nice88 asia register

nice88 asia register B. Metzler seel. Sohn & Co. Holding AG acquired a new stake in shares of DoorDash, Inc. ( NASDAQ:DASH – Free Report ) in the 3rd quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The institutional investor acquired 7,189 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,026,000. Several other hedge funds also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Rakuten Securities Inc. grew its stake in DoorDash by 302.3% in the 3rd quarter. Rakuten Securities Inc. now owns 173 shares of the company’s stock worth $25,000 after buying an additional 130 shares in the last quarter. Meeder Asset Management Inc. grew its stake in DoorDash by 82.0% in the 2nd quarter. Meeder Asset Management Inc. now owns 293 shares of the company’s stock worth $32,000 after buying an additional 132 shares in the last quarter. Headlands Technologies LLC bought a new stake in shares of DoorDash in the 2nd quarter worth approximately $32,000. Versant Capital Management Inc lifted its holdings in shares of DoorDash by 340.8% in the 2nd quarter. Versant Capital Management Inc now owns 335 shares of the company’s stock worth $36,000 after acquiring an additional 259 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Quest Partners LLC lifted its holdings in shares of DoorDash by 146.8% in the 2nd quarter. Quest Partners LLC now owns 343 shares of the company’s stock worth $37,000 after acquiring an additional 204 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 90.64% of the company’s stock. DoorDash Stock Performance Shares of DASH stock opened at $177.24 on Friday. DoorDash, Inc. has a one year low of $92.56 and a one year high of $178.16. The company’s 50-day moving average is $153.61 and its 200 day moving average is $128.96. The company has a market capitalization of $73.62 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of -393.87, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 13.31 and a beta of 1.67. Analyst Ratings Changes DASH has been the subject of a number of recent research reports. Jefferies Financial Group boosted their price objective on shares of DoorDash from $155.00 to $180.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, October 22nd. Needham & Company LLC boosted their price objective on shares of DoorDash from $145.00 to $180.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, October 31st. JMP Securities boosted their price objective on shares of DoorDash from $160.00 to $190.00 and gave the stock a “market outperform” rating in a report on Thursday, October 31st. BTIG Research upgraded shares of DoorDash from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $155.00 price objective for the company in a report on Thursday, September 19th. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company boosted their price objective on shares of DoorDash from $127.00 to $142.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a report on Friday, October 4th. Ten investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and twenty-four have given a buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, DoorDash has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $164.03. Read Our Latest Stock Report on DoorDash Insider Activity at DoorDash In other DoorDash news, Director Stanley Tang sold 1,855 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, November 20th. The shares were sold at an average price of $169.98, for a total transaction of $315,312.90. Following the transaction, the director now owns 35,413 shares in the company, valued at approximately $6,019,501.74. This represents a 4.98 % decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this hyperlink . Also, CFO Ravi Inukonda sold 7,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, August 30th. The shares were sold at an average price of $127.86, for a total transaction of $895,020.00. Following the transaction, the chief financial officer now owns 396,152 shares in the company, valued at $50,651,994.72. This represents a 1.74 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . In the last ninety days, insiders have sold 547,753 shares of company stock valued at $84,544,996. 7.92% of the stock is owned by insiders. DoorDash Company Profile ( Free Report ) DoorDash, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, operates a commerce platform that connects merchants, consumers, and independent contractors in the United States and internationally. The company operates DoorDash Marketplace and Wolt Marketplace, which provide various services, such as customer acquisition, demand generation, order fulfillment, merchandising, payment processing, and customer support. Featured Stories Want to see what other hedge funds are holding DASH? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for DoorDash, Inc. ( NASDAQ:DASH – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for DoorDash Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for DoorDash and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .EAGAN, Minn. (AP) — The Minnesota Vikings waived cornerback Akayleb Evans on Saturday in another setback for their beleaguered 2022 draft class. Evans started 15 games last season, but he had been relegated to a special teams role this year after the Vikings added veteran cornerbacks Stephon Gilmore and Shaquill Griffin. Evans was a fourth-round pick out of Missouri, one of three defensive backs among Minnesota's first five selections in 2022. Lewis Cine (first round) was waived and Andrew Booth (second round) was traded earlier this year. One of their second-round picks, guard Ed Ingram, lost his starting spot last week. Evans was let go to clear a roster spot for tight end Nick Muse, who was activated from injured reserve to play on Sunday at Chicago. The Vikings ruled tight end Josh Oliver out of the game with a sprained ankle. AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/NFL

