lodibet com login philippines

lodibet com login philippines OTTAWA - First Nations leaders are split over next steps after a landmark $47.8-billion child welfare reform deal with Canada was struck down, prompting differing legal opinions from both sides. The Assembly of First Nations and a board member of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society have received competing legal opinions on potential ways forward. Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict says the chiefs he represents are still hoping the agreement that chiefs outside the province voted down two months ago is not moot. Chiefs in Ontario are interveners in the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal case that led to its realization. He added there are also concerns that some of the elements in the new negotiation mandate outlined by chiefs in an October assembly go beyond the current governance structure of the Assembly of First Nations. “There will have to be action by the Assembly of First Nations in the very near future to advance these positions, but you also need willing partners,” Benedict said. “We’re still considering what our options are.” Those options are also being debated in legal reviews commissioned by the Assembly of First Nations and a board member of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, which are both parties to the human rights case, along with Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Khelsilem, a chairperson from the Squamish Nation who penned a resolution that defeated the deal in October, critiqued the stance of Ontario First Nations by saying they negotiated a “bad agreement” for First Nations outside the province and now that chiefs want to go back to the table for a better deal, they want to split from the process entirely. “It potentially undermines the collective unity of First Nations to achieve something that is going to benefit all of us,” he said. The $47.8-billion agreement was struck in July after decades of advocacy and litigation from First Nations and experts, seeking to redress discrimination against First Nations children who were torn from their families and placed in foster care. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal said Canada’s underfunding was discriminatory because it meant kids living on reserve were given fewer services than those living off reserves, and tasked Canada with reaching an agreement with First Nations to reform the system. The agreement was meant to cover 10 years of funding for First Nations to take control of their own child welfare services from the federal government. Chiefs and service providers critiqued the deal for months, saying it didn’t go far enough to ensure an end to the discrimination. They have also blasted the federal government for what they say is its failure to consult with First Nations in negotiations, and for the exclusion of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, which helped launched the initial human rights complaint. In October at a special chiefs assembly in Calgary, the deal was struck down through two resolutions. The Assembly of First Nations sought a legal review of those resolutions by Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP — a firm where the former national chief of the organization, Perry Bellegarde, works as a special adviser. In the legal review from Fasken, it appears as though the assembly asked for direction on how to get “rid” of two resolutions used to vote down the deal, with an employee of the firm saying they can review the resolutions together if they want them both gone, or they can “leave room for compromise” with one of the resolutions. In a statement, the Assembly of First Nations said the review was conducted to assess the legal, technical and operational aspects of the resolutions to ensure their “effective implementation.” “The opinions formed by external counsel are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of the AFN,” said Andrew Bisson, the chief executive officer, who added it’s not unusual for the organization to seek such reviews. Bisson did not address the language used by a Fasken employee to “get rid” of resolutions, but said “the legal and technical reviews were conducted in good faith, not to undermine the chiefs’ direction. The chiefs have provided clear direction, and the AFN is committed to following that direction.” The legal reviews from Fasken, dated Nov. 15, argue that the October resolutions on child welfare require a significant review of who voted for them, along with changes to the organization’s charter should they be implemented. Resolution 60 called for a rejection of the final settlement agreement, and for the establishment of a Children’s Chiefs Commission that will be representative of all regions and negotiate long-term reforms. It also called for the AFN’s executive committee to “unconditionally include” the Caring Society in negotiations. Fasken said that commission is contrary to the AFN’s charter, and the law, because the AFN’s executive committee doesn’t have the power to create one, and that the executive committee “alone” has the authority to execute mandates on behalf of the assembly. It adds there are no accountability measures for the new negotiation body, and that it will represent regions that are not participants in the AFN. Resolution 61, which built upon resolution 60, is similarly against the charter for the same reasons, the review says. As such, it says, the resolutions can’t be implemented. The firm also wrote that there were alleged conflicts of interest during the October vote, saying “numerous proxies were also employees, shareholders, directors, agents or otherwise had a vested interest” in the First Nations child and family service agencies whose interests were the subject of the resolutions. Chief Joe Miskokomon of Chippewas of the Thames First Nation in southwestern Ontario called that “political deception.” In response to that review, a board member of the Caring Society, which has been a vocal critic of the July deal, sought their own. The review penned by Aird Berlis for Mary Teegee and dated Dec. 2 stated it was “inappropriate for the AFN to seek, and not disclose, legal opinions which are then cited to attempt to second-guess decisions already made by the First Nations in Assembly.” It also states that while the AFN’s vice-president of strategic policy and integration, Amber Potts, raised concerns with the movers and seconders of the resolutions, the entirety of the legal opinion the assembly sought was not shared with them. Teegee’s review challenges that of the AFN’s by saying the resolutions are consistent with the AFN’s charter, and that nothing restricts First Nations in assembly from expressing their sovereign will by delegating authority to another entity. “AFN’s role and purpose at all times is to effect the sovereign will of First Nations, however it is expressed, on ‘any matter’ that they see fit,” the review from Aird Berlis reads. “It is too late to attempt to question the resolutions. They are now final.” This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 9, 2024.

