magic mixies genie lamp

Tongaat to offload Zim operations to Vision ownersWhat we can VERIFY about Enron’s return to the internetmagic mixies genie lamp 。

Congress readies nearly $900 billion in defense spending

CHICAGO (AP) — As Donald Trump’s Cabinet begins to take shape, those on both sides of the abortion debate are watching closely for clues about how his picks might affect reproductive rights policy in the president-elect’s second term . Trump’s cabinet picks offer a preview of how his administration could handle abortion after he repeatedly flip-flopped on the issue on the campaign trail. He attempted to distance himself from anti-abortion allies by deferring to states on abortion policy, even while boasting about nominating three Supreme Court justices who helped strike down the constitutional protections for abortion that had stood for half a century. In an NBC News interview that aired Sunday, Trump said he doesn't plan to restrict medication abortion but also seemed to leave the door open, saying “things change.” “Things do change, but I don't think it's going to change at all,” he said. The early lineup of his new administration , including nominations to lead health agencies, the Justice Department and event the Department of Veterans Affairs, has garnered mixed — but generally positive — reactions from anti-abortion groups. Abortion law experts said Trump's decision to include fewer candidates with deep ties to the anti-abortion movement could indicate that abortion will not be a priority for Trump's administration. “It almost seems to suggest that President Trump might be focusing his administration in other directions," said Greer Donley, an associate law professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Karen Stone, vice president of public policy at Planned Parenthood Action Fund , said while many of the nominees have “extensive records against reproductive health care,” some do not. She cautioned against making assumptions based on Trump's initial cabinet selections. Still, many abortion rights groups are wary, in part because many of the nominees hold strong anti-abortion views even if they do not have direct ties to anti-abortion activists. They're concerned that an administration filled with top-level officials who are personally opposed to abortion could take steps to restrict access to the procedure and funding. After Trump’s ambiguity about abortion during his campaign, "there’s still a lot we don’t know about what policy is going to look like," said Mary Ruth Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law. That approach may be revealed as the staffs within key departments are announced. Trump announced he would nominate anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Health and Human Services Department, which anti-abortion forces have long targeted as central to curtailing abortion rights nationwide. Yet Kennedy shifted on the issue during his own presidential campaign. In campaign videos, Kennedy said he supports abortion access until viability , which doctors say is sometime after 21 weeks, although there is no defined timeframe. But he also said “every abortion is a tragedy” and argued for a national ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy, a stance he quickly walked back. The head of Health and Human Services oversees Title X funding for a host of family planning services and has sweeping authority over agencies that directly affect abortion access, including the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The role is especially vital amid legal battles over a federal law known as EMTALA, which President Joe Biden’s administration has argued requires emergency abortion access nationwide, and FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. Mini Timmaraju, president of the national abortion rights organization Reproductive Freedom for All, called Kennedy an “unfit, unqualified extremist who cannot be trusted to protect the health, safety and reproductive freedom of American families.” His potential nomination also has caused waves in the anti-abortion movement. Former Vice President Mike Pence , a staunch abortion opponent, urged the Senate to reject Kennedy’s nomination. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the national anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said the group had its own concerns about Kennedy. “There’s no question that we need a pro-life HHS secretary," she said. Fox News correspondent Marty Makary is Trump’s pick to lead the FDA, which plays a critical role in access to medication abortion and contraception. Abortion rights groups have accused him of sharing misinformation about abortion on air. Russell Vought , a staunch anti-abortion conservative, has been nominated for director of the Office of Management and Budget. Vought was a key architect of Project 2025 , a right-wing blueprint for running the federal government. Among other actions to limit reproductive rights, it calls for eliminating access to medication abortion nationwide, cutting Medicaid funding for abortion and restricting access to contraceptive care, especially long-acting reversible contraceptives such as IUD’s. Despite distancing himself from the conservative manifesto on the campaign trail, Trump is stocking his administration with people who played central roles in developing Project 2025. Trump acknowledged that drafters of the report would be part of his incoming administration during the Sunday interview with NBC News, saying “Many of those things I happen to agree with.” “These cabinet appointments all confirm that Project 2025 was in fact the blueprint all along, and the alarm we saw about it was warranted,” said Amy Williams Navarro, director of government relations for Reproductive Freedom for All. Dr. Mehmet Oz , Trump’s choice to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is a former television talk show host who has been accused of hawking dubious medical treatments and products. He voiced contradictory abortion views during his failed Senate run in 2022. Oz has described himself as “strongly pro-life, praised the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade , claimed “life starts at conception” and referred to abortion as “murder.” But he also has echoed Trump’s states-rights approach, arguing the federal government should not be involved in abortion decisions. “I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that’s always allowed our nation to thrive to put the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves,” he said during a Senate debate two years ago. An array of reproductive rights groups opposed his Senate run. As CMS administrator, Oz would be in a key position to determine Medicaid coverage for family planning services and investigate potential EMTALA violations. As Florida’s attorney general, Pam Bondi defended abortion restrictions, including a 24-hour waiting period. Now she’s Trump’s choice for attorney general . Her nomination is being celebrated by abortion opponents but denounced by abortion rights groups concerned she may revive the Comstock Act , an anti-vice law passed by Congress in 1873 that, among other things, bans mailing of medication or instruments used in abortion. An anti-abortion and anti-vaccine former Florida congressman, David Weldon, has been chosen to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which collects and monitors abortion data across the country. Former Republican congressman Doug Collins is Trump’s choice to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs amid a political battle over abortion access and funding for troops and veterans. Collins voted consistently to restrict funding and access to abortion and celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade. “This is a team that the pro-life movement can work with," said Kristin Hawkins, president of the national anti-abortion organization Students for Life. The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here . The AP is solely responsible for all content.'Booo!' Trump fans say they are 'disheartened' after he gives 'slap in the face to MAGA'

