utah State Legislature during oral arguments at the Utah Supreme Court in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2024. Status of the gerrymandering lawsuit As lawmakers try to sort out how they plan to respond to the Utah Supreme Court’s ballot initiative ruling, the case that precipitated it — over 2018′s Proposition 4 which sought to prohibit partisan gerrymandering — is now in the hands of a lower court judge. After Better Boundaries’ initiative was approved by voters in 2018, the Legislature passed SB200 , which made the independent redistricting commission created under the bill simply advisory and removed a restriction on drawing legislative and congressional boundaries to favor one party and disadvantage another. The League of Women Voters, Mormon Women for Ethical Government and several voters sued , arguing that the congressional boundaries the Legislature adopted intentionally disadvantaged voters in Salt Lake County, one of the few somewhat liberal bastions in the state. In July, the Utah Supreme Court ruled that by undoing the core of the Better Boundaries Initiative, lawmakers essentially deprived voters of their constitutional right to enact ballot initiatives that reform government — prompting the Legislature’s attempt to amend the constitution to make ballot initiatives subject to repeal or amendment by lawmakers. The court said that, if the Legislature wants to substantially impair a voter-passed initiative, lawmakers need a compelling interest and the change must be narrowly tailored and sent the case back to a lower court judge to decide if the state met its burden. In a court filing last month attorneys for the Legislature argued that portions of the Better Boundaries initiative are unconstitutional, alleging they infringe on the Legislature’s right to create political boundaries, among other reasons. “The State has compelling interests in ensuring that its laws are constitutional, that all Utahns are represented in the redistricting process, that redistricting plans are enacted in a timely fashion, and that the State’s fiscal health isn’t jeopardized by prolonged litigation cost and mountainous attorney’s fees,” attorneys for the Legislature wrote. The plaintiffs’ lawyers responded in a brief filed just before the Thanksgiving holiday arguing that voters have been deprived of the nonpartisan gerrymandering that they voted for in 2018 and urged the court to move quickly and order the maps to be redrawn. “Utahns deserve to vote under lawful maps drawn according to the standards they adopted in enacting Prop 4 six years ago, and the Court should expeditiously conduct remedial proceedings to ensure that a lawful map is in effect for the 2026 election,” they wrote. Editor’s note • This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.Then Wednesday's targeted fatal shooting of the UnitedHealthcare CEO on a midtown Manhattan sidewalk thrust the executive and his business into the national spotlight. Thompson, who was 50, had worked at the giant UnitedHealth Group Inc for 20 years and run the insurance arm since 2021 after running its Medicare and retirement business. As CEO, Thompson led a firm that provides health coverage to more than 49 million Americans — more than the population of Spain. United is the largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans, the privately run versions of the U.S. government’s Medicare program for people age 65 and older. The company also sells individual insurance and administers health-insurance coverage for thousands of employers and state-and federally funded Medicaid programs. The business run by Thompson brought in $281 billion in revenue last year, making it the largest subsidiary of the Minnetonka, Minnesota-based UnitedHealth Group. His $10.2 million annual pay package, including salary, bonus and stock options awards, made him one of the company's highest-paid executives. The University of Iowa graduate began his career as a certified public accountant at PwC and had little name recognition beyond the health care industry. Even to investors who own its stock, the parent company's face belonged to CEO Andrew Witty, a knighted British triathlete who has testified before Congress. When Thompson did occasionally draw attention, it was because of his role in shaping the way Americans get health care. At an investor meeting last year, he outlined his company's shift to “value-based care,” paying doctors and other caregivers to keep patients healthy rather than focusing on treating them once sick. “Health care should be easier for people,” Thompson said at the time. “We are cognizant of the challenges. But navigating a future through value-based care unlocks a situation where the ... family doesn’t have to make the decisions on their own.” Thompson also drew attention in 2021 when the insurer, like its competitors, was widely criticized for a plan to start denying payment for what it deemed non-critical visits to hospital emergency rooms. “Patients are not medical experts and should not be expected to self-diagnose during what they believe is a medical emergency,” the chief executive of the American Hospital Association wrote in an open letter addressed to Thompson. “Threatening patients with a financial penalty for making the wrong decision could have a chilling effect on seeking emergency care.” United Healthcare responded by delaying rollout of the change. Thompson, who lived in a Minneapolis suburb and was the married father of two sons in high school, was set to speak at an investor meeting in a midtown New York hotel. He was on his own and about to enter the building when he was shot in the back by a masked assailant who fled on foot before pedaling an e-bike into Central Park a few blocks away, the New York Police Department said. Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said investigators were looking at Thompson's social media accounts and interviewing employees and family members. “Didn’t seem like he had any issues at all,” Kenny said. "He did not have a security detail.” AP reporters Michael R. Sisak and Steve Karnowski contributed to this report. Murphy reported from Indianapolis.
Israel strikes Houthi rebels in Yemen's capital while WHO chief says he was meters away
Intel's interim co-CEO Zinsner says new chief executive will have foundry experience
Montreal Canadiens: Dilemma on DefenseThe ( ) is an exciting option for long-term . I believe the business could pay really impressive in the coming years with a $10,000 investment. I'm not about to suggest that Soul Patts currently has a dividend yield of more than 30%, but I do want to show how the power of can help grow a decent into a huge payment in time. As Albert Einstein once supposedly said: Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it, he who doesn't, pays it. So, what makes this business a powerful compounder? For readers and . It can invest wherever it sees opportunities. Not only does the portfolio offer significant , but the company is also one of the most impressive ASX dividend stocks because of its long-term growth in underlying value and dividend. Soul Patts has increased its annual ordinary dividend every year since 2000, which I think is a great record. Dividend growth has accelerated in recent years – in the past three financial years, the payout has grown at a of 15.3%. However, Soul Patts' current grossed-up dividend yield, including , is 3.9% using the annual payment from FY24. A $10,000 investment would unlock $390 of annual passive income from the ASX dividend stock. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, but if Soul Patts were to continue growing its dividend at a CAGR of 15% per year over the next 15 years, the annual passive income would grow to $3,173. But, it may be too optimistic to expect the dividend to keep growing at that pace. If Soul Patts grew its dividend at a CAGR of 10% over the next 20 years, which would still be very good, it could grow to an annual dividend payment of $2,623. Dividend growth is not guaranteed, particularly in the double-digit percentage range. But I think Soul Patts has a number of exciting investments that could help its portfolio returns. Some of those investments include ownership of ( ) shares, ( ) shares, and its private equity electrification business, Ampcontrol. I have a high level of confidence that owning this ASX dividend stock could be very rewarding in the coming years.
- Previous: fifa fishing
- Next: tilapia fishing
