russian roulette online
Winnipeg Jets (17-4, in the Central Division) vs. Minnesota Wild (13-3-4, in the Central Division) Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * Winnipeg Jets (17-4, in the Central Division) vs. Minnesota Wild (13-3-4, in the Central Division) Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? Winnipeg Jets (17-4, in the Central Division) vs. Minnesota Wild (13-3-4, in the Central Division) Saint Paul, Minnesota; Monday, 8 p.m. EST BOTTOM LINE: The Minnesota Wild play the Winnipeg Jets in a matchup of Central Division opponents. Minnesota is 13-3-4 overall and 2-1-2 against the Central Division. The Wild rank eighth in NHL play with 69 total goals (averaging 3.4 per game). Winnipeg has a 17-4 record overall and a 6-1-0 record in Central Division play. The Jets have a 9-0-0 record when scoring a power-play goal. Monday’s game is the second meeting between these teams this season. The Jets won the last matchup 2-1 in overtime. TOP PERFORMERS: Kirill Kaprizov has 13 goals and 21 assists for the Wild. Marat Khusnutdinov has over the past 10 games. Joshua Morrissey has two goals and 18 assists for the Jets. Cole Perfetti has scored goals over the past 10 games. LAST 10 GAMES: Wild: 6-2-2, averaging three goals, 4.9 assists, 3.4 penalties and 7.9 penalty minutes while giving up 2.1 goals per game. Jets: 7-3-0, averaging 3.3 goals, 4.9 assists, 4.3 penalties and 13 penalty minutes while giving up 2.3 goals per game. INJURIES: Wild: None listed. Jets: None listed. ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar. AdvertisementTopline TikTok asked the Supreme Court to take up its case challenging the federal government’s ban on the app Monday, as the popular social media company faces a last-minute scramble to preserve access to the app before the law—which bans TikTok unless it’s sold to a new company—takes effect next month, after a lower court upheld the law . Key Facts What To Watch For TikTok asked the Supreme Court to rule on its request to pause the law by Jan. 6, before the law is scheduled to take effect on Jan. 19. If there’s no ruling by Jan. 6, TikTok requested the Supreme Court issue an order that temporarily blocks the law to ensure the law won’t take effect while the court is deliberating. Crucial Quote “If Americans, duly informed of the alleged risks of ‘covert’ content manipulation, choose to continue viewing content on TikTok with their eyes wide open, the First Amendment entrusts them with making that choice, free from the Government’s censorship,” TikTok argued in its filing at the Supreme Court, claiming if the law is upheld, “Congress will have free rein to ban any American from speaking simply by identifying some risk that the speech is influenced by a foreign entity.” What Happens If Tiktok Ban Takes Effect? If the TikTok ban is allowed to take effect—either on Jan. 19 or later—it would mean Apple and Google would no longer host TikTok in their app stores, so users would not be able to download TikTok or update the app. The law also prohibits internet service providers from enabling TikTok’s “distribution, maintenance, or updating,” which would likely affect companies like Oracle, which hosts TikTok’s U.S. user data. TikTok has argued that provision of the law would mean companies could no longer “provid[e] the services that enable the TikTok platform to function, effectively shutting down TikTok in the United States.” The legislation does allow TikTok to keep operating if it separates itself from ByteDance, though TikTok has not yet announced any plans to do so and claimed ByteDance divesting from TikTok is “not possible technologically, commercially, or legally.” Can Trump Stop The Tiktok Ban? President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration is reportedly interested in “halting” the TikTok ban, but Trump has not yet announced any concrete commitment to doing so or suggested how he could oppose a ban. “We’ll take a look at TikTok,” Trump said at a press conference Monday, adding he has a “warm spot in my heart for TikTok” given his popularity with youth on the app. CNN reports Trump then met with TikTok CEO Shou Chew at the president-elect’s Mar-a-Lago estate on Monday after his press conference, but there are no reports on what the two discussed. It’s still unclear how Trump could oppose a ban, though legal experts have suggested the most viable way would be to negotiate a solution with TikTok that allows Trump to say the company is in compliance with the law, whether it has fully separated itself from ByteDance or not. James Lewis, director of the Strategic Technologies Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told NPR that China may be more willing to approve a sale of TikTok to an American owner if Trump backs off his threat of high tariffs on Chinese imports