234win legit

Sam Darnold completed 33 of 43 passes for a career-best 377 yards to go with three touchdowns and one interception, and the Minnesota Vikings escaped with a 27-25 win over the Green Bay Packers on Sunday afternoon in Minneapolis. Justin Jefferson had eight catches for 92 yards for Minnesota (14-2), which won its ninth game in a row. Jalen Nailor, Jordan Addison and Cam Akers had one touchdown reception apiece for the Vikings. Jordan Love completed 19 of 30 passes for 185 yards and one touchdown for Green Bay (11-5). Josh Jacobs and Emanuel Wilson each rushed for a touchdown and Malik Heath had a touchdown catch for the Packers, who lost to the Vikings for the second time this season. Minnesota's nine-game winning streak matches its third longest in franchise history. The Vikings are enjoying their longest stretch of success since 1975, when they won 10 straight. Green Bay rallied with back-to-back touchdowns in the fourth quarter to pull within two. Wilson scored on a 5-yard run to cut the Packers' deficit to 27-18 with 6:12 to go. Love brought Green Bay within 27-25 with 2:18 to play. He fired a 3-yard touchdown pass to Heath, who scored on a quick slant. The Vikings got the ball on the following kickoff and never gave it back to Green Bay. Darnold secured the win when he lobbed a pass to Akers for a first down to set up the victory formation. The Packers opened the scoring late in the first quarter with a 22-yard field goal by Brandon McManus. Minnesota responded to grab a 13-3 lead at the half. Darnold found Nailor for a 31-yard touchdown with 11:52 remaining in the first half. Nailor was wide open and made a basket catch near the back of the end zone. Reichard rounded out the first-half scoring with field goals from 25 yards and 50 yards. The Vikings increased their lead to 20-3 on the opening drive of the second half. Addison made a diving grab for an 18-yard touchdown. Green Bay pulled within 20-10 with 5:07 left in the third quarter. Jacobs scored on a 2-yard run. Darnold's third touchdown pass, this time to Akers, made it 27-10 in favor of the Vikings with 51 seconds remaining in the third quarter. --Field Level MediaPresident of the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), Samuel Agbeluyi, recently had an interactive session with members of the Finance Correspondent Association of Nigeria (FICAN), during which he shed some light on President Bola Tinubu’s tax reform bills and also explained why the proposals are for the overall good of the country’s economy. Tony Chukwunyem reports President Tinubu’s tax reform bills, currently before the National Assembly, have sparked a lot of controversy among various groups in the country, with some critics questioning the President’s decision to send the bills to the lawmakers at this time. What is your take on the issue? I’m not here to say whether the timing of the tax reform bills is right or wrong. I even believe that it is right and that we need those amendments passed as quickly as possible so that the Nigeria can actually benchmark its economy against other countries’. As we are speaking, a lot of people want to invest in Nigeria. The President is going all over the world, marketing the country. It is good to market the country, but the people who are coming into Nigeria, will do their background check; they will still do all the necessary findings before they come because you are just one of several countries in the world. So for them to come, there has to be certainty on what they want to put on the table. I will give you an example. Taxation is a major point; it is a major variable that they must be sure of before they come in. So for tax professionals, how do you advise an American or a French person that we have about 65 types of taxes; how do you explain that? You are already demarketing the country yourself. And if you don’t say it, you are telling lies and as a professional you are not supposed to tell lies. These 60 or 65 taxes, depending on the state you are visiting, exclude the activities of non-state actors; those ones who would come to your shop and ask you to do something (part with your money) otherwise they would disrupt your business. You are carrying goods from one point to another and they are not allowing you to do that. So for tax professionals we have been longing for this kind of bill so that we will have certainty of the law guiding and administering the tax arrangement in the country. Also, statistics reveal that only nearly five different types of taxes that we have among the 60 or 65, are actually bringing in over 90 per cent of our tax revenue. Now how do you bother the system, disturb a business, disturb a company, disturb the personnel working with company with about 60 different types of taxes that are not helping the country? If revenue is by the number of taxes that you collect, Nigeria’s tax to GDP will be over 30 per cent. So why are we struggling with a low tax to GDP ratio? So, it means that we just have those things as nuisance tax as we call them. You are not helping the system. President Tinubu mentioned his dislike for multiple taxation immediately after he assumed office and he walked the talk and set up a committee and we