What to know about Pam Bondi Trump's new pick for attorney general

Alexander: Golden at-bat? It would only tarnish baseball

William Blair reissued their outperform rating on shares of Powerfleet ( NASDAQ:AIOT – Free Report ) in a research note issued to investors on Thursday, RTT News reports. Separately, Barrington Research reiterated an “outperform” rating and issued a $10.00 price objective on shares of Powerfleet in a research report on Monday, November 11th. View Our Latest Stock Analysis on Powerfleet Powerfleet Trading Up 7.1 % Powerfleet ( NASDAQ:AIOT – Get Free Report ) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, November 12th. The company reported ($0.02) earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of ($0.01) by ($0.01). The business had revenue of $77.02 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $74.54 million. During the same quarter last year, the company earned ($0.14) earnings per share. On average, analysts predict that Powerfleet will post -0.14 EPS for the current year. About Powerfleet ( Get Free Report ) PowerFleet, Inc provides wireless Internet-of-Things asset management solutions in the United States, Israel, and internationally. The company offers real-time intelligence for organizations to capture IoT data from various types of assets with devices and sensors to increase efficiencies, and improve safety and security, as well as increase their profitability in easy-to-understand reports, dashboards, and real-time alerts; and application programming interfaces for additional integrations and development to boost other enterprise management systems and third-party applications. Featured Stories Receive News & Ratings for Powerfleet Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Powerfleet and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .EAGAN, Minn. — The waived cornerback on Saturday in another setback for their beleaguered 2022 draft class. started 15 games last season, but he had been relegated to a special teams role this year after the added veteran cornerbacks Stephon Gilmore and Shaquill Griffin. was a fourth-round pick out of Missouri, one of three defensive backs among Minnesota’s first five selections in 2022. Lewis Cine (first round) was waived and Andrew Booth (second round) was traded earlier this year. One of their second-round picks, guard Ed Ingram, lost his starting spot last week. was let go to clear a roster spot for tight end Nick Muse, who was activated from injured reserve to play on Sunday at Chicago. The ruled tight end Josh Oliver out of the game with a sprained ankle. Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click to Read More and View Comments Click to Hide

As someone who has spent years navigating the world of audiology, I’ve realized that helping others embrace hearing health is about more than just telling them what to do yet meeting them where they are. As a lifelong hearing aid user — spanning the evolution from clunky analog devices to today’s sleek, high-tech digital models — I’ve learned firsthand that no one likes to be told they “need” something, especially regarding hearing loss. A saying resonates deeply with me: Tell me, I’ll forget; show me, I may remember; involve me, and I’ll understand. This philosophy has shaped how I approach conversations about hearing health. Instead of insisting, I share my journey openly. I show people that being hard of hearing doesn’t define me, it is part of who I am — and it’s nothing to shy away from. Whether I’m wearing those early, bulky analog hearing aids or the sophisticated, Bluetooth-enabled models I use today, I’ve always been proud to showcase the tech on my ears. My mission? To spark curiosity, break stigmas, and invite others to explore hearing health in an empowering, not intimidating way. The Role of Technology in Hearing Health The advancements in hearing aid technology over the years have been remarkable—not just for people like me, but for everyone. Much of the innovation in hearing aids has shaped the consumer audio devices we all use today, from earbuds to noise-canceling headphones. I like to think of myself as a guinea pig for the many promising techs, testing how they improve clarity in conversation, manage noise, and promote hearing health, thus, overall body wellness. Hearing aids have gone from simple amplifiers to highly personalized devices capable of filtering out specific types of noise, connecting seamlessly to smartphones, and even adjusting to different environments automatically. The technology inside most listening devices isn’t just about making sounds louder — it’s about making them more clear, helping people communicate effectively and experience the world more fully. My mission goes beyond my own experience. As someone who values hearing health, I am its ambassador, advocating why it's essential to all of us. On behalf of countless companies — from startups