The story so far: The 29th edition of the Conference of Parties (COP), arguably the most important of the UN’s climate conferences, was scheduled to end on November 22, after 11 days of negotiations, and take a collective step forward in addressing rising carbon emissions. However, deliberations are expected to carry on beyond the deadline with several sticking points outstanding. What is the significance of COP29? Going into the talks, developing countries had stated that at least a trillion dollars per year from 2025-35 would be necessary to meet emission targets. This was seen to be the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance which refers to money that will be given to developing countries by developed countries to help the former meet their goals to transition away from the continued use of fossil fuels and curb greenhouse gas emissions. Developing countries have been repeatedly saying that the figure should be “trillions of dollars.” To this end, developed countries have mobilised and transferred $115 billion in 2021-22 — a controversial clause that has yet to be resolved in the universal agreement — but per the Paris Agreement, a new target higher than $100 billion must be agreed upon by 2025. The talks in Baku were expected to conclusively agree upon a number but there continues to be a sharp split between developed and developing countries on the quantum and other basic aspects of what this NCQG should look like. What do developing countries want? This block of countries include China, India and the Group of 77 countries. There are also other coalitions such as the Like Minded Developing Countries (LMDC), Least Developing Countries (LDC), Small Island Developing Countries (SIDS) etc. Nearly all developing countries fall into one or multiple groupings and while they have differences, they are largely agreed on the point that it is the developed countries that should pay the bulk of climate finance. More importantly, they specified that this money had to be provided not only to help countries meet their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) but also buffer against existing threats of climate change, and make good for climate damage already wrought. The NDCs are targeted, voluntary plans by all countries to reduce carbon emissions by certain quantities until 2030. The NCQG, the developing countries say, should also reflect contributions by developed countries on the basis of their historical contribution to existing carbon concentrations in the atmosphere as well as their per capita GDP. To put this in perspective, it is important to note that even if all countries fulfilled their stated voluntary commitments, it would as of now only translate to a 2% cut, and this year — the latest scientific assessments suggest — carbon emissions will likely increase 0.8% over 2023. What does the developed world say? However developed countries, led by the European Union, say these demands are unreasonably high. They aver that “all actors” (read countries) should collectively work to hike up climate finance to $1.3 trillion per year by 2035. While agreeing that they must “take the lead” they have only a set a goal of $250-300 billion by 2035 per year. Moreover this would consist of a “variety of sources,” including “public and private, bilateral and multilateral, and alternative sources.” Related Stories Climate-threatened nations stage protest at COP29 over contentious deal Finance deadlock pushes COP29 to brink of failure U.N. rules for carbon trading between nations approved at COP29 climate talks This suggests that another major demand of the developing world, of ensuring most of the money is in the form of grants or low-cost loans, remains unmet. Have any concrete agreements been made? A week before the conference began, China had petitioned the Presidency of COP29 to discuss “climate-change related unilateral restrictive trade measures” at the conference. This is an unusual request as trade issues are discussed on forums such as the World Trade Organization. China proposed this as part of a grouping of countries called BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China). The petition is primarily directed at a European Union proposal called the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which imposes a tax on products imported into the EU that don’t conform to carbon-emission norms required by the Union. The CBAM is currently operating in a “transitional phase” but will come into full effect from January 1, 2026. The first day of the conference saw an agreement on carbon markets to be supervised by the UN. Such a market would allow countries to trade carbon credits — certified reductions of carbon emissions — among themselves and whose prices are determined as a consequence of emission caps imposed by countries. The market itself follows from a section in the Paris Agreement, called Article 6. Sub- sections within the Article spell out how countries can bilaterally trade carbon among themselves (Art 6.2) and participate in a global carbon market (6.4). Though most of the necessary nuts and bolts to make operational such a carbon market, supervised by a United Nations body, were in place since 2022, there were several niggles, particularly on ensuring that the carbon credits generated are genuine and its antecedents are transparent. While there is criticism among environmentalist groups that enough discussions on this didn’t take place, this is supposed to be a mechanism to facilitate climate finance. India has been discussing bilateral deals to trade carbon with several countries. An agreement such as the one in Baku could be a catalyst, and activate India’s own carbon-trading market. Published - November 24, 2024 04:20 am IST Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit environmental politics / environmental cleanup / summit / The Hindu Explains

