wild casino location

wild casino location New roof completed at East Oxford Community Centre

President Biden on Monday signed into law a defense bill that authorizes significant pay raises for junior enlisted service members, aims to counter China's growing power and boosts overall military spending to $895 billion despite his objections to language stripping coverage of transgender medical treatments for children in military families. Mr. Biden said his administration strongly opposes the provision because it targets a group based on gender identity and "interferes with parents' roles to determine the best care for their children." He said it also undermines the all-volunteer military's ability to recruit and retain talent. "No service member should have to decide between their family's health care access and their call to serve our nation," the president said in a statement . The Senate forwarded the bill to Mr. Biden after passing it last week by a vote of 85-14. In the House, a majority of Democrats voted against the bill after House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted on adding the provision to ban transgender medical care for children. The legislation easily passed by a vote of 281-140. Mr. Biden also objected to other language in the bill prohibiting the use of money earmarked to transfer detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to some foreign countries and into the United States. He urged Congress to lift those restrictions. The annual defense authorization bill, which directs Pentagon policy, provides a 14.5% pay raise for junior enlisted service members and a 4.5% increase for others. The legislation also directs resources towards a more confrontational approach to China, including establishing a fund that could be used to send military resources to Taiwan in much the same way that the U.S. has backed Ukraine. It also invests in new military technologies, including artificial intelligence, and bolsters the U.S. production of ammunition. Greenland's leader says "we are not for sale" after Trump suggests U.S. takeover The U.S. has also moved in recent years to ban the military from purchasing Chinese products, and the defense bill extended that with prohibitions on Chinese goods from garlic in military commissaries to drone technology. The legislation still must be backed up with a spending package. Taiwan Health Mike Johnson Joe Biden Politics China Children“Barbenheimer” was a phenomenon impossible to manufacture. But, more than a year later, that hasn’t stopped people from trying to make “Glicked” — or even “Babyratu” — happen. The counterprogramming of “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer” in July 2023 hit a nerve culturally and had the receipts to back it up. Unlike so many things that begin as memes, it transcended its online beginnings. Instead of an either-or, the two movies ultimately complemented and boosted one another at the box office. This combination of images shows promotional art for "Gladiator II," left, and "Wicked." And ever since, moviegoers, marketers and meme makers have been trying to recreate that moment, searching the movie release schedule for odd mashups and sending candidates off into the social media void. Most attempts have fizzled (sorry, “Saw Patrol” ). This weekend is perhaps the closest approximation yet as the Broadway musical adaptation “Wicked” opens Friday against the chest-thumping sword-and-sandals epic “Gladiator II.” Two big studio releases (Universal and Paramount), with one-name titles, opposite tones and aesthetics and big blockbuster energy — it was already halfway there before the name game began: “Wickiator,” “Wadiator,” “Gladwick” and even the eyebrow raising “Gladicked” have all been suggested. “'Glicked' rolls off the tongue a little bit more,” actor Fred Hechinger said at the New York screening of “Gladiator II” this week. “I think we should all band around ‘Glicked.’ It gets too confusing if you have four or five different names for it.” As with “Barbenheimer," as reductive as it might seem, “Glicked” also has the male/female divide that make the fan art extra silly. One is pink and bright and awash in sparkles, tulle, Broadway bangers and brand tie-ins; The other is all sweat and sand, blood and bulging muscles. Both films topped Fandango’s most anticipated holiday movie survey, where 65% of respondents said that they were interested in the “Glicked” double feature. Theaters big and small are also pulling out the stops with movie-themed tie-ins. B&B Theaters will have Roman guards tearing tickets at some locations and Maximus popcorn tubs. Marcus Theaters is doing Oz photo ops and friendship bracelet-making. Alamo Drafthouse is leaning into the singalong aspect (beware, though, not all theaters are embracing this) and the punny drinks like “Defying Gravi-Tea.” This image released by Universal Pictures shows Cynthia Erivo, left, and Ariana Grande in a scene from the film "Wicked." “Rather than it being in competition, I think they’re in conversation,” “Gladiator II” star Paul Mescal said. “This industry needs a shot in the arm. Those films gave it last year. We hope to do it this year.” And the hope is that audiences will flock to theaters to be part of this moment as well. It's a sorely needed influx of could-be blockbusters into a marketplace that's still at an 11% deficit from last year and down 27.2% from 2019, according to data from Comscore. “Competition is good for the marketplace. It’s good for consumers,” said Michael O'Leary, the president and CEO of the National Association of Theatre Owners. “Having two great movies coming out at the same time is simply a multiplier effect.” “Glicked” is currently tracking for a combined North American debut in the $165 million range, with “Wicked” forecast to earn around $100 million (up from the $80 million estimates a few weeks ago) and “Gladiator II” pegged for the $65 million range. “Barbenheimer” shattered its projections last July. Going into that weekend, “Barbie” had been pegged for $90 million and “Oppenheimer” around $40 million. Ultimately, they brought in a combined $244 million in that first outing, and nearly $2.4 billion by the end of their runs. It’s possible “Glicked” will exceed expectations, too. And it has the advantage of another behemoth coming close behind: “Moana 2,” which opens just five days later on the Wednesday before the Thanksgiving holiday. “Glickedana” triple feature anyone? This image released by Paramount Pictures shows Pedro Pascal, left, and Paul Mescal in a scene from "Gladiator II." “These are 10 important days,” O'Leary said. “It’s going to show the moviegoing audience that there’s a lot of compelling stuff out there for them to see.” There are infinite caveats to the imperfect comparison to “Barbenheimer,” as well. “Wicked” is a “Part One.” Musicals carry their own baggage with moviegoers, even those based on wildly successful productions (ahem, “Cats”). “Gladiator II” got a head start and opened internationally last weekend. In fact, in the U.K. it played alongside “Paddington in Peru,” where that double was pegged “Gladdington.” “Gladiator” reviews, while positive, are a little more divided than the others. And neither directors Ridley Scott nor Jon M. Chu has the built-in box office cache that Christopher Nolan’s name alone carries at the moment. The new films also cost more than “Barbie” ($145 million) and “Oppenheimer” ($100 million). According to reports, “Gladiator II” had a $250 million price tag; “Wicked” reportedly cost $150 million to produce (and that does not include the cost of the second film, due next year). The narrative, though, has shifted away from “who will win the weekend.” Earlier this year, Chu told The Associated Press that he loves that this is a moment where “we can root for all movies all the time.” Close behind are a bevy of Christmas releases with double feature potential, but those feel a little more niche. There’s the remake of “Nosferatu,” the Nicole Kidman kink pic “Babygirl” and the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” The internet can’t even seem to decide on its angle for that batch of contenders, and none exactly screams blockbuster. Sometimes the joy is just in the game, however. Some are sticking with the one-name mashup (“Babyratu”); others are suggesting that the fact that two of the movies feature real-life exes (Timothée Chalamet and Lily-Rose Depp) is enough reason for a double feature. And getting people talking is half the battle. When in doubt, or lacking a catchy name, there’s always the default: “This is my Barbenheimer.” Associated Press journalist John Carucci and Film Writer Jake Coyle contributed reporting. Last summer, Malibu's iconic blonde faced off against Cillian Murphy and the hydrogen bomb in the unforgettable "Barbenheimer" double feature. Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. Receive the latest in local entertainment news in your inbox weekly!

