rich9 sign up
Guardiola denies rift with De Bruyne during Man City's dramatic slump
Lebanon said Israeli strikes Thursday on the country's east and south killed 52 people, as raids also hit south Beirut and Hezbollah claimed its deepest attack on Israel in over a year. More than 11 months of cross-border fire between Israel and Hezbollah over the Gaza conflict escalated into all-out war in September, with Israel conducting an extensive bombing campaign, primarily targeting Hezbollah strongholds, and sending ground troops into southern Lebanon. "Israeli enemy strikes that targeted the Baalbek district" in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley left "40 dead and 52 wounded", a health ministry statement said, listing tolls for 10 different locations. Lebanon's official National News Agency (NNA) said a couple and their four children were killed in a strike on a house in the village of Maqneh, while another couple and their young daughter were among 11 people killed in a raid on nearby Nabha. The ministry also reported "seven dead and 24 wounded" in "Israeli enemy strikes" on south Lebanon's Nabatiyeh district, and "five dead and 26 wounded" in strikes elsewhere in south Lebanon. In Israel, first responders said a man was killed after rocket fire from Lebanon hit the Galilee region in the country's north. In Beirut's southern suburbs, the NNA reported at least 12 strikes throughout Thursday, after relative calm while US envoy Amos Hochstein visited earlier this week, seeking to broker an end to the Israel-Hezbollah war. Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee on social media platform X issued several rounds of evacuation warnings for Beirut's southern suburbs, as well as areas in and around the southern coastal city of Tyre, but none for east Lebanon. AFPTV footage showed columns of smoke rising from the southern suburbs, usually a densely populated residential district but now largely emptied. Adraee said on X that the Israeli military "targeted a weapons depot, a command headquarters and terrorist infrastructure" belonging to Hezbollah in south Beirut. Amid a series of attack claims, Hezbollah said its fighters targeted "the Hatzor air base" near Israel's southern city of Ashdod, around 150 kilometres (90 miles) from Lebanon's southern border, "with a missile salvo" -- its deepest target in more than a year of hostilities. In 10 separate statements, Iran-backed Hezbollah said its fighters also targeted Israeli troops in and near the south Lebanon town of Khiam, including with artillery, rockets and drones. The NNA said "the enemy army" was "blowing up homes and residential buildings during its incursion into the town". Lebanon's official news agency and Hezbollah have reported fighting and air strikes in the Khiam area ever since Israeli ground troops first entered Lebanon on September 30. Earlier Thursday, United Nations special coordinator for Lebanon Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert visited Baalbek's UNESCO-listed archaeological area, after the UN's cultural body this week granted more than 30 heritage sites in Lebanon "provisional enhanced protection" amid the war. Lebanon's health ministry said Thursday that at least 3,583 people had been killed in the violence since October 2023. Most of the deaths have been since September this year. The Israeli military said Wednesday that three soldiers were killed in south Lebanon, bringing to 52 the number killed in Lebanon since the start of ground operations. bur-lg/givTexas Pacific Land Co. (NYSE:TPL) Shares Sold by Avior Wealth Management LLCDA Davidson Issues Positive Forecast for AZEK (NYSE:AZEK) Stock PriceFaraday Future to Give FX Business Update and Show First FX Prototype Mules in Las Vegas, NV from January 5-7
NoneSubscribe Search Search Sort by Relevance Title Date Subscribe ALBAWABA - Huawei officially announced its departure from the Android operating system, starting a new era for the Chinese technology giant with the introduction of HarmonyOS Next, an entirely self-developed operating system set to establish Huawei as a rival in the smartphone OS market. Also Read Huawei unveils $2800 world’s first “Trifold” phone, Mate XT As Huawei continues to strive for technical sovereignty in the aftermath of US sanctions, It unveiled on Tuesday the Mate 70 series of smartphones that are equipped with the company's latest independent operating system, CNBC reports. Check this!!! Yess Check this!!!! Huawei Mate 70's feature is insane 🔥 pic.twitter.com/xSpoKMsvlj — ctrlnews (@disctrlnews) November 26, 2024 This next-generation operating system is completely devoid of Android code, in contrast to the previous HarmonyOS, which was built on an Android foundation. While this brings autonomy to Huawei, it means that Android apps will not function on the new OS, marking a challenge for Huawei in attracting developers to port their apps to a new system. Huawei asserts to be making significant investments in developer engagement to address this, as reported by Android Authority. According to the company, more than 10,000 applications are now compatible with the new OS, and in a few months, the total number will rise to 100,000. Huawei's Mate 70 series, Mate 70, Mate 70 Pro, and Mate 70 Pro+, is the first to support HarmonyOS Next, launching with Android-like. HarmonyOS 4.3. HarmonyOS