bet365 app download for android latest version

bet365 app download for android latest version

Gaetz withdraws name from consideration as Trump's pick for Attorney General

In a letter to the Prime Minister, shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel and shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the decision by the International Criminal Court (ICC) had “no proper basis in international law”. They said the UK’s refusal to explicitly say whether or not the Israeli premier would be detained if he arrived in the country “opens the farcical spectre of your Government trying to sanction the arrest” of an ally to Britain. Criticising the ICC warrant, the shadow ministers said: “It is hard to escape the conclusion this is an activist decision, motivated by politics and not the law.” They argued the court was established to pursue cases in instances where countries do not have robust and independent judiciaries, which could not be said of Israel. “The UK Government’s response to the decision has been nonsensical,” they said. “On Friday, the Home Secretary refused to say whether Mr Netanyahu would be detained if he travelled to the UK. “This opens the farcical spectre of your Government trying to sanction the arrest on UK soil of the leader of an ally of the UK, while you continue a diplomatic charm offensive with the Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping. “It falls to you to clarify the Government’s position – now. The Government must make clear that it does not support an arrest warrant being issued which has no proper basis in international law.” Downing Street on Friday indicated that Mr Netanyahu could face arrest if he entered the UK, refusing to comment on “hypotheticals” but saying Britain would always follow its “legal obligations”. The International Criminal Court Act 2001 states that a Secretary of State must, on receipt of a request for arrest from the ICC, “transmit the request and the documents accompanying it to an appropriate judicial officer”. Asked whether the UK would comply with requirements under the Act, Sir Keir’s spokesman said: “Yes, the Government would fulfil its obligations under the Act and indeed its legal obligations.” The ICC has issued a warrant for Mr Netanyahu and his former defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes in Gaza. Number 10 previously said the domestic process linked to ICC arrest warrants has never been used to date by the UK because no-one wanted by the international court had visited the country. It added that Israel remained a “key partner across a range of areas”. The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “It is important that we have a dialogue with Israel at all levels to reach the ceasefire that we all want to see, to bring an end to the violence, to protect civilians and ensure the release of hostages.” The ICC also issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, head of Hamas’s armed wing, over the October 7 2023 attacks that triggered Israel’s offensive in Gaza. A domestic court process would be required before Mr Netanyahu faced arrest if he set foot in the UK. The ICC said there are “reasonable grounds to believe” Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant were responsible for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare, and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution and other inhumane acts”. The court’s pre-trial chamber also found “reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”. The impact of the warrants is likely to be limited since Israel and its major ally, the US, are not members of the ICC.

Malique Ewin finished with team highs of 17 points and seven rebounds to lead the Florida State Seminoles to a 92-59 victory over the Massachusetts Minutemen in each team's final game of the Naismith Hall of Fame Tip-Off on Sunday afternoon in Uncasville, Conn. The Seminoles (6-1) won their third consecutive game and went 2-0 in the event as they pulled away in the second half, leading by as many as 36 points. It's Florida State's best start since the 2019-20 season when it went 7-1. UMass (1-5) dropped its fifth in a row following a season-opening win over New Hampshire despite a strong game on Sunday from Jaylen Curry, who scored 17 points. Curry, with six free throws, helped propel the Minutemen on a 10-0 run over a four-plus minute span in the first half to take a 24-23 lead with 4:22 left. FSU closed the half on a 13-3 run to lead 37-27 at halftime. A 15-4 surge to open the second half helped the Seminoles break the game open. Florida State's defense frustrated UMass shooters throughout the contest, especially on the perimeter, limiting the Minutemen to 3-for-24 shooting (12.5 percent) from 3-point range and 18-for-58 (31 percent) overall. The Seminoles finished with 22 points off 17 UMass turnovers. On the flipside, Florida State had one of its best shooting games of the season. The Seminoles moved the ball well throughout the game and finished with 25 assists while only turning the ball over 10 times. The Seminoles shot 33 for 58 (57 percent) from the field and made 9 of 18 three-pointers to put together a season-high scoring output. Once again, Florida State shined thanks to its depth as 10 players scored and four scored in double figures. The Seminoles were able to have 16 players participate in the game as well. Jamir Watkins finished with 14 points while Jerry Deng and Justin Thomas each had 10 points. For UMass, Daniel Rivera finished with 12 points and six rebounds while Nate Guerengomba had 10 points. Daniel Hankins-Sanford collected a game-high 13 rebounds. --Field Level MediaThe standard Lorem Ipsum passage, used since the 1500s "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero in 45 BC "Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" Thanks for your interest in Kalkine Media's content! To continue reading, please log in to your account or create your free account with us.