are where we are today. So to me, that we are bringing sanity to the tax space is a great thing. Imagine the fact that companies receive letters from local government that they want to check their books; states will write that they want to check their books for various tax responsibilities; FIRS will also write. The laws that set up these tax laws and responsibilities allow for audit. So you can’t say FIRS don’t come and audit me. FIRS can call you for audit and they can do investigation. The state has the same power. So when you subject somebody who is operating in a very hostile business environment to this kind of tax administration, you are not helping that system. And after sometime, people don’t want to do business again. They will prefer to put their money in treasury bills. They would say, let me invest somewhere else and I won’t need to bother myself with diesel, generator and these people coming from revenue office. That is not helping us because you can only create employment when people do business; when they set up companies. So the benefits of the tax reform bills are enormous. You have the benchmark for the threshold for small business being raised from 25 per cent to 50 per cent; that is a major move. What they are saying is that, have more money in your hand; go and do your business; once you are prosperous enough, then you can visit us or we can visit you. But if you are still operating between the 25 and 40 per cent threshold, most likely, your working capital will be impaired. And you know getting money from the banks, particularly for SMEs in Nigeria, is a tall order. Also, you know that you can’t drive economic activities with taxation because without economic activities there will be no taxation. The moment you put too much pressure on companies, they will fold up and they will not be there tomorrow for you to collect anything. Can you share your views on the debate over the proposed derivation of Value Added Tax (VAT) based on consumption? We have talked so much about derivation as if it is the only thing in the VAT bill. If you buy equipment, before now, the money you expend to put the infrastructure for the equipment and the like in place, let’s say N200 million, by virtue of what we have as at today, depending on the nature of that equipment, you can’t retrieve your money until five or 10 years. But what is being proposed in this bill is that your equipment, the amount you spend on assets, will be zero rated. Zero rated means that you can claim the input. So that in that year, you will claim the input and that is all and of course your turnover or whatever it is that is your output. Another aspect of the benefit of this bill is that before now, once you do the differential and government needs to refund money to you, under this bill, the process for refund is made simpler. But as we speak and I have been in practice for quite some time, no company can get refund from the FIRS until they subject you to another round of audit and that will take years. So the amount of relief that is being given to the tax payer under this proposal is enormous. And again I repeat that the derivation principle, if it would pose a problem, then it can dropped. Everybody must be carried along. If state A is not doing well the fall out of not doing well will get to the state that is doing well. So beyond economic activity you also need to look at the social aspects of the bill and the political balancing, that is fair. How would you react to the view that the reason there is so much controversy about the tax reform bills is that the Presidency didn’t consult widely enough before sending them to the National Assembly? There was a lot of consultation among tax professionals within the six geo political zones in the country, but evidently it is not enough. And I think it won’t be enough. What we tax professionals need to know is that we have talked to ourselves and those who were not part of the consultation have all the facilities to read what was going on. But for the political leaders, I was expecting a lot of consultations and buyin, because without buy in, this massive change will look strange to some people and that is what we are seeing. I expect that consultation at this level to be led by the President himself. This is because Nigeria has a lot to gain once this thing is successful and we have a lot to lose should it not be successful-God forbid. So I expect the Presidency, the political leaders to lead the consultations. Let’s not be carried away; and that is why as an Institute, we are sticking to the technical points. The political leaders know how they can actually talk to themselves. So we recommend that this should be done immediately so that everybody will be on the same page. Won’t low income earners be adversely affected by these bills as it appears they are not being consulted? I don’t see how it will adversely affect them. Even at the point of deliberation on the bill some state internal revenue chairmen asked questions about who would be paying personal income tax in form of PAYE in the their states under the new minimum wage. Now, let’s work with the statistics. What do you actually receive from somebody receiving N30, 000? In