app bet365 android
app bet365 android
eXp Realty Launches Local Sponsor Partnership Program to Strengthen Global Agent SuccessSilvia Pinal Passes Away at 94 Who Are the Surviving Actresses of the Golden Age of Cinema? Divas of Cinema Still in the Spotlight Mexico was met with heartbreaking news on Thursday, November 28, with the passing of Silvia Pinal. The actress, who defined an era in Mexican Golden Age Cinema, died at 94 after health complications led to her hospitalization in Mexico City. Her death prompted numerous tributes on social media, where she was celebrated as «the last diva of the Mexican Golden Age of Cinema.» However, this claim sparked debate, as other prominent figures from that era are still alive and have left an indelible mark on the industry. WHO ARE THE SURVIVING ACTRESSES OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF CINEMA? Who Are the Surviving Actresses of the Golden Age of Cinema? – Photos: Mezcalent One such figure is María Victoria, born in Guadalajara in 1933, remembered for her iconic role in La criada bien criada. With a career spanning film, television, and music, she is considered one of Mexico’s most versatile artists. YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN: Silvia Pinal dies: A great figure of Mexican cinema Another notable actress is Elsa Aguirre, born in Chihuahua in 1930. Known for her work in drama and comedy, her beauty and talent earned her a special place in the hearts of Mexicans. Queens of the Silver Screen Irma Dorantes, famous for being married to Pedro Infante, is another enduring reference in Mexican cinema. Born in Mérida in 1934, she also had a successful career in music and film. Among the most celebrated actresses is Jacqueline Andere, born in Mexico City in 1938. Primarily recognized for her work in telenovelas, she began her career in the 1950s and remains active in the entertainment industry. Are These Golden Age Actresses Still in the Industry? Luz María Aguilar, born in Chihuahua in 1935, is another key figure, according to Infobae . Her talent spanned film, theater, and television, solidifying her as a highly respected actress. Finally, Ana Luisa Peluffo, born in Querétaro in 1929, is known for breaking barriers in national cinema. Her versatility made her a respected and admired actress in the industry. These women embody the greatness of Mexico’s Golden Age of Cinema, debunking the notion that Silvia Pinal was the last living diva. CLICK ON THE PHOTO TO LISTEN TO NATALIA RAMÍREZ DISCUSS THE TRUTH ABOUT THE NEW SEASON OF BETTY LA FEA Photo: MundoNOW if(typeof custom_paginate == "function")custom_paginate()
All-star Scottie Barnes returns to Raptors lineup vs. TimberwolvesBiden Says Jimmy Carter to Receive State Funeral in Washington
Musadik calls for holding dialogue to address national issuesRohit Sharma's struggles with the bat continued in the ongoing Border-Gavaskar Trophy, as the Indian captain failed to make an impact in the fourth Test at Melbourne. After a brief stint in the middle order during the second and third Tests, he moved back to his customary opening position but was dismissed cheaply for 3 and 9 in the two innings. With just 31 runs from five innings on this tour, Rohit's average stands at a dismal 6.20, the lowest for any visiting captain in a Test series in Australia. Currently, Rohit holds the unenviable record for the worst batting average for a visiting captain, surpassing the previous low of West Indies' Courtney Walsh (7.75). Despite missing the first Test due to paternity leave, Rohit returned to captaincy for the second Test at Adelaide, which India lost by 10 wickets. He had batted at No. 6 in the third Test but opted to open in Melbourne, where his bat failed again. In the battle of captains, Australia skipper Pat Cummins established his dominance over his counterpart Rohit Sharma on the final day of the fourth Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in Melbourne. Rohit came out to open alongside young Yashasvi Jaiswal to make a case for India to chase down a herculean 340-run total set by the hosts. Instead of going berserk in front of MCG stands filled with hopeful Indian fans, the opening duo decided to deal with caution and negate the threat of the new red ball. Rohit looked comfortable till the drinks break, and even after the resumption of the game, he grew more in confidence. After facing 39 deliveries and understanding the nature of the surface, Rohit felt it was time to take a chance against Cummins. The Indian skipper tried to flick Captain Fantastic but gave away a leading edge in the process to Mitchell Marsh, stationed at gully. The Indian skipper had to return to the dressing room with 9(40). This was the sixth instance of Rohit losing his wicket to Cummins in Test cricket, the most a captain has been dismissed by an opposition captain in the format. Former England captain Ted Dexter lost his wicket to former Australia captain Richie Benaud five times. Former India skipper Sunil Gavaskar is tied for the feat after losing his wicket five times to former Pakistan captain Imran Khan. After Rohit's dismissal, everything fell apart for the Indian team. KL Rahul joined the Indian skipper in the same over for a five-ball duck. Virat Kohli lost his discipline and got lured into playing a drive by left-armer Mitchell Starc on the final ball before lunch. Jaiswal and Rishabh Pant offered stability and assurance by leading the charge against the Australian bowling attack. Boundaries became more frequent, with Australian bowlers feeling tiredness creep up to them with each passing over. (With inputs from Agencies)