NoneThe standard Lorem Ipsum passage, used since the 1500s "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero in 45 BC "Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" Thanks for your interest in Kalkine Media's content! To continue reading, please log in to your account or create your free account with us.

Developing nations slam 'paltry' $300 bn climate deal

Marcus Johnson and Bowling Green take down New Mexico State 61-60( MENAFN - VMR News) The global Carbon Fiber Bike market is poised for significant growth, driven by advancements in technology and changing consumer preferences towards fitness and sustainability. While challenges like high costs persist, increasing government support and innovative solutions are expected to bridge the gap, making carbon fiber bikes more accessible across demographics. The global carbon fiber bike market is witnessing significant growth, fueled by increasing consumer interest in lightweight, durable, and high-performance bicycles. Carbon fiber bikes are preferred for their superior strength-to-weight ratio, providing competitive advantages for cycling enthusiasts, racers, and adventure seekers. This report delves into the market dynamics, trends, and forecasts for the carbon fiber bike industry from 2023 to 2032. Get more information on“Global Carbon Fiber Bike Market Research Report” by requesting FREE Sample Copy at Market Segmentation By Type By Application Regional Analysis North America The region leads in demand for high-performance carbon fiber bikes due to a well-established cycling culture, organized racing events, and growing health consciousness. Europe Europe showcases robust growth, particularly in countries like Germany, the Netherlands, and France, where cycling is ingrained in urban transportation and recreational activities. Asia-Pacific Emerging economies like China and India are witnessing increasing adoption of carbon fiber bikes due to rising disposable incomes, urbanization, and growing fitness trends. Rest of the World Regions like South America and the Middle East are showing potential growth due to increasing awareness of health and eco-friendly transport solutions. Industry Trends Market Dynamics Drivers Challenges Market Size and Forecast (2023-2032) The global carbon fiber bike market is projected to grow at a CAGR of X.X% during the forecast period, reaching a market value of approximately $X billion by 2032 . Factors such as technological advancements, growing environmental concerns, and increased participation in cycling activities will drive this growth. Browse Global Carbon Fiber Bike Market Research Report with detailed TOC at Competitive Landscape Prominent players in the market include: These companies are focusing on product innovation, partnerships, and expansions to maintain competitive advantage. MENAFN30112024004588010304ID1108941705 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Report: UCF HC Gus Malzahn to become Florida State OCPassive investing has boomed in recent years, allowing mutual funds and ETFs to scale rapidly and investors to buy and hold for long periods. At the same time, its popularity could be exacerbating the market's volatile swings and the rising concentration in a handful of key stocks, Apollo's chief economist Torsten Sløk says. Passive investing has been a hit partly because it is lower risk than active investing. By putting assets into externally managed funds like ETFs or retirement savings plans like 401(k)s, investors get returns that match the market's trajectory. Active investors, meanwhile, have to react quickly to market developments, switching strategies when economic conditions change. This can lead to greater short-term gains as well as losses. tends to yield higher net returns in the long run in comparison, making it relatively safer and more popular amongst risk-averse traders, but in the process, it's made active investing riskier, Sløk says. "Higher passive ownership can increase volatility, lower market liquidity, and increase market concentration in large cap names such as the so-called 'Magnificent Seven,'" Sløk wrote in a recent paper. He said that the massive shift toward passive investing has resulted in greater price spikes and dips as investor demand has become less reactive to stock prices. It's also resulted in a less actively traded market, where mispricing can be greater and last for longer. Those two factors drive greater , which has been on the rise recently. The Cboe volatility index up almost 30% in the last six months. With more active investors turning passive, there are also fewer investors shorting stocks, Sløk said. If the trend continues, shorts will be "squeezed out" more easily, which will boost volatility in large-cap shares and put upward pressure on their prices. He said that makes it riskier to short large-caps, which will only fuel a greater shift to passive flows. "In short, when active investors turn passive, large-cap stocks will benefit disproportionately. This dynamic can be observed in the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of large- and mega-cap stocks, which have been consistently high and growing," he wrote. Passive investing has rocketed in popularity in the past three decades, accounting for 50% of total equity investing in and globally, almost double what it was in 2012, Sløk said. Read the original article on