any country, the big people are the ones who actually pay personal income tax and statistics have shown that they are under 10 per cent. So we have all the big people in the country so what they need to do is to be good. Now there is another school of thought that says don’t exempt anybody; once they pay N1 or N2 into the pocket of the government it gives them the moral right; a sense of belonging. But ‘sense of belonging’ for somebody who is dying? So, I think that the voice for exception for low earners should be louder. Years ago, I represented this Institute-I was not the President then- at a public hearing held by the National Assembly on minimum tax. As an Institute we have spoken against minimum tax. This is because, minimum tax is capital erosion. Somebody has done his business for a year, he didn’t make profit (because you are supposed to subject his profit to tax computation), but he didn’t make profit and you say he must do minimum tax. Where is he getting the money from? From his capital. So you are eroding the capital. And in Nigeria, we have gone through a lot of trails, if I can use that word. As the President said: ‘Let the poor breathe’. If we must follow that slogan, then exempt the low earner so that Nigeria will be better. What is likely to be the impact of the tax reform bills, if passed, on financial inclusion? I will go back to the cashless economy policy of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and its naira redesign programme. For those of us who have travelled outside this country, how often do you see people carrying cash? God help you if you are a black man and you get to any store in London and you bring out 100 pounds or 50 pounds. I have met a Briton who said he has never sighted 50 pounds in his life time. And we are carrying cash up and down in Nigeria. Who benefits? I’m speaking to the benefits of cashless economy and the naira redesign programme. Whatever the immediate past CBN Governor has done right, we acknowledge; whatever he has not done right, we isolate and deal with it on its merit and not to throw everything into the dustbin. So let’s take the very reasonable conclusion on the cashless economy: many people should have access to banking services. However, to do that, you also need to talk to CBN. The outrageous charges are also one of the things driving people away from the banks. Thank God for the fintechs; those ones are doing better. And I say to the established banks; they’d better wake up on time before they drive all of us to the fintechs. I have entered major hotels in this country and I bring out my debit card and I see Moniepoint or Opay and I say, where are the big banks of this world? Let it not be like NITEL and the experience we are having now. So don’t drive away people from the banking sector through outrageous charges. Once you don’t do that many people will come into that space and of course it will be easy to trace transactions. Furthermore, government must hold consultations on the tax reform bills at a very senior level; it should not be left to technocrats alone. When they are in a meeting and there are aspects that are not too clear to them, they can bring in technocrats to make our presentations and we leave the hall for them. They understand their language; they know how to talk to themselves. They need to do that at this time. But the most important thing is this. Let us assume that all the issues are resolved and the bills become an Act. If we give our money in terms of our tax payments to the government and we still see this kind of lifestyle shown by Local government chairmen, spouses of local government chairmen, state governors and by the leadership at the Federal level, it will be difficult for you to have voluntary compliance. I say this with all emphasis. So we appeal to our political leaders- it is a fiduciary duty to the nation-before you leave large go and be a Dangote. And the Dangote himself is not even living large. So as a political leader stop living large at our expense; tone down the opulence. Once you do this, you will restore the trust deficit that has been lost. Once the trust deficit is restored then there will be voluntary compliance, once there is voluntary compliance, cost of collection will go down and revenue will go up. This is the way to go; this is what we recommend to government. We won’t be tired of giving our recommendations. This is because we are the ones advising people to go and pay your taxes; it’s the right thing to do; its what will make Nigeria great and so on. The Economic stabilisation bills, which we pray will turn into an Act, will not on its own make Nigeria an el dorado. What will make Nigeria an el dorado is very good usage of tax revenue.234win legit 。

