https www 90jili cc

AP News Summary at 6:01 p.m. ESTMoroccan fintech firm Talaty has garnered support from prominent investors such as Witamax and Renew Capital, along with angel investors. Although the total funding amount remains undisclosed, these investors are known champions of innovation and growth in Africa. AI-Powered Financial Solutions Talaty is breaking new ground in the world of finance for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) through its AI-driven platform. By merging cutting-edge technologies such as computer vision and text analysis with behavioral finance, Talaty is revolutionizing conventional financial processes. This transformative approach aims to enhance SMBs’ access to much-needed working capital. The platform not only streamlines lending processes for financial institutions but also cuts down on default rates while slashing operational costs by a remarkable 90%. Through its strategic use of AI, Talaty provides lenders with more efficient, reliable, and inclusive credit decision-making tools, catering primarily to the underserved SMB sector. Securing financing often poses a hefty challenge for SMBs, with a significant percentage of bankruptcies resulting from payment defaults. Talaty aims to simplify this process, ensuring that financial partners can deliver timely support. Witamax’s Strategic Investment Witamax, Morocco’s first privately-backed VC fund, through its Funds II and III, sees this investment as aligning with their mission to support startups addressing critical societal challenges across Africa. They recognize Talaty’s innovative approach as a crucial tool for empowering millions of SMEs across the continent. Future Ambitions Armed with fresh investment, Talaty is poised to expand its AI-powered credit solutions, with plans to enter Francophone Africa. This move promises to further their mission of enhancing financial inclusion for SMBs throughout the region. Revolutionizing Finance: How Talaty is Transforming SMB Lending with AI Innovations In the rapidly evolving fintech landscape, Moroccan firm Talaty is setting a new standard for financial solutions targeting small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). With impressive backing from renowned investors such as Witamax and Renew Capital, Talaty is focused on leveraging AI to tackle longstanding challenges in the SMB sector. The Power of AI in Financial Solutions Talaty’s innovative use of AI technologies, which integrates computer vision and text analysis with behavioral finance, is reshaping traditional banking processes. By doing so, the firm is making it easier for SMBs to secure the working capital necessary for sustained growth and stability. One of the most significant impacts of their platform is the dramatic reduction in operational costs for lenders, down by an impressive 90%. This efficiency comes with enhanced decision-making capabilities, allowing lenders to minimize default rates with more precise risk assessments. Addressing SMB Challenges For SMBs, access to financing remains a critical hurdle, often leading to business failures due to cash flow shortages. Talaty’s user-centric platform not only ensures smoother access to loans but also facilitates a quick and accurate credit decisioning process, thereby reducing the time spent by financial institutions on each application. Strategic Investments and Market Influence Witamax, Morocco’s pioneering privately-backed venture capital fund, views their investment in Talaty as a strategic move to support startups solving vital societal issues across Africa. Their endorsement underscores the potential of Talaty’s platform to empower millions of SMEs by addressing their financial inclusion needs effectively. Witamax sees Talaty as a catalyst for economic growth, particularly in underbanked regions. Expanding Horizons in Francophone Africa With the recent infusion of investments, Talaty is set to expand its groundbreaking financial solutions to Francophone Africa. This expansion is poised to reinforce their dedication to enhancing financial inclusivity across diverse markets. It is a significant step that will potentially open doors for SMBs in these regions to access more reliable and inclusive financial services. Predictions and the Future of Fintech Solutions As fintech continues to disrupt conventional banking, Talaty represents the innovative potential within the sector. Predictions for the future suggest an increasing reliance on AI-driven platforms to close the financial inclusion gap worldwide. Talaty’s approach is likely to inspire similar ventures, fostering a landscape where technology seamlessly integrates with financial needs, thus empowering smaller businesses to thrive in an increasingly digital economy.A Tennessee man is convicted of killing 2 at a high school basketball game in 2021https www 90jili cc 。

Stock market today: Wall Street closes higher as the Dow reaches another recordWorker at US department giant Macy’s intentionally hid $US154 million worth of expenses

Macquarie downgrades NIO on weak guide, demand concernsInvestornewsbreaks Cambridge House International's VRIC Highlights Emergence Of New Commodity Super-Cycle