German far-right AfD leader is Chinese-speaking lesbian economistExtensive confidential documents in the lead-up to the collapse of Northern Ireland’s institutions in 2002 have been made available to the public as part of annual releases from the Irish National Archives. They reveal that the Irish Government wanted to appeal to the UK side against “manipulating” every scenario for favourable election results in Northern Ireland, in an effort to protect the peace process. In the years after the landmark 1998 Good Friday Agreement, a number of outstanding issues left the political environment fraught with tension and disagreement. Mr Trimble, who won a Nobel Peace Prize with SDLP leader John Hume for their work on the Agreement, was keen to gain wins for the UUP on policing, ceasefire audits and paramilitary disarmament – but also to present his party as firmer on these matters amid swipes from its Unionist rival, the DUP. These issues were at the front of his mind as he tried to steer his party into Assembly elections planned for May 2003 and continue in his role as the Executive’s first minister despite increasing political pressure. The documents reveal the extent to which the British and Irish Governments were trying to delicately resolve the contentious negotiations, conscious that moves seen as concessions to one group could provoke anger on the other side. In June 2002, representatives of the SDLP reported to Irish officials on a recent meeting between Mr Hume’s successor Mark Durkan and Prime Minister Tony Blair on policing and security. Mr Blair is said to have suggested that the SDLP and UUP were among those who both supported and took responsibility for the Good Friday Agreement. The confidential report of the meeting says that Mr Durkan, the deputy First Minister, was not sure that Mr Trimble had been correctly categorised. The Prime Minister asked if the SDLP could work more closely with the UUP ahead of the elections. Mr Durkan argued that Mr Trimble was not only not saleable to nationalists, but also not saleable to half of the UUP – to which Mr Blair and Northern Ireland Secretary John Reid are said to have laughed in agreement. The SDLP leader further warned that pursuing a “save David” campaign would ruin all they had worked for. Damien McAteer, an adviser for the SDLP, was recorded as briefing Irish officials on September 10 that it was his view that Mr Trimble was intent on collapsing the institutions in 2003 over expected fallout for Sinn Fein in the wake of the Colombia Three trial, where men linked to the party were charged with training Farc rebels – but predicted the UUP leader would be “in the toilet” by January, when an Ulster Unionist Council (UUC) meeting was due to take place. A week later in mid September, Mr Trimble assured Irish premier Bertie Ahern that the next UUC meeting to take place in two days’ time would be “okay but not great” and insisted he was not planning to play any “big game”. It was at that meeting that he made the bombshell announcement that the UUP would pull out of the Executive if the IRA had not disbanded by January 18. The move came as a surprise to the Irish officials who, along with their UK counterparts, did not see the deadline as realistic. Sinn Fein described the resolution as a “wreckers’ charter”. Doubts were raised that there would be any progress on substantive issues as parties would not be engaged in “pre-election skirmishing”. As that could lead to a UUP walkout and the resulting suspension of the institutions, the prospect of delaying the elections was raised while bringing forward the vote was ruled out. Therefore, the two Governments stressed the need to cooperate as a stabilising force to protect the Agreement – despite not being sure how that process would survive through the January 18 deadline. The Irish officials became worried that the British side did not share their view that Mr Trimble was not “salvageable” and that the fundamental dynamic in the UUP was now Agreement scepticism, the confidential documents state. In a meeting days after the UUC announcements, Mr Reid is recorded in the documents as saying that as infuriating as it was, Mr Trimble was at that moment the “most enlightened Unionist we have”. The Secretary said he would explore what the UUP leader needed to “survive” the period between January 18 and the election, believing a significant prize could avoid him being “massacred”. Such planning went out the window just weeks later, when hundreds of PSNI officers were involved in raids of several buildings – including Sinn Fein’s offices in Stormont. The resulting “Stormontgate” spy-ring scandal accelerated the collapse of powersharing, with the UUP pulling out of the institutions – and the Secretary of State suspending the Assembly and Executive on October 14. For his part, Irish officials were briefed that Mr Reid was said to be “gung ho” about the prospect of exercising direct rule – reportedly making no mention of the Irish Government in a meeting with Mr Trimble and Mr Durkan on that day. The Northern Ireland Secretary was given a new role and Paul Murphy was appointed as his successor. A note on speaking points for a meeting with Mr Murphy in April showed that the Irish side believed the May elections should go ahead: “At a certain stage the political process has to stand on its own feet. “The Governments cannot be manipulating and finessing every scenario to engineer the right result. “We have to start treating the parties and the people as mature and trusting that they have the discernment to make the right choices.” However, the elections planned for May did not materialise, instead delayed until November. Mr Trimble would go on to lose his Westminster seat – and stewardship of the UUP – in 2005. The November election saw the DUP emerge as the largest parties – but direct rule continued as Ian Paisley’s refused to share power with Sinn Fein, which Martin McGuinness’ colleagues. The parties eventually agreed to work together following further elections in 2007. – This article is based on documents in 2024/130/5, 2024/130/6, 2024/130/15
- Previous:
- Next: apuestas deportivas bet365
