winner777
The Electronic Privacy Information Center ( ) has urged the Dutch Data Protection Authority to protect students and employees from the harms of emotion recognition. The EU prohibits the development, deployment, and placement of emotion recognition systems in the EU market intended for workplaces and educational institutions, with limited exceptions for certain medical and safety reasons. However, the Dutch data protection agency Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) opened a consultation requesting feedback on the implementation of this prohibition. The Washington DC-based EPIC has urged AP to define emotion recognition systems broadly and to either allow for no exemptions for its use, or construe the medical and safety exemption narrowly. EPIC’s recommendation is based on the “complete lack of scientific evidence that these systems work,” the organization , and that they “violate” various protections enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and other EU regulations. EPIC regularly advocates for the protection of civil liberties and privacy rights, with focus on biometric surveillance, and has previously complained to the FTC on a . In addition, it has on the harms of emotion recognition, and warned the United States Department of Justice on the . AI-based emotion recognition systems make predictions about an individual’s emotional state based on biometric data such as heart rate, skin moisture, voice tone, gestures or facial expressions. However, the science behind “emotion recognition” can be barely construed as science. This is for the simple reason that inner emotions can be very hard to objectively measure based on a person’s external features. For example, a skilled movie actor can be read as sad or anguished or extremely happy, but it does not mean that they are genuinely experiencing those emotions within themselves. Researchers have found that and that these can also vary substantially across different cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Therefore, “objectively” assessing emotions is a misnomer. Furthermore, such technologies can display discrimination based on race, gender and disability. Australian researcher and lawyer Natalie Shard recently explained in a piece for The Conversation why she believes the Australian government should have specific regulations surrounding the use of such technologies, which can be read . | | | | | | | |
GoDaddy ( NYSE:GDDY – Free Report ) had its price objective upped by Robert W. Baird from $200.00 to $225.00 in a report released on Tuesday, Benzinga reports. The firm currently has an outperform rating on the technology company’s stock. Several other research firms also recently issued reports on GDDY. Piper Sandler increased their target price on GoDaddy from $172.00 to $176.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Thursday, October 31st. Cantor Fitzgerald reissued a “neutral” rating and set a $170.00 price objective on shares of GoDaddy in a report on Monday, October 7th. Raymond James lifted their target price on GoDaddy from $150.00 to $175.00 and gave the company a “strong-buy” rating in a report on Friday, August 2nd. StockNews.com downgraded shares of GoDaddy from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Friday, November 8th. Finally, B. Riley raised their price target on shares of GoDaddy from $170.00 to $190.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, October 31st. Five research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, nine have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. According to MarketBeat, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $173.31. View Our Latest Stock Report on GDDY GoDaddy Stock Up 1.8 % GoDaddy ( NYSE:GDDY – Get Free Report ) last released its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, October 30th. The technology company reported $1.32 EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $1.25 by $0.07. GoDaddy had a net margin of 41.74% and a return on equity of 267.29%. The business had revenue of $1.15 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $1.14 billion. During the same period in the prior year, the firm earned $0.89 earnings per share. The company’s revenue was up 7.3% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, equities research analysts anticipate that GoDaddy will post 4.95 EPS for the current year. Insider Activity at GoDaddy In related news, COO Roger Chen sold 1,000 shares of GoDaddy stock in a transaction on Friday, November 15th. The shares were sold at an average price of $183.80, for a total value of $183,800.00. Following the transaction, the chief operating officer now directly owns 185,632 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $34,119,161.60. The trade was a 0.54 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this link . Also, CFO Mark Mccaffrey sold 5,500 shares of the stock in a transaction on Wednesday, August 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $164.75, for a total transaction of $906,125.00. Following the sale, the chief financial officer now directly owns 101,286 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $16,686,868.50. The trade was a 5.15 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . In the last 90 days, insiders have sold 29,845 shares of company stock valued at $4,803,380. Insiders own 0.61% of the company’s stock. Institutional Inflows and Outflows A number of hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of GDDY. Anchor Investment Management LLC bought a new stake in shares of GoDaddy in the 3rd quarter worth approximately $31,000. Te Ahumairangi Investment Management Ltd lifted its stake in GoDaddy by 86.8% in the third quarter. Te Ahumairangi Investment Management Ltd now owns 15,012 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $2,340,000 after acquiring an