Next will be released in a later update, enabling users to switch when ready, with plans to deploy all smartphones on HarmonyOS Next by 2025. Starting at ¥5,499 ($759), the Mate 70 series has a relatively reasonable price tag, while the premium Mate X6 foldable costs ¥12,999 ($1,798). With more than 3 million pre-orders on Chinese e-commerce sites, the first demand seems to be promising for the challenged tech giant. A passionate about the Gaming Industry with a career of over 5 years in the field, I write about current trends and news in the Game Development business and how it impact the industry and players. Laith has recently started a new position at Al Bawaba as a freelance business writer. Subscribe Sign up to our newsletter for exclusive updates and enhanced content Subscribe Now Subscribe Sign up to get Al Bawaba's exclusive celeb scoops and entertainment news Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive updates and enhanced content Subscribe
Pat King found guilty of mischief for role in ‘Freedom Convoy’None
Loganair flight to Aberdeen forced to return to Manchester after lightning cracks windshieldSEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The president of South Korea early Wednesday lifted the martial law he imposed on the country hours earlier, bending to political pressure after a tense night in which troops surrounded parliament and lawmakers voted to reject military rule. President Yoon Suk Yeol, who appeared likely to be impeached over his actions, imposed martial law late Tuesday out of frustration with the opposition, vowing to eliminate “anti-state” forces as he struggles against opponents who control parliament and that he accuses of sympathizing with communist North Korea. Police and military personnel were seen leaving the grounds of parliament following the bipartisan vote to overrule the president, and the declaration was formally lifted around 4:30 a.m. during a Cabinet meeting. Parliament acted swiftly after martial law was imposed, with National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik declaring that the law was “invalid” and that lawmakers would “protect democracy with the people.” In all, martial law was in effect for about six hours. The president’s surprising move harkened back to an era of authoritarian leaders that the country has not seen since the 1980s, and it was immediately denounced by the opposition and the leader of Yoon’s own conservative party. Lee Jae-myung , leader of the liberal Democratic Party, which holds the majority in the 300-seat parliament, said the party’s lawmakers would remain in the Assembly’s main hall until Yoon formally lifted his order. Woo applauded how troops quickly left the Assembly after the vote. “Even with our unfortunate memories of military coups, our citizens have surely observed the events of today and saw the maturity of our military,” Woo said. While announcing his plan to lift martial law, Yoon continued to criticize parliament’s attempts to impeach key government officials and senior prosecutors. He said lawmakers had engaged in “unscrupulous acts of legislative and budgetary manipulation that are paralyzing the functions of the state.” Jo Seung-lae, a Democratic lawmaker, claimed that security camera footage following Yoon’s declaration showed that troops moved in a way that suggested they were trying to arrest Lee, Woo and even Han Dong-hoon, the leader of Yoon’s People Power Party. Officials from Yoon’s office and the Defense Ministry did not respond to requests for comment early Wednesday. Seemingly hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the Assembly, waving banners and calling for Yoon’s impeachment. Some protesters scuffled with troops ahead of the lawmakers’ vote, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or major property damage. At least one window was broken as troops attempted to enter the Assembly building. One woman tried unsuccessfully to pull a rifle away from one of the soldiers, while shouting “Aren’t you embarrassed?” Under South Korea’s constitution, the president can declare martial law during “wartime, war-like situations or other comparable national emergency states” that require the use of military force to maintain peace and order. It was questionable whether South Korea is currently in such a state. When martial law is declared, “special measures” can be employed to restrict freedom of press, freedom of assembly and other rights, as well as the power of courts. The constitution also states that the president must oblige when the National Assembly demands the lifting of martial law with a majority vote. Following Yoon’s announcement of martial law, South Korea’s military proclaimed that parliament and other political gatherings that could cause “social confusion” would be suspended, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency said. The military said anyone who violated the decree could be arrested without a warrant. In Washington, the White House said the U.S. was “seriously concerned” by the events in Seoul. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said President Joe Biden’s administration was not notified in advance of the martial law announcement and was in contact with the South Korean government. Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said there was no effect on the more than 27,000 U.S. service members based in South Korea. The South Korean military also said that the country’s striking doctors should return to work within 48 hours, Yonhap said. Thousands of doctors have been striking for months over government plans to expand the number of students at medical schools. Soon after martial law was declared, the parliament speaker called on his YouTube channel for all lawmakers to gather at the National Assembly. He urged military and law enforcement personnel to “remain calm and hold their positions. All 190 lawmakers who participated in the vote supported the lifting of martial law. At one point, television footage showed police officers blocking the entrance of the National Assembly and helmeted soldiers carrying rifles in front of the building. An Associated Press photographer saw at least three helicopters, likely from the military, that landed inside the Assembly grounds, while two or three helicopters circled above the site. The leader of Yoon’s conservative party called the decision to impose martial law “wrong.” Lee, who narrowly lost to Yoon in the 2022 presidential election, said Yoon’s announcement was “illegal and unconstitutional.” Yoon said during a televised speech that martial law would help “rebuild and protect” the country from “falling into the depths of national ruin.” He said he would “eradicate pro-North Korean forces and protect the constitutional democratic order.” “I will eliminate anti-state forces as quickly as possible and normalize the country,” he said, while asking the people to believe in him and tolerate “some inconveniences.” Yoon — whose approval rating dipped in recent months — has struggled to push his agenda against an opposition-controlled parliament since taking office in 2022. His party has been locked in an impasse with the liberal opposition over next year’s budget bill. The opposition has also attempted to impeach three top prosecutors, including the chief of the central Seoul prosecutors’ office, in what the conservatives have called a vendetta against their criminal investigations of Lee, who has been seen as the favorite for the next presidential election in 2027 in opinion polls. During his televised announcement, Yoon also described the opposition as “shameless pro-North Korean anti-state forces who are plundering the freedom and happiness of our citizens.” He did not elaborate. Yoon has taken a hard line on North Korea over its nuclear ambitions, departing from the policies of his liberal predecessor, Moon Jae-in, who pursued inter-Korean engagement. Yoon has also dismissed calls for independent investigations into scandals involving his wife and top officials, drawing quick, strong rebukes from his political rivals. Yoon’s move was the first declaration of martial law since the country’s democratization in 1987. The country’s last previous martial law was in October 1979, following the assassination of former military dictator Park Chung-hee. Sydney Seiler, Korean chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argued that the move was symbolic for Yoon to express his frustration with the opposition-controlled parliament. “He has nothing to lose,” said Seiler, comparing Yoon’s move to the Hail Mary pass in American football, with a slim chance of success. Now Yoon faces likely impeachment, a scenario that was also possible before he made the bold move, Seiler said. Natalia Slavney, research analyst at the Stimson Center’s 38 North website that focuses on Korean affairs, said Yoon’s imposition of martial law was “a serious backslide of democracy" that followed a “worrying trend of abuse” since he took office in 2022. South Korea “has a robust history of political pluralism and is no stranger to mass protests and swift impeachments,” Slavney said, citing the example of former President Park Geun-hye, the country’s first female president, who was ousted from office and imprisoned for bribery and other crimes in 2017 . Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, South Korea, and Matt Lee, Didi Tang and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans Raises Position in Kimberly-Clark Co. (NYSE:KMB)That's the message from the two Indiana General Assembly finance leaders whose two-year legislative task force recently completed a comprehensive review of state and local tax policies. State Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton, and state Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, the co-chairmen of the State and Local Tax Review Task Force, said any tax law changes enacted in 2025 likely will be incremental in nature and their financial impact spread over a number of years so as not to cripple local government spending on education, public safety and other essential services. "The complexity of this system cannot be fixed to provide overnight relief to any one classification of taxpayer. The process requires a multiyear effort to ease into a reform," Holdman said. "The legislation you will see introduced this session will take time to fully implement. (Property) tax bills for 2025 cannot be fixed this session further beyond what the Indiana General Assembly has done the last couple of sessions, like capping general fund local levy growth." Braun repeatedly has said cutting property taxes is among his top priorities when he takes over the governor's office