Quest Partners LLC Sells 1,506 Shares of Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE:ONTO)How the Capitals' aggressive offseason has paid off so farArticle content It’s troubling news that the city of Montreal is preparing to put up the former Empress theatre for sale, warns an architecture and art historian who has studied the landmark and says she’s worried the city is signalling it has given up on its preservation and on its function as a gathering place in Notre-Dame-de-Grâce after years of neglecting it. “I was indeed surprised by the city’s decision to put the cinema up for sale,” said Camille Bédard, who began researching the theatre’s architectural and social relevance for her bachelor’s degree in art history in 2009 and continued her research for a master’s degree in architectural history. She was reacting to a Gazette report Friday revealing that the city, which has owned the Sherbrooke St. W. cinema since 1999, is preparing a call for proposals to sell it for “mixed-use development” that would be at least 20 per cent housing. It will be at least the third call for proposals for the forlorn property in just over a decade. “Following the 2021 call for projects, it seems to me that the city and the borough should have understood how central this building is to the community,” Bédard said, adding that the building shows the ravages of neglect by the city. “I would have hoped that political decision-makers would grasp their responsibility in saving the building. This, in my eyes, would be a political vision supporting projects that animate and mobilize citizens.” Bédard grew up in N.D.G. and recalls the awe of entering the theatre for the first time at the age of four in the early 1990s. By then, it was serving as a repertory cinema called Cinema V. The neo-Egyptian-style theatre, built in 1927, “is really very rare,” Bédard said, adding that the architecture was perhaps inspired by a wave of interest in all things Egyptian following the 1922 archeological discovery of Pharaoh Tutankhamun’s 3,300-year-old tomb. It’s the only historic neo-Egyptian theatre dating from the 1920s in Canada, she said. Moreover, her interviews with people who went to the Empress while it was a “palace” cinema, then a burlesque theatre and still later Cinema V revealed “there is a huge community attachment to this theatre,” Bédard said. The Empress is a fine example of an “atmospheric” theatre of the 1920s, she said, meaning that the ornamentation and architectural elements inside help create the illusion of an outdoor space. That includes the ceiling, which created the effect of a starry night sky. The 1,550-seat theatre was built by Montreal architect Alcide Chaussé, who was an expert on fire prevention. His expertise was valued at the time, given the tragic 1927 fire at the Laurier Palace theatre in which 77 children and adolescents perished. The interior design was handled by Emmanuel Briffa. Before the advent of television, neighbourhood theatres like the Empress “were gathering places,” Bédard said. “Cinemas were places where people met or socialized and spent a lot of time. It was like their second living room.” The community’s attachment to the Empress/Cinema V hasn’t waned since a minor fire in 1992, which served as a pretext for its owner to shut it down and eventually sell to the city, she contends. In fact, successive mayoral candidates since the 1990s have promised to restore the theatre, and every call from the city or the Côte-des-Neiges—N.D.G. borough for public input on its future use has elicited huge response. In the 1990s, a group of citizens spearheaded a project to turn the theatre building into the Empress Cultural Centre. However, nothing came of it. In 2010, another group, led by Élaine Éthier and Mario Fortin, the former CEO of the Beaubien and Parc cinemas, began mounting a project to turn the site into Cinéma N.D.G. The project won the city’s 2012 call for proposals for the Empress. But even that project sputtered out because of a lack of support from the city, says one of the two project leaders. “It was 10 years of my life,” Éthier told The Gazette, adding that her group was caught in a catch-22 with the city. The group assembled 75 per cent of its financing and was working with architects and engineers, she said. But the city wanted them to have 100 per cent of their financing before it would transfer the building to their non-profit. However, they needed to own the building to complete their financing, she said. Then, in the 2017 municipal election, a Projet Montréal team was elected in the borough and the new borough mayor, Sue Montgomery, announced a new call for projects for the Empress. With all the foot-dragging, the city and borough have allowed the Empress to fall into ruin, said Éthier, who has worked in the film industry all her life. For example, the borough and city stopped heating the building sometime after 2012, she contends. “It’s very sad,” Éthier said. “Every time I hear news of the Empress, it breaks my heart.” Politicians only seem to care about the Empress when there’s an election, she said. “We have municipal elections coming next year and suddenly they’re talking about the Empress again,” she said. “We haven’t heard the politicians talk about the Empress since the last election (in 2021). Why is it put back on the table at every election, but in-between we don’t hear anything?” lgyulai@postmedia.com