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Rasheed Bello had 20 points in Purdue Fort Wayne's 87-81 victory over Drexel on Monday. Bello added eight assists for the Mastodons (4-2). Corey Hadnot II went 6 of 7 from the field (3 for 4 from 3-point range) to add 15 points. Jalen Jackson had 13 points and went 6 of 13 from the field. The Dragons (4-3) were led in scoring by Cole Hargrove, who finished with 19 points, 14 rebounds and four assists. Kobe Magee added 15 points and three steals for Drexel. Shane Blakeney finished with 12 points. Jackson scored nine points in the first half and Purdue Fort Wayne went into halftime trailing 37-35. Bello scored 15 second-half points. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .By KENYA HUNTER, Associated Press ATLANTA (AP) — As she checked into a recent flight to Mexico for vacation, Teja Smith chuckled at the idea of joining another Women’s March on Washington . As a Black woman, she just couldn’t see herself helping to replicate the largest act of resistance against then-President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2017. Even in an election this year where Trump questioned his opponent’s race , held rallies featuring racist insults and falsely claimed Black migrants in Ohio were eating residents’ pets , he didn’t just win a second term. He became the first Republican in two decades to clinch the popular vote, although by a small margin. “It’s like the people have spoken and this is what America looks like,” said Smith, the Los Angeles-based founder of the advocacy social media agency, Get Social. “And there’s not too much more fighting that you’re going to be able to do without losing your own sanity.” After Trump was declared the winner over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris , many politically engaged Black women said they were so dismayed by the outcome that they were reassessing — but not completely abandoning — their enthusiasm for electoral politics and movement organizing. Black women often carry much of the work of getting out the vote in their communities. They had vigorously supported the historic candidacy of Harris, who would have been the first woman of Black and South Asian descent to win the presidency. Harris’ loss spurred a wave of Black women across social media resolving to prioritize themselves, before giving so much to a country that over and over has shown its indifference to their concerns. AP VoteCast , a survey of more than 120,000 voters, found that 6 in 10 Black women said the future of democracy in the United States was the single most important factor for their vote this year, a higher share than for other demographic groups. But now, with Trump set to return to office in two months, some Black women are renewing calls to emphasize rest, focus on mental health and become more selective about what fight they lend their organizing power to. “America is going to have to save herself,” said LaTosha Brown, the co-founder of the national voting rights group Black Voters Matter. She compared Black women’s presence in social justice movements as “core strategists and core organizers” to the North Star, known as the most consistent and dependable star in the galaxy because of its seemingly fixed position in the sky. People can rely on Black women to lead change, Brown said, but the next four years will look different. “That’s not a herculean task that’s for us. We don’t want that title. ... I have no goals to be a martyr for a nation that cares nothing about me,” she said. AP VoteCast paints a clear picture of Black women’s concerns. Black female voters were most likely to say that democracy was the single most important factor for their vote, compared to other motivators such as high prices or abortion. More than 7 in 10 Black female voters said they were “very concerned” that electing Trump would lead the nation toward authoritarianism, while only about 2 in 10 said this about Harris. About 9 in 10 Black female voters supported Harris in 2024, according to AP VoteCast, similar to the share that backed Democrat Joe Biden in 2020. Trump received support from more than half of white voters, who made up the vast majority of his coalition in both years. Like voters overall, Black women were most likely to say the economy and jobs were the most important issues facing the country, with about one-third saying that. But they were more likely than many other groups to say that abortion and racism were the top issues, and much less likely than other groups to say immigration was the top issue. Despite those concerns, which were well-voiced by Black women throughout the campaign, increased support from young men of color and white women helped expand Trump’s lead and secured his victory. Politically engaged Black women said they don’t plan to continue positioning themselves in the vertebrae of the “backbone” of America’s democracy. The growing movement prompting Black women to withdraw is a shift from history, where they are often present and at the forefront of political and social change. One of the earliest examples is the women’s suffrage movement that led to ratification in 1920 of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution , which gave women the right to vote. Black women, however, were prevented from voting for decades afterward because of Jim Crow-era literacy tests, poll taxes and laws that blocked the grandchildren of slaves from voting. Most Black women couldn’t vote until the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Black women were among the organizers and counted among the marchers brutalized on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Alabama, during the historic march in 1965 from Selma to Montgomery that preceded federal legislation. Decades later, Black women were prominent organizers of the Black Lives Matter movement in response to the deaths of Black Americans at the hands of police and vigilantes. In his 2024 campaign, Trump called for leveraging federal money