Jan. 13 from term-limited Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb. On the campaign trail, Braun promised to reset residential property tax bills to 2021 levels, reduce the amount of a home's assessed value subject to tax, strictly limit future property tax increases, and make it more difficult for taxing units to temporarily increase property tax revenue through a voter referendum. Holdman, who also leads the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee, said he's been "working closely with the Braun team" and help for Hoosier taxpayers "could be on its way." But Holdman also acknowledged, "It may take some time to work its way through the established system, as well as the General Assembly." "The overall tax policy in Indiana is one of the best in the nation," Holdman said. "With regards to property tax, the state of Indiana does not levy property tax from any classification of property taxpayers. The property tax is entirely a local tax. We have nothing to do other than set policy." The policy seemingly most annoying to Hoosiers is that an increase in the assessed value of their home results in a higher property tax bill — until an owner-occupied home hits the constitutional maximum tax bill of 1% of the property's assessed value. Thompson, who also leads the budget-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said the recent surges in assessed value growth often generate so much additional money for local governments that even when a unit's governing authority raises or lowers its property tax rate the change is little noticed by the taxpayer. "At some point you have to have a system where when you raise the rate the taxpayer sees an increase," Thompson said. "(Or, after lowering the rate,) "all the money just goes to other units. The taxpayer doesn't see a penny change." At the same time, Holdman noted local units of government statewide currently have about $4.8 billion in unused local income tax capacity. He said local governments interested in reducing property taxes potentially could replace that revenue with higher county income taxes, even as the state continues gradually reducing its individual income tax rate to 2.9% by 2027. Though Holdman also is interested in pursuing strict spending caps for local governments that more or less match the typically inflation-level annual spending growth at the state level. "We do not need to be spending much more than a 3.25% increase from one year to the next," Holdman said. The task force's final report also endorsed reductions in agricultural and business property tax categories that Democratic task force members pointed out would shift onto homeowners an even greater share of the cost of funding local government. "I see no focused relief for homeowners in here, whatsoever," said state Rep. Ed Delaney, D-Indianapolis. "We're presiding over tax shifts onto homeowners (and) away from businesses. We're doing that." "I think it's time to get serious about what's happened to the tax caps after 13 years of one-party (Republican) control and 15 or 16 years of the tax caps. I don't think they're working for the homeowners, and I think that's what we should be addressing." Delaney said part of the problem is Indiana has more than 2,000 local units of government and the General Assembly repeatedly has shied away from eliminating any of them, including the more than 1,000 township governments that duplicate, in many places, services provided by the county or municipalities. State Sen. David Niezgodski, D-South Bend, said Democrats stand ready to partner with Republicans to begin tackling these issues when lawmakers return to the Statehouse in January for their four-month regular legislative session. "We absolutely know that taxpayers are crying out for some relief. We know that there is a need out there," Niezgodski said. "We have a lot of work in front of us."SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - NOVEMBER 03: Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo attend the "Journey Through Oz" ... [+] Tour to celebrate the Australian premiere of "Wicked" at State Theatre on November 03, 2024 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Saverio Marfia/Getty Images) The movie Wicked opened to rave reviews recently, clocking in at 90% on Rotten Tomatoes with fans going wild over the book-to-theater-to-movie production. Some fans have become a little too enthusiastic, though, singing along in theaters . As we have come to expect, this has caused an uproar on social media . “I’m not paying to hear you sing Wicked ,” chided TikToker and podcast host Munashe Chinyanganya in a mock scolding tone. She suggested singing along in the car before arriving at the movie theater. And, when you get to the theater, putting yourself on mute. (I hope that “mute yourself” idea becomes a meme.) Signs popped up in theaters as well, instructing fans not to sing along during the movie . The same controversy happened when other recent musicals came out as a movie. This Viral Smart Bassinet Is 30% Off With The Snoo Black Friday Sale The 50 Best Black Friday Deals So Far, According To Our Deals Editors Escalating quickly Things escalated quickly in the debate when well-known film critic Richard Roeper chimed in on X. His view? While the fans who want to sing are calling everyone else judgmental, he feels