ABORIGINAL children continue to be disproportionately represented in deaths of children known to the Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ). Login or signup to continue reading In 2023, 42 of the 96 children who died and who were known to authorities were Aboriginal, the Child Death 2023 Annual Report says. The colonisation of Aboriginal land has had a devastating and long-lasting impact on Aboriginal people, the report says. "Past policy and legislation leading to the forced removal of Aboriginal children from their families and Country has resulted in profound, intergenerational trauma. "Ongoing, systemic disadvantage is reflected in the continuous over-representation of Aboriginal children in contact with child protection and out-of-home care system." It was imperative that DCJ look for ways to understand and address the disproportionate number of Aboriginal children in the system and engage in culturally reflective and responsive practice, the report says. In May 2024, the Minister for Families and Communities Kate Washington approved a DCJ plan to make interim changes to risk assessment to respond to concerns about a cultural bias within the previous 'structured decision making' risk assessment process. Since September, the department has started using the new 'family based assessment' process, the report says. "DCJ is redesigning the family preservation service system in NSW to improve outcomes, experience, suitability and accessibility for families who want to access and would benefit from working with a family preservation service," the report says. As part of ongoing reform, DCJ jas committed to growing the Aboriginal community controlled sector to ensure the child protection system has the capability and capacity to meet the needs of Aboriginal communities and families. Community health & welfare, social justice, investigations, general news.Gabriel.Fowler@newcastleherald.com.au Community health & welfare, social justice, investigations, general news.Gabriel.Fowler@newcastleherald.com.au DAILY Today's top stories curated by our news team. Also includes evening update. WEEKDAYS Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation. WEEKLY The latest news, results & expert analysis. WEEKDAYS Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening. WEEKLY Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters. WEEKLY Love footy? We've got all the action covered. WEEKLY Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe. WEEKLY Get the latest property and development news here. WEEKLY Going out or staying in? Find out what's on. WEEKDAYS Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more. WEEKLY Follow the Newcastle Knights in the NRL? Don't miss your weekly Knights update. TWICE WEEKLY Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday. WEEKLY Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarExpert, ACM's exclusive motoring partner. TWICE WEEKLY Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over. AS IT HAPPENS Be the first to know when news breaks. DAILY Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am! DAILY Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily!

