fa178

fa178 QB Daniel Jones disagrees with the Giants' decision to bench him and says he wants to play

Jonah Goldberg Among elites across the ideological spectrum, there's one point of unifying agreement: Americans are bitterly divided. What if that's wrong? What if elites are the ones who are bitterly divided while most Americans are fairly unified? History rarely lines up perfectly with the calendar (the "sixties" didn't really start until the decade was almost over). But politically, the 21st century neatly began in 2000, when the election ended in a tie and the color coding of electoral maps became enshrined as a kind of permanent tribal color war of "red vs. blue." Elite understanding of politics has been stuck in this framework ever since. Politicians and voters have leaned into this alleged political reality, making it seem all the more real in the process. I loathe the phrase "perception is reality," but in politics it has the reifying power of self-fulfilling prophecy. Like rival noble families in medieval Europe, elites have been vying for power and dominance on the arrogant assumption that their subjects share their concern for who rules rather than what the rulers can deliver. Political cartoonists from across country draw up something special for the holiday In 2018, the group More in Common published a massive report on the "hidden tribes" of American politics. The wealthiest and whitest groups were "devoted conservatives" (6%) and "progressive activists" (8%). These tribes dominate the media, the parties and higher education, and they dictate the competing narratives of red vs. blue, particularly on cable news and social media. Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of Americans resided in, or were adjacent to, the "exhausted majority." These people, however, "have no narrative," as David Brooks wrote at the time. "They have no coherent philosophic worldview to organize their thinking and compel action." Lacking a narrative might seem like a very postmodern problem, but in a postmodern elite culture, postmodern problems are real problems. It's worth noting that red vs. blue America didn't emerge ex nihilo. The 1990s were a time when the economy and government seemed to be working, at home and abroad. As a result, elites leaned into the narcissism of small differences to gain political and cultural advantage. They remain obsessed with competing, often apocalyptic, narratives. That leaves out most Americans. The gladiatorial combatants of cable news, editorial pages and academia, and their superfan spectators, can afford these fights. Members of the exhausted majority are more interested in mere competence. I think that's the hidden unity elites are missing. This is why we keep throwing incumbent parties out of power: They get elected promising competence but get derailed -- or seduced -- by fan service to, or trolling of, the elites who dominate the national conversation. There's a difference between competence and expertise. One of the most profound political changes in recent years has been the separation of notions of credentialed expertise from real-world competence. This isn't a new theme in American life, but the pandemic and the lurch toward identity politics amplified distrust of experts in unprecedented ways. This is a particular problem for the left because it is far more invested in credentialism than the right. Indeed, some progressives are suddenly realizing they invested too much in the authority of experts and too little in the ability of experts to provide what people want from government, such as affordable housing, decent education and low crime. The New York Times' Ezra Klein says he's tired of defending the authority of government institutions. Rather, "I want them to work." One of the reasons progressives find Trump so offensive is his absolute inability to speak the language of expertise -- which is full of coded elite shibboleths. But Trump veritably shouts the language of competence. I don't mean he is actually competent at governing. But he is effectively blunt about calling leaders, experts and elites -- of both parties -- stupid, ineffective, weak and incompetent. He lost in 2020 because voters didn't believe he was actually good at governing. He won in 2024 because the exhausted majority concluded the Biden administration was bad at it. Nostalgia for the low-inflation pre-pandemic economy was enough to convince voters that Trumpian drama is the tolerable price to pay for a good economy. About 3 out of 4 Americans who experienced "severe hardship" because of inflation voted for Trump. The genius of Trump's most effective ad -- "Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you" -- was that it was simultaneously culture-war red meat and an argument that Harris was more concerned about boutique elite concerns than everyday ones. If Trump can actually deliver competent government, he could make the Republican Party the majority party for a generation. For myriad reasons, that's an if so big it's visible from space. But the opportunity is there -- and has been there all along. Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch: thedispatch.com . Catch the latest in Opinion Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!Gaetz withdraws as Trump's pick for attorney general, averting confirmation battle in the Senate

Watch: Woman’s daring lion kiss goes viral; this is what internet saysPorter shot 9 for 12 (4 for 6 from 3-point range) and 4 of 4 from the free-throw line for the Blue Raiders (5-1). Essam Mostafa scored 20 points and added 10 rebounds. Kamari Lands shot 6 for 12, including 4 for 8 from beyond the arc to finish with 17 points. The Bulls (3-3) were led in scoring by Jayden Reid, who finished with 18 points, four assists and three steals. Jamille Reynolds added 17 points and nine rebounds for South Florida. Kasen Jennings finished with 13 points. Middle Tennessee led 51-33 at halftime, with Porter racking up 14 points. Mostafa led the way with a team-high 14 second-half points. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