By Abdulrahman Shaheen and Abby Sewell | Associated Press DAMASCUS, Syria — Syrians poured into streets echoing with celebratory gunfire on Sunday after a stunning rebel advance reached the capital, ending the Assad family’s 50 years of iron rule but raising questions about the future of the country and the wider region. Joyful crowds gathered in squares in Damascus, waving the Syrian revolutionary flag in scenes that recalled the early days of the Arab Spring uprising, before a brutal crackdown and the rise of an insurgency plunged the country into a nearly 14-year civil war. Others gleefully ransacked the presidential palace and residence after President Bashar Assad and other top officials vanished, their whereabouts unknown. Russia, a close ally, said Assad left the country after negotiations with rebel groups and had given instructions to transfer power peacefully. Abu Mohammed al-Golani , a former al-Qaida commander who cut ties with the group years ago and says he embraces pluralism and religious tolerance, leads the biggest rebel faction and is poised to chart the country’s future. In his first public appearance since fighters entered the Damascus suburbs Saturday, al-Golani visited the sprawling Umayyad Mosque and called Assad’s fall “a victory to the Islamic nation.” Calling himself by his given name, Ahmad al-Sharaa, and not his nom de guerre, he told hundreds of people that Assad had made Syria “a farm for Iran’s greed.” The rebels face the daunting task of healing bitter divisions in a country ravaged by war and still split among armed factions. Turkey-backed opposition fighters are battling U.S.-allied Kurdish forces in the north, and the Islamic State group is still active in some remote areas. Syrian state television broadcast a rebel statement early Sunday saying Assad had been overthrown and all prisoners had been released. They called on people to preserve the institutions of “the free Syrian state.” The rebels later announced a curfew in Damascus from 4 p.m. to 5 a.m. The rebels said they freed people held at the notorious Saydnaya prison, where rights groups say thousands were tortured and killed . A video circulating online purported to show rebels breaking open cell doors and freeing dozens of female prisoners, many of whom appeared shocked. At least one small child was seen among them. “This happiness will not be completed until I can see my son out of prison and know where is he,” said one relative, Bassam Masr. “I have been searching for him for two hours. He has been detained for 13 years.” Rebel commander Anas Salkhadi later appeared on state TV and sought to reassure Syria’s religious and ethnic minorities, saying: “Syria is for everyone, no exceptions. Syria is for Druze, Sunnis, Alawites, and all sects.” “We will not deal with people the way the Assad family did,” he added. Damascus residents prayed in mosques and celebrated in squares, calling, “God is great.” People chanted anti-Assad slogans and honked car horns. Teenage boys picked up weapons apparently discarded by security forces and fired into the air. Revelers filled Umayyad Square, where the Defense Ministry is located. Some waved the three-starred Syrian flag that predates the Assad government and was adopted by the revolutionaries. Elsewhere, many parts of the capital were empty and shops were closed. Soldiers and police left their posts and fled, and looters broke into the Defense Ministry. Videos showed families wandering the presidential palace, some carrying stacks of plates and other household items. “It’s like a dream. I need someone to wake me up,” said opposition fighter Abu Laith, adding the rebels were welcomed in Damascus with “love.” At the Justice Ministry, where rebels stood guard, Judge Khitam Haddad said they were protecting documents from the chaos. Outside, some residents sought information about relatives who disappeared under Assad. The rebels “have felt the pain of the people,” said one woman, giving only her first name, Heba. She worried about possible revenge killings by the rebels, many of whom appeared to be underage. Syria’s al-Watan newspaper, which was historically pro-government, wrote: “We are facing a new page for Syria. We thank God for not shedding more blood.” It added that media workers should not be blamed for publishing past government statements, saying it “only carried out the instructions.” A statement from the Alawite sect that has formed the core of Assad’s base called on young Syrians to be “calm, rational and prudent and not to be dragged into what tears apart the unity of our country.” The rebels mainly come from the Sunni Muslim majority in Syria, which also has sizable Druze, Christian and Kurdish communities. In Qamishli in the northeast, a Kurdish man slapped a statue of the late leader Hafez Assad with his shoe. Syrian Prime Minister Mohammed Ghazi Jalali said the government was ready to “extend its hand” to the opposition and turn its functions over to a transitional government. A video shared on Syrian opposition media showed armed men escorting him from his office and to the Four Seasons hotel on Sunday. Rami Abdurrahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told The Associated Press that Assad, 59, took a flight early Sunday from Damascus. A senior diplomat from the United Arab Emirates, which had sought to rehabilitate Assad’s image and has welcomed high-profile exiles in recent years, declined to comment on his whereabouts. Anwar Gargash said Assad’s destination at this point is a “footnote in history,” comparing it to the long exile of German Kaiser Wilhelm II after World War I. The rebel advances since Nov. 27 were the largest in recent years, and saw the cities of Aleppo, Hama and Homs fall within days as the Syrian army melted away. Russia, Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group, which provided crucial support to Assad throughout the uprising, abandoned him as they reeled from other conflicts. The end of Assad’s rule was a major blow to Iran and its allies, already weakened by conflict with Israel . Iran, which had strongly backed him throughout the civil war, said Syrians should decide their future “without destructive, coercive, foreign intervention.” The Iranian Embassy in Damascus was ransacked after apparently having been abandoned. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meanwhile said Israeli troops had temporarily seized a buffer zone in the Golan Heights established in 1974, saying it was to protect Israeli residents after Syrian troops abandoned positions. Israel’s military later warned residents of five southern Syria communities to stay home for their safety, and didn’t respond to questions. Israel captured the Golan in the 1967 Mideast war and later annexed it. The international community, except for the United States, views it as occupied. The rebels are led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, or HTS , which has its origins in al-Qaida and is considered a terrorist organization by the United States and the United Nations. Al-Golani, has sought to recast the group as a moderate and tolerant force. “Golani has made history and sparked hope among millions of Syrians,” said Dareen Khalifa, a senior adviser with the International Crisis Group. “But he and the rebels now face a formidable challenge ahead.” The U.N.’s special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, called Saturday for urgent talks in Geneva to ensure an “orderly political transition.” The Gulf nation of Qatar, a key regional mediator, hosted an emergency meeting of foreign ministers and top officials from eight countries with interests in Syria late Saturday. They included Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Turkey. Majed al-Ansari, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, said they agreed on the need “to engage all parties on the ground,” including the HTS, and that the main concern is “stability and safe transition.” Sewell reported from Beirut. Associated Press writers Bassem Mroue, Sarah El Deeb and Kareem Chehayeb in Beirut; Samar Kassaballi, Omar Sanadiki and Ghaith Alsayed in Damascus; Jon Gambrell in Manama, Bahrain; Josef Federman in Doha, Qatar; and Tia Goldenberg in Jerusalem, contributed.STATE COLLEGE — Despite falling to No. 1 Oregon in the Big Ten Championship, Penn State will play in its first appearance in the College Football Playoff. Announced Sunday afternoon, the Nittany Lions drew the No. 6 seed in the CFP, and will host 11-seed SMU on Saturday, Dec. 21 at noon in Beaver Stadium. Penn State lost 45-38 to Oregon in Saturday’s Big Ten Championship, arguably playing its best offensive game of the season. That said, it was also unquestionably the worst defensive game for the Nittany Lions all season. Let’s get into it... Watching these two teams play, the thing that jumped off the screen was Oregon’s speed, offensively and defensively. The Ducks rushed for 183 yards Saturday, led by junior running back Jordan James. James had 20 carries for 87 yards with two touchdowns. Then, when James wasn’t in the game, the Ducks went to junior Noah Whittington, who rushed for 82 yards on 15 carries. Not only did the running game hurt Penn State, the Oregon passing game dropped the hammer as well. The Penn State defense has been susceptible to quick-triggered quarterbacks and intermediate passes all season, and that was the case Saturday. Dillon Gabriel was 22-of-32 for 283 yards and four touchdowns, and his biggest beneficiary was a player highlighted in my preview of the game, wide receiver Tez Johnson. Johnson caught a game-high 11 passes on 12 targets, rolling up 181 yards and a touchdown against Penn State. Johnson’s 16.5 yards per catch is an eye-popping number, because whenever Gabriel needed a big play downfield, Johnson was there to make the Nittany Lions pay. His 48-yard touchdown catch made it a 38-24 game with 7:36 left in the third quarter. Five other Ducks caught passes in the game as sophomore tight end Kenyon Sadiq had a couple grabs for 30 yards, and scored on both. Tight end Terrance Ferguson also hurt the Nittany Lions with three catches for 30 yards, including a touchdown that put Oregon ahead 21-10 in the first half. Speed kills, and the Nittany Lions had real issues with it from a positioning and tackling standpoint. Maybe it was the sleek black Oregon uniforms, but Penn State struggled to bring down the slippery Ducks most of the night. Penn State finished with only one sack and six tackles for loss. Big Ten Defensive Player of the Year Abdul Carter finished with six total tackles but did not record a sack or a tackle for loss in the game. It was only Carter’s fourth game this season without a tackle for loss. “To be quite frank, they sped up our defense,” veteran defensive tackle Dvon J-Thomas said after the game. “That’s a credit to their offensive coordinator. They did an incredible job of speeding us up. We also just made a lot of mistakes. That’s a credit to them. When you have such a talented team and you’re playing at an elite level, the margin of error is very, very small. Coach Franklin alluded to that after the game, the margin of error is so small, so slim in these games that it makes all the difference. “I feel like defensively that we made more mistakes in that game than we’ve made in almost any other game. And you know it’s up to a great team to capitalize. I feel like Oregon did that today.” Though the Nittany Lions are an exceptional second-half defensive team, even that couldn’t save them as Oregon did something no other team could do this season — score a touchdown on Penn State in the third quarter. Oregon also did a good job of mixing tempo against Penn State. The Ducks had three scoring drives of 10 plays or more, but the time those drives took was significant. Oregon’s final touchdown drive was most gutting as it went 12 plays for 75 yards spanning 6 minutes and 49 seconds. The Ducks also had a 10-play, 61-yard scoring drive that lasted only 1 minute and 46 seconds. Being able to sustain drives, but also being able to chew up time and be speedy played a big role in Oregon’s offensive success. “They do a really good job of making it a space game,” Penn State coach James Franklin said. “They’ve got three wide receivers that are challenging — (Johnson) is really challenging in space. They’ve got a really good running back, and they’ve got a quarterback that is poised and confident, distributes the ball. “Then. they do a really good job of changing up tempo — going fast at