to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs in government programs and discussions of race, gender or sexual orientation in schools. His rhetoric on immigration, including false claims that Black Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating cats and dogs, drove support for his plan to deport millions of people . Tenita Taylor, a Black resident of Atlanta who supported Trump this year, said she was initially excited about Harris’ candidacy. But after thinking about how high her grocery bills have been, she feels that voting for Trump in hopes of finally getting lower prices was a form of self-prioritization. “People say, ‘Well, that’s selfish, it was gonna be better for the greater good,”’ she said. “I’m a mother of five kids. ... The things that (Democrats) do either affect the rich or the poor.” Some of Trump’s plans affect people in Olivia Gordon’s immediate community, which is why she struggled to get behind the “Black women rest” wave. Gordon, a New York-based lawyer who supported the Party for Socialism and Liberation’s presidential nominee, Claudia de la Cruz, worries about who may be left behind if the 92% of Black women voters who backed Harris simply stopped advocating. “We’re talking millions of Black women here. If millions of Black women take a step back, it absolutely leaves holes, but for other Black women,” she said. “I think we sometimes are in the bubble of if it’s not in your immediate circle, maybe it doesn’t apply to you. And I truly implore people to understand that it does.” Nicole Lewis, an Alabama-based therapist who specializes in treating Black women’s stress, said she’s aware that Black women withdrawing from social impact movements could have a fallout. But she also hopes that it forces a reckoning for the nation to understand the consequences of not standing in solidarity with Black women. “It could impact things negatively because there isn’t that voice from the most empathetic group,” she said. “I also think it’s going to give other groups an opportunity to step up. ... My hope is that they do show up for themselves and everyone else.” Brown said a reckoning might be exactly what the country needs, but it’s a reckoning for everyone else. Black women, she said, did their job when they supported Harris in droves in hopes they could thwart the massive changes expected under Trump. “This ain’t our reckoning,” she said. “I don’t feel no guilt.” AP polling editor Amelia Thomson DeVeaux and Associated Press writer Linley Sanders in Washington contributed to this report. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin bids farewell to Capitol Hill with criticism of Democrats and calls for a third partyFacebook X Email Print Save Story On Christmas Day, Donald Trump issued his traditional holiday greeting. Posting on Truth Social, the social-media site created to serve as a platform for both his personal enrichment and his political aggrandizement, he reprised his threats to reclaim the Panama Canal from its current state of being controlled by the country in which it exists, tweaked Canada as America’s future “51st state,” pushed his plan to purchase Greenland “for National Security purposes,” and wished a merry Christmas to the “Radical Left Lunatics” he so recently defeated in “the Greatest Election in the History of Our Country.” Would it be too 2016 of me to suggest that this is absurd, embarrassing, worrisome stuff? As 2024 ends, the prevailing attitude toward the manic stylings and overheated threats of the once and future President, even among his diehard critics, seems to be more one of purposeful indifference than of explicit resistance; call it surrender or simply resignation to the political reality that Trump, despite it all, is twenty-five days away from returning to the Oval Office. A year ago, a Trump victory was far from inconceivable—the grimly anti-incumbent mood of the American electorate, and the former President’s almost comically easy dispatch of a host of G.O.P. primary challengers who were, for the most part, afraid to criticize him, suggested that it was not only a possible outcome but even a likely one. Yet it is also true that, as 2024 began, Trump’s win was far from inevitable—an alternate reality that, like the half of the country that could not countenance his return to office, has been erased from the Trumpian narrative about his “unprecedented and powerful mandate.” In the weeks since Election Day, it’s been as if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and all the polite technocratic debates of their polite, technocratic Administration have vanished into the mists of time—were the past four years in Washington all some strange dream sequence, like that entire season of “Dallas” back in the nineteen-eighties? Radical revisionism—by Trump and on his behalf—is a strong contender for the theme of this disruptive year, in which some unique property of political alchemy managed to transform a defeated and disgraced ex-President facing four criminal indictments into a perfectly electable Republican candidate with a quirky communications style, a host of more or less legitimate grievances, and a plan to Make America Great Again by empowering his billionaire sidekicks and rolling back laws, regulations, geopolitical trends, and social norms that he and his voters don’t like. Rewriting history, relitigating old fights, plain old revanchism—these worked for Trump in 2024, and it’s a safe bet that, along with revenge and retribution, they will be the themes of the new Trump Administration that takes office on January 20th. Whether it’s peremptory attacks on a 1977 Panama