Experience The New Hindi Music Video Banarasi Mohabbat By Akash Seth & Bandana Datta Recommended Playlist Russell Brand's Legal Troubles Deepen: Charges Loom as Prosecutors Review Assault Claims Randeep-Lin’s power-packed Delhi reception Showbiz round up with Delhi Times Showbiz round up with Delhi Times Top Viral Videos Dua Lipa Casually Announces Engagement To Callum Turner With Low-Key Holiday Snaps | WATCH Singer Dua Lipa is engaged to 'Fantastic Beasts' actor Callum Turner after less than a year of dating. The couple 'couldn't be happier' as they take their relationship to the next level. Dua shared photos from her holiday at home, showcasing ring-clad hands. Watch- Manmohan Singh Dies At 92; Remembering The 'Accidental Prime Minister' With Controversial Biopic You Can't Miss This Hora - Inside Selena Gomez & Benny Blanco's First Hanukkah As Engaged Couple Vinod Kambli Thanks Sachin Tendulkar From Hospital Bed, Gives Update Amid Health Concern | WATCH Shyam Benegal, Renowned Filmmaker, Passes Away at 90: PM Modi and Bollywood Pay Tribute to the Icon Megan Fox-Gun Kelly, Sabrina Carpenter-Barry Keoghan; 2024's Most Heartbreaking Hollywood Splits This year has been a rollercoaster of emotions in Tinseltown, with some of the most shocking celebrity breakups making headlines. From Megan Fox and Machine Gun Kelly’s fiery fallout to Sabrina Carpenter and Barry Keoghan’s unexpected split, these stories have left fans heartbroken. In this video, we look at the ugliest and most heartbreaking celebrity splits of 2024, revealing the stories behind the breakup and the shocking twists that led to these high-profile splits. Taylor Swift Surprises Fan At Kansas Children's Hospital With Unexpected Christmas Gift AP Dhillon, Divine Set the Stage on Fire at Karan Aujla’s Mumbai Show | WATCH Sandhya Theatre Woman's Death Case: Cops Say Allu Arjun Ignored Their Warning AP Dhillon vs Diljit Dosanjh: Instagram Drama Heats Up as AP Drops Major Proof– Will Diljit Respond? Vicky Kaushal’s Emotional Tribute Moves Karan Aujla to Tears at Mumbai Concert | WATCH Karan Aujla's recent concert in Mumbai was filled with emotional moments, particularly when actor Vicky Kaushal praised Karan's talent, bringing him to tears. The night also included a surprise appearance by Parineeti Chopra, adding to the excitement. Watch the video to experience these unforgettable moments and witness the crowd's reaction to these star-studded performances! Shah Rukh Khan, Aishwarya & Abhishek Bachchan Turn Kids’ School Annual Day Into A Glamour Fest RIP Zakir Hussain: Celebrities Pay Tribute to the Tabla Maestro's Timeless Legacy | WATCH Zakir Hussain Passes Away At 73, Takes Last Breath In US Hospital After Battling Heart Issues Liam Payne Case: Waiter Reveals New Details; Claims Declining Rolex Watch Offer Raj Kapoor's 100th Birth Anniversary Celebrated In Pakistan, Fans Cut Cake At Kapoor Haveli Pakistan's film lovers celebrated 100th birth anniversary of Raj Kapoor as they gathered at the iconic 'Kapoor Haveli' in Peshawar. Fans remembered legendary Bollywood filmmaker and marked the occasion with a cake cutting ceremony. Watch- 'Pushpa 2' Fan Death Case: Allu Arjun Sent To 14 Days Judicial Custody Varun Dhawan Calls Out 'Unfair Blame' on Allu Arjun Over 'Pushpa 2' Tragedy 'Pushpa 2' Stampede Case: Allu Arjun in Custody for Woman’s Death Jennifer Lopez Sparks Rumours With 'Extra' Closeness To Staff Short Videos Priyanka Chopra's Hand Gestures Spark Curiosity SRK Avoids Fall During Wild Airport Scene Sonu Nigam Always Leaves Us In Awe With His Presence Hina Khan Stuns In A Pink Kashmiri Salwar Suit Kareena Kapoor's Birthday Bash: A Glimpse of Her Fabulous Gift and Cake Aditya Roy Kapur’s Drool-Worthy Transformation Wamiqa Gabbi's Bold Look Steals All the Spotlight Neil Nitin Mukesh’s Emotional Goodbye to Bappa with Final Aarti Jackie’s Ganpati Aarti Moment; You Won’t Believe What He Brings Along Siddhant & Raghav’s Bromance Related Articles Mahesh Babu starrer 'Guntur Kaaram' to re-release on New Year's eve in limited screens IVE announces comeback with new album 'IVE EMPATHY' American Idol finalist Emmy Russell is expecting her first child with singer Tyler Ward After Kangana Ranaut, Honey Singh supports Diljit Dosanjh, slams states' hypocrisy over liquor advisories: 'Alcohol is in the culture, not just in Punjab' Politics heats up over 'Raghupati Raghav' bhajan at BJP event in Bihar, singer apologises NFL and Roc Nation 2024 Songs of the Season: From Lil Wayne to DJ Clue Hotel, resort rooms sold out for last week of Dec New stills released for upcoming movie 'Dark Nuns' featuring Song Hye Kyo, Jeon Yeo Been, and Lee Jin Uk MORE FROM E TIMES