times, then slowing down. Then look-look, see what we’re in defensively, look to the sideline, check the call, and then we’re trying to check the call. It was a chess game the entire time. Again, give them credit. But some of the things they were doing to cause stress and their athleticism also created some of the mistakes and challenges that we made.” Offense answers the bell Offensively, though it wasn’t perfect, the Nittany Lions did more than enough to win this game. They put up 518 total yards, rushing for 292 yards and ripping off 8.3 yards per carry. They also had more first downs than Oregon, 28-24. Kaytron Allen and Nicholas Singleton were spectacular against Oregon. Allen rushed for 124 yards on 14 carries and a touchdown, while Singleton rushed for 105 on 10 carries and caught a touchdown pass. “Oregon entered the game 22nd in the country in rush defense, giving up 112 games per game, and we rushed for 292 yards today on them,” Franklin said. Kaytron averaged 8.9 yards per carry and Nick Singleton averaged 10.5. Both went over 100 yards. It’s a credit to the O-line and tight ends and obviously those two young men. I also think it was the balance and our ability to both run and pass throughout the game.” Quarterback Drew Allar wasn’t particularly sharp, but he made some impressive throws to extend drives. He wasn’t great, but wasn’t that bad either — throwing for 226 yards and three touchdowns. However, his 51.3% completion percentage (20-for-39) was his worst all season, and his two interceptions were costly. His first one was a poor throw behind Trey Wallace that Dontae Manning picked and nearly took to the house. The turnover led directly to points as James walked in from a yard out to give Oregon a 28-10 lead. The second pick was a questionable call, considering it was on second-and-1 from Penn State’s 46. With Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen combining for 229 yards rushing, running the ball there with two timeouts made more sense than to take a deep shot to Wallace, who isn’t exactly known for contested catches. Though Oregon’s Nikko Reed got away with a tug of Wallace’s jersey, Allar’s ball wasn’t quite in position for Wallace to catch it exclusively along the sideline, and Reed made a great play on the ball. The turnover allowed Oregon to run out the clock for an eight-point victory. “I saw [Reed] hold and not get any depth, and tried to give Trey a chance,” Allar said. “I’ve got to do a better job of him or nobody. I’ve just got to see the leverage with the DB and give him more of a back shoulder, around the body where it’s going to be him or nobody and move on in the progression. But that’s what I saw on that play.” Not only were Singleton and Allen excellent on Saturday, so was Tyler Warren, who had a team-leading seven catches for 84 yards. Oregon did a commendable job to keep Warren out of the end zone, and Warren failed to come up with a few of the catches he’s made routinely most of the season, as he got 12 targets on the night. “I mean, on third down specifically they tried to bracket him a little bit,” Allar said of Oregon’s coverage of Warren. “Honestly, it kind of opened up our backside progressions. There were a couple early in the game where I hit Trey on a third-and-15 in man coverage where the strong safety just bracketed Tyler. So they tried to take him away as much as they could, but he still had a phenomenal game in the pass game and the run game.” The catch that wasn’t In perhaps the most head-scratching sequence of the night, Allar threw to Omari Evans near the left sideline and though Evans caught the ball by every presentable angle, the pass was ruled incomplete. The play would’ve allowed Penn State to move farther down the field on a critical drive as they were looking to score and convert a potential game-tying two-point conversion. “There were a couple calls that we didn’t get that I thought we should have,” Franklin said. “One of the calls that I thought was a critical point in the game was the two-minute drive with a catch on the sideline to Omari, I thought was a catch. And looking on the Jumbotron, it looked like it was a catch. “It is what it is, but the catch on the sideline, to me, that’s a critical moment in the game and it was close enough that it should have been buzzed down and at least reviewed.” The path of...most favorable?...resistance Had Penn State defeated Oregon, it would have clinched the No. 1 seed in the CFP. With the loss to Oregon, the sixth-seeded Nittany Lions draw SMU, who rightfully made it over Alabama due to its 33-30 loss in the ACC Championship to Clemson. Penn State still gets to host its first-ever home playoff game in the CFP era, and the current path is favorable despite not clinching the 1-seed and a first-round bye. Top-seed Oregon and fourth-seed Arizona State each earned first-round byes, as did No. 2-seed Georgia and third-seed Boise State. If Penn State gets past SMU, it will face Boise State in the second round of the CFP. The best case scenario would see Penn State beat Boise State and face the winner of Georgia and the winner of the first-round matchup between Notre Dame and Indiana in the CFP semifinals.OTTAWA - First Nations leaders are split over next steps after a landmark $47.8-billion child welfare reform deal with Canada was struck down, prompting differing legal opinions from both sides. The Assembly of First Nations and a board member of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society have received competing legal opinions on potential ways forward. Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict says the chiefs he represents are still hoping the agreement that chiefs outside the province voted down two months ago is not moot. Chiefs in Ontario are interveners in the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal case that led to its realization. He added there are also concerns that some of the elements in the new negotiation mandate outlined by chiefs in an October assembly go beyond the current governance structure of the Assembly of First Nations. “There will have to be action by the Assembly of First Nations in the very near future to advance these positions, but you also need willing partners,” Benedict said. “We’re still considering what our options are.” Those options are also being debated in legal reviews commissioned by the Assembly of First Nations and a board member of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, which are both parties to the human rights case, along with Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Khelsilem, a chairperson from the Squamish Nation who penned a resolution that defeated the deal in October, critiqued the stance of Ontario First Nations by saying they negotiated a “bad agreement” for First Nations outside the province and now that chiefs want to go back to the table for a better deal, they want to split from the process entirely. “It potentially undermines the collective unity of First Nations to achieve something that is going to benefit all of us,” he said. The $47.8-billion agreement was struck in July after decades of advocacy and litigation from First Nations and experts, seeking to redress discrimination against First Nations children who were torn from their families and placed in foster care. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal said Canada’s underfunding was discriminatory because it meant kids living on reserve were given fewer services than those living off reserves, and tasked Canada with reaching an agreement with First Nations to reform the system. The agreement was meant to cover 10 years of funding for First Nations to take control of their own child welfare services from the federal government. Chiefs and service providers critiqued the deal for months, saying it didn’t go far enough to ensure an end to the discrimination. They have also blasted the federal government for what they say is its failure to consult with First Nations in negotiations, and for the exclusion of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, which helped launched the initial human rights complaint. In October at a special chiefs assembly in Calgary, the deal was struck down through two resolutions. The Assembly of First Nations sought a legal review of those resolutions by Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP — a firm where the former national chief of the organization, Perry Bellegarde, works as a special adviser. In the legal review from Fasken, it appears as though the assembly asked for direction on how to get “rid” of two resolutions used to vote down the deal, with an employee of the firm saying they can review the resolutions together if they want them both gone, or they can “leave room for compromise” with one of the resolutions. In a statement, the Assembly of First Nations said the review was conducted to assess the legal, technical and operational aspects of the resolutions to ensure their “effective implementation.” “The opinions formed by external counsel are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of the AFN,” said Andrew Bisson, the chief executive officer, who added it’s not unusual for the organization to seek such reviews. Bisson did not address the language used by a Fasken employee to “get rid” of resolutions, but said “the legal and technical reviews were conducted in good faith, not to undermine the chiefs’ direction. The chiefs have provided clear direction, and the AFN is committed to following that direction.” The legal reviews from Fasken, dated Nov. 15, argue that the October resolutions on child welfare require a significant review of who voted for them, along with changes to the organization’s charter should they be implemented. Resolution 60 called for a rejection of the final settlement agreement, and for the establishment of a Children’s Chiefs Commission that will be representative of all regions and negotiate long-term reforms. It also called for the AFN’s executive committee to “unconditionally include” the Caring Society in negotiations. Fasken said that commission is contrary to the AFN’s charter, and the law, because the AFN’s executive committee doesn’t have the power to create one, and that the executive committee “alone” has the authority to execute mandates on behalf of the assembly. It adds there are no accountability measures for the new negotiation body, and that it will represent regions that are not participants in the AFN. Resolution 61, which built upon resolution 60, is similarly against the charter for the same reasons, the review says. As such, it says, the resolutions can’t be implemented. The firm also wrote that there were alleged conflicts of interest during the October vote, saying “numerous proxies were also employees, shareholders, directors, agents or otherwise had a vested interest” in the First Nations child and family service agencies whose interests were the subject of the resolutions. Chief Joe Miskokomon of Chippewas of the Thames First Nation in southwestern Ontario called that “political deception.” In response to that review, a board member of the Caring Society, which has been a vocal critic of the July deal, sought their own. The review penned by Aird Berlis for Mary Teegee and dated Dec. 2 stated it was “inappropriate for the AFN to seek, and not disclose, legal opinions which are then cited to attempt to second-guess decisions already made by the First Nations in Assembly.” It also states that while the AFN’s vice-president of strategic policy and integration, Amber Potts, raised concerns with the movers and seconders of the resolutions, the entirety of the legal opinion the assembly sought was not shared with them. Teegee’s review challenges that of the AFN’s by saying the resolutions are consistent with the AFN’s charter, and that nothing restricts First Nations in assembly from expressing their sovereign will by delegating authority to another entity. “AFN’s role and purpose at all times is to effect the sovereign will of First Nations, however it is expressed, on ‘any matter’ that they see fit,” the review from Aird Berlis reads. “It is too late to attempt to question the resolutions. They are now final.” This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 9, 2024.