California bill would mandate armed school officers following Oroville shootingIn a message to the American people, the King expressed “great sadness” at the news of Mr Carter’s death, describing him as “a committed public servant” who “devoted his life to promoting peace and human rights”. He added: “His dedication and humility served as an inspiration to many, and I remember with great fondness his visit to the United Kingdom in 1977. “My thoughts and prayers are with President Carter’s family and the American people at this time.” Mr Carter, a former peanut farmer, served one term in the White House between 1977 and 1981 and spent his post-presidency years as a global humanitarian, winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. Sir Keir Starmer said Mr Carter had “lived his values in the service of others to the very end” through “decades of selfless public service”. Praising a “lifelong dedication to peace” that saw him win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, Sir Keir added: “Motivated by his strong faith and values, President Carter redefined the post-presidency with a remarkable commitment to social justice and human rights at home and abroad.” Tributes to Mr Carter followed the announcement of his death by his family on Sunday, more than a year after he decided to enter hospice care. His son, Chip Carter, said: “My father was a hero, not only to me but to everyone who believes in peace, human rights, and unselfish love.” Very sorry to hear of President Carter’s passing. I pay tribute to his decades of selfless public service. My thoughts are with his family and friends at this time. pic.twitter.com/IaKmZcteb1 — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) December 29, 2024 US President Joe Biden, one of the first elected politicians to endorse Mr Carter’s bid for the presidency in 1976, said the world had “lost an extraordinary leader, statesman and humanitarian”. He said: “Over six decades, we had the honour of calling Jimmy Carter a dear friend. But, what’s extraordinary about Jimmy Carter, though, is that millions of people throughout America and the world who never met him thought of him as a dear friend as well. “With his compassion and moral clarity, he worked to eradicate disease, forge peace, advance civil rights and human rights, promote free and fair elections, house the homeless, and always advocate for the least among us.” Vice President Kamala Harris said Mr Carter “reminded our nation and the world that there is strength in decency and compassion”. “His life and legacy continue to inspire me — and will inspire generations to come,” she said. “Our world is a better place because of President Carter.” Other UK politicians also paid tribute to Mr Carter. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said he was “an inspiration” who “led a truly remarkable life dedicated to public service with a genuine care for people”. Scottish First Minister John Swinney described the former president as “a good, decent, honest man who strove for peace in all that he did”, while Welsh First Minister said he was “a remarkable man” and “a humanitarian and scholar”. Former prime minister Sir Tony Blair said Mr Carter’s “life was a testament to public service”. He added: “I always had the greatest respect for him, his spirit and his dedication. He fundamentally cared and consistently toiled to help those in need.” Gordon Brown, another former prime minister, said it was a “privilege” to have known Mr Carter, who “will be mourned, not just in America, but in every continent where human rights are valued”. Mr Carter is expected to receive a state funeral featuring public observances in Atlanta, Georgia, and Washington DC before being buried in his hometown of Plains, Georgia. A moderate democrat born in Plains in October 1924, Mr Carter’s political career took him from the Georgia state senate to the state governorship and, finally, the White House, where he took office as 39th president in the wake of the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War. His presidency saw economic disruption amid volatile oil prices, along with social tensions at home and challenges abroad including the Iranian revolution that sparked a 444-day hostage crisis at the US embassy in Tehran. But he also brokered the Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel, which led to a peace treaty between the two countries in 1979. After his defeat in the 1980 presidential election, he worked more than four decades leading The Carter Centre, which he and his late wife Rosalynn co-founded in 1982 to “wage peace, fight disease, and build hope”. Under his leadership, the Carter Center virtually eliminated Guinea Worm disease, which has gone from affecting 3.5 million people in Africa and Asia in 1986 to just 14 in 2023. Mrs Carter, who died last year aged 96, had played a more active role in her husband’s presidency than previous first ladies, with Mr Carter saying she had been “my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished”. Earlier this year, on his 100th birthday, Mr Carter received a private congratulatory message from the King, expressing admiration for his life of public service

Texans claim WR Diontae Johnson off waivers from Ravens

