7 online casino
( MENAFN - IANS) Jaipur, Dec 28 (IANS) The Rajasthan government on Friday released an advisory on 'Deepfakes' to spread awareness among individuals and organisations about the associated threats and possible ways of prevention. The advisory focuses on threats and countermeasures to ensure effective cyber hygiene and security among the general public at the ground level. The identified target audience or potential beneficiaries, according to the advisory, include both individuals as well as organisations. The advisory was issued in consonance with the cyber security measures or actionable points determined during the third National Conference of Chief Secretaries under the theme "Cyber Security: Emerging Challenges". The advisory explained Deepfake technology as an application of Artificial Intelligence in the manipulation of videos, images and even audio. The major risks associated with Deepfake technology are the spread of misinformation, fraud or scams and reputational damage. Both positive and negative applications of Deepfakes have been identified by the advisory. While positive applications can be seen in the generation of special effects in movies and engaging or interactive educational content, there are numerous negative uses as well. There is a risk of financial fraud through impersonation, disinformation to manipulate public opinion, along with emotional and financial extortion through non-consensual explicit content. The concerned advisory also highlights certain preventive steps which can be referred to by both individuals and organisations to avoid mishaps caused by Deepfake technology and its negative applications. Individuals and organisations are advised to do cross-referencing for every information and exercise extreme caution in case of personal information. Certain measures like Multi-Factor Authentication or MFA, strong privacy settings, verification protocols, and consistent security audits can aid the general public in combating the ill effects of Deepfake technology. On an individual level, the general public is advised to be cautious while sharing any information in the digital space. It is advised to assess the authenticity of the source of concerned information. The concerned advisory also provided certain preventive measures meant specifically for organisations. For organisations dealing with large amounts of company and customer data, it is advised to make use of MFA to ensure secure use, storage and transfer of data. Organisations are also advised to undertake security audits at regular intervals along with the usage of encrypted modes of communication. The advisory also suggests the formulation of crisis management plans in case of any mishap. For further assistance and information, the advisory is available for reference to the general public. MENAFN27122024000231011071ID1109035807 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.The Hollywood nostalgia machine has been spinning its wheels. But if there’s anyone who knows a thing or two about spinning wheels, it’s NASCAR driver Frankie Muniz, who’s just signed on to star in a limited run of four new episodes of Malcolm in the Middle , Disney+ announced today. Bryan Cranston and Jane Kaczmarek are also set to reprise their roles, with the original series’ creator Linwood Boomer returning as a writer and executive producer. The new batch of episodes will follow a middle-age Malcolm and his daughter getting dragged back into the family’s dysfunction at Hal and Lois’s 40th wedding-anniversary party. No premiere date has been set yet. There’s been some speculation as to whether the Wilkerson family would grace our screens again, with Muniz revealing in 2022 that Cranston had been working on a script . But the better question is, should they? Malcolm led the single-cam sitcom charge when it debuted nearly 25 years ago, and much of its humor and core pathos relied on a scrappy optimism that feels outdated in today’s political climate (not to mention, its series finale saw Malcolm set off on a trajectory toward becoming the people’s president — as opposed to, you know, another multimillionaire demagogue taking office ...). There’s also no word on if any of the other brothers will be appearing. Who will Malcolm be in the middle of? But maybe we needn’t be worried at all, and the years have given the show’s creators plenty of great ideas for material. For instance, a plotline about a cat flooding the family’s home could be comedy gold.Study reveals single people are more depressed and 'less satisfied' than couples