to industry leaders — I’m here to meet you where you are, raising awareness and encouraging conversations about hearing health, no matter your age or level of hearing ability. The Unintended Consequences of Noise Noise is unavoidable in modern life, affecting everyone in ways we often don’t realize. While we might think of gaming, loud concerts, or construction sites as obvious sources of noise pollution, daily and persistent noise and sounds have harmful unintended consequences. Take, for example, the constant stream of alerts, notifications, and ringtones from our devices. These sounds are designed to grab our attention, often interrupting us with sharp, jarring tones. The average smartphone user hears dozens—if not hundreds — of these alerts daily, often at unnecessarily loud volumes. Over time, this exposure can contribute to hearing fatigue, stress, long-term damage and inability to focus . Another example is public spaces, like airports or shopping malls. While they may seem innocuous, these environments are filled with overlapping layers of sound – from announcements to background music to the chatter of crowds. This constant noise can lead to sensory overload, making it difficult for our brains to process and filter what we hear – leading to fatigue. Even something as seemingly harmless as the hum of appliances or the drone of traffic can have unintended consequences. Studies have shown that prolonged exposure to low-frequency noise can affect sleep quality, increase stress levels, and even impact cardiovascular health. What if there is a proactive way to manage and mitigate the conundrum of noise, sound, and hearing, like Lifelong Sound Health? Lifelong Sound Health Breaks Stigmas and Embraces Proactive Hearing Health Hearing issues often remain hidden despite the prevalence of noise in our lives. It’s surprising how many people don’t talk about hearing problems with their doctors — or even know what an audiologist does. This silence stems from a lack of awareness, which we must change, like the classic stigmas of high cost and vanity. Hearing challenges are deeply personal and often hard to articulate, even to professionals. That’s why we need to reframe the conversation. At Akoio, their “Lifelong Sound Health” philosophy is a straightforward and proactive way to think about hearing health. It’s about understanding your auditory exposure in everyday terms: noise, sound, and hearing. Think of it like sun exposure. Just as we know too much sun can harm our skin, we should consider how noise exposure impacts our ears and overall health. Start by asking yourself simple questions: Breaking it down this way makes hearing health more approachable. By understanding your auditory habits, you’re taking the first step toward better sound health—without the dreaded feeling of being told, “You need a hearing aid.” Reframing Hearing Health for Everyone One of the most significant barriers to addressing hearing loss is the stigma associated with it. For many, wearing a hearing aid feels like an admission of aging or vulnerability, this perspective needs to change. Hearing aids are excellent assistive devices that enhance our quality of life and help us engage more fully with the world. That is where awareness plays a crucial role. Education about hearing health should start early, just like lessons about dental care or protecting our skin from the sun. By normalizing conversations about hearing, we can empower people to take control of their hearing health. For example, schools could incorporate lessons about the dangers of excessive gaming noise and loud music and the importance of safe listening habits. Workplaces could provide noise protection resources and encourage employees to monitor their hearing health. For individuals, it’s about recognizing that hearing health is vital to overall wellness—not something to ignore until a problem arises. A Call to Awareness The key to improving hearing health is awareness. Whether you’re dealing with hearing loss, tinnitus, or other auditory challenges, it’s important to acknowledge the role sound plays in your overall well-being. Hearing is a deeply personal sense, yet it’s also one we all share. From the soothing sounds of nature to the voices of loved ones, hearing connects us to the world and to each other. Protecting that connection is worth the effort. So, let’s embrace the tools, resources, and technology available to us. Let’s talk openly about hearing health in a way that’s thoughtful, accessible, and stigma-free. And most importantly, let’s commit to a future where sound health is a priority for everyone—because when we listen, we thrive. By thinking critically about how we interact with noise, sound, and hearing daily, we can all take steps toward better hearing health. After all, sound isn’t just something we hear—it’s something we live.For Lincoln mother Sierra Shouse, there was no other option but to send her oldest son Sammy to Christ Lincoln Schools for kindergarten, even if it was a financial burden. Shouse went to school there herself, and Sammy was enrolled in the school's day care program at age 4, helping him build friendships and familiarity with the school staff. "It's the only school he's ever known," Shouse said. Shouse was aided in paying for the private school through an opportunity scholarship provided by LB1402, which passed the Legislature earlier this year, appropriating $10 million per year for scholarships to private schools. Shouse said she intends to keep Sammy enrolled at Christ Lincoln no matter what, but after LB1402's program was repealed through a voter referendum, the future of her two younger children is still up in the air. People are also reading... Rest assured, Nebraska volleyball fans: The missing fan behind the servers will be back Saturday Matt Rhule reacts to no-call at end of Nebraska-USC game: "I don’t know what else to say" Arrest made in 55-year-old cold case of Nebraska teen stabbed to death 'Bocephus' is back: Hank Williams Jr. to play Lincoln arena Friday Nebraska's home game against Wisconsin gets time, TV designation Kidnapping in Nebraska prompted police chase that ended with 3 dead in Missouri Signing Day: Meet Nebraska volleyball's five-player 2025 class Wind-aided fire destroys vacant Village Inn in Lincoln As Nebraska's Democratic Party shrinks, some former party officials call for change Mountain lion spotted on trail camera east of Bennet, Sheriff's Office says Amie Just: Ahead of milestone birthday, local sports figures give advice on turning 30 UNO freezes funds for LGBTQ+, multicultural, other student groups after audit Sound waves: What others are saying about Nebraska's win against Wisconsin Amie Just: Bring out the tissues — and the brooms — for Nebraska volleyball's emotional win Blunt as ever, Dana Holgorsen unpacks Nebraska role, struggling run game There are plenty of unanswered questions left in the wake of the referendum's success, which passed comfortably in Nebraska's general election by just more than 14 percentage points. Supporters of LB1402 in the Nebraska Legislature are working out the best way to approach "school choice" policies, while families who benefited from the scholarships are left in a state of limbo, unsure if they will continue seeing the same support. Meanwhile, a Nebraska Supreme Court ruling from September could affect future moves to provide public money for private school students. How did Nebraska get here? For the past eight years, state Sen. Lou Ann Linehan of the Omaha area has championed "school choice" legislation. Most of her proposals came up short, until LB753 passed in 2023, allocating $25 million annually in tax credits for private donations to the private school scholarship funds. That bill also faced a repeal through a voter referendum, led by Support Our Schools Nebraska. Opponents to LB753 and LB1402 argued the bills would deplete state funding available for public schools, which could lead to budget cuts and property tax increases. The first Support Our Schools referendum qualified for the ballot, but to get around the referendum, Linehan introduced LB1402 in 2024, which repealed LB753 upon its passage. Linehan acknowledged LB1402 was an " end run " bill intended to circumvent the referendum. In response, Support Our Schools launched a new ballot initiative campaign to partially repeal LB1402, getting rid of the underlying program, but retaining the LB753 repeal. Once again, supporters gathered enough signatures in their petition drive to qualify for the ballot. The second referendum faced attempts to remove it from the ballot, several of which came directly from Linehan. It also survived a challenge in the Nebraska Supreme Court in September, and Support Our Schools leader Tim Royers said he expected more opposition in the months leading up to November. Linehan, who did host one news conference days before the election to combat a Support Our Schools ad, said the reason she didn't try harder to oppose the referendum was simply because she felt it didn't make sense to sink a ton of funds to protect a program that only appropriated $10 million each year. "We're not going to spend $10 million to save $10 million," Linehan said. Royers noted, however, that in 2023, Keep Kids First, a group with which Linehan was affiliated, raised more than $1.4 million to oppose the first Support Our Schools referendum. Support Our Schools raised about $1.7 million that year, and raised an additional $4.6 million so far this year. What's next for Nebraska 'school choice'? The landscape for "school choice" policy is sure to look different in the 2025 session, if only because Linehan is term-limited and will not be returning. Royers said he can't imagine another lawmaker emerging with the same level of commitment Linehan brought. But Linehan says she's not worried. She said there's "more than a handful" of current senators willing to take up the mantle, and she was also optimistic about several incoming lawmakers who will be starting their first terms next year. She mentioned Omaha Sens. Brad Von Gillern and Christy Armendariz, both of whom told the Omaha World-Herald they were interested in school choice policy, though neither confirmed that they were planning any bills for next session. Possibly the biggest hurdle for "school choice" advocates next year comes from the Nebraska Supreme Court ruling that allowed this year's referendum to stay on the ballot. Plaintiffs argued the measure didn't qualify for the ballot because it violated a provision of the Nebraska Constitution that prohibits voter referendums from affecting direct appropriations. But the high court ruled that since the ballot initiative only sought to repeal a section of LB1402 that didn't include an appropriation, it could be subject to a referendum. The ruling noted that