AllenComm, a leading provider of innovative, effective learning experiences, and Pure Storage Data Solutions have received recognition for an online learning program to support a corporate values initiative SALT LAKE CITY , Dec. 5, 2024 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- AllenComm — an innovator in learning advisory, design, tech and talent for the corporate learning and development market — and Pure Storage have received a 2024 Silver Davey Award for an online learning program designed to help the data solutions company build and nurture a unified corporate culture worldwide. The annual Davey Awards, one of the world's largest and most prestigious creative awards competitions, honors the achievements of the "Creative Davids" who derive their strength from big ideas, rather than stratospheric budgets. After rapid growth from a few hundred employees in a single office to more than 5,600+ members and offices internationally, Pure Storage was looking to build upon the corporate culture that made it successful. AllenComm collaborated with the company to create a unique learning program that not only reflects internal marketing communications but inspires learners to find value and reward in the experience. The scalable online program, entitled Simply Pure, uses a narrative-oriented approach that puts learners in charge of their learning experience. Engaging videos, motion graphic videos and interactive activities are incorporated to showcase the company's history and explain unfamiliar technical terms, with contextual stories added to generate excitement. Learners can select any of five topics based on what they want to know, rather than having to follow a defined path created for them. After 6 months, and more than 2,300 Pure Storage team members participating in the program, employees say they feel more connected personally with their jobs because they now understand more clearly how they fit into the broader organization. "Shared stories can strengthen an organization's leadership culture by connecting with and engaging all employees as participants in the story," said AllenComm CEO, Ron Zamir . "Our learner experience designers worked closely with Pure Storage to capture their foundational stories and to scale the storytelling with video and animation." "At Pure Storage, we value inspiration and innovation as central to our culture," said Jack Reid , Learning Partner at the company's Leadership Academy. "AllenComm has helped us to realize our vision of scaling our culture with a development program that is intentionally not a typical training program. We're honored that the result of our partnership is receiving acclaim within the learning industry, but we're even more excited that this foundational program in our Pure Leadership Academy is helping to democratize leadership in our expanding organization." You can learn more about the award-winning Pure Storage program here. To find out more about other learning programs developed by AllenComm, visit their website . About AllenComm For over 40 years, AllenComm has partnered with leading companies and non-profit organizations to create and scale transformative learning solutions. Extensive instructional design experience, innovative learning technologies and agency-level creative teams enable AllenComm to stand out in the learning landscape. Considered one of the top firms of its kind, AllenComm wins dozens of industry awards year after year for its custom learning solutions. Partnering with AllenComm to supplement and support learning and adjacent needs for human capital management has helped customers reduce expenses, shorten onboarding periods and increase the impact of their efforts. Media Contact AllenComm, AllenComm, (801) 537-7800, info@allencomm.com , AllenComm View original content: https://www.prweb.com/releases/allencomm-and-pure-storage-win-2024-davey-award-for-education-website-302324141.html SOURCE AllenComm

Jimmy Carter, a former peanut farmer who rose from rural Georgia to the White House and went on to a storied post-presidency that included winning the Nobel Peace Prize, died Sunday at his home in Plains, Ga. He was 100. An outsider, free from the baggage of Washington, Carter defeated President Gerald R. Ford in 1976, a victory seen as representing a clean break with the Watergate era. But the 39th president’s solitary term in office was hamstrung by a sluggish economy and crises at home and abroad. His presidency was also an anomaly, sandwiched between a total of two decades of Republican presidents. Carter, who was born on Oct. 1, 1924, was predeceased by his wife, Rosalynn Carter, who died on Nov. 19, 2023. The couple was married for more than 77 years. Their son Chip Carter confirmed the former president’s death Sunday to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution . The Carter Center announced in February 2023 that the former president had decided to receive hospice care and spend his remaining time at home with family, rather than seek further medical treatment “after a series of short hospital stays.” Years before, Carter had been diagnosed with melanoma, which he announced in August 2015 had extended to his brain. He said at the time that he expected to have a short time to live, but after aggressive treatment he was reported free of the melanoma by December of that year. In what was perhaps the high point of his post-presidency years, Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on Oct. 11, 2002, for what the Nobel Foundation called “his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.” In his acceptance speech, Carter criticized the very notion of preemptive