7xm dev
LOS ANGELES , Dec. 20, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP ("GPM") announces that investors with substantial losses have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit against ASML Holding N.V. ("ASML" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: ASML ). Class Period: January 24, 2024 – October 15, 2024 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 13, 2025 If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the ASML lawsuit, you can submit your contact information at www.glancylaw.com/cases/asml-holding-nv/ . You can also contact Charles H. Linehan , of GPM at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, or via email at [email protected] to learn more about your rights. The complaint filed alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the issues being faced by suppliers, like ASML, in the semiconductor industry were much more severe than Defendants had indicated to investors; (2) the pace of recovery of sales in the semiconductor industry was much slower than Defendants had publicly acknowledged; (3) Defendants had created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to customer demand and anticipated growth, while also downplaying risk from macroeconomic and industry fluctuations, as well as stronger regulations restricting the export of semiconductor technology, including the products that ASML sells; and (4) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn , Twitter , or Facebook . To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to the pending class action lawsuit, please contact Charles Linehan, Esquire , of GPM, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067 at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, by email to [email protected] , or visit our website at www.glancylaw.com . If you inquire by email please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. Contacts Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP , Los Angeles Charles Linehan , 310-201-9150 or 888-773-9224 [email protected] www.glancylaw.com SOURCE Glancy Prongay & Murray LLPEpsilon Energy Ltd. Announces Quarterly DividendNintendo Switch 2 Leak: Hall-Effect Sticks, Docked Power Boost, and More!
Wade Taylor IV helps No. 22 Texas A&M get by Texas Tech
Recursion Pharmaceuticals Reports Grant of Inducement Awards as Permitted by the Nasdaq Listing ...Trump's Republican Party is increasingly winning union voters. It's a shift seen in his labor pickTrump's tariff threat a grim reminder of turbulent trade in first administration
Pune, Nov 23 (PTI) Many candidates in western Maharashtra who had switched over from other parties ahead of the assembly elections suffered defeats, in what could be a public message against political opportunism. Former state minister Harshvardhan Patil, who recently joined Sharad Pawar’s NCP (SP), lost in Indapur to sitting Congress MLA Dattatray Bharne fielded by Ajit Pawar-led NCP by a margin of 19,410 votes. Bharne polled 1,17,236 votes compared to 97,826 votes by Patil. Notably, Patil had left the Congress before the 2019 state elections to join the BJP but was similarly defeated by Bharne, who was then with the undivided NCP. In Kolhapur’s Kagal constituency, Samarjeet Ghatge, another turncoat, was trounced by NCP minister Hasan Mushrif by 11,581 votes. Ghatge had moved from the BJP to NCP (SP) before the elections. Meanwhile, in Tasgaon of Sangli district, former BJP MP Sanjaykaka Patil, who joined NCP to contest the polls, was defeated by Rohit Patil by 27,644 votes. Rohit Patil, son of former home minister R R Patil, polled 1,28,403 votes, while Sanjaykaka Patil secured 1,00,759 votes. (This story has not been edited by THE WEEK and is auto-generated from PTI)Biden and Trump lead tributes to 'extraordinary' Jimmy Carter after deathTrump says he can’t guarantee tariffs won’t raise US prices
Jonah Goldberg Among elites across the ideological spectrum, there's one point of unifying agreement: Americans are bitterly divided. What if that's wrong? What if elites are the ones who are bitterly divided while most Americans are fairly unified? History rarely lines up perfectly with the calendar (the "sixties" didn't really start until the decade was almost over). But politically, the 21st century neatly began in 2000, when the election ended in a tie and the color coding of electoral maps became enshrined as a kind of permanent tribal color war of "red vs. blue." Elite understanding of politics has been stuck in this framework ever since. Politicians and voters have leaned into this alleged political reality, making it seem all the more real in the process. I loathe the phrase "perception is reality," but in politics it has the reifying power of self-fulfilling prophecy. Like rival noble families in medieval Europe, elites have been vying for power and dominance on the arrogant assumption that their subjects share their concern for who rules rather than what the rulers can deliver. Political cartoonists from across country draw up something special for the holiday In 2018, the group More in Common published a massive report on the "hidden tribes" of American politics. The wealthiest and whitest groups were "devoted conservatives" (6%) and "progressive activists" (8%). These tribes dominate the media, the parties and higher education, and they dictate the competing narratives of red vs. blue, particularly on cable news and social media. Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of Americans resided in, or were adjacent to, the "exhausted majority." These people, however, "have no narrative," as David Brooks wrote at the time. "They have no coherent philosophic worldview to organize their thinking and compel action." Lacking a narrative might seem like a very postmodern problem, but in a postmodern elite culture, postmodern problems are real problems. It's worth noting that red vs. blue America didn't emerge ex nihilo. The 1990s were a time when the economy and government seemed to be working, at home and abroad. As a result, elites leaned into the narcissism of small differences to gain political and cultural advantage. They remain obsessed with competing, often apocalyptic, narratives. That leaves out most Americans. The gladiatorial combatants of cable news, editorial pages and academia, and their superfan spectators, can afford these fights. Members of the exhausted majority are more interested in mere competence. I think that's the hidden unity elites are missing. This is why we keep throwing incumbent parties out of power: They get elected promising competence but get derailed -- or seduced -- by fan service to, or trolling of, the elites who dominate the national conversation. There's a difference between competence and expertise. One of the most profound political changes in recent years has been the separation of notions of credentialed expertise from real-world competence. This isn't a new theme in American life, but the pandemic and the lurch toward identity politics amplified distrust of experts in unprecedented ways. This is a particular problem for the left because it is far more invested in credentialism than the right. Indeed, some progressives are suddenly realizing they invested too much in the authority of experts and too little in the ability of experts to provide what people want from government, such as affordable housing, decent education and low crime. The New York Times' Ezra Klein says he's tired of defending the authority of government institutions. Rather, "I want them to work." One of the reasons progressives find Trump so offensive is his absolute inability to speak the language of expertise -- which is full of coded elite shibboleths. But Trump veritably shouts the language of competence. I don't mean he is actually competent at governing. But he is effectively blunt about calling leaders, experts and elites -- of both parties -- stupid, ineffective, weak and incompetent. He lost in 2020 because voters didn't believe he was actually good at governing. He won in 2024 because the exhausted majority concluded the Biden administration was bad at it. Nostalgia for the low-inflation pre-pandemic economy was enough to convince voters that Trumpian drama is the tolerable price to pay for a good economy. About 3 out of 4 Americans who experienced "severe hardship" because of inflation voted for Trump. The genius of Trump's most effective ad -- "Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you" -- was that it was simultaneously culture-war red meat and an argument that Harris was more concerned about boutique elite concerns than everyday ones. If Trump can actually deliver competent government, he could make the Republican Party the majority party for a generation. For myriad reasons, that's an if so big it's visible from space. But the opportunity is there -- and has been there all along. Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch: thedispatch.com . Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!EXCLUSIVE Woe de parfum! Harrods perfume seller accuses rival of hurling card reader at her in squabble By JAMES TOZER and MARY O CONNOR Published: 22:02, 8 December 2024 | Updated: 22:48, 8 December 2024 e-mail View comments Harrods bills its marble-lined, sixth floor 'salon de perfums' – famed for selling the most exclusive scents – as a 'secluded scented nirvana' aimed at the most discerning customer. But when it came to staff selling the 'hand-selected brands', things were not as fragrant, it has been alleged. Tempers flared between staff at rival concessions at the West End department store, according to a tribunal claim. Natalia Pytel, who was employed by Luxe Associates, alleged that a worker at competitor brand Edeniste made 'spiteful' comments about the products she was selling from an adjacent desk. Their dispute culminated when the employee – referred to only as Evie – was said to have thrown a card reader machine at Ms Pytel. Ms Pytel complained both to Luxe Associates and Harrods – but CCTV footage was said to have shown 'nothing untoward'. She was then sacked by Luxe Associates after being accused of being rude to a customer. Ms Pytel, who is Polish, brought an employment tribunal case against Harrods. She alleged unfair dismissal, detriment for making a whistleblowing public interest disclosure, and harassment under the Equality Act. Natalia Pytel (pictured) who was employed by Luxe Associates, alleged that a worker at competitor brand Edeniste made 'spiteful' comments about the products she was selling from an adjacent desk Their dispute culminated when the employee – referred to only as Evie – was said to have thrown a card reader machine at Ms Pytel who is pictured here Ms Pytel, who is Polish, brought an employment tribunal case against Harrods. She alleged unfair dismissal, detriment for making a whistleblowing public interest disclosure, and harassment under the Equality Act But at a preliminary hearing in London the case was struck out because a judge said her complaints had no reasonable prospect of success. Ms Pytel accepted that Harrods hadn't employed her, and she only had five months service with Luxe Associates– the minimum service for making an unfair dismissal claim is currently two years. In a statement in support of her claim, Ms Pytel – who began work at the concession in February last year - said: 'I struggled to work with one of the girls from a neighbour brand. 'Every day she was making spiteful comments about my brands and was aggressively behaving towards me.'On June 13 she threw a PDQ card reader machine at me. 