Liverpool powered seven points clear at the top of the Premier League as the title favourites survived a scare in their 3-1 win against Leicester, while Bruno Fernandes was sent off in Manchester United's dismal 2-0 defeat at lowly Wolves. Erling Haaland missed a penalty as crisis-torn Manchester City failed to end their dismal run with a 1-1 draw against Everton, but it was United's travails and Liverpool's remarkable run that took centre-stage on Thursday. Arne Slot's side were shocked by Jordan Ayew's early strike at Anfield, but the leaders recovered their composure to equalise just before the interval through Cody Gakpo. England midfielder Jones marked his 100th top-flight appearance with the second goal soon after half-time. Mohamed Salah's 19th goal this term wrapped up Liverpool's 11th win in their last 13 games in all competitions. "We created enough, but because we went 1-0 down it was a game," Liverpool manager Slot said. "Then you saw how good we are and Leicester didn't want to come back into the game." Liverpool's comeback lifted them well clear of second-placed Chelsea, who were defeated 2-1 by Fulham earlier in the day. United suffered a third successive loss in all competitions to leave new boss Ruben Amorim with five defeats in his first 10 games. Fernandes was dismissed two minutes into the second half at Molineux for a second bookable offence. United's 10 men cracked in the 58th minute when Matheus Cunha's corner went straight in as goalkeeper Andre Onana flapped under pressure. Hwang Hee-chan compounded Amorim's misery when he tapped in with just seconds left. Losing to fourth-bottom Wolves was another bitter blow for United, who endured a humiliating 3-0 defeat by Bournemouth at Old Trafford last weekend after losing 4-3 in the League Cup at Tottenham. With his team marooned in 14th place -- just eight points above the relegation zone -- Amorim's woes might not be over, with United facing in-form Newcastle on Monday before travelling to Liverpool in their first game of 2025. "It's so tough to win games in this league with 11 men. With 10 men, it's more difficult," Amorim said. Champions Manchester City have just one victory in their last 13 games in all competitions as their Christmas schedule started in disappointing fashion. Bernardo Silva put City in front early on before Iliman Ndiaye salvaged a point for Everton. Seven minutes into the second half, Haaland had the chance to end his longest goal drought at the Etihad but Jordan Pickford denied him. City are languishing in seventh place and sit five points adrift of the top four, with their astonishing decline showing no sign of ending. "Of course we need results and we didn't get it. The team played really good again in all departments and unfortunately could not win," said City boss Pep Guardiola. At Stamford Bridge, Chelsea were stunned by Fulham's late fightback in a dramatic west London derby. It was Chelsea's first home defeat against Fulham since 1979. Cole Palmer put Chelsea ahead after 16 minutes, the England forward drilling home from the edge of the area after weaving through the Fulham defence in dazzling style. But Fulham levelled with eight minutes left when Harry Wilson nodded in from close range. There was worse to come for the Blues when Rodrigo Muniz completed the turnaround in the 95th minute. Nottingham Forest climbed to third place after a 1-0 win against sputtering Tottenham at the City Ground. Forest's fourth successive win was sweet revenge for boss Nuno Espirito Santo, whose former club Tottenham had Djed Spence sent off in the closing moments for a second booking. Tottenham are stuck in 11th as the pressure mounts on boss Ange Postecoglou. Newcastle swatted aside 10-man Aston Villa 3-0, moving up to fifth place after winning three consecutive league games for the first time since 2023. Jarrod Bowen's 59th-minute goal gave West Ham a 1-0 win at bottom of the table Southampton after the visitors saw Guido Rodriguez's red card overturned by VAR. It was a frustrating start for new Saints boss Ivan Juric, who has replaced the sacked Russell Martin. Bournemouth and Crystal Palace shared a goalless draw at the Vitality Stadium. smg/nf