war as having “catastrophic consequences.” He added: “If we accept the premise that the United Nations is the best avenue for the maintenance of peace, then the carefully considered decisions of the United Nations Security Council must be enforced. All too often, the alternative has proven to be uncontrollable violence and expanding spheres of hostility.” Relationship with Congress Scholars have judged Carter’s dealings with Congress critically. Democrats controlled both the Senate and the House for the entirety of his presidency. But many experts have argued that the former agribusinessman was largely disinterested in working directly with lawmakers. After leaving the White House, Carter tried to reverse the conventional wisdom about his relationship with Congress, arguing that lawmakers mostly supported his initiatives. “Despite the controversial and often unpopular nature of my proposals to the Congress, I had remarkably good success in congressional approval of bills I supported,” he wrote in his 2010 book “White House Diary.” Carter pointed to congressional vote data compiled by CQ, writing that at the time his book was published it showed he ranked third among all presidents, behind Lyndon B. Johnson and John F. Kennedy, when it came to garnering congressional approval for legislation on which he took a position and was voted on by lawmakers. Congress gave Carter his way 76.6% of the time, according to the CQ Almanac data. But Politifact, an independent fact-checking organization, found the former Georgia governor’s batting average with Congress was “unexceptional.” That’s because few of Carter’s initiatives actually became law; CQ’s methodology handed out successful scores for a positive vote in one chamber, even if a bill never became law. The roots of Carter’s struggles with Congress can be traced to his time in the governor’s mansion, according to scholars at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, which specializes in presidential studies. “As when he was governor, Carter had an abiding dislike for the backroom dealing that is so pervasive in Washington,” Robert Strong, a politics professor at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Va., wrote for the Miller Center. Strong said lawmakers “found the new president hard to deal with.” Soon after he entered the White House, lawmakers sensed he lacked the support of many Americans — and they pounced. “Congress asserted its power over the president by shooting down (a) consumer-protection bill and (a) labor reform package,” Strong said. “Carter responded by vetoing a public works package in 1978 on the grounds that it was inflationary. A pattern of mutual distrust and contempt had been set.” Energy policy Also complicating his dealings with Congress was his opposition, soon after taking office, to a rivers and harbors bill supported by Democratic leaders that he felt was full of wasteful spending. Perhaps his biggest achievement was on energy policy, which Carter pushed at a time when U.S. oil imports had risen 65% in the four years before he became president. Carter’s advocacy also came when America was heavily reliant on imports from the OPEC cartel. He convinced lawmakers to pass several measures credited with increasing oil and natural gas supplies and generally lowering prices, as well as others that reshaped mileage standards for cars and American companies’ use of fuel. Carter faced an economy besieged by so-called stagflation, a combination of high inflation, high unemployment and plodding growth. His often-troubled presidency was a drag on congressional Democrats — and his own reelection effort — in 1980. Former California Gov. Ronald Reagan walloped Carter, taking 489 of 538 Electoral College votes. Carter won just six states, including Georgia, as well as the District of Columbia. Republicans picked up 34 House seats and 12 in the Senate, enough to take control of that chamber. After the presidency Carter revealed during an August 2015 press conference that the Iranian hostage crisis, in which an attempted military rescue of embassy employees ended in the deaths of eight American servicemembers, was among his biggest regrets. “I wish I had sent one more helicopter to get the hostages, and we would’ve rescued them,” Carter said, “and I would’ve been reelected.” The New York Times reported in March 2023 that allies of Reagan went on a mission to the Middle East seeking to stop the Iranians from releasing 52 American hostages before Election Day in 1980. After leaving the White House, Carter was among the most active former presidents of the modern era. He participated in election monitoring around the globe, and regularly worked with Habitat for Humanity. What’s more, the Carter Center in Atlanta studied issues such as mental health and fought lesser-known problems, including Guinea-worm disease. Before leaving office in 2001, then-President Bill Clinton reportedly told confidants that the Carter Center was the model for the kind of post-presidency pursuits he envisioned. ©2024 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Visit cqrollcall.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.Sempra Named Among Newsweek's 'Most Responsible Companies'