'I felt unsafe working around her so I decided I would ask for help.' After Ms Pytel spoke out, counter-claims were made against her, according to tribunal documents.She was sacked on July 24 last year. In her claim, Ms Pytel said a manager subsequently informed her that 'I did not fit into perfumery and was rude to a customer, therefore he decided to terminate my contract'. She claimed that she asked a colleague to assist, but the colleague was 'extremely rude' to the customer and refused to process the refund he initially requested. Ms Pytel complained both to Luxe Associates and Harrods – but CCTV footage was said to have shown 'nothing untoward' (Stock image of Harrods) Ms Pytel – who represented herself - also alleged that she experienced 'harassment and bullying' by two shop floor managers. However Employment Judge Jonathan Gidney threw out all her claims, pointing out that she was never directly employed by Harrods. Her job was with the Luxe Associates concession, he stressed – but having only worked there for just over five months, she wasn't entitled to claim unfair dismissal. Ms Pytel's detriment claim also fell as she had not specified what disclosure she claimed to have made in the public interest. Finally her harassment claim was invalid as she did not specify any 'protected characteristic' – for example race, sex or religion – which allegedly led to her being singled out. 'There is, simply put, no reasonable prospect of [Ms Pytel] establishing her complaints against [Harrods], and accordingly, I strike [Ms Pytel's] claims out,' he concluded. Harrods and Luxe Associates were approached for comment. According to her social media profile, Ms Pytel now sells make-up at a different West End department store. Under Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner's controversial overhaul of workers' rights, employees will be able to launch unfair dismissal claim from their first day in a job. However companies would be able to keep new recruits on probation for up to nine months after business groups claimed the move would disincentive hiring. London Share or comment on this article: Woe de parfum! Harrods perfume seller accuses rival of hurling card reader at her in squabble e-mail Add commentPHILADELPHIA -- Saquon Barkley knew the Eagles season rushing record could be his on Sunday with the type of stellar performance that has become the standard during his first season in Philadelphia. As for the exact moment Barkley hit the milestone, he wasn't sure — until the “MVP!” chants echoed throughout the Linc after a 9-yard run in the fourth quarter . “The records are great, they put a smile on your face,” Barkley said, “but the season is far from over.” Needing 109 yards to break LeSean McCoy's record, Barkley rushed for 124 yards and pushed his season total to 1,623 in a 22-16 victory over Carolina . Barkley needed just 13 games to pass McCoy, who rushed for 1,607 yards in 2013. He also overtook Wilbert Montgomery, who had 1,512 yards in 1978. “I never wrote the goal down to break it,” Barkley said. “You're always aware of it. That's how I train. That's how I operate in the offseason. I want to be great.” Barkley also maintained his pace to break Eric Dickerson’s NFL single-season rushing record of 2,105 yards, set in 1984 with the Los Angeles Rams. “That would be extremely cool to do,” Barkley said. “If it happens, it happens, and not with the mindset of, I'm scared to go try to do it. Whatever it takes to win football games.” Barkley is averaging 124.8 yards per game. At that pace and with one more game to play than Dickerson, he would become the top single-season rusher in NFL history. He needs 483 yards yards over the final four games to top Dickerson’s 40-year-old record. He averaged 6.2 yards on 20 carries against the Panthers to help the Eagles win their ninth straight game. McCoy, who was inducted into the team's Hall of Fame this season, remains the franchise’s rushing leader with 6,792 yards. Referencing his old uniform number, McCoy congratulated Barkley on social media with “a lot of love, coming from 2-5." “Being a fan of Shady's growing up, and seeing the spectacular things he was able to do with the ball in his hand, to be able to have my name mentioned with him definitely means a lot,” Barkley said. Barkley left the New York Giants in the offseason and signed a three-year deal worth $26 million guaranteed to join the Eagles, who made him the highest-paid running back in franchise history. The 27-year-old has been worth every dollar. Barkley is among the favorites for league MVP, according to BetMGM Sportsbook. Buffalo Bills quarterback Josh Allen was the only player with better MVP odds entering Sunday. Barkley has a franchise-record nine 100-yard rushing games in a season. Although he was held out of the end zone Sunday, he began the day leading the league with four rushing touchdowns of 25-plus yards. Barkley, the No. 2 overall pick in the 2018 NFL draft, topped 1,000 yards three times in his six seasons with the Giants. He finished with 1,312 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns in 2022 and rushed for 1,307 yards and 11 scores as a rookie. Eagles general manager Howie Roseman, who had been unwilling to spend on elite running backs, pounced on Barkley and the decision was celebrated as a success in Philly from the first game of the season. Barkley rushed for two scores and caught a TD pass in the opener against Green Bay. His three touchdowns were the most by an Eagles player in his debut since Terrell Owens in 2004. Barkley only soared in production and popularity from there, his highlight reel stamped by a reverse leap over the head of a Jacksonville defender last month. He's since vaulted over every running back ahead of him on the Eagles rushing list — and has a chance at NFL history. ___ AP NFL: https://apnews.com/NFL
Sunday Night Football: Jayden Daniels carries Commanders into postseason with 30-24 OT win
True Pwr LLC: Leading The Charge In Solar Energy Solutions In Murrieta
- Previous: 7xm customer service
- Next: 7xm dot xyz