FDA approves injectable version of Bristol Myers Squibb's cancer drug OpdivoPrepare to win Christmas with IYKYK Taylor Swift gifts. They’re perfect for those who might want to *whisper* their Swiftie status after regularly sporting an Eras t-shirt for a year and a half. Or maybe get a nod of recognition from a fellow Swiftie. Below is a selection of items from clothing to make-up, most of which Swift has been seen wearing. Best of all, being a billionaire like the “Fortnight” singer isn’t required. All of the IYKYK Swift Christmas gifts are under $120. 1. Taylor Swift Christmas gifts: Nars lipstick-$26 Although Swift’s red lip is iconic, she does occasionally wear other hues. Enter, Nars “Morocco” lipstick . Makeup artist Lorrie Turk revealed on her Instagram stories that one lipstick “Taylor wears all the time” is indeed the brand’s cinnamon shade (via Marie Claire ). “It’s Nars Morocco lipstick,” she wrote. “She’s [Swift] worn it for years.” Turk revealed the bit of intel on Swift’s makeup alongside an image of the “I Can Do It With a Broken Heart” singer at the 2024 MTV VMAs and the Kansas City Chiefs first game of the 2024-25 season. Buy it for $26 in cream or matte formulas—Swift prefers the former—to bring joy to any Swiftie on Christmas morning. 2. Sherpa cat backpack-$80 The perfect gift for any Swiftie who is also a self-proclaimed “cat lady” (or man) like Swift, the songstress carried one of her beloved cats in Sherpa’s cat backpack during the 2020 Miss Americana documentary . Get it at Petco for $80. 3. Crap Eyewear sunglasses-$99 The most expensive item of all the Swift Christmas gifts is these sunglasses from Crap Eyewear coming in at just under $100. A nod to sunnies of the ‘90s, Swift has been seen wearing the brand’s Marquee Rox shades multiple times. (Ahem, at the U.S. Open with Travis Kelce and in a video promoting the final leg of the Eras tour .) 4. Taylor Swift Christmas gifts: Pop Flex Active skort-$60 Get the Swiftie in your life their very own lilac short shirt a la “The Tortured Poets Department” track, “imgonnagetyouback.” Seen on Swift in footage of Eras tour rehearsals, the Pirouette Skort from Cassey Ho’s Pop Flex brand can be worn for workouts and beyond. Get the “Digital Lavender” shade to match Swift or choose from one of 15 other colors. 5. Flaunt phone case-$46 A stocking stuffer any Swiftie would love, this mother of pearl Flaunt phone case was spotted in a March 2023 TikTok of Swift’s. It’s available in a wide range of sizes for iPhones and Galaxy. Get it for $46 or bundle with a ring and protective screen for a discount. 6. Taylor Swift ‘Speak Now’ koi fish sweatshirt-$85 Get ready for a major IYKYK Taylor Swift moment with this cozy koi fish sweatshirt. A nod to the “Down Bad” singer’s “Speak Now” era—remember her koi guitar?—and her Nashville, Tennessee, home with a koi pond , it’s perfect for any Swiftie who wants a more demure way to show their love for Swift. Find it on Swift’s official website for $85. But be quick—her merch is known to sell out. 7. ‘New Heights’ hat-$36 OK, so this isn’t exactly a subtle nod to Swift, but it’s too cute not to include. For Swifties wanting to support the pop star’s romance with Kelce , what better gift than official merch from the Super Bowl winner’s podcast? Swift wore the green and white hat to Coachella with the Kansas City Chiefs tight end in April 2024. Soon after it sold out online (via People ). But, good news, the hat is back in stock. It’s available on Homage —with the option of green or black—for $36. Honorable mention: Taylor Swift’s go-to camera Last but not least is perhaps the most IYKYK Swift Christmas gift of the bunch, the pop star’s go-to camera. Swift has been seen carrying an Olympus OM-D E-M10 many times over the years. She’s even become known for a certain camera filter, Vintage I, that’s used in many of her photos (via Digital Camera World ). While the filter comes with the camera, that doesn’t mean having to shell out hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars to get the signature Swift photo filter. (The camera starts at $700.) Simply download the Olympus app—for free—and apply the Vintage I filter to an image.By MICHAEL R. SISAK and JENNIFER PELTZ NEW YORK (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump’s lawyers urged a judge again Friday to throw out his hush money conviction, balking at the prosecution’s suggestion of preserving the verdict by treating the case the way some courts do when a defendant dies. They called the idea “absurd.” Related Articles National Politics | Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time National Politics | Ruling by a conservative Supreme Court could help blue states resist Trump policies National Politics | A nonprofit leader, a social worker: Here are the stories of the people on Biden’s clemency list National Politics | Nancy Pelosi hospitalized after she ‘sustained an injury’ on official trip to Luxembourg National Politics | Veteran Daniel