LB1402 had a separate appropriation bill that accompanied it. Linehan said the ruling threatened any and all legislation that came with appropriations, and it could lead to the "death of the A bill," using the legislative shorthand for an appropriations bill. Neither Von Gillern nor Armendariz gave specifics on how lawmakers could approach school choice legislation that would be shielded from a referendum in the wake of the ruling. Linehan argued that appropriation bills aren't even necessary for legislation that allocates funds, describing them as more of a "counting mechanism" than anything else. But Fiscal Analyst Scott Danigole said appropriation bills are necessary for most measures that appropriate state funds, with the only exception he could think of being a bill that shifted funding that had already been appropriated. While it is theoretically possible for lawmakers to do away with appropriation bills, it would require them to get creative, and would likely bring a lot of ripple effects. Although Royers said he would be shocked if no "school choice" policies are introduced in 2025, he believes the overall appetite to debate the issue has lessened in the aftermath of the referendum. Like Linehan, Royers also found encouragement in the the outcome of several legislative races. He said the Legislature will become more "public school friendly" than it was in 2024. "I think everybody is trying to take a break from the 'school choice' fight," he said. Royers said the primary concern for lawmakers should be addressing the educator shortage in Nebraska, which leads to issues like larger class sizes that can affect academic performance. Royers said special education teacher vacancies were 10 times higher last school year than they were in 2013, citing data from the state Department of Education, and Nebraska's colleges aren't producing enough new teachers to fill the gap. What will happen with schools, students who benefited from the program? Meanwhile, the people directly involved in LB1402's program are also trying to figure out their next steps. Jeremy Ekeler, the executive director of Opportunity Scholarships of Nebraska, said the organization is currently tying up loose ends, and trying to see if it can continue on as an organization that operates based on private donations. OSN worked with Odyssey, a national technology vendor that works with five other states to implement similar programs. OSN provided Odyssey with local information, while Odyssey ran the technology that processed the applications and distributed the scholarships directly to eligible schools based on LB1402's guidelines. According to Ekeler, between LB753 and LB1402, roughly 5,500 scholarships were issued, averaging about $2,300 per student. For LB1402's program, about $9.2 million overall was distributed in scholarships. Those scholarships are still good through the end of this academic year, but they will not continue into the 2025-26 school year. That will make the budget tighter for Omaha Street School, where Principal Anthony Williams said 12 of the school's 35 students received scholarships this year through LB1402. The average cost to educate each student is roughly $23,000 per year, Williams said. All of their families use some form of financial aid, and Williams said the school tailors its tuition to the financial needs of each family, ranging from $30 to $550 per month. Without outside support, he said the school has to eat the remaining costs. "Sometimes, we got to pinch pennies," Williams said. Williams said LB1402's program expiring will not mean any of the current students will not be able to continue learning at the school. In fact, he said the school may be able to stretch the scholarship funds through the following school year. Shouse said she intends to keep Sammy enrolled at Christ Lincoln, but she is not sure about her younger two children, which she said is a "heartbreaking" dilemma. Her younger children, 3 and 1, respectively, are already enrolled in Christ Lincoln's daycare and pre-school programs. Shouse is a single mother, and provides the sole income for her family. During Sammy's first year of kindergarten, he did not have a scholarship, which Shouse said placed a heavy financial burden on her. That took the form of multiple small sacrifices, from having breakfast for dinner because it was cheaper, to telling Sammy he couldn't attend a friend's birthday party because she couldn't afford to buy a present. "There was a lot of tears," Shouse said. "There's always been a lot of tears." There are several reasons why Shouse hasn't considered public school an option for any of her children. Primarily, she said Christ Lincoln best aligns with her family values. She's also concerned that the larger class sizes would mean her children wouldn't get the individualized care they need. Two of her children, including Sammy, have IEPs. When it was first recommended to Shouse that Sammy repeat kindergarten based on his speech therapy needs and emerging academic concerns, she said she sought out summer school options for him through Lincoln Public Schools, but was denied because his needs weren't severe enough. She said LPS officials told her there was no reason to delay his advancement to first grade, which she said exemplified that they were not properly attuned to her son's needs. "It's not a school board's decision what's best for my child," Shouse said.