it’s the other way around—that people should wait until the streaming release to sing at home. Frankly, I love when this happens. It’s all fairly harmless so far, although the tone of some of these reports is a bit too self-serious for my tastes. This ABC News report tried to lighten the mood a bit and even brought in a panel to discuss the controversy: My take on Wicked sing-alongs Social media is at its best when there is fair and honest debate over a topic from both sides, and that’s what I’m seeing for the most part. There are mostly jokes and playful jabs at this point, and I imagine theaters are trying to be proactive to prevent any actual dust-ups. BuzzFeed seemed to offer both perspectives about the controversy in a recent report as well. Another report explained how someone rented a theater just to be able to sing along with a group of about 100 friends. “Unless you have won a Tony, no singing will be permitted,” said the person who rented the theater. The final resolution is that theaters are planning to double up showings of the movie Wicked and include an option where everyone can sing along to the movie. That might put the Wicked controversy to rest for good.A Very Electric Christmas to be ISU on Monday
Just Say No: Congress Considers Neocon Lesson Plans to Keep Kids Off CommunismNone
Advertisement 2 This advertisement has not loaded yet. Advertisement 3 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Advertisement 3 This advertisement has not loaded yet.
WACO, Texas (AP) — Georgia’s Dasha Vidmanova and Columbia’s Michael Zheng won NCAA singles tennis titles on Sunday. Vidmanova, a 21-year-old senior from the Czech Republic, beat DJ Bennett of Auburn 6-3, 6-3 for the Bulldogs’ first women’s singles championship since 2010. Zheng, a 20-year-old junior from Montville, New Jersey, beat Ozan Baris of Michigan State 6-2, 4-6, 6-2 to become the first Ivy League player to collect an NCAA men’s singles crown since 1922. The final between Zheng and Baris was the first men’s NCAA tennis singles final between two Americans since 2017. ___ More AP tennis:
Australia passed one of the strictest internet crackdowns in the world last month, banning children under 16 from being on social media or opening new accounts. The law, which takes effect a year from now, holds social media companies responsible for verifying kids' ages. Not complying could trigger fines up to nearly $50 million. The law came over the objections of social media companies, which have criticized it as a form of free speech suppression. Tech companies have also argued that blocking kids from being on social media will drive them to darker, less regulated corners of the internet. The law's passage comes as scrutiny intensifies in Washington over legislating online safety protections for children, with proposals under debate that would hold platforms responsible for exposing young users to dangerous, hateful or toxic content online. From Silicon Valley to state capitals, all eyes are on how Australia's law will be implemented, and the person tasked with enforcing the law is Julie Inman Grant, Australia's eSafety Commissioner, the country's top internet regulator. NPR spoke with Grant about what led to the social media ban, what enforcement looks like and how her agency plans to address the unintended consequences of criminalizing the use of social media for kids under 16. The conversation has been edited for brevity and clarity. For our American audience, can you just explain what the eSafety Commission does? Grant: The eSafety Commission was set up nine years ago, in 2015, and has been the first online safety regulator in the world. Part of our function is to provide research, prevention, education — and then we've got complaint schemes for kids who are being cyberbullied. For all Australians who've experienced image-based abuse with the non-consensual sharing of deepfakes and intimate images, for instance. And then we do a lot of work around assessing tech trends, becoming an anticipatory regulator so that as new technology paradigms shift and move our way, we're prepared to address them The new law draws a line at 16 years old, that anyone under that age should not be able to access social media. Why 16? Grant: We've set out arbitrary numbers for the age of a child for a long time. Many social media apps require users to be 13. But it really depends on the actual circumstances of the child. Do they have parental supervision? Do they have underlying mental health issues? What kind of content are they looking at, and for how long? So a whole range of things are important. The prime minister decided to go with 16, but there were other proposals for 14, or 15. There are a lot of questions about how age verification will work. A proposal to require government-issued IDs was nixed over privacy concerns. Using facial recognition technology, or biometric scanning, has been discussed. How will these kinds of systems work? Grant: There are really only three ways you can verify someone's age online, and that's through ID, through behavioral signals or through biometrics. And all have privacy implications. There was big concern with providing government ID. But there are digital identity providers, like one called Yoti, that can estimate someone's age using facial recognition technology. But we do want to make sure