Outlook Wealth Advisors LLC lifted its stake in shares of Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN – Free Report ) by 4.6% during the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 4,213 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock after purchasing an additional 187 shares during the quarter. Outlook Wealth Advisors LLC’s holdings in Amazon.com were worth $785,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Several other large investors also recently modified their holdings of the stock. PayPay Securities Corp lifted its position in shares of Amazon.com by 64.6% during the 2nd quarter. PayPay Securities Corp now owns 163 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $32,000 after buying an additional 64 shares during the last quarter. Hoese & Co LLP bought a new stake in shares of Amazon.com during the 3rd quarter worth $37,000. Bull Oak Capital LLC bought a new stake in shares of Amazon.com during the 3rd quarter worth $45,000. Christopher J. Hasenberg Inc lifted its position in shares of Amazon.com by 650.0% during the 2nd quarter. Christopher J. Hasenberg Inc now owns 300 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $58,000 after buying an additional 260 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Values First Advisors Inc. bought a new stake in shares of Amazon.com during the 3rd quarter worth $56,000. 72.20% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Insider Activity In related news, Director Daniel P. Huttenlocher sold 1,237 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, November 19th. The stock was sold at an average price of $199.06, for a total transaction of $246,237.22. Following the completion of the transaction, the director now directly owns 24,912 shares in the company, valued at $4,958,982.72. The trade was a 4.73 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink . Also, SVP David Zapolsky sold 2,190 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, September 24th. The stock was sold at an average price of $195.00, for a total value of $427,050.00. Following the transaction, the senior vice president now owns 62,420 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $12,171,900. The trade was a 3.39 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Over the last three months, insiders sold 6,026,683 shares of company stock worth $1,252,148,795. 10.80% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders. Amazon.com Stock Performance Amazon.com ( NASDAQ:AMZN – Get Free Report ) last issued its earnings results on Thursday, October 31st. The e-commerce giant reported $1.43 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $1.14 by $0.29. The firm had revenue of $158.88 billion for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $157.28 billion. Amazon.com had a return on equity of 22.41% and a net margin of 8.04%. The business’s revenue was up 11.0% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the previous year, the company posted $0.85 earnings per share. On average, equities research analysts forecast that Amazon.com, Inc. will post 5.29 EPS for the current year. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades Several equities analysts have commented on AMZN shares. Redburn Atlantic increased their target price on Amazon.com from $225.00 to $235.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Tuesday. Royal Bank of Canada increased their target price on Amazon.com from $215.00 to $225.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. The Goldman Sachs Group raised their price objective on Amazon.com from $230.00 to $240.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Scotiabank raised their price objective on Amazon.com from $245.00 to $246.00 and gave the stock a “sector outperform” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Finally, Itau BBA Securities downgraded Amazon.com from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and set a $186.00 price objective for the company. in a research report on Friday, August 2nd. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, forty-one have issued a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Amazon.com presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $236.20. Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on AMZN Amazon.com Profile ( Free Report ) Amazon.com, Inc engages in the retail sale of consumer products, advertising, and subscriptions service through online and physical stores in North America and internationally. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). It also manufactures and sells electronic devices, including Kindle, Fire tablets, Fire TVs, Echo, Ring, Blink, and eero; and develops and produces media content. Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Amazon.com How to Invest in Small Cap Stocks The Latest 13F Filings Are In: See Where Big Money Is Flowing How to Use the MarketBeat Dividend Calculator 3 Penny Stocks Ready to Break Out in 2025 Health Care Stocks Explained: Why You Might Want to Invest FMC, Mosaic, Nutrien: Top Agricultural Stocks With Big Potential Receive News & Ratings for Amazon.com Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Amazon.com and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Letter: Loughing out loud, or crying tears?Luke Humphries defeats Luke Littler to retain Players Championship Finals title

Luke Humphries defeats Luke Littler to retain Players Championship Finals titleNew Dragons and Old Tricks Help ‘House of the Dragon’ Declare War in Season 2

