ps4 jb

Fulks puts up 26, Milwaukee defeats IU Indianapolis 88-81
The secret to making successful financial New Year’s resolutions
None
The Pittsburgh Steelers have seen their share of elite running backs this season, but coach Mike Tomlin described Saquon Barkley as both dominant and dynamic because the Philadelphia Eagles star has created a degree of separation from his peers in highlight reel-caliber plays. Barkley’s backwards bounce over Jacksonville Jaguars cornerback Jarrian Jones might be the NFL’s play of the year. It’s certainly one that had Steelers inside linebacker Patrick Queen pondering a reporter’s question about the best way to tackle a player who is both powerful and elusive. “Not duck your head when you try to tackle,” Queen said. “That’s the simplest way. If you want to hit somebody, you’ve got to see what you’re hitting.” While the Steelers see Barkley as the best running back in the league — one who’s on pace to break Eric Dickerson’s 40-year-old single-season rushing record of 2,105 yards — the NFL’s No. 4 rush defense isn’t ducking the challenge of stopping the catalyst to the league’s top ground attack. Barkley has rushed for 1,623 yards on 266 carries this season, is averaging 6.1 yards per carry and 124.8 per game and has 1,890 yards from scrimmage — all of which lead the league — and has broken LeSean McCoy’s team record for single-season rushing yards (1,607). When it comes to the best back he’s faced, Queen didn’t hesitate to crown Barkley the king. “I think Saquon’s got that title this year,” Queen said of Barkley, who is on pace to rush for 2,122 yards. “You see what he’s doing. He’s unstoppable right now. ... Even when he’s not in space, he’s able to break tackles and stuff. Just an all-around good back: elusive, strong, can make multiple guys miss at one time. So he definitely is my No. 1 right now.” Tomlin took it a step further, calling Barkley’s offseason signing with the Philadelphia Eagles “the most significant acquisition in the NFL in 2024.” After three 1,000-yard seasons in six years with the New York Giants, who drafted him No. 2 overall out of Penn State in 2018, Barkley signed a three-year, $37.75 million contract with his hometown team that includes $26 million guaranteed. That deal has looked like a bargain so far as the 6-foot, 233-pounder has nine 100-yard games, including a career-best 255 rushing yards and 302 yards from scrimmage against the Los Angeles Rams in Week 12. Barkley is a four-time NFC player of the week, won NFC player of the month honors in November and is a leading MVP candidate. “He’s dynamic,” Tomlin said. “He checks all the boxes, in terms of physical talent: He’s got top-end speed. He can hit a home run, as evidenced by the Rams game. He’s good in tight-space areas. He can get downhill. He can lower his pads and run behind his pads. He’s got good lateral abilities. He can make people miss. He’s just a really complete player, and obviously that’s been a significant acquisition for them.” Even as Tomlin called Barkley’s performances “eye-opening” and said their chances of success starts with minimizing his impact, the Steelers coach warned that Barkley “can’t have the totality of your attention” as he did when with the Giants. Not with the Eagles leading the league in rushing yards (2,476) and rushing touchdowns (25) with Barkley running behind an offensive line anchored by tackles Jordan Mailata and Lane Johnson and beside dual-threat quarterback Jalen Hurts, who has 544 rushing yards and 13 touchdowns this season. To further prove Hurts’ value: Barkley has been tackled at the 1-yard line 11 times this season and hasn’t scored on any of those drives; Hurts has either run for or thrown a touchdown on 10 of them. And yet Barkley still has scored 13 times, 11 by run and twice on receptions. “When you play in the AFC North, we go against a lot of great running backs and ball carriers,” Steelers rookie nickel back Beanie Bishop Jr. said. “You’ve got Derrick Henry and Lamar Jackson in Baltimore and Nick Chubb in Cleveland, so we’re familiar with going against good backs. When we played against Derrick Henry, he was the (NFL’s) leading rusher. Things don’t change here in Pittsburgh. One of the things we pride ourselves on is being able to stop the run.” The Steelers are allowing only 91.5 rushing yards per game this season. They held Atlanta’s Bijan Robinson to 68 yards, Indianapolis’ Jonathan Taylor to 88 yards, Henry to 65 yards and Chubb to 59 and 48 yards in his two games. Ironically, the only running back to eclipse the 100-yard mark against the Steelers this season was Barkley’s replacement with the Giants: Tyrone Tracy Jr. ran for 145 yards on 20 carries in Week 8. Linebacker Elandon Roberts said the Steelers want to win the run game battle. He knows it starts with stopping Barkley but doesn’t want to put too much focus on one player because of the talent surrounding him. Instead, the Steelers are emphasizing the need to swarm and smother Barkley. “A team in December is based on if you can run the ball and if you can stop the run. That’s how we go into each week,” Roberts said. “I’m not devaluing Saquon. If we weren’t playing Saquon this week, we’d be eyeing the exact same (situation) because that’s just what December football is all about. Obviously, playing the top back in this league, we’ll definitely have to hone in. But that’s just playing within our defense.”