Canal treaty whose terms he now wants to reject or the resurrection of nineteenth-century economic protectionism or the fantastical reimagining of the January 6th rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol as innocent martyrs, Trump is a conservative in an entirely different sense than the one we have come to know: he is not a Republican who sticks to the status quo but instead a would-be strongman whose attachment to a past of his own imagining will now, once again, become the country’s governing ideology. Every year since 2018 , I have written a version of this year-end Letter from Washington. What’s striking reading back through them now, on the eve of Trump’s return to the White House, is not so much his continued dominance of our politics as it is the consistency of how he has accomplished it—the manic governing by social-media pronouncement, the bizarro news cycles, and the normalizing of what would have previously been considered the politically un-normalizable. Even his targets are remarkably similar year in and year out—the Radical Left Lunatics, windmills, Justin Trudeau. In Trump’s 2023 Christmas social-media post, he wished the nation a happy holiday while praying that his enemies “ROT IN HELL.” What we have managed to forget about Trump in these past few years would fill entire books about other Presidents. This year-end exercise has been a small effort in trying to remember. This strikes me as more important than ever in 2024, after an election year in which tapping into the American capacity for collective forgetting proved to be one of Trump’s superpowers. Many of the year’s signal events were so dramatic that they don’t need much recounting now: Trump’s unprecedented criminal trial and his thirty-four felony convictions in a New York state court last May; the incoherent June 27th debate that effectively ended Biden’s career; the attempted assassination of Trump as he spoke at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13th, and the remarkable images of him thrusting his fist in the air and mouthing “Fight!” immediately after a bullet grazed his ear but spared his life. It was just a few days later that Biden dropped out of the race, reinvigorating Democrats with sudden hope that they might beat Trump, after all—only to have Harris, despite a surge of joyous online memes and more than a billion dollars in campaign contributions, suffer an even bigger defeat to Trump than Hillary Clinton’s shocking loss to him in 2016. Even the subsidiary plotlines of 2024 were epic, from the spectre of the world’s richest man leaping around Trump’s rallies like an overheated schoolboy to the scorching success of a Republican ad campaign that portrayed America as a dangerous hellscape of invading illegal immigrants, rampant inflation, and intolerant leftists eager to force transgender surgery on your children. Soon after the election, Trump tried to appoint Matt Gaetz as Attorney General, even knowing that the Florida Republican had been investigated by his own congressional colleagues for paying a minor for sex—a choice that resulted in one of the fastest implosions of a Cabinet selection in modern history. We will not soon forget all that. Where Trump benefits more from this failure to remember is in the common practice, among his allies and detractors alike, of disregarding much of what he says and does, whether it is his vow to close the U.S. border and begin the largest mass deportations in American history on the first day of his Presidency, to end the war in Ukraine in twenty-four hours, or to nullify the Constitution’s guarantee of birthright citizenship. So that’s what I’m most hoping does not get lost in this apathetic moment, when his enemies are averting their gaze and his allies are so confident in the imminent arrival of a MAGA utopia that they have little need to sweat the details. (A new Associated Press / NORC poll, released Thursday, says sixty-five per cent of American adults now feel the need to limit their consumption of news about politics and the government—the Great Tune-Out is real.) Heading into 2025, I do not believe that warnings about the dangers of an unchecked Trump are overstated. Instead, it is the creeping sense that Trump is entering office largely unopposed that more and more worries me. It is a major warning sign, among many, that the ideological policing of Trump’s adversaries as shrill, hysterical, and hypocritical has been so very effective. I am bracing for impact, and not only fearing but expecting the worst. But while Trump may now believe himself so powerful that he can rewrite history on his own behalf, it’s also fair to anticipate that his past will serve not only as prologue but as precedent for 2025. If neither the American voters nor the Republican Party could stop Trump, his many personal weaknesses just might. Presidents, especially second-term Presidents, often stumble. Many occupants of the White House find themselves bogged down in scandal and infighting, victims of their own overreach, hubris, or just sheer incompetence. This was the story of the first Trump Administration, and there is plenty of reason to believe that it will be what happens in his second term, too. Should one root for the failure of an American President? Half of the country, Trump’s half, did this, to great effect, in 2024; in 2025, it will be everybody else’s turn. ♦ 2024 in Review The best movies . The best jokes . The best books . The best podcasts . Our most popular cartoons on Instagram. The animals that made it all worth it . Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker .

The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a quarter point Wednesday and signaled a slower pace of cuts ahead, as uncertainty grows over inflation and President-elect Donald Trump's economic plans. Policymakers voted 11-to-1 to lower the central bank's key lending rate to between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent, the Fed announced in a statement. This is the final planned interest rate decision before outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden makes way for Republican Donald Trump, whose economic proposals include tariff hikes and the mass deportation of millions of undocumented workers. Here's what to watch for in five key areas of your financial life, as rates fall now. Mortgages Web Development Mastering Full Stack Development: From Frontend to Backend Excellence By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Design Canva Magic Write: Ideas to Stunning Slides in No Time By - Prince Patni, Software Developer (BI, Data Science) View Program Office Productivity Mastering Microsoft Office: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and 365 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Web Development Master RESTful APIs with Python and Django REST Framework: Web API Development By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Office Productivity Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By - Study At Home, Quality Education Anytime, Anywhere View Program Data Science MySQL for Beginners: Learn Data Science and Analytics Skills By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Web Development 12-Factor App Methodology: Principles and Guidelines By - Prince Patni, Software Developer (BI, Data Science) View Program Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By - Neil Patel, Co-Founder and Author at Neil Patel Digital Digital Marketing Guru View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) AI and Analytics based Business Strategy By - Tanusree De, Managing Director- Accenture Technology Lead, Trustworthy AI Center of Excellence: ATCI View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Collaborative AI Foundations: Working Smarter with Machines By - Prince Patni, Software Developer (BI, Data Science) View Program Office Productivity Microsoft Word Mastery: From Beginner to Expert By - CA Raj K Agrawal, Chartered Accountant View Program Office Productivity Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide 2024 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Data Science SQL Server Bootcamp 2024: Transform from Beginner to Pro By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Data Analysis Learn Power BI with Microsoft Fabric: Complete Course By - Prince Patni, Software Developer (BI, Data Science) View Program Entrepreneurship Startup Fundraising: Essential Tactics for Securing Capital By - Dr. Anu Khanchandani, Startup Coach with more than 25 years of experience View Program Entrepreneurship Marketing & Sales Strategies for Startups: From Concept to Conversion By - Dr. Anu Khanchandani, Startup Coach with more than 25 years of experience View Program Office Productivity Advanced Excel Course - Financial Calculations & Excel Made Easy By - Anirudh Saraf, Founder- Saraf A & Associates, Chartered Accountant View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) AI for Everyone: Understanding and Applying the Basics on Artificial Intelligence By - Ritesh Vajariya, Generative AI Expert View Program Web Development Advanced C++ Mastery: OOPs and Template Techniques By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Design Microsoft Designer Guide: The Ultimate AI Design Tool By - Prince Patni, Software Developer (BI, Data Science) View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Tabnine AI Masterclass: Optimize Your Coding Efficiency By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Mortgage rates have been volatile. Rates peaked at about 7.8% late last year and had fallen as low as 6.08% in late September. But strong economic data and concerns about President-elect Donald Trump's potentially inflationary agenda nudged rates higher again. Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages don't move in tandem with the Fed's benchmark but instead generally track with the yield on 10-year Treasury bonds, which are influenced by a variety of factors, including expectations about inflation, the Fed's actions and how investors react. The average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.6% as of Thursday, down from 6.69% the previous week and 6.95% a year ago. Other home loans are more closely tethered to the central bank's decisions. Home-equity lines of credit and adjustable-rate mortgages -- which carry variable interest rates -- generally adjust within two billing cycles after a change in the Fed's rates. Auto Rates Auto rates and car prices have been trending lower, but they still remain elevated, making affordability a challenge. Dealerships have been offering more incentives and discounts to attract buyers, and that's expected to continue. Car loans tend to track with the yield on the five-year Treasury note, which is influenced by the Fed's key rate. But other factors determine how much borrowers actually pay, including your credit history, the type of vehicle, the loan term and the down payment. Lenders also take into consideration the levels of delinquent auto loans. As those move higher, so do