Peering Into Hologic's Recent Short InterestJonah Goldberg Among elites across the ideological spectrum, there's one point of unifying agreement: Americans are bitterly divided. What if that's wrong? What if elites are the ones who are bitterly divided while most Americans are fairly unified? History rarely lines up perfectly with the calendar (the "sixties" didn't really start until the decade was almost over). But politically, the 21st century neatly began in 2000, when the election ended in a tie and the color coding of electoral maps became enshrined as a kind of permanent tribal color war of "red vs. blue." Elite understanding of politics has been stuck in this framework ever since. Politicians and voters have leaned into this alleged political reality, making it seem all the more real in the process. I loathe the phrase "perception is reality," but in politics it has the reifying power of self-fulfilling prophecy. Like rival noble families in medieval Europe, elites have been vying for power and dominance on the arrogant assumption that their subjects share their concern for who rules rather than what the rulers can deliver. Political cartoonists from across country draw up something special for the holiday In 2018, the group More in Common published a massive report on the "hidden tribes" of American politics. The wealthiest and whitest groups were "devoted conservatives" (6%) and "progressive activists" (8%). These tribes dominate the media, the parties and higher education, and they dictate the competing narratives of red vs. blue, particularly on cable news and social media. Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of Americans resided in, or were adjacent to, the "exhausted majority." These people, however, "have no narrative," as David Brooks wrote at the time. "They have no coherent philosophic worldview to organize their thinking and compel action." Lacking a narrative might seem like a very postmodern problem, but in a postmodern elite culture, postmodern problems are real problems. It's worth noting that red vs. blue America didn't emerge ex nihilo. The 1990s were a time when the economy and government seemed to be working, at home and abroad. As a result, elites leaned into the narcissism of small differences to gain political and cultural advantage. They remain obsessed with competing, often apocalyptic, narratives. That leaves out most Americans. The gladiatorial combatants of cable news, editorial pages and academia, and their superfan spectators, can afford these fights. Members of the exhausted majority are more interested in mere competence. I think that's the hidden unity elites are missing. This is why we keep throwing incumbent parties out of power: They get elected promising competence but get derailed -- or seduced -- by fan service to, or trolling of, the elites who dominate the national conversation. There's a difference between competence and expertise. One of the most profound political changes in recent years has been the separation of notions of credentialed expertise from real-world competence. This isn't a new theme in American life, but the pandemic and the lurch toward identity politics amplified distrust of experts in unprecedented ways. This is a particular problem for the left because it is far more invested in credentialism than the right. Indeed, some progressives are suddenly realizing they invested too much in the authority of experts and too little in the ability of experts to provide what people want from government, such as affordable housing, decent education and low crime. The New York Times' Ezra Klein says he's tired of defending the authority of government institutions. Rather, "I want them to work." One of the reasons progressives find Trump so offensive is his absolute inability to speak the language of expertise -- which is full of coded elite shibboleths. But Trump veritably shouts the language of competence. I don't mean he is actually competent at governing. But he is effectively blunt about calling leaders, experts and elites -- of both parties -- stupid, ineffective, weak and incompetent. He lost in 2020 because voters didn't believe he was actually good at governing. He won in 2024 because the exhausted majority concluded the Biden administration was bad at it. Nostalgia for the low-inflation pre-pandemic economy was enough to convince voters that Trumpian drama is the tolerable price to pay for a good economy. About 3 out of 4 Americans who experienced "severe hardship" because of inflation voted for Trump. The genius of Trump's most effective ad -- "Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you" -- was that it was simultaneously culture-war red meat and an argument that Harris was more concerned about boutique elite concerns than everyday ones. If Trump can actually deliver competent government, he could make the Republican Party the majority party for a generation. For myriad reasons, that's an if so big it's visible from space. But the opportunity is there -- and has been there all along. Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch: thedispatch.com . Catch the latest in Opinion Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!None