NoneB. Metzler seel. Sohn & Co. Holding AG Acquires New Holdings in DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH)

Musk and Ramaswamy have their work cut out for themIt’s an abiding promise of newly elected American presidents: The executive branch henceforth will be liberated from the perils of waste, fraud and abuse. President-elect Donald Trump, in his contribution to the canon, has announced he’ll create the Department of Government Efficiency, led by tech impresarios Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. The aim, Trump says, is to “dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies.” There’s reason to be skeptical about Trump’s ambitions for this body. And many previous efforts along these lines – from the Truman Committee to Al Gore’s “reinventing government” initiative – have failed to tame the federal leviathan. But the goal of getting taxpayers better value for their money remains eminently desirable. As a start, any effort of this kind requires setting achievable goals – and Musk and Ramaswamy have already emphasized a good one. They want to get federal workers back to the office. Long after the pandemic, government buildings are still conspicuously underpopulated. In his 2022 State of the Union address, President Joe Biden called on federal workers to return to their offices, and his administration has periodically urged people back to their desks, but with little apparent effect. A recent report on telework arrangements at four agencies found that one (the Veterans Benefits Administration) has failed to collect the data it needs to manage the system effectively, and that the other three (the Farm Service Agency, the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) haven’t evaluated telework’s effects on performance. There’s little here to allay taxpayers’ suspicions that absence from the office means less work being done. What taxpayers should expect from public services would, more generally, be a good focus for DOGE’s efforts. The client-facing aspects of the U.S. government badly need attention. Whether it’s filing taxes, claiming benefits, buying savings bonds from TreasuryDirect, securing licenses and permissions, or dealing with regulators with overlapping jurisdictions, effective customer service rarely seems to be a priority. Entrepreneurs like Musk and Ramaswamy don’t need to be told why this matters. As important as this mission is, however, voters should be realistic. Musk once said he aimed to cut “at least $2 trillion” from Biden’s proposed $6.5 trillion-a-year budget. On the face of it, such a claim isn’t credible: It would mean cutting all spending, including defense, Medicare and Social Security, by a third. Trump has already promised to protect the main entitlement programs. Regardless of who’s in charge, even modest cuts in such spending are politically perilous. The savings from thinning the federal workforce, as Musk and Ramaswamy have advocated, are trivial when set against the biggest outlays. Another concern is that both men may have conflicts of interest and, as outside advisers, may not be subject to normal disclosure rules. For their effort to work, they’ll need to be forthright with the public about their financial involvements. Ideally, DOGE would aim to strengthen and broaden the audit powers that currently reside with the Government Accountability Office (which advises Congress) and the Office of Management and Budget (a branch of the White House). To the general public, these existing functions are all but invisible and lack teeth: Too often, reports are issued and little if anything happens. DOGE could improve this oversight by publicizing opportunities to make government work better – by highlighting the real waste, duplication, underperformance and poor customer service that the existing audit systems let slide, as well as recommending changes. Set up that way, DOGE can promote accountability as well as transparency. But to succeed, its leaders will need to know what they’re talking about and command credibility with taxpayers. Musk and Ramaswamy should be commended for their ambition. They should also remember that fixing the government is an incredibly arduous task – and making ridiculous promises doesn’t help. Bloomberg Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.