rates, which makes qualifying for a loan more difficult, particularly for those with lower credit scores. Credit Cards The interest rates you pay on any balances that you carry should fall after the Fed has acted, though it may not be instant, and it will vary by card issuer. Last week, the average interest rate on credit cards was 20.35%, according to Bankrate. Much depends, however, on your credit score and the type of card. Rewards cards, for instance, often charge higher-than-average interest rates. Savings Accounts The rate reversal is likely to be most disappointing for savers, who have benefited from juicier yields on everything from online savings accounts and certificates of deposit to money market funds. Those are all likely to inch lower, in line with the Fed's move, but some providers may move faster than others. That usually depends on whether the bank wants to attract new customers by dangling yields that are more attractive than their competitors' offerings. But you can safely assume that online high-yield savings account will still offer the most competitive rates, with some banks still offering yields of 4.5% to 5.05%, according to Bankrate. Traditional commercial banks' yields, meanwhile, have remained anemic throughout this period of higher rates. The national average savings account rate was 0.56% in mid-December, according to Bankrate. Student Loans There are two main types of student loans. Most people turn to federal loans first. Their interest rates are fixed for the life of the loan, they're far easier for teenagers to get, and their repayment terms are more generous. Current rates are 6.53% for undergraduates, 8.08% for unsubsidized graduate student loans and 9.08% for the PLUS loans that both parents and graduate students use. Rates reset on July 1 each year and follow a formula based on the 10-year Treasury bond auction in May. Private student loans are a bit of a wild card. Undergraduates often need a co-signer, rates can be fixed or variable, and much depends on your credit score. FAQs Q1. What is full form of US Fed? A1. The full form of the US Fed is the Federal Reserve. Q2. What is current interest rate cut by the US Fed? A2. Policymakers voted 11-to-1 to lower the central bank's key lending rate to between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent, the Fed announced in a statement. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

Mercury retrograde in 2025 presents unique challenges for Aquarius, from communication breakdowns to relationship tensions. Learn how to prepare for each retrograde phase and turn disruptions into opportunities for growth. Mumbai: Mercury retrograde is a time when the seemingly backward motion of this celestial body stirs up disruptions in communication, technology, and travel. For Aquarians, a sign ruled by intellect and forward-thinking innovation, this phenomenon can feel particularly frustrating. Mercury typically lends its support to Aquarius, aiding clarity and connection. However, during its retrograde, you may find yourself navigating misunderstandings, delays, and a heightened potential for misplaced trust. This calls for heightened awareness and patience to turn potential mishaps into opportunities for introspection and recalibration. The retrograde periods in 2025 present distinct challenges for Aquarius, with effects rippling through communication, relationships, and social networks. Whether it’s a sudden miscommunication with colleagues, unresolved issues in partnerships, or disruptions in group projects, the key to navigating these phases lies in preparation and flexibility. Let’s delve into the retrograde periods, their specific impacts, and actionable precautions for each. Understanding Mercury Retrograde Mercury retrograde is more than just an astrological buzzword; it’s a celestial event that can upend everyday life. During this time, Mercury’s usual influence over communication, learning, and travel is disrupted, leading to delays, misunderstandings, and technical glitches. For Aquarius, known for their logical and progressive nature, this can feel like swimming against the tide. Mercury retrograde is a time to slow down, reassess, and revisit unfinished business rather than forge ahead. 1st Mercury Retrograde: March 14 to April 7 — Aries and Pisces In this period, Mercury retrogrades in your 3rd house, governing communication, siblings, and short travel. Be prepared for potential mix-ups in daily exchanges and disruptions in your travel plans. Emails, texts, and social media posts are more prone to misunderstandings, and interactions with siblings or coworkers may feel strained. Precautions: 2nd Mercury Retrograde: July 17 to August 11 — Leo This retrograde hits your 7th house, bringing tension to partnerships and close relationships. Old issues may resurface, requiring delicate handling. Avoid making new commitments or signing partnership agreements, as details may be unclear. Instead, focus on honest dialogue and revisiting unresolved matters. Precautions: 3rd Mercury Retrograde: November 9 to November 29 — Sagittarius and Scorpio Mercury retrogrades in your 11th house of social networks and aspirations, disrupting group activities and networking opportunities. Plans with friends or community projects may face sudden changes, while social dynamics might feel tense. This is a time to reflect on your long-term goals rather than embark on new ventures. Precautions: Key Takeaway