Penny, acquitted in NYC subway chokehold, will join Trump’s suite at football game The Manhattan district attorney’s office is asking Judge Juan M. Merchan to “pretend as if one of the assassination attempts against President Trump had been successful,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in a blistering 23-page response. In court papers made public Tuesday, District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office proposed an array of options for keeping the historic conviction on the books after Trump’s lawyers filed paperwork earlier this month asking for the case to be dismissed. They include freezing the case until Trump leaves office in 2029, agreeing that any future sentence won’t include jail time, or closing the case by noting he was convicted but that he wasn’t sentenced and his appeal wasn’t resolved because of presidential immunity. Trump lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove reiterated Friday their position that the only acceptable option is overturning his conviction and dismissing his indictment, writing that anything less will interfere with the transition process and his ability to lead the country. The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined comment. It’s unclear how soon Merchan will decide. He could grant Trump’s request for dismissal, go with one of the prosecution’s suggestions, wait until a federal appeals court rules on Trump’s parallel effort to get the case moved out of state court, or choose some other option. In their response Friday, Blanche and Bove ripped each of the prosecution’s suggestions. Halting the case until Trump leaves office would force the incoming president to govern while facing the “ongoing threat” that he’ll be sentenced to imprisonment, fines or other punishment as soon as his term ends, Blanche and Bove wrote. Trump, a Republican, takes office Jan. 20. “To be clear, President Trump will never deviate from the public interest in response to these thuggish tactics,” the defense lawyers wrote. “However, the threat itself is unconstitutional.” The prosecution’s suggestion that Merchan could mitigate those concerns by promising not to sentence Trump to jail time on presidential immunity grounds is also a non-starter, Blanche and Bove wrote. The immunity statute requires dropping the case, not merely limiting sentencing options, they argued. Blanche and Bove, both of whom Trump has tabbed for high-ranking Justice Department positions, expressed outrage at the prosecution’s novel suggestion that Merchan borrow from Alabama and other states and treat the case as if Trump had died. Blanche and Bove accused prosecutors of ignoring New York precedent and attempting to “fabricate” a solution “based on an extremely troubling and irresponsible analogy between President Trump” who survived assassination attempts in Pennsylvania in July and Florida in September “and a hypothetical dead defendant.” Such an option normally comes into play when a defendant dies after being convicted but before appeals are exhausted. It is unclear whether it is viable under New York law, but prosecutors suggested that Merchan could innovate in what’s already a unique case. “This remedy would prevent defendant from being burdened during his presidency by an ongoing criminal proceeding,” prosecutors wrote in their filing this week. But at the same time, it wouldn’t “precipitously discard” the “meaningful fact that defendant was indicted and found guilty by a jury of his peers.” Prosecutors acknowledged that “presidential immunity requires accommodation” during Trump’s impending return to the White House but argued that his election to a second term should not upend the jury’s verdict, which came when he was out of office. Longstanding Justice Department policy says sitting presidents cannot face criminal prosecution . Other world leaders don’t enjoy the same protection. For example, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is on trial on corruption charges even as he leads that nation’s wars in Lebanon and Gaza . Trump has been fighting for months to reverse his May 30 conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records . Prosecutors said he fudged the documents to conceal a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels to suppress her claim that they had sex a decade earlier, which Trump denies. In their filing Friday, Trump’s lawyers citing a social media post in which Sen. John Fetterman used profane language to criticize Trump’s hush money prosecution. The Pennsylvania Democrat suggested that Trump deserved a pardon, comparing his case to that of President Joe Biden’s pardoned son Hunter Biden, who had been convicted of tax and gun charges . “Weaponizing the judiciary for blatant, partisan gain diminishes the