(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Robert C. Donnelly , Gonzaga University (THE CONVERSATION) Former President Jimmy Carter, who died on Dec. 29, 2024, at age 100 at his home in Plains, Georgia, was a dark horse Democratic presidential candidate with little national recognition when he beat Republican incumbent Gerald Ford in 1976. The introspective former peanut farmer pledged a new era of honesty and forthrightness at home and abroad, a promise that resonated with voters eager for change following the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War. His presidency, however, lasted only one term before Ronald Reagan defeated him. Since then, scholars have debated – and often maligned – Carter’s legacy, especially his foreign policy efforts that revolved around human rights. Critics have described Carter’s foreign policies as “ineffectual” and “hopelessly muddled ,” and their formulation demonstrated “weakness and indecision.” As a historian researching Carter’s foreign policy initiatives , I conclude his overseas policies were far more effective than critics have claimed. A Soviet strategy The criticism of Carter’s foreign policies seems particularly mistaken when it comes to the Cold War, a period defined by decades of hostility, mutual distrust and arms buildup after World War II between the U.S. and Russia, then known as the Soviet Union or Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). By the late 1970s, the Soviet Union’s economy and global influence were weakening. With the counsel of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Soviet expert , Carter exploited these weaknesses. During his presidency, Carter insisted nations provide basic freedoms for their people – a moral weapon against which repressive leaders could not defend. Carter soon openly criticized the Soviets for denying Russian Jews their basic civil rights , a violation of human rights protections outlined in the diplomatic agreement called the Helsinki Accords . Carter’s team underscored these violations in arms control talks. The CIA flooded the USSR with books and articles to incite human rights activism. And Carter publicly supported Russian dissidents – including pro-democracy activist Andrei Sakharov – who were fighting an ideological war against socialist leaders. Carter adviser Stuart Eizenstat argues that the administration attacked the Soviets “in their most vulnerable spot – mistreatment of their own citizens.” This proved effective in sparking Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’s social and political reforms of the late 1980s, best known by the Russian word “glasnost ,” or “openness.” The Afghan invasion In December 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in response to the assassination of the Soviet-backed Afghan leader, Nur Mohammad Taraki. The invasion effectively ended an existing détente between the U.S. and USSR. Beginning in July 1979, the U.S. was providing advice and nonlethal supplies to the mujahideen rebelling against the Soviet-backed regime. After the invasion, National Security Advisor Brzezinski advised Carter to respond aggressively to it. So the CIA and U.S. allies delivered weapons to the mujahideen, a program later expanded under Reagan. Carter’s move effectively engaged the Soviets in a proxy war that began to bleed the Soviet Union. By providing the rebels with modern weapons, the U.S. was “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war,” according to Brzezinski : a progressively expensive war, a strain on the socialist economy and an erosion of their authority abroad. Carter also imposed an embargo on U.S. grain sales to the Soviets in 1980. Agriculture was the USSR’s greatest economic weakness since the 1960s. The country’s unfavorable weather and climate contributed to successive poor growing seasons, and their heavy industrial development left the agricultural sector underfunded . Economist Elizabeth Clayton concluded in 1985 that Carter’s embargo was effective in exacerbating this weakness. Census data compiled between 1959 and 1979 show that 54 million people were added to the Soviet population. Clayton estimates that 2 to 3 million more people were added in each subsequent year. The Soviets were overwhelmed by the population boom and struggled to feed their people. At the same time, Clayton found that monthly wages increased, which led to an increased demand for meat. But by 1985, there was a meat shortage in the USSR. Why? Carter’s grain embargo, although ended by Reagan in 1981, had a lasting impact on livestock feed that resulted in Russian farmers decreasing livestock production . The embargo also forced the Soviets to pay premium prices for grain from other countries, nearly 25 percent above market prices . For years, Soviet leaders promised better diets and health , but now their people had less food. The embargo battered a weak socialist economy and created another layer of instability for the growing population. The Olympic boycott In 1980, Carter pushed further to punish the Soviets. He convinced the U.S. Olympic Committee to refrain from competing in the upcoming Moscow Olympics while the Soviets repressed their people and occupied Afghanistan. Carter not only promoted a boycott, but he also embargoed U.S. technology