Austin, Dec. 08, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Overhead Cranes Market Size & Growth Analysis: “According to SNS Insider Research, The Overhead Cranes Market size was valued at USD 5.24 Billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 8.68 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 5.78% over the forecast period from 2024 to 2032.” The Overhead Cranes Market is fueled by infrastructure growth, expanding manufacturing, and rising port and logistics needs in emerging economies. The Overhead Cranes Market is experiencing significant growth, largely driven by the increasing demand for infrastructure development in emerging economies. As these economies continue to expand, there is a rising need for advanced material handling solutions to support the growth of key sectors. The rapid expansion of manufacturing industries requires efficient systems to manage and transport heavy materials, which boosts the demand for overhead cranes. Additionally, the growth in port and logistics infrastructure further contributes to this trend. Ports require cranes to handle large volumes of goods, while logistics hubs rely on cranes for efficient transportation of materials. The ongoing infrastructure development projects, coupled with the increasing industrial activities, make overhead cranes essential for optimizing operations in various sectors, thus driving the overall market growth. With continued industrialization, the demand for these cranes is expected to remain strong in the coming years. Get a Sample Report of Overhead Cranes Market@ https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/1132 Major Players Analysis Listed in this Report are: ABUS Kransysteme GmbH Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) EMH, Inc. GH Cranes & Components Gorbel Cranes Kito Corporation Konecranes Plc Ralf Teichmann GmbH Sumitomo Heavy Industries Material Handling Systems Co., Ltd. Weihua Group Terex Corporation Liebherr Group Jaso Industrial Cranes Sany Group Cargotec Corporation Dongqi Crane DHS Crane ZPMC Demag Cranes & Components Faymonville & Other Players Overhead Cranes Market Report Scope: Need more industry insights or statistical data on Overhead Cranes Market, Make an Inquiry Now@ https://www.snsinsider.com/enquiry/1132 Market Dominance and Trends in Bridge Cranes and Lifting Capacity Segments: 2023 Insights By Type: The Bridge Cranes segment dominated the market with a share of over 37% in 2023. Bridge cranes are vital in industries that require the lifting of heavy loads across large spaces, providing the precision needed for safe and efficient load handling. Their widespread use in sectors such as automotive, manufacturing, and construction highlights their importance in industrial operations. These cranes can span large areas and handle substantial materials, making them ideal for heavy-duty environments. Their ability to maneuver and lift heavy loads with precision and reliability has solidified their position as the preferred solution in industries where efficiency and safety are paramount. By Lifting Capacity: The "Up to 5 Ton" segment held a market share of over 42% in 2023. Cranes used for light to medium lifting tasks are commonly found in manufacturing, warehouses, and logistics environments due to their affordability and versatility. These cranes are particularly suited for everyday applications, including material handling, assembly, and the transportation of small equipment. Their ability to handle moderate loads with ease makes them invaluable in operations where efficiency and cost-effectiveness are key. As industries seek to optimize workflows and reduce operational costs, the demand for these cranes continues to grow. They are appreciated not only for their lower initial investment but also for their operational efficiency, helping businesses increase productivity while maintaining safety and reliability in tasks such as lifting and moving materials. Overhead Cranes Market Key Segmentation: By Type Gantry Cranes Jib Cranes Bridge Cranes Others By Lifting Capacity Up to 5 Ton 6-10 Ton 11-50 Ton More Than 50 Ton By End Use Industry Manufacturing Automotive and Transportation Construction Metal and Mining Power and Utilities Ports and Shipyards Others Do you have any specific queries on Overhead Cranes Market, Request an Analyst Call Now@ https://www.snsinsider.com/request-analyst/1132 Asia-Pacific Dominates Overhead Cranes Market in 2023, While North America Poised for Fastest Growth The Asia-Pacific region led the Overhead Cranes Market in 2023, accounting for more than 36% of the market share. The growth of the overhead cranes market in the Asia-Pacific region is primarily fueled by the ongoing industrialization in countries such as China, India, Japan, and South Korea. The expansion of infrastructure projects, along with the growth of the