in exchange. Surprising Fact If the ban were to take effect and prohibit U.S. internet service providers from hosting TikTok’s user data, that could mean all of that personal data would be moved to China . Forbes reported in 2023 that’s what happened when the app shut down operations in India, with an unnamed TikTok employee saying, they “don’t think [Indians are] Key Background The TikTok ban was signed into law with bipartisan support after the app had long raised concerns among lawmakers, who banned the app from government devices before moving to outlaw it in the U.S. entirely. TikTok has consistently denied any wrongdoing or links to the Chinese government, though Forbes has reported on numerous concerns involving the app, including including TikTok spying on journalists , tracking “sensitive” words , promoting Chinese propaganda criticizing U.S. politicians and mishandling user data . The D.C. Circuit upheld the law in December after TikTok and individual creators on the app sued to overturn the ban, with a panel of judges backing the government’s assessment that banning it was necessary for national security. The judges were not sympathetic to TikTok’s First Amendment claims, arguing that the government wasn’t censoring any content on the app since it can all stay up if ByteDance just divests from TikTok and the law’s “divest-or-be-banned” approach is actually the least restrictive way to deal with the government’s security concerns. The appeals court then ruled Friday that TikTok’s request to temporarily block the law while the company goes to the Supreme Court was “unwarranted,” noting the company still has time to go to the high court before the law takes effect and striking down TikTok’s claims that pausing the ban is necessary to preserve the company’s First Amendment rights, since the court already ruled that the law does not violate those rights. Further Reading
Minnesota 30, Chicago 27, OT"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero in 45 BC "Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" 1914 translation by H. Rackham "But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?" 1914 translation by H. Rackham "But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?" To keep reading, please log in to your account, create a free account, or simply fill out the form below.
You’ve perhaps heard of GOG.com’s game preservation efforts. And that . And then there are the modernization projects for games like and , including side efforts like . And . But there’s more: Two recent open source projects highlight yet another major game reservation push, in this case to help classic games run well on modern PCs. This isn’t about piracy: In both cases, you have to own the original game. Both are quite interesting. Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift! The first is called . This is an “open re-implementation of including the Spearhead and Breakthrough expansions with modern features and bugfixes [and] with cross-platform support.” This project just hit a major (beta) milestone which its developers say make the game fully implemented on modern PCs. This includes the single-player campaigns provided by the core game and its two expansions, and even the multiplayer experience. And it’s not just for Windows. It works on Mac and Linux too. And on Windows 11 on Arm (!). To use openmohaa, you have to own , and as the developers note, (and maybe elsewhere). . There’s also TRX, which is described as an open source implementation of the original two games. As with openmohaa, there’s a GitHub page for the project, and as with that project, you need the original games, which you can find on ($9.99 for both) and ($6.99 each). works now on Windows, Mac, and Linux, but is currently Windows-only. Interesting stuff. I assume there are more projects like this, so let me know if you’re aware of any. And there will be almost certainly others coming in the future as well. Paul Thurrott is an award-winning technology journalist and blogger with 30 years of industry experience and the author of 30 books. He is the owner of and the host of three tech podcasts: with Leo Laporte and Richard Campbell, , and with Brad Sams. He was formerly the senior technology analyst at Windows IT Pro and the creator of the SuperSite for Windows from 1999 to 2014 and the Major Domo of Thurrott.com while at BWW Media Group from 2015 to 2023. You can reach Paul via , or . Join the crowd where the love of tech is real - become a Thurrott Premium Member today! Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday
Gap Inc. Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2024 Results, Raises Full Year OutlookSeibert misses an extra point late as the Commanders lose their 3rd in a row, 34-26 to the Cowboys
NoneFrench Government Collapses After Vote Of No Confidence