there is not discrimination, or bias, and some of these technologies are less accurate depending on the kind of face being scanned. I met with an age assurance provider last week in Washington, D.C., who is using an AI-based system that looks at hand movements and has a 99% success rate. Wait, what? Using hand movements to confirm someone's age? Grant: Yes. Say you do a peace sign then a fist to the camera. It follows your hand movements. And medical research has shown based on your hand movement, it can identify your age. So there are some innovative solutions out there. But whatever social media companies end up using, it's going to be balanced against privacy, and it must ensure it does not undermine a user's security. Research that's examined the link between social media use and teens' emotional states has come back mixed. There really is not a super clear causal link between greater use of social media and upticks in anxiety and depression among teens. So knowing this, isn't this law based on a false premise? Grant: For teens in marginalized communities, like the LGBTQA+ community, or teens with disabilities, or those who are neurodivergent, our own research has shown that online communities can provide a space for them to feel more at home — almost provide a lifeline — but also be places of hate. So both of these issues have been raised. I think the genesis of this movement has been Jonathan Haidt, author of the book The Anxious Generation , and he even admits some of the research is mixed. And it's true that it is not necessarily causal. But in many circumstances, it's certainly correlational. And this law is focused on the addictive design and features, and dark patterns that emerge on social media platforms. Now, messaging services and gaming apps will be exempt. The Minister of Communication will ultimately decide which platforms are in and which are out. And I will do my own separate analysis and make recommendations. Companies, like TikTok, have said pushing under-16 teens away from established social media apps could make young people drift toward darker corners of the internet where there are no rules or safety measures in place. What's your response to that? Grant: I believe we should approach online safety the same way we have water safety. And what I mean by that is: Decades ago, there were tragic backyard drownings in swimming pools. So Australia made a decisive decision that all pools would be fenced, and that would be backed by enforcement. But we don't try and fence the ocean because that's futile. What we do is we teach our children to swim at the youngest age, just like we need to teach them digital literacy. We teach them to swim between the flags. We have lifeguards. We have shark nets where we know there are predators and we teach them about rip [tides]. And you could use the analogy of the algorithmic rip. We want to keep them swimming between the flags where there is supervision, so they aren't going to the darker, murkier waters where there is no supervision. So I think that is a reasonable concern. And the reason I refer to this as a social media restriction rather than a total ban is that messaging and gaming sites and anything that delivers education or health care information, like community forums, will be exempted. I talked to a 15-year-old in Australia who can't imagine living, or being social, without social media. What do you say to other teens who feel that way? Grant: I've been having high-level discussions with social media companies. And there's the possibility that some of the social media functionality could be removed, rather than an entire app being blocked off, to ensure those dark patterns and addictive design features are addressed. And maybe when they turn 16, the full functionality of the social media app can be enabled — whether that's the Snap Map, or being able to post Reels on Instagram. When this law takes effect, on Dec. 10, 2025, there's not going to be some switch that's flipped off. Every user under 16 will not automatically have their apps disappear. The first thing we've tasked social media companies with doing is identifying who all the under 16-year-old users are on their platforms. We did research in September of this year finding that 84% of 8- to 12-year-olds are already on social media. And interestingly, we asked, "Were your parents or any adults aware that you were setting up these social media accounts early?" And 80% of them said yes. And in 90% of cases, it was parents that helped them set up their accounts. So I wouldn't say it's necessarily willful blindness, but, to date, social media companies may not even exactly know how many under-16-year-old users are on their platforms. The onus to date has been falling on the parents and the children themselves, and this law is the government making a very definitive statement and saying: We need to put the burden back on you, companies, just like we did with car manufacturers 60 years ago with seatbelts. And now, there's so much lifesaving technology in our cars, like anti-lock brakes and airbags, that we take for granted. Back then, the car manufacturers pushed back, but now they compete on safety. This law is really aimed at making normative change, that the onus should fall on platforms. Copyright 2024 NPR
- Previous:
- Next: 5 richest man in the philippines