Mikel Arteta has called on Arsenal to make a Champions League statement with a win at Sporting. The Gunners have failed to win – or score – in their last four European matches on the road. Advertisement A narrow 1-0 defeat at Inter Milan last time out has left Arteta’s side down in 12th place in the new-look Champions League table. London to Lisbon. ✈️ Champions League football returns tomorrow ⭐️ pic.twitter.com/oOhGLN9WSA — Arsenal (@Arsenal) November 25, 2024 Advertisement And the Spaniard believes a victory in the Portuguese capital, against a Sporting side who, when still managed by Ruben Amorim, thumped Manchester City 4-1 earlier this month, will prove they belong in elite company. “It’s certainly something we have to improve,” said Arteta. Advertisement “I think we have made the right steps and, looking back with the way we played against Inter, which is a team that has been so dominant in their league, reached the final of the Champions League which they should have won, to play and dominate that game. “But the reality is that you have to make it happen and we didn’t. “Making those steps is what we have to do next. Be ruthless, be efficient in the opposition box and do what we have to do to take the three points away from here.” Sporting are now managed by Joao Pereira, who has been promoted seamlessly from the reserve team in the wake of Amorim’s switch to Manchester United. Advertisement “The run they are on is incredible,” added Arteta. “That tells you that it is not only the quality, the set-up, the ambition, it is something about the team energy that they have. Advertisement “That is a great challenge that we have tomorrow, to come here and make a statement and show we are capable against this kind of opponent. Be ourselves and win the game.” Kieran Tierney was a surprise addition to the travelling squad. The Scotland full-back has been sidelined since June after suffering a hamstring injury at Euro 2024. If called upon, Tierney would make his first Arsenal appearance since the 2023 Community Shield. “Everybody in the squad is fully fit and available to start the game,” said Arteta. “We have Kieran Tierney after a long injury, it’s great news that he’s back, he’s been training with the team and he’s at the level to participate.”

Quest Partners LLC lifted its position in Resideo Technologies, Inc. ( NYSE:REZI – Free Report ) by 2.3% in the third quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The firm owned 22,045 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 505 shares during the period. Quest Partners LLC’s holdings in Resideo Technologies were worth $444,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Boston Partners raised its stake in shares of Resideo Technologies by 3.0% in the 1st quarter. Boston Partners now owns 6,700,564 shares of the company’s stock valued at $150,177,000 after buying an additional 193,351 shares in the last quarter. D. E. Shaw & Co. Inc. increased its stake in Resideo Technologies by 53.4% in the second quarter. D. E. Shaw & Co. Inc. now owns 1,214,375 shares of the company’s stock valued at $23,753,000 after acquiring an additional 422,730 shares during the period. AXA S.A. raised its position in Resideo Technologies by 198.8% in the second quarter. AXA S.A. now owns 100,427 shares of the company’s stock worth $1,964,000 after purchasing an additional 66,817 shares in the last quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. lifted its stake in Resideo Technologies by 3.1% during the third quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. now owns 742,628 shares of the company’s stock worth $14,957,000 after purchasing an additional 22,353 shares during the period. Finally, Victory Capital Management Inc. boosted its holdings in Resideo Technologies by 54.8% during the second quarter. Victory Capital Management Inc. now owns 145,025 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,837,000 after purchasing an additional 51,338 shares in the last quarter. 91.71% of the stock is owned by institutional investors. Resideo Technologies Stock Up 3.2 % REZI opened at $27.21 on Friday. The firm has a market cap of $4.00 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 24.51 and a beta of 2.09. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.69, a quick ratio of 1.10 and a current ratio of 1.82. The firm’s 50-day simple moving average is $21.38 and its 200-day simple moving average is $20.64. Resideo Technologies, Inc. has a twelve month low of $16.16 and a twelve month high of $27.33. Insiders Place Their Bets Analyst Ratings Changes Separately, Evercore ISI assumed coverage on Resideo Technologies in a report on Friday, August 9th. They issued an “outperform” rating and a $25.00 target price for the company. View Our Latest Analysis on REZI About Resideo Technologies ( Free Report ) Resideo Technologies, Inc develops, manufactures, and sells comfort, energy management, and safety and security solutions to the commercial and residential end markets in the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Products and Solutions, and ADI Global Distribution. Further Reading Want to see what other hedge funds are holding REZI? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Resideo Technologies, Inc. ( NYSE:REZI – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Resideo Technologies Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Resideo Technologies and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .A fresh perspective on investing has caught the attention of the financial world. As market dynamics continue to evolve, investors are seeking alternative strategies to maximize their returns. Innovative Approach This new method emphasizes diversifying portfolios in unexpected ways. By focusing on sectors traditionally overlooked, investors are finding opportunities in areas they never considered before. Instead of sticking to the usual trends, this approach encourages a broader vision, spotting potential in emerging industries and technologies. Reshaping Portfolios Analysts suggest that this strategy could redefine how we think about risk and reward. By venturing outside conventional boundaries, investors may unlock new growth potential. This new mindset champions a proactive search for novelty in markets, aiming for both stability and innovation. Global Impact The ripple effect of this shift is already being felt worldwide. As more adopt this novel approach, the global investment landscape may see significant changes. Embracing a mix of tried-and-true methods along with bold, new ideas could lead to a more balanced and prosperous financial future. A Call for Action Now is the time for investors to reconsider their strategies and explore new horizons. With this innovative investment path, individuals can potentially harness diverse opportunities to bolster their financial well-being. As the adage goes, fortune often favors the bold. Unveiling the Future: Revolutionary Investment Tactics Transforming Global Markets In an era where market dynamics are constantly shifting, a new investment strategy is gaining traction, challenging traditional financial principles and offering fresh opportunities for growth. The Rise of Alternative Investment Strategies The new approach focuses on diversifying investment portfolios in unconventional ways, particularly by targeting sectors often neglected. These sectors include emerging industries and breakthrough technologies that promise substantial returns. By venturing beyond traditional market trends, investors can identify opportunities that were previously overlooked. Pros and Cons of the Innovative Investment Strategy – Pros : – Expands investment opportunities by identifying undervalued sectors. – Facilitates potential high returns through exploration of emerging markets. – Encourages a diversified portfolio, reducing overall investment risk. – Cons : – May involve higher risk due to the unpredictability of untested markets. – Requires extensive research and due diligence to identify viable opportunities. – Potentially volatile, with results less consistent than traditional strategies. Predictions and Trends: The Future of Investing Industry experts predict that this innovative investment approach could reshape the concept of risk and reward within financial markets. By blending stability with innovation, this strategy encourages a future where new market frontiers are explored, potentially leading to a more dynamic global investment landscape. Insights into the Global Impact The implementation of these strategies is already influencing global markets. As more investors adopt this approach, there is potential for significant changes in investment behaviors worldwide. The shift towards a balanced integration of time-tested methods and groundbreaking ideas could foster more robust financial systems globally. Security and Sustainability: Investment Strategies for the Modern World A key consideration for investors looking to adopt this strategy is ensuring security and sustainability. Emphasizing environmentally sustainable practices and assessing the long-term viability of new technologies ensures ethical and responsible investing. Compatibility with Existing Investment Principles This new strategy doesn’t solely replace traditional approaches but complements them. It encourages investors to think outside the box while still honoring the fundamental principles of risk management and portfolio diversification. Are You Ready for the Change? A Call to Action for Investors As the financial world evolves, it’s crucial for investors to reevaluate their strategies and consider exploring these new horizons. Engaging with this innovative approach may open doors to opportunities that not only enhance individual portfolios but also contribute positively to global economic growth. For more information on diverse investment strategies, visit Forbes .