Stock market today: Wall Street slips as technology stocks drag on the marketDodgers add to dream team with Blake Snell and aren't done yet. We need more teams to be like them

Porter's 26 lead Middle Tennessee over South Florida 95-88

The Los Angeles Chargers activated running back J.K. Dobbins from injured reserve on Friday. Dobbins is formally listed as questionable but figures to be the team's top running threat for Saturday's road game against the New England Patriots. Teammate Gus Edwards (ankle) was ruled out Thursday. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. As property values continue to outpace inflation, property taxes are taking a bigger bite out of homeowners’ wallets. A new analysis from Construction Coverage breaks down property tax rates by state, county, and city to reveal where homeowners have the greatest burden. Click for more. Where Are U.S. Property Taxes Highest and Lowest? A State, County, and City AnalysisWhat 8 Analyst Ratings Have To Say About Jabil

Bany John is struggling to hold its own at the box office. The film, after opening at more than Rs 11.25 crore on Christmas, has continued to fall each day. At the end of three days, the film has not managed to touch Rs 20 crores. Baby John continues to fall According to Sacnilk’s early estimates, Baby John earned approximately Rs3.65 crore on the third day at the box office. The first-day collection was Rs 11.25 crore and there was a drastic drop on day 2. The third day saw a bigger drop. Despite being a major holiday release, the movie struggled to attract audiences for Kalees' mass entertainer. Here’s looking at Baby John’s total collection after three days at the box office: Baby John Box Office Collection DayBaby John Box Office CollectionBaby John Box Office Collection Day 1Rs 11. 25 CroreBaby John Box Office Collection Day 2Rs 4.75 Crore Baby John Box Office Collection Day 3Rs 3.65 Crore * early estimatesBaby John Box Office TotalRs ₹ 19.65 Crore ALSO READ: Baby John Box Office Collection Day 1: Atlee-Varun Film FAILS To Beat Pushpa 2, Earns Rs 12 Crore On Christmas More about Baby John Zoom's in-house reviewer gave the film 2.5 stars. The review states, "Baby John has Atlee’s classic touch. It has strong political flavours wrapped in the sweet coating of a commercial actioner. Over the years, the definition of mass has changed and Atlee has a pivotal role to play in the shift. It comes as no surprise that Theri has inspired Baby John. Coated with Bollywood masala, the film offers nothing new in terms of story. Following the success formula of Theri, director Kalees relies too much on Varun’s stardom and jarring loud action sequences. It’s a been there, done that situation." The film is facing stiff competition from Allu Arjun's Pushpa 2 as well! Get Latest News Live on Times Now along with Breaking News and Top Headlines from Box Office, Entertainment News and around the world.

Castor Oil Could Be the Secret to Thicker Brows and Longer LashesNetflix signs US broadcast deal with FIFA for the Women's World Cup in 2027 and 2031RENN Fund, Inc. Announces Record Date for Year End Distribution