logistics and manufacturing sectors in these nations, is driving the demand for overhead cranes. Additionally, the region's large number of crane manufacturers and cost-effective production capabilities make Asia-Pacific a key hub for both the production and consumption of overhead cranes on a global scale. North America is expected to witness the fastest growth in the coming years. The growing industrial activities, especially in automotive manufacturing, aerospace, and construction, are fueling the demand for advanced overhead crane systems. In North America, the incorporation of smart sensors, IoT technology, and energy-efficient solutions into crane systems is increasingly common, improving both operational efficiency and safety. Additionally, the continuous modernization of existing crane systems in the region is further driving market growth. Recent Developments In June 2024: Liebherr's factory in Ehingen, Germany, expanded its product lineup with the introduction of the world's most powerful 6-axle crane: the new LTM 1400-6.1. Featuring a 70-meter telescopic boom, this crane is designed for easy and efficient setup processes. The LTM 1400-6.1 succeeds the highly regarded and successful LTM 1350-6.1. In February 2023: Weihua introduced a Smart Manager System for crane lifting operations, marking the beginning of a new era of digitalization and safety advancements in the lifting industry. This system enables users to eliminate hidden risks and achieve enhanced efficiency with added value. Buy a Single-User PDF of Overhead Cranes Market Research Report 2024-2032@ https://www.snsinsider.com/checkout/1132 Table of Contents – Major Key Points 1. Introduction 2. Executive Summary 3. Research Methodology 4. Market Dynamics 5. Statistical Insights and Trends Reporting 6. Competitive Landscape 7. Overhead Cranes Market Segmentation, By Type 8. Overhead Cranes Market Segmentation, By Lifting Capacity 9. Overhead Cranes Market Segmentation, By End Use Industry 10. Regional Analysis 11. Company Profiles 12. Use Cases and Best Practices 13. Conclusion Access Complete Report Details of Overhead Cranes Market Analysis & Outlook Study 2024-2032@ https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/overhead-cranes-market-1132 [For more information or need any customization research mail us at info@snsinsider.com] About Us: SNS Insider is one of the leading market research and consulting agencies that dominates the market research industry globally. Our company's aim is to give clients the knowledge they require in order to function in changing circumstances. In order to give you current, accurate market data, consumer insights, and opinions so that you can make decisions with confidence, we employ a variety of techniques, including surveys, video talks, and focus groups around the world.Ontario First Nations mull next steps on child welfare amid various legal opinions

What to know about Brooke Rollins, Trump's pick for agriculture secretary

Fortnite Ballistic, a 5v5 first-person tactical shooter mode, is set to launch in early access on December 11. Epic Games is bringing first-person gaming experience to Fortnite. The mode features teams of attackers and defenders clashing in intense, strategy-focused matches, which will test skills and coordination. The early access version of Ballistic will debut with a single map, Skyline 10, and a limited number of weapons and items. Each match will last seven rounds, in which the attacker's goal is to plant a Rift Point device, while defenders will try to prevent it. Path of Exile 2 Early Access Available Today on PS5; Check Price and Other Details. Ballistic hits Early Access December 11 Round by Round. Tactical FPS. 5v5. Get a whole new perspective and get all the details on Ballistic, here: https://t.co/ZiUJW8l1wW pic.twitter.com/VAt5KD2xz1 — Fortnite (@FortniteGame) December 7, 2024 (SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter, Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)Conte: ‘Napoli not going back, there will be bumps in the road’

Mawson Infrastructure Group Inc. Announces Monthly Operational Update for November 2024COP 29: Here's what to know about the new funding deal at UN climate talksKey details to know about the arrest of a suspect in the killing of UnitedHealthcare's CEO

Sheriden Hackney knows what loneliness can feel like. It’s why she started Conscious ConnectionLiberty Roofing Pro's Offers Affordable Butler Roofing Solutions in Butler, PAWhy Williams-Sonoma Rallied 28.2% in November

Global Applicant Tracking (ATS) Software Market Size, Share and Forecast By Key Players-Visume, Jobvite, Jobscan, JobAdder, ADP

Dukes take down Jacksonville State in Boardwalk BatttleLife After Soto Nationals Outfield Plans Take Shape

Bhiwandi: Samajwadi Party MLA Rais Shaikh From Bhiwandi East Seeks MCOCA-Like Law To Stop Defamation Of Legends