for Aquarius in 2025 While Mercury retrogrades in 2025 may bring moments of confusion, delays, and challenges, they also offer valuable opportunities for growth. For Aquarius, these periods will encourage a reevaluation of communication strategies, partnerships, and long-term goals. By staying flexible, double-checking details, and embracing patience, you can transform potential obstacles into moments of clarity and insight. Approach these retrogrades as a time for reflection, and you’ll emerge stronger and more aligned with your true aspirations. ( Disclaimer: The predictions provided are for general informational purposes and should not be considered professional advice. News9 Live does not take responsibility for any decisions made based on these predictions. ) Click for more latest Astrology news . Also get top headlines and latest news from India and around the world at News9. AK Singh, an astrologer with over 5 years of experience, offers Vastu tips, daily horoscope predictions, Lal Kitab remedies, tarot card readings, and numerology services. For inquiries, contact him at frolicstars99@gmail.com. Latest NewsToo early to celebrate – Arne Slot keeps leaders Liverpool focusedMacquarie downgrades NIO on weak guide, demand concerns

None

Donald Trump Jr. emerges as a political force of his own as he helps his father launch a second term

As a Democrat who immersed himself in political news during the presidential campaign, Ziad Aunallah has much in common with many Americans since the election. He's tuned out. “People are mentally exhausted,” said Aunallah, 45, of San Diego. “Everyone knows what is coming and we are just taking some time off.” Television ratings — and now a new poll — clearly illustrate the phenomenon. About two-thirds of American adults say they have recently felt the need to limit media consumption about politics and government because of overload, according to the survey from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Smaller percentages of Americans are limiting their intake of news about overseas conflicts, the economy or climate change, the poll says. Politics stand out. Election news on CNN and MSNBC was taking up too much of Sam Gude's time before the election, said the 47-year-old electrician from Lincoln, Nebraska. “The last thing I want to watch right now is the interregnum,” said Gude, a Democrat and no fan of President-elect Donald Trump . The poll, conducted in early December, found that about 7 in 10 Democrats say they are stepping back from political news. The percentage isn't as high for Republicans, who have reason to celebrate Trump's victory. Still, about 6 in 10 Republicans say they've felt the need to take some time off too, and the share for independents is similar. The differences are far starker for the TV networks that have been consumed by political news. After election night through Dec. 13, the prime-time viewership of MSNBC was an average of 620,000, down 54% from the pre-election audience this year, the Nielsen company said. For the same time comparison, CNN's average of 405,000 viewers was down 45%. At Fox News Channel, a favorite news network for Trump fans, the post-election average of 2.68 million viewers is up 13%, Nielsen said. Since the election, 72% of the people watching one of those three cable networks in the evening were watching Fox News, compared to 53% prior to election day. A post-election slump for fans of the losing candidate is not a new trend for networks that have become heavily identified for a partisan audience. MSNBC had similar issues after Trump was elected in 2016. Same for Fox in 2020, although that was complicated by anger : many of its viewers were outraged then by the network's crucial election night call of Arizona for the Democratic presidential candidate, Joe Biden , and sought alternatives. MSNBC had its own anger issues after several “Morning Joe” viewers became upset that hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski visited Trump shortly after his victory last month. Yet while the show's ratings are down 35% since Election Day, that's a smaller drop than the network's prime-time ratings. CNN points out that while it has been suffering in the television ratings, its streaming and digital ratings have been consistent. MSNBC can take some solace in history. In previous years, network ratings bounce back when the depression after an election loss lifts. When a new administration takes office, people who oppose it are frequently looking for a gathering place. “I’ll be tuning back in once the clown show starts,” Aunallah said. “You have no choice. Whether or not you want to hear it, it's happening. If you care about your country, you have no choice but to pay attention.” But the ride may not be smooth. MSNBC's slide is steeper than it was in 2016; and there's some question about whether Trump opponents will want to be as engaged as they were during his first term. People are also unplugging from cable television in rates that are only getting more rapid, although MSNBC believes it has bucked this trend eating away at audiences before. Related story: MSNBC might make room for ‘more GOP voices’ as Trump sequel looms The poll indicates that Americans want less talk about politics from public figures in general. After an election season where endorsements from celebrities like Taylor Swift made headlines, the survey found that Americans are more likely to disapprove