Congress readies nearly $900 billion in defense spendingJAMAICA PEGASUS LAUNCHES 2024 BLACK FRIDAY/CYBER MONDAY SALEWASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump has promised to end birthright citizenship as soon as he gets into office to make good on campaign promises aiming to restrict immigration and redefining what it means to be American. But any efforts to halt the policy would face steep legal hurdles. Birthright citizenship means anyone born in the United States automatically becomes an American citizen. It's been in place for decades and applies to children born to someone in the country illegally or in the U.S. on a tourist or student visa who plans to return to their home country. It's not the practice of every country, and Trump and his supporters have argued that the system is being abused and that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen. But others say this is a right enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, it would be extremely difficult to overturn and even if it's possible, it's a bad idea. Here's a look at birthright citizenship, what Trump has said about it and the prospects for ending it: During an interview Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Trump said he “absolutely” planned to halt birthright citizenship once in office. “We’re going to end that because it’s ridiculous,” he said. Trump and other opponents of birthright citizenship have argued that it creates an incentive for people to come to the U.S. illegally or take part in “birth tourism,” in which pregnant women enter the U.S. specifically to give birth so their children can have citizenship before returning to their home countries. “Simply crossing the border and having a child should not entitle anyone to citizenship,” said Eric Ruark, director of research for NumbersUSA, which argues for reducing immigration. The organization supports changes that would require at least one parent to be a permanent legal resident or a U.S. citizen for their children to automatically get citizenship. Others have argued that ending birthright citizenship would profoundly damage the country. “One of our big benefits is that people born here are citizens, are not an illegal underclass. There’s better assimilation and integration of immigrants and their children because of birthright citizenship,” said Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the pro-immigration Cato Institute. In 2019, the Migration Policy Institute estimated that 5.5 million children under age 18 lived with at least one parent in the country illegally in 2019, representing 7% of the U.S. child population. The vast majority of those children were U.S. citizens. The nonpartisan think tank said during Trump’s campaign for president in 2015 that the number of people in the country illegally would “balloon” if birthright citizenship were repealed, creating “a self-perpetuating class that would be excluded from social membership for generations.” In the aftermath of the Civil War, Congress ratified the 14th Amendment in July 1868. That amendment assured citizenship for all, including Black people. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” the 14th Amendment says. “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” But the 14th Amendment didn't always translate to everyone being afforded birthright citizenship. For example, it wasn't until 1924 that Congress finally granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the U.S. A key case in the history of birthright citizenship came in 1898, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Wong Kim Ark, born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the states. The federal government had tried to deny him reentry into the county after a trip abroad on grounds he wasn’t a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act. But some have argued that the 1898 case clearly applied to children born of parents who are both legal immigrants to America but that it's less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status or, for example, who come for a short-term like a tourist visa. “That is the leading case on this. In fact, it’s the only case on this,” said Andrew Arthur, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports immigration restrictions. “It’s a lot more of an open legal question than most people think.” Some proponents of immigration restrictions have argued the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the 14th Amendment allows the U.S. to deny citizenship to babies born to those in the country illegally. Trump himself used that language in his 2023 announcement that he would aim to end birthright citizenship if reelected. Trump wasn't clear in his Sunday interview how he aims to end birthright citizenship. Asked how he could get around the 14th Amendment with an executive action, Trump said: “Well, we’re going to have to get it changed. We’ll maybe have to go back to the people. But we have to end it.” Pressed further on whether he'd use an executive order, Trump said “if we can, through executive action." He gave a lot more details in a 2023 post on his campaign website . In it, he said he would issue an executive order the first day of his presidency, making it clear that federal agencies “require that at least one parent be a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident for their future children to become automatic U.S. citizens.” Trump wrote that the executive order would make clear that children of people in the U.S. illegally “should not be issued passports, Social Security numbers, or be eligible for certain taxpayer funded welfare benefits.” This would almost certainly end up in litigation. Nowrasteh from the Cato Institute said the law is clear that birthright citizenship can’t be ended by executive order but that Trump may be inclined to take a shot anyway through the courts. “I don’t take his statements very seriously. He has been saying things like this for almost a decade," Nowrasteh said. "He didn’t do anything to further this agenda when he was president before. The law and judges are near uniformly opposed to his legal theory that the children of illegal immigrants born in the United States are not citizens." Trump could steer Congress to pass a law to end birthright citizenship but would still face a legal challenge that it violates the Constitution. Associated Press reporter Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.