How to Watch Top 25 Women’s College Basketball Games – Monday, November 25

Iowa rides ground game to bounce back win at Maryland, Kaleb Johnson surpasses Shonn Greene

Q : I attended your behavioral leadership training two years ago and have found many great successes with your strategies in my classroom. I used to use a system for tracking kind acts in the classroom and using class-wide rewards, and I’m thinking about returning to a similar one that I saw on Facebook. The goal is to keep the community unified but accountable and to visually see their progress. A: I am so happy to hear that you have found success using behavioral leadership strategies and procedures! You certainly can go back to using a class-wide system for positive behaviors. While this is better than a class-wide system for negative behaviors (check marks, pulling cards, “clipping down”), I don’t suggest it. You say the systems that you are looking at using “keep the community unified and accountable,” but I think behavioral leadership already does exactly that already. People are also reading... Rest assured, Nebraska volleyball fans: The missing fan behind the servers will be back Saturday Matt Rhule, Luke Fickell both downplay postgame encounter between Fickell, Donovan Raiola Arrest made in 55-year-old cold case of Nebraska teen stabbed to death Signing Day: Meet Nebraska volleyball's five-player 2025 class Wisconsin officer grabbing Donovan Raiola's arm a 'misunderstanding,' UW police say ‘I don’t care who’s played': Nebraska’s Dana Holgorsen on personnel changes at tight end Amie Just: Bring out the tissues — and the brooms — for Nebraska volleyball's emotional win Man found dead in north Lincoln, police say Cover Five: With pressure rising, Matt Rhule delivers Nebraska a bowl bid in Year 2 Nebraska GOP to seek hard-right social policies in 2025 legislative session Sound waves: What others are saying about Nebraska's win against Wisconsin Here's how Nebraska doctors are finding 'more opportunities to save lives' from lung cancer UNO freezes funds for LGBTQ+, multicultural, other student groups after audit Amie Just: Ahead of milestone birthday, local sports figures give advice on turning 30 As Nebraska's Democratic Party shrinks, some former party officials call for change There are two main reasons that I wouldn’t go back to a system. First, it takes your time and energy. I suspect that you are like every other teacher I’ve ever met, and every moment of your day is full. So then, you will have to take something away that you currently do. I would hate for this to take away from something else that is good for your kids. Second, having these types of systems tends to, especially with the most savvy of kids, give them the impression that you need some kind of tangible bribes to “make them behave.” Having no system has the opposite effect. We want kids to think, “Why do I do good things in class? I don’t really know; my teacher doesn’t really do anything to make me be good. Hmm, it must be because I am good.” Of course, you have been using behavioral leadership strategies and procedures to guide kids to make good choices, but as you know, these just tend to become so ingrained in the classroom that kids don’t really notice much, since they’re not punitive and most are just nice but sophisticated means of sharing control and building relationships. It’s kind of like fish not really knowing that they live in water. They just take it for granted. It’s just better for kids to think, “I use positive behaviors because I’m a good person” rather than for any part of them to think, “I use good behaviors to get things.” I often had kids in my classes who were used to a system from previous years. Here’s a sample conversation that I can remember having on the first day of school about that. You may have already had a similar conversation in the past two years. Kid: So, what do you get in here if you’re good? Kid Whisperer: What do you mean? Kid: I mean, what do I get if I’m good? Kid Whisperer: Well, I think that you are good no matter what. Now, people can choose to do good things and bad things. That’s up to you. In this room, if you choose to work hard, you get to do things that are maybe more fun than work. If you do things that are kind, helpful and thoughtful, more people will like you. In this room, if you are the first to be ready, you get to do fun stuff before the people who are not ready. If you are efficient, you will have more time to play. If you are responsible, you will get more leadership opportunities. And, as you know, the use of behavioral leadership strategies and procedures creates the environment that I describe here, and traditional discipline does not.Stock up on these popular board games for your next get-together

Katie Porter granted temporary restraining order against an ex after ‘ongoing threats and harassment’Liverpool beat holders Real Madrid with Aston Villa denied win against Juventus

UN publishes new death toll from gang massacre in HaitiABSOLUTELY NOT! Democratic Senator Peter Welch Wants to Restore Funding for Terror-Loving UNRWA