than approve of celebrities, large companies and professional athletes speaking out about politics. Still, Gude is among those discovering other ways to get news to which he does want to pay attention, including on YouTube. MSNBC is also in the middle of some corporate upheaval that raises questions about potential changes. Parent company Comcast announced last month that the cable network is among some properties that will spin off into a new company, which will give MSNBC new corporate leadership and cut its ties to NBC News. Some of the Americans who have turned away from political news lately also had some advice for getting them engaged again. Gude said, for example, that MSNBC will always have a hard-core audience of Trump haters. But if the network wants to expand its audience, “then you have to talk about issues, and you have to stop talking about Trump.” Kathleen Kendrick, a 36-year-old sales rep from Grand Junction, Colorado, who's a registered independent voter, said she hears plenty of people loudly spouting off about their political opinions on the job. She wants more depth when she watches the news. Much of what she sees is one-sided and shallow, she said. “You get a story but only part of a story,” Kendrick said. “It would be nice if you could get both sides, and more research.” Aunallah, similarly, is looking for more depth and variety. He's not interested “in watching the angry man on the corner yelling at me anymore,” he said. “It's kind of their own fault that I'm not watching,” he said. “I felt they spent all this time talking about the election. They made it so much of their focus that when the main event ends, why would people want to keep watching?” The poll of 1,251 adults was conducted Dec. 5-9, 2024, using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.Israel strikes Houthi rebels in Yemen's capital while WHO chief says he was meters away

After Loss to Gonzaga, SDSU Basketball Preps for Players Era Festival in Las VegasOpponents of plans to legalise assisted dying “mustn’t be hearing” the stories of the terminally ill, the MP pushing for a change in the law has said. At a meeting in Parliament on Monday evening, a panel of terminally ill and bereaved people urged parliamentarians to back the Bill proposed by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater when it comes before the Commons on Friday, describing the current situation as “inhumane”. Josh Cook, whose mother took her own life while in the advanced stages of Huntington’s disease and has the gene for the condition himself, said the status quo meant palliative care eventually “turns from care to torture”. He said: “We reach a point every single time where that care is forced on to a person, their choices are taken away and they are kept alive. “For me, if I go through Huntington’s, my end will be... stuck in the house, twitching and wearing a hole through the carpet, a peg line to keep me alive while my throat muscles give out and I choke to death. That’s what the current law says I have to endure.” Other panellists discussed their fear that their terminal illness would lead to a loss of control and significant pain. Tracey Iles, who has stage four breast cancer, said: “I love living and make the best of every day, but there is always that fear niggling away at the forefront of my mind and that is how I will die. “I really don’t want to suffer in my last days or months, I don’t want my family to watch me in pain. If assisted dying becomes law in this country, I will be able to stop worrying about having a bad death.” Another panellist, Laura Perkins, described her mother being diagnosed with two forms of cancer and offered the choice of which she wanted to die from as they could not be treated at the same time. She said: “The medical team solemnly informed us that it was more humane to die of liver cancer than mouth cancer, so in her fragile state she was advised to start a course of radiotherapy on her throat to keep those tumours at bay to allow the liver cancer to grow back as this was the better death.” With just four days remaining before Parliament’s first vote on her legislation, Ms Leadbeater called for the debate to focus on “the problem we have to fix” rather than “who in the Cabinet has fallen out with who else in the Cabinet”. She said: “Please tell these stories, because this is what I think some MPs mustn’t be hearing, because how can you hear these stories and tell me there’s not a problem? “How can you tell me these families should have not had a choice other than what we’ve heard tonight? I just refuse to accept that.” Ms Leadbeater’s Bill enjoys cross-party backing, and supporters of her proposals have expressed cautious optimism that it could have enough votes to pass its first hurdle on Friday. But the MP herself said there was still a “reasonable cohort of MPs who haven’t made their minds up”. She said: “That’s why over the next four days, let’s use this as an opportunity to tell your stories and to make sure MPs do realise the unacceptable situation that we’ve got for so many families.” Friday’s vote is just the first stage in the legislative process for Ms Leadbeater’s Bill, which if approved will then face further parliamentary scrutiny over the coming months.

Off-road vehicle seized after 'antisocial driver breaches High Court injunction'

Twins agree to deals with Brock Stewart, Michael Tonkin and Justin Topa at the MLB non-tender deadline