additional 6,974 shares during the period. TD Private Client Wealth LLC boosted its holdings in GoDaddy by 7.0% in the third quarter. TD Private Client Wealth LLC now owns 8,197 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $1,285,000 after acquiring an additional 539 shares in the last quarter. Coldstream Capital Management Inc. purchased a new position in GoDaddy during the 3rd quarter valued at $314,000. Finally, Geode Capital Management LLC raised its holdings in GoDaddy by 2.5% in the 3rd quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 3,423,622 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $535,153,000 after purchasing an additional 84,550 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 90.28% of the company’s stock. About GoDaddy ( Get Free Report ) GoDaddy Inc engages in the design and development of cloud-based products in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments: Applications and Commerce, and Core Platform. The Applications and Commerce segment provides applications products, including Websites + Marketing, a mobile-optimized online tool that enables customers to build websites and e-commerce enabled online stores; and Managed WordPress, a streamlined and optimized website building that allows customers to easily build and manage a faster WordPress site; Managed WooCommerce Stores to sell anything and anywhere online; and marketing tools and services, such as GoDaddy Studio mobile application, search engine optimization, Meta and Google My Business, and email and social media marketing designed to help businesses acquire and engage customers and create content. Read More Receive News & Ratings for GoDaddy Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for GoDaddy and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Will Howard passed for two touchdowns and rushed for another, TreVeyon Henderson ran for a score and No. 2 Ohio State beat previously undefeated No. 5 Indiana 38-15 on Saturday. All Ohio State (10-1, 7-1 Big Ten, CFP No. 2) has to do now is beat Michigan at home next Saturday and it will earn a return to the Big Ten championship game for the first time since 2020 and get a rematch with No. 1 Oregon. The Ducks beat Ohio State 32-31 in a wild one back on Oct. 12. The Hoosiers (10-1, 7-1, No. 5 CFP) had their best chance to beat the Buckeyes for the first time since 1988 but were hurt by special teams mistakes and disrupted by an Ohio State defence that sacked Canadian quarterback Kurtis Rourke five times. “In life, all good things come to an end,” Indiana coach Curt Cignetti said. Late in the first half, Indiana punter James Evans fumbled a snap and was buried at his own 7-yardline with the Buckeyes taking over. That turned quickly into a 4-yard TD run by Henderson that gave the Buckeyes a 14-7 lead. Early in the second half, Caleb Downs fielded an Evans punt at the Ohio State 21, raced down the right sideline, cut to the middle and outran the coverage for a TD that put the Buckeyes up 21-7. It was the first time a Buckeye returned a punt for a touchdown since 2014. Howard finished 22 for 26 for 201 yards. Emeka Egbuka had seven catches for 80 yards and a TD. “Our guys just played with a chip today, and that’s the way you got to play the game of football,” Ohio State coach Ryan Day said. Indiana scored on its first possession of the game and its last, both short runs by Ty Son Lawson, who paced the Hoosiers with 79 rushing yards. Rourke, a 24-year-old from Oakville, Ont., is the brother of BC Lions QB Nathan Rourke. He was 8 for 18 for 68 yards. “We had communication errors, pass (protection), every time we dropped back to pass, something bad happened," Cignetti said. Indiana's 151 total yards was its lowest of the season. And it was the most points surrendered by the Hoosier's defence. The takeaway Indiana: Its special season was blemished by the Buckeyes, who beat the Hoosiers for the 30th straight time. Indiana was eyeing its first conference crown since sharing one with two other teams in 1967. That won't happen now. “Ohio State deserved to win,” Cignetti said. “They had those (third quarter scores), and we just couldn’t respond.” Ohio State: Didn't waste the opportunities presented by the Hoosiers when they got sloppy. The Buckeyes led 14-7 at the break and took control in the second half. An offensive line patched together because of multiple injuries performed surprisingly well. “We know what was at stake," Day said. “We don't win this game, and we have no chance to go to Indianapolis and play in the Big Ten championship. And that's real. We've had that approach for the last few weeks now, more than that.” Poll implications Some voters were obviously unsure of Indiana because it hadn't played a nationally ranked team before Ohio State. After this one, the Hoosiers will drop. All about Will Howard made history by completing 80% of his passes for the sixth time this season. No other Ohio State quarterback has done that. He completed his first 14 passes in a row and finished with a 85% completion rate. “I think Buckeye nation is now seeing, after 11 games, that this guy is a winner, he's tough, he cares about his teammates, he's a leader,” Day said. Up next Indiana hosts Purdue in the regular-season finale next Saturday. Ohio State hosts rival Michigan on Saturday. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football Mitch Stacy, The Associated Press
NonePitt quarterback Eli Holstein leaves game with left leg injury against LouisvilleNTPC Green Energy IPO Wrap: Allotment, GMP, And Key Listing Details; Everything You Need To KnowMichael Saylor Reveals MicroStrategy Is 'Making $500M A Day' With Bitcoin: 'May Very Well Be The Most Profitable Company In The US Growing The Fastest Right Now' - Benzinga
NEW YEAR, NEW LOOK: HYATT CENTRIC SOUTH BEACH MIAMI DEBUTS ELEVATED STYLE AND LUXURY
- Previous:
- Next: winner777 login