-- Shares Facebook Twitter Reddit Email “ With a name like Humphrey DeForest Bogart, you’ve got to be tough,” intones Bogie in director Kathryn Ferguson ’s insightful and entertaining documentary, “Bogart: Life Comes in Flashes,” now in theaters. Using the rugged screen legend’s words (voiced by Kerry Shale), as well as film clips, archive footage and interviews with friends – including director John Huston and actress Louise Brooks – Ferguson recounts Bogart's career from his early days on the Broadway stage to his initial efforts in Hollywood to finally his unqualified success. Ferguson frames Bogart’s personal life through the women in his life, his indomitable mother Maud, an illustrator and suffragette who supported the family, as well as his wives Helen Menken, Mary Philip, Mayo Methot and of course, Lauren Bacall , all of whom contributed to his career. Bacall’s memories about their relationship on-screen and off are the most poignant in the film. She recalls Howard Hawks discouraging their relationship, as well as her decisions about working and raising her two children with Bogart. Ferguson focuses mainly on Bogart’s life off-screen. He was a heavy drinker and loved sailing. His fights with his third wife, Mayo Methot — they were known as “The Battling Bogarts” — were oddly charming. As her career was on the downslope during their union (in the late 1930s through the mid 1940’s), he was not quite a leading man yet, and after they met, and as the film explains, “She set fire to him, and blew the lid off all his inhibitions — forever.” Related In "My Name Is Alfred Hitchcock," director Mark Cousins explores the Master of Suspense's legacy “Bogart: Life Comes in Flashes” emphasizes how the iconic star cemented his screen image by playing a heavy in “The Petrified Forest” in 1936. After a series of gangster roles, he shifted to starring in detective films, most notably as Sam Spade in “ The Maltese Falcon ” and as Philip Marlowe in “ The Big Sleep .” He also delivered Oscar-nominated performances in the classic “ Casablanca ” and as Queeg in “The Caine Mutiny,” winning the Academy Award for best actor for “The African Queen.” “Bogart: Life Comes in Flashes” also features interviews with Bogart and Bacall’s son, Stephen Bogart, an executive producer of the film, who spoke with Salon about Bogie, Bacall and this new documentary. This is the first authorized doc about Bogart. What initiated this project, and, as manager of his estate, what was it about this film that appealed to you? Kathryn came to me, and I spoke to my sister and my partner about it. Initially I was going to say if this would be another cookie-cutter documentary on the man and his movies, I wasn’t interested in that. That’s been done before, many times. When Kathryn told me the perspective that she wanted to take on this, I was all in. It was totally different from anything I saw or different from a documentary on a movie star that I’ve seen. The movies are secondary to the man, and that was what brought it home to me. What can you say about the selection of clips, interviews, and archival footage used to tell Bogart’s story in the film? We didn’t pick and choose anything. We opened our archives and let her run with it. I saw her documentary on Sinead O’Connor , I was gratified. I didn’t have any input on what clips or audio was used — that was all Kathryn’s production team. I didn’t want to have any input because that’s not my bailiwick. I didn’t want to get in the way of someone who knows what they are doing. It was an incredible amount of research. It took a year and half to make. Some stuff they found I had never seen before. Humphrey Bogart and Gloria Graeme on the set of "In a Lonely Place" (Freestyle Digital Media) The film defines Bogart’s life and career through the women in his life, his mother and wives. Did you ever meet your father’s ex-wives? If so, what were your impressions of them? No, I never met them. My father died when I was 8; he was sick when I was 7. My mother and I never talked about them, especially about Mayo. I was never spoken to about these women. I only looked at them in the periphery. I found out more about them because I really didn’t know anything. It was interesting how they each did contribute, even unknowingly, to his career. His mother didn’t know what he was going to become. Helen [Menken] didn’t know what he would become. I will say my father did have an eye. His wives were very good-looking. He really loved Mary [Philips], but she didn’t want to stay in LA. She wanted to be on Broadway, so she went back to New York. And Mayo [Methot] was the one who influenced his stratospheric rise to stardom more than anyone else in how she guided him and the movies he made before “Casablanca.” And then my mother [Lauren Bacall] came along, and it was more my father making my mother’s career, but she guided him in his activism. He was an activist when he refused to do a film without Lena Horne because she was Black. But he was one of the first stars to start his own production company and fight against the studio system. When you talk about Mayo, I think of “ A Star Is Born ” with one on the way up and one on the way down . . . Right, that was in the doc. That must have been difficult for Mayo. She could see him going up and her going down, and then the whole thing just disintegrated. Then he met my mother and that didn’t help things at all. It was interesting to learn about Mayo’s influence and that perspective. And it must have been devasting for Mayo when Bogie hooked up with this 19-year-old, my mother [Bacall]. I want to talk about your mother, if we can. She was an icon too. When my mother got the Kennedy Center Honor, she wanted Gregory Peck to introduce her. He was a longtime friend, but because Gregory Peck agreed to introduce Bob Dylan , she ended up with Sam Waterson , who my mother didn’t really know. I got to meet Bob Dylan, which was cool. Bob looked at me and said he was really nervous to meet the President, who was Clinton . I told him, “Bob, I think he’s more nervous to meet you!” We need your help to stay independent Subscribe today to support Salon's progressive journalism There is also a line in the film that your father felt he wasn’t a good father, but I took this to mean he felt guilty that he wasn’t there for you as much as he felt he should be. Thoughts? I don’t think that’s correct. I think he wasn’t a young kid kind of father. I don’t think he should have felt that way. Some parents, especially males, have trouble with 1- and 2-year-olds. I had a difficult time [as a father] with that as well. It is difficult for a male to relate to a 1- to 2-year-olds. That’s not true for all men. I think he had a difficult time because he was a father late in life. He was very rigid with scheduling — go to work, come home, have dinner with my mother without the kids, and go to the boat on the weekend. I didn’t go to the boat, and I wasn’t having dinner with him. What do you remember about your father? What lessons did your father (or your mother) impart to you? He said, always tell the truth, and the Golden Rule: Do unto others as they would do unto you, which I’ve tried to live by. He was an honest guy and didn’t cotton fools. He was very principled. As Katharine Hepburn said in the movie, he was kind of puritanical, because those where the times back then. It was very closed. Especially sexual mores back then. He was very nice and polite. He was a different kind of guy. Bogart played characters who were insolent. He embodied toughness. He was “rugged” and the epitome of cool. What do you think made him such an icon? Why do you think he has endured for decades? I don’t know. I have no idea how it happens. He was all those things you said he was. He was an activist. He worked for Adlai Stevenson and went to the House Un-American Activities Commission [hearings]. Why he has continued over so many other people – I think my mother and his relationship certainly had a lot to do with that. But he died early. He made great movies. He was a writer’s actor; he loved writers. The film shows that Bogart, when he was starting out, had setbacks and successes. His early films made little impression until his gangster era and detective films got him noticed. Did he (or your mother) talk about his career, and how he felt he was perceived? My mother and I really didn’t talk about it. He says in the documentary he thought he was always going to play gangsters. He was electrocuted how many times, and shot how many times, and died how many times and all that. “High Sierra” was the tough guy [breakthrough]. When he got into the detective genre, with “The Maltese Falcon,” it was a whole new arc for him. He wondered: How am I going to be leading man? They want me to be a leading man in “Casablanca.” Are they out of their minds? Then he made another transition. It’s such an interesting arc of work. It’s very surprising. I think it would have been surprising to him. You mother, Lauren Bacall, says in the film that she based her career around him. She also wanted a son to remind her of Bogie. Can you talk about the dynamic of their relationship? Her influence was not his choice of films or his career, but personally — his change from Republican to Democrat, and his support of Adlai Stevenson. Instead of being as much of a loner, he was going out in public with my mother. He was going to Africa to make “The African Queen.” He was ornery and talked about how pissed off he was at John Huston the whole time. John Huston was never nice, but he made some great films! . . . No, but what a guy! Talk about a renaissance man. He was what, fighting in the Mexican American war, going elephant hunting and all this sort of stuff. I remember the line [about making “The African Queen”] in the film: “If it was something John thought was easy to get to, he would discard it to get to do something harder to make it more difficult.” Working with him and Kate Hepburn and bringing the whole Rat Pack — this was my mother’s influence on him. That and giving him a stable home life, saying we’re going to have some kids, and be married, and I’m going to follow you everywhere . . . Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter , Crash Course. What is your favorite film, performance, or scene featuring your father and why? My favorite is “Treasure of the Sierra Madre,” because of the story behind it. My father wasn’t going to do it. His agent said, “You really have to do it. John wants you to do it. Walter [Huston, John’s father] is going to be in it.” And Bogie goes, “I don’t want to die, I’m a star. I don’t want to play the second guy.” But he did it because they were such great friends, and it ended up being a spectacular movie that won Walter Huston an Oscar. “Bogart: Life Comes in Flashes” is playing select theaters. It will be released on digital Dec.10. Read more about Old Hollywood "It’s this double standard": Faye Dunaway doc director on the legendary actor's unfair reputation Recut "Caligula": Less sex and more plot will "right one of the greatest wrongs in cinema history" "There was a lot of infamy": Elizabeth Taylor fought scandal and slut-shaming throughout her career By Gary M. Kramer Gary M. Kramer is a writer and film critic based in Philadelphia. Follow him on Twitter . MORE FROM Gary M. Kramer Related Topics ------------------------------------------ Bogart: Life Comes In Flashes Humphrey Bogart Interview Lauren Bacall Movies Stephen Humphrey Bogart Related Articles Advertisement:MAGA Conservatives Accuse Elon Musk of Censorship Over Immigration Disagreements on XNone

Trump names Pam Bondi as his pick for attorney general after Gaetz withdraws from consideration