and other goods needed to produce the Olympics. He also stopped NBC from paying the final US$20 million owed to the USSR to broadcast the Olympics. China, Germany, Canada and Japan – superpowers of sport – also participated in the boycott. Historian Allen Guttmann said, “The USSR lost a significant amount of international legitimacy on the Olympic question.” Dissidents relayed to Carter that the boycott was another jab at Soviet leadership. And in America, public opinion supported Carter’s bold move – 73% of Americans favored the boycott . The Carter doctrine In his 1980 State of the Union address, Carter revealed an aggressive Cold War military plan. He declared a “ Carter doctrine ,” which said that the Soviets’ attempt to gain control of Afghanistan, and possibly the region, was regarded as a threat to U.S. interests. And Carter was prepared to meet the threat with “ military force .” Carter also announced in his speech a five-year spending initiative to modernize and strengthen the military because he recognized the post-Vietnam military cuts weakened the U.S. against the USSR. Ronald Reagan argued during the 1980 presidential campaign that, “Jimmy Carter risks our national security – our credibility – and damages American purposes by sending timid and even contradictory signals to the Soviet Union.” Carter’s policy was based on “weakness and illusion” and should be replaced “with one founded on improved military strength,” Reagan criticized. In 1985, however, President Reagan publicly acknowledged that his predecessor demonstrated great timing in modernizing and strengthening the nation’s forces, which further increased economic and diplomatic pressure on the Soviets. Reagan admitted that he felt “very bad” for misstating Carter’s policies and record on defense. Carter is most lauded today for his post-presidency activism , public service and defending human rights. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for such efforts. But that praise leaves out a significant portion of Carter’s presidential accomplishments. His foreign policy, emphasizing human rights, was a key instrument in dismantling the power of the Soviet Union. This is an updated version of a story that was originally published on May 2, 2019. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: https://theconversation.com/jimmy-carters-lasting-cold-war-legacy-his-human-rights-focus-helped-dismantle-the-soviet-union-113994 .
A Florida man was arrested Wednesday and charged with a plot to "reboot" the U.S. government by planting a bomb at the New York Stock Exchange this week and detonating it with a remote-controlled device, according to the FBI. Harun Abdul-Malik Yener, 30, of Coral Springs, Florida, was charged with an attempt to use an explosive device to damage or destroy a building used in interstate commerce. The FBI began investigating Yener in February based on a tip that he was storing "bombmaking schematics" in a storage unit. They found bomb-making sketches, many watches with timers, electronic circuit boards and other electronics that could be used for building explosive devices, according to the FBI. He had also searched online for things related to bomb-making since 2017, according to the FBI. RELATED STORY | Court overturns actor Jussie Smollett's 2019 conviction in hate crime hoax case Yener also told undercover FBI agents that he wanted to detonate the bomb the week before Thanksgiving and that the stock exchange in lower Manhattan would be a popular site to target. "The Stock Exchange, we want to hit that, because it will wake people up," he told undercover FBI agents, according to court documents. Yener, who was described as "unhoused," wanted to bomb the stock exchange in order to "reboot" the U.S. government, explaining that it would be "like a small nuke went off," killing everyone inside the building, according to court documents. In the last month, he had rewired two-way radios so that they could work as remote triggers for an explosive device and planned to wear a disguise when planting the explosives, according to court documents. Yener had his first court appearance Wednesday afternoon and will be detained while he awaits a trial. He was known to post videos on a YouTube channel about making explosives and fireworks from household items, and had a history of making threats, according to court documents. He was fired last year from a restaurant in Coconut Creek, Florida, after his former supervisor said he threatened to "go Parkland shooter in this place." He was also part of a small group that tried to join the far-right anti-government group the " Boogaloo Bois " and extremist group the Proud Boys but was denied membership because he said he wanted "to pursue martyrdom," according to court documents. The news was first reported by the website CourtWatch. Calls to telephone numbers listed for Harun Abdul-Malik Yener in public records rang unanswered and a lawyer was not listed in court records.
Yankees suffer another blow as former All-Star leaves for American League rivals
At least 6 dead in political protests in Pakistan’s capital
NoneTechnologický inovační institut v Abú Zabí zahajuje summit o umělé inteligenci s otevřeným zdrojovým kódem, na kterém se vedou kritické diskuse o budoucnosti umělé inteligence
- Previous: ps3838 sports
- Next: ps88 casino download