Citing concerns about "undocumented illegals" and despite "significant push back" from Montana fisheries staff, Fish and Wildlife Commissioner K.C. Walsh's late-hour amendment to reduce how many fish some anglers can keep to eat was approved. The Fish and Wildlife Commission sanctioned the amendment in a 5-2 vote at its Nov. 12 meeting with commissioners Susan Brooke, of Bozeman, and Brian Cebull, of Billings, opposing the change. The measure restricts the daily and possession limits for trout in the Western and Central fishing districts on rivers and streams to three fish daily and in possession. The change only applies to streams where the Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks recommended going to a five fish limit. For example, on the Dearborn River, a tributary to the Missouri, FWP proposed moving from three fish to the Central District's standard five fish limit. In proposing the change, the department said there was "no biological justification to maintain" the three fish limit. Growth concern Walsh, a former fishing gear manufacturing executive, said the increase could harm the Dearborn fishery and others where a similar increase was proposed. "The state is enjoying vibrant growth right now in population," he said. "Our country is seeing very significant growth in immigration, and we may have people moving to the state that need more clarity on what our Montana values represent. I feel that a lower limit on rivers and streams is warranted for that reason alone." Since 1999, Montana's population has increased by more than 250,000 people, a jump of more than 25%. In the same time span, FWP's survey of angling pressure showed an increase of 2,400 angler days in the Western District, less than half a percent. The Central District saw an increase of almost 39,700 angler days over the same period, a 2.5% increase. Both districts saw higher spikes in some years. Simplify, standardize The department had suggested the change under orders to simplify and standardize its regulations where possible. The proposal, along with many others, went out to the public in August followed by eight statewide meetings. The last meeting was held on Sept. 12. Walsh's amendment is dated Oct. 20. Although posted online, the amendment — along with others the commissioners now regularly introduce — got much less statewide attention from anglers. Commissioner Pat Tabor, a Whitefish resident and founder of Swan Mountain Outfitters, said amendments by the commission are necessary because they must react to proposals from the department rather than being able to participate in their creation, calling it the "department's plan." Email exchange Emails the commission must make public as part of a lawsuit settlement show Walsh was running his idea past FWP Director Dustin Temple as early as Sept. 30. At that time, Walsh was considering reducing the bag limit to two fish with an 8-inch minimum length. On Sept. 23 he emailed commission vice-chairman Tabor asking for his thoughts, writing: "I believe anglers' perception of 'opportunity' has changed from catching and eating fish to catching bigger and better quality trout." In an Oct. 16 email to Tabor, he noted his proposal had generated "significant push back" from FWP's Fisheries Division. "With record numbers of newcomers to our state including undocumented illegals, I think assuming catch & release on a trust basis is a big mistake," Walsh wrote. Survey says FWP's 2023 angler survey showed 87% of anglers on the Missouri River between Holter Dam to Cascade Bridge — one of the busiest stretches of stream in the state — practiced catch and release fishing with only 5% taking fish home to eat. On the Madison River, 97% of anglers reported releasing fish with 1% keeping fish to eat. Looking more widely, the survey showed 91% of anglers fishing in Central District streams released all fish, while 93% kept no fish in the Western District. Mike Duncan, Region 3 fisheries manager, told the commissioners that water has been identified as the "primary limiting factor" to fish populations and health. "What we found is that harvest, to this point, does not have a biological effect on most of these rivers," Duncan said. "Water is driving the bus, and we're working on that." When asked if anglers catching and releasing fish may be stressing trout to the point of death, Duncan said studies have shown possibly 5% or less of released fish die unless water temperatures exceed 70 degrees, at which point fatalities increase "substantially." Opponents Ballantine angler Doug Dreeszen told the commission he has fished the Yellowstone River for 70 years and sees FWP's efforts to standardize regulations as helpful to avoid confusion and to ease enforcement. "I think in general the Montana value, why we live here, is to catch fish," he said. "If a person wants to keep a fish, so be it." A Pryor Creek resident told the commission the change would be akin to telling him where he could fish. He also argued that if the fisheries biologists say it's OK, the commission should listen to them. Philip Gilbert, of Laurel, said his family catches and eats fish whereas fly anglers "torture the same fish time after time before it finally dies and floats down the river." The Montana Wildlife Federation also opposed Walsh's regulation change, saying it infringed on opportunities for harvest-oriented and subsistence anglers. Support Walsh's proposal drew support from Will Israel, the executive director of the Montana Outfitters and Guides Association, as well as the group's vice president, a fishing outfitter. "Our rationale for supporting this change includes encouraging a shift towards quality over quantity," Israel said. Tabor also voiced strong support for the amendment. "I want to protect that fishery for multiple decades," he said. "And I feel like memorializing that we are purposely, you know, being conservative in our wild stock management, that's a philosophy that I want us to wholly embrace, as both a commission and department, because things are changing." Social vs. biological Commissioner Brooke said the arguments seem to be about social, not biological concerns. Tabor disagreed, although adding he wished FWP had "value statements" in its plan. "Our obligation really is to protect the fish ... not to protect the rights of an angler," he said. Commissioner Brooke pushed back, saying the number of anglers keeping fish is so small that there's no biological reason to enact the change. She also noted the department's adaptive management plan allows the department to enact changes when there are concerns. Tabor countered that FWP's ability to adapt is slowed by budgetary, personnel and other factors. "We're adapting, but could we have seen this coming and maybe putting a measure in ahead before we get to a point where it's more drastic?" he questioned. Walsh noted in his emails that he hoped his proposal would generate a "lively discussion." "And who knows, maybe it will pass," he wrote to Temple. FWP recently adopted a new fishing regulation process, moving from a four-year cycle to a twoyear cycle, the department noted. "Previously, the department would review and update the fishing regulations annually based on established criteria, and every four years the department would use a rigorous public process to update the fishing regulations. Implementing a two-year process is expected to reduce staff time needed for fishing regulation evaluation while providing more opportunity for public input." FWP proposed 48 regulation changes. Be the first to know Get local news delivered to your inbox!Even with access to blockbuster obesity drugs, some people don't lose weight