FDA approves cancer drug developed by B.C.'s Zymeworks

Top 5 Cybersecurity Careers to Watch in 2025 12-26-2024 09:40 PM CET | Science & Education Press release from: ABNewswire Imagine a world where every swipe, click, or tap could put your data at risk. As we hurtle towards a more connected future, the demand for cybersecurity professionals has skyrocketed. It's not just about defending against hackers anymore - companies are hunting for experts who can anticipate threats, build ironclad defenses, and protect their most valuable asset: data. What's even better? They're willing to pay handsomely for it. Whether you're just starting out or looking to level up your career, the cybersecurity landscape in 2025 offers a treasure trove of high-paying opportunities. So, what are the roles that stand out? Which ones could lead you to six-figure salaries or more? In this blog, we will discover the Top 5 Highest-Paying Cybersecurity Jobs for 2025 [ https://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/key-cybersecurity-trends-and-skills-for-2025_722916.html ] and trust us, these roles aren't just lucrative; they're exciting and impactful. Ready to explore? Let's jump right in! 1. Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) A Chief Information Security Officer, or CISO, isn't just a job - it's a responsibility. Think of a CISO as the commander of a company's cybersecurity army. They strategize, oversee incident responses, and ensure that every corner of the organization is protected from cyber threats. With such a high level of accountability, it's no surprise that CISOs [ https://www.infosectrain.com/courses/cciso-certification-online-training/ ] are some of the best-paid professionals in the industry. By 2025, they can expect salaries ranging from $210,000 to $280,000, with industries like finance and healthcare often offering even higher figures. What Do You Need to Get There? * Key Certifications: CISSP, CISM, or CISA. * Skills: Risk management, IT governance, and a deep understanding of business operations. * Experience: Years of hands-on expertise and a proven track record in leadership roles. With the rise of cyber threats targeting critical industries, CISOs are indispensable, and the paycheck proves it. 2. Security Architect If you love designing and building secure systems, this role could be your calling. Security Architects are the masterminds who create the "blueprints" for an organization's cybersecurity infrastructure. They design secure networks, implement encryption protocols, and think three steps ahead of potential attackers. By 2025, Security Architects can earn between $155,000 and $260,000, making it one of the most rewarding roles for tech-savvy professionals. What Do You Need to Get There? * Key Certifications: CISSP, ISSAP, or CCSP. * Skills: Secure network design, cloud security expertise, and hands-on experience with firewalls and encryption tools. If you're someone who thrives on planning and innovation, this role offers both creative and financial satisfaction. 3. Cloud Security Engineer As the world moves to the cloud, the demand for Cloud Security Engineer [ https://www.infosectrain.com/courses/certified-cloud-security-engineer-training-course/]s has surged. These professionals ensure that platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud remain safe from breaches and vulnerabilities. In 2025, Cloud Security Engineers are expected to rake in $125,000 to $205,000 annually. With organizations increasingly reliant on cloud technology, this role offers both stability and growth. What Do You Need to Get There? * Key Certifications: AWS Certified Security Specialty, CCSP, or Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer. * Skills: Mastery of cloud platforms, network security, and data encryption. If you're fascinated by cloud computing, this is a career path that promises immense rewards. 4. Cybersecurity Manager/Director Are you a natural leader? As a Cybersecurity [ https://www.infosectrain.com/free-cybersecurity-training/ ] Manager or Director, you'll oversee policies, manage teams, and ensure rapid responses to cyber incidents. Think of yourself as the glue that holds a company's cybersecurity strategy together. By 2025, professionals in these roles can earn between $135,000 and $190,000, making it a great option for those who enjoy managing people and processes. What Do You Need to Get There? * Key Certifications: CISM, CISSP, or CCISO. * Skills: Leadership, policy creation, and incident response. For those who love strategy and teamwork, this role is as rewarding as it ge 5. Ethical Hacker Ever thought about getting paid to think like a hacker? Ethical Hackers [ https://www.infosectrain.com/courses/certified-ethical-hacker-ceh-training/ ], also known as penetration testers, are hired to uncover vulnerabilities in systems before malicious actors can exploit them. With salaries ranging from $105,000 to $165,000, Ethical Hackers are highly sought after by companies looking to strengthen their defenses. What Do You Need to Get There? * Key Certifications: CEH, OSCP, or CPENT. * Skills: Proficiency in tools like Kali Linux, programming expertise, and knowledge of network protocols. This role is perfect for those who enjoy solving puzzles and thinking outside the box Your Future Awaits Cybersecurity isn't just a career, it's a mission. As the digital world grows, so does the need for skilled professionals who can protect it. Whether you're aiming for a leadership position as a CISO or want to explore into the technical world as an Ethical Hacker, the opportunities are endless, and so are the rewards. Which of these roles excites you the most? Drop a comment below and let us know. And remember, the future of cybersecurity is bright and it could be yours for the taking. Salary Source Courtesy: Cybersecurity Ventures, Glassdoor, Robert Half's 2024 Salary Guide, Dice Insights, Payscale, and Cybersecurity Guide. Media Contact Company Name: InfosecTrain (An Intiative by Azpirantz Technologies LLP) Contact Person: Vikas Agrawal Email:Send Email [ https://www.abnewswire.com/email_contact_us.php?pr=top-5-cybersecurity-careers-to-watch-in-2025 ] Phone: 18008437890 Address:B7, Sector 1 City: Noida State: Uttar Pradesh 201301 Country: India Website: http://www.infosectrain.com This release was published on openPR.

The massive use of social media by Fijians, particularly during late-night hours, could soon affect the country’s productivity, according to Fiji Times Editor-in-Chief Fred Wesley. Speaking at the Cultural Heritage and Tolerance Symposium organized by the Asian Foundation in Suva yesterday, Wesley raised concerns about the growing impact of social media on the nation’s work ethic. Wesley highlighted the rising trend of people using social media well into the night, often until the early hours of the morning. He questioned the deepening influence of social media, which seems to be encroaching into the daily lives of many Fijians. The editor also expressed frustration over the lack of political will to address the issue of social media regulation and its impact. Wesley emphasized the urgency of taking action, especially given the rapid pace of online commenting as comments aren’t coming once a week as they’re coming by the minute. The three-day symposium continues today.