Supercomputing center nears debutThe decision by special counsel Jack Smith, who had fiercely sought to hold Mr Trump criminally accountable for his efforts to subvert the 2020 election, represented the end of the federal effort against the former president following his election victory this month despite the election-related cases and multiple other unrelated criminal charges against him. The move, announced in court papers, marks the end of the Justice Department’s landmark effort to hold Mr Trump accountable for what prosecutors called a criminal conspiracy to cling to power in the run-up to his supporters’ attack on the US Capitol on January 6 2021. In court papers, prosecutors said the Justice Department’s position “is that the Constitution requires that this case be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated”. Mr Smith’s team emphasised that the move to abandon the prosecutions, in federal courts in Washington and Florida, was not a reflection of their view on the merits of the cases but rather a reflection of their commitment to longstanding department policy. “That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind,” the prosecutors wrote in Monday’s court filing in the election interference case. The decision was expected after Mr Smith’s team began assessing how to wind down both the 2020 election interference case and the separate classified documents case in the wake of Mr Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris. The Justice Department believes Trump can no longer be tried in accordance with longstanding policy that says sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted. Mr Trump has cast both cases as politically motivated and has vowed to fire Mr Smith as soon as he takes office in January. The 2020 election case brought last year was once seen as one of the most serious legal threats facing the Republican as he vied to reclaim the White House. However, it quickly stalled amid legal fighting over Mr Trump’s sweeping claims of immunity from prosecution for acts he took while in the White House. The US Supreme Court in July ruled for the first time that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution, and sent the case back to US District Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine which allegations in the indictment, if any, could proceed to trial. The case was just beginning to pick up steam again in the trial court in the weeks leading up to this year’s election. Mr Smith’s team filed a lengthy brief in October laying out new evidence they planned to use against him at trial, accusing him of “resorting to crimes” in an increasingly desperate effort to overturn the will over voters after he lost to President Joe Biden.Twins tender contracts to all arbitration-eligible players; reach terms with three
Mumbai: The V P Road Police have registered a case against three Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers for allegedly assaulting a shopkeeper in South Mumbai's Girgaon area and circulating a video of the incident. Following the FIR, the police have issued notices to the accused, summoning them for questioning. The case has been registered against MNS workers Kuldip Bapardekar, Arjun Jadhav, and Nagesh Hatankar under sections 127(2), 115(2), and 3(5) of the BNS Act. Investigations are ongoing. The altercation reportedly occurred after a Marathi woman, Vimal Mhaskar, complained to MNS workers about a Marwari shopkeeper, Babulal Prajapti, who allegedly insisted on speaking in Marwari with her while she was shopping. In response, the MNS workers confronted the shopkeeper, slapped him, and recorded the act. The video of the assault was shared widely on social media on Tuesday, November 3, prompting the police to take action. In #Mumbai #MNS workers slap shopkeepers in the Girgaon area of South Mumbai,after he ask women to speak to him in Marwadi instead of Marathi Shopkeepers says Now' BJP emergence to power in the state,अब मारवाड़ी में बात करने का मराठी में नहीं,अब बीजेपी की सत्ता आई है। pic.twitter.com/UMyAtOcbxE The V P Road Police have stated that further inquiries are underway to gather evidence and determine the exact sequence of events. The accused MNS workers are expected to provide their statements soon. This incident has sparked debates about linguistic tolerance and appropriate behavior in public spaces, with authorities urging citizens to report grievances through legal channels instead of resorting to violence.
Islanders host the Red Wings after Palmieri's 2-goal gameIntel expects US to shave chip-making grant, sources sayWith bowl drought quenched, Matt Rhule eager to see Nebraska football set new 'standard'
Neighbors: Chris Vodopich enjoys keeping busy, volunteering
NoneNone
- Previous: russian roulette game online
- Next: to play roulette