collective faith in our institutions and sows further division,” Fetterman wrote Wednesday on Truth Social. Trump’s hush money conviction was in state court, meaning a presidential pardon — issued by Biden or himself when he takes office — would not apply to the case. Presidential pardons only apply to federal crimes. Since the election, special counsel Jack Smith has ended his two federal cases , which pertained to Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss and allegations that he hoarded classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. A separate state election interference case in Fulton County, Georgia, is largely on hold. Trump denies wrongdoing in all. Trump had been scheduled for sentencing in the hush money case in late November. But following Trump’s Nov. 5 election victory, Merchan halted proceedings and indefinitely postponed the former and future president’s sentencing so the defense and prosecution could weigh in on the future of the case. Merchan also delayed a decision on Trump’s prior bid to dismiss the case on immunity grounds. A dismissal would erase Trump’s conviction, sparing him the cloud of a criminal record and possible prison sentence. Trump is the first former president to be convicted of a crime and the first convicted criminal to be elected to the office.
Lawyers representing tens of thousands of Quebecers in two class-action lawsuits against three major tobacco manufacturers will seek to receive more than $900 million in fees for their work in the landmark case that has spanned decades. Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * Lawyers representing tens of thousands of Quebecers in two class-action lawsuits against three major tobacco manufacturers will seek to receive more than $900 million in fees for their work in the landmark case that has spanned decades. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? Lawyers representing tens of thousands of Quebecers in two class-action lawsuits against three major tobacco manufacturers will seek to receive more than $900 million in fees for their work in the landmark case that has spanned decades. Spokespeople for counsel in one of the lawsuits say documents were filed in court Friday requesting approval for a notice that would be sent to the class-action members about the payment being sought for more than 175,000 hours of work. The move comes a day after lawyers said the companies’ creditors, including representatives for the class-action plaintiffs, approved a proposed settlement that would see the companies pay out a total of $32.5 billion. More than $4 billion is earmarked for the plaintiffs in the lawsuits, and the payment requested by their lawyers represents 22 per cent of that sum. The proposed deal announced in October would also see the companies — JTI-Macdonald Corp., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges and Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. — pay out more than $24 billion to provinces and territories and more than $2.5 billion to Canadian smokers not included in the lawsuits. The proposal cleared a significant hurdle Thursday but must still obtain the court’s approval before it can be implemented, and a hearing scheduled for late January will also include a motion for approval of the legal fees. The fees requested by counsel in the class actions total $906,180,000 plus taxes, and include tens of millions of dollars in costs incurred over the course of the litigation that began in the late 1990s as well as future services to manage the claims process, spokespeople said in a statement. Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. “The requested fees reflect not only the extraordinary scope of the work performed and the results achieved but also the unwavering dedication of the lawyers and their teams,” André Lespérance, one of the lawyers representing some of the Quebec plaintiffs, said in a statement. “They tirelessly and vigorously took on the Canadian tobacco industry, shouldering the costs and risks of litigation without any assurance of payment. This commitment was driven solely by the pursuit of fair and equitable compensation for the victims and their families.” A Quebec court ordered the companies to pay about $15 billion to the plaintiffs in 2015, a ruling that was upheld by the province’s top court four years later. The companies then obtained creditor protection in Ontario, which froze all legal proceedings against them while they negotiated a deal with all their creditors, including provincial governments seeking to recoup smoking-related health-care costs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 13, 2024. Advertisement AdvertisementFormer Rams Star Officially Available For Playoff Run
- Previous:
- Next: 9y online casino