Jonah Goldberg Among elites across the ideological spectrum, there's one point of unifying agreement: Americans are bitterly divided. What if that's wrong? What if elites are the ones who are bitterly divided while most Americans are fairly unified? History rarely lines up perfectly with the calendar (the "sixties" didn't really start until the decade was almost over). But politically, the 21st century neatly began in 2000, when the election ended in a tie and the color coding of electoral maps became enshrined as a kind of permanent tribal color war of "red vs. blue." Elite understanding of politics has been stuck in this framework ever since. Politicians and voters have leaned into this alleged political reality, making it seem all the more real in the process. I loathe the phrase "perception is reality," but in politics it has the reifying power of self-fulfilling prophecy. Like rival noble families in medieval Europe, elites have been vying for power and dominance on the arrogant assumption that their subjects share their concern for who rules rather than what the rulers can deliver. Political cartoonists from across country draw up something special for the holiday In 2018, the group More in Common published a massive report on the "hidden tribes" of American politics. The wealthiest and whitest groups were "devoted conservatives" (6%) and "progressive activists" (8%). These tribes dominate the media, the parties and higher education, and they dictate the competing narratives of red vs. blue, particularly on cable news and social media. Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of Americans resided in, or were adjacent to, the "exhausted majority." These people, however, "have no narrative," as David Brooks wrote at the time. "They have no coherent philosophic worldview to organize their thinking and compel action." Lacking a narrative might seem like a very postmodern problem, but in a postmodern elite culture, postmodern problems are real problems. It's worth noting that red vs. blue America didn't emerge ex nihilo. The 1990s were a time when the economy and government seemed to be working, at home and abroad. As a result, elites leaned into the narcissism of small differences to gain political and cultural advantage. They remain obsessed with competing, often apocalyptic, narratives. That leaves out most Americans. The gladiatorial combatants of cable news, editorial pages and academia, and their superfan spectators, can afford these fights. Members of the exhausted majority are more interested in mere competence. I think that's the hidden unity elites are missing. This is why we keep throwing incumbent parties out of power: They get elected promising competence but get derailed -- or seduced -- by fan service to, or trolling of, the elites who dominate the national conversation. There's a difference between competence and expertise. One of the most profound political changes in recent years has been the separation of notions of credentialed expertise from real-world competence. This isn't a new theme in American life, but the pandemic and the lurch toward identity politics amplified distrust of experts in unprecedented ways. This is a particular problem for the left because it is far more invested in credentialism than the right. Indeed, some progressives are suddenly realizing they invested too much in the authority of experts and too little in the ability of experts to provide what people want from government, such as affordable housing, decent education and low crime. The New York Times' Ezra Klein says he's tired of defending the authority of government institutions. Rather, "I want them to work." One of the reasons progressives find Trump so offensive is his absolute inability to speak the language of expertise -- which is full of coded elite shibboleths. But Trump veritably shouts the language of competence. I don't mean he is actually competent at governing. But he is effectively blunt about calling leaders, experts and elites -- of both parties -- stupid, ineffective, weak and incompetent. He lost in 2020 because voters didn't believe he was actually good at governing. He won in 2024 because the exhausted majority concluded the Biden administration was bad at it. Nostalgia for the low-inflation pre-pandemic economy was enough to convince voters that Trumpian drama is the tolerable price to pay for a good economy. About 3 out of 4 Americans who experienced "severe hardship" because of inflation voted for Trump. The genius of Trump's most effective ad -- "Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you" -- was that it was simultaneously culture-war red meat and an argument that Harris was more concerned about boutique elite concerns than everyday ones. If Trump can actually deliver competent government, he could make the Republican Party the majority party for a generation. For myriad reasons, that's an if so big it's visible from space. But the opportunity is there -- and has been there all along. Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch: thedispatch.com . Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!Paulo Dybala could return to the Roma starting lineup when they face Tottenham Hotspur in the Europa League in North London on Thursday night. The elegant attacker played just three minutes off the bench in the 1-0 defeat to Napoli at the weekend, after missing the previous outing against Bologna, and the international break with Argentina. When on the field, Dybala has been magical for the Giallorossi, contributing to 53 goals in just over two years at the club, but he is not on it enough, starting just seven of Roma's 17 games so far this season. Dybala also has history with Spurs, as he was the man who scored the winning goal at Wembley when Juventus knocked them out of the Champions League in 2018 - the only previous time they have lost at home to an Italian club in UEFA competition. The Argentine is one of a number of players who could start behind Artem Dovbyk in attack, with Lorenzo Pellegrini and Matias Soule also in contention to start. New manager Claudio Ranieri only made one change for his first game in charge, replacing Soule with Pellegrini, but there were big changes tactically, as he has reverted to a 4-4-2 system, binning Juric's 3-4-3 approach. Nicola Zalewski , Tommaso Baldanzi and Enzo Le Fee have all seen their game time greatly reduced recently, so will hope that the new manager will give them an opportunity to prove themselves here. Mats Hummels is another player who could return to the fold, because he was not seen for a month after scoring an own goal and conceding five against Fiorentina, but looked much more competent as a second-half substitute against Napoli on Sunday. Mario Hermoso could also return in defence soon, with Alexis Saelemaekers making good progress in his recovery from an ankle injury too, but Eldor Shomurodov will not be available until next month. Roma possible starting lineup: Svilar; Celik, Mancini, Hummels, Angelino; Soule, Baldanzi, Cristante, Zalewski; Dybala, Dovbyk Click here to see how Spurs could line up for this Europa League clash.None