As you scroll through your social media feed or let your favorite music app curate the perfect playlist, it may feel like artificial intelligence is improving your life – learning your preferences and serving your needs. But lurking behind this convenient facade is a growing concern: algorithmic harms. These harms aren’t obvious or immediate. They’re insidious, building over time as AI systems quietly make decisions about your life without you even knowing it. The hidden power of these systems is becoming a significant threat to privacy, equality, autonomy and safety. AI systems are embedded in nearly every facet of modern life. They suggest what shows and movies you should watch, help employers decide whom they want to hire, and even influence judges to decide who qualifies for a sentence. But what happens when these systems, often seen as neutral, begin making decisions that put certain groups at a disadvantage or, worse, cause real-world harm? The often-overlooked consequences of AI applications call for regulatory frameworks that can keep pace with this rapidly evolving technology. I study the intersection of law and technology, and I’ve outlined a legal framework to do just that. Slow burns One of the most striking aspects of algorithmic harms is that their cumulative impact often flies under the radar. These systems typically don’t directly assault your privacy or autonomy in ways you can easily perceive. They gather vast amounts of data about people — often without their knowledge — and use this data to shape decisions affecting people’s lives. Sometimes, this results in minor inconveniences, like an advertisement that follows you across websites. But as AI operates without addressing these repetitive harms, they can scale up, leading to significant cumulative damage across diverse groups of people. Consider the example of social media algorithms. They are ostensibly designed to promote beneficial social interactions. However, behind their seemingly beneficial facade, they silently track users’ clicks and compile profiles of their political beliefs, professional affiliations and personal lives. The data collected is used in systems that make consequential decisions — whether you are identified as a jaywalking pedestrian, considered for a job or flagged as a risk to commit suicide. Worse, their addictive design traps teenagers in cycles of overuse, leading to escalating mental health crises, including anxiety, depression and self-harm. By the time you grasp the full scope, it’s too late — your privacy has been breached, your opportunities shaped by biased algorithms, and the safety of the most vulnerable undermined, all without your knowledge. This is what I call “intangible, cumulative harm”: AI systems operate in the background, but their impacts can be devastating and invisible. Why regulation lags behind Despite these mounting dangers, legal frameworks worldwide have struggled to keep up. In the United States, a regulatory approach emphasizing innovation has made it difficult to impose strict standards on how these systems are used across multiple contexts. Courts and regulatory bodies are accustomed to dealing with concrete harms, like physical injury or economic loss, but algorithmic harms are often more subtle, cumulative and hard to detect. The regulations often fail to address the broader effects that AI systems can have over time. Social media algorithms, for example, can gradually erode users’ mental health, but because these harms build slowly, they are difficult to address within the confines of current legal standards. Four types of algorithmic harm Drawing on existing AI and data governance scholarship, I have categorized algorithmic harms into four legal areas: privacy, autonomy, equality and safety. Each of these domains is vulnerable to the subtle yet often unchecked power of AI systems. The first type of harm is eroding privacy. AI systems collect, process and transfer vast amounts of data, eroding people’s privacy in ways that may not be immediately obvious but have long-term implications. For example, facial recognition systems can track people in public and private spaces, effectively turning mass surveillance into the norm. The second type of harm is undermining autonomy. AI systems often subtly undermine your ability to make autonomous decisions by manipulating the information you see. Social media platforms use algorithms to show users content that maximizes a third party’s interests, subtly shaping opinions, decisions and behaviors across millions of users. The third type of harm is diminishing equality. AI systems, while designed to be neutral, often inherit the biases present in their data and algorithms. This reinforces societal inequalities over time. In one infamous case, a facial recognition system used by retail stores to detect shoplifters disproportionately misidentified women and people of color. The fourth type of harm is impairing safety. AI systems make decisions that affect people’s safety and well-being. When these systems fail, the consequences can be catastrophic. But even when they function as designed, they can still cause harm, such as social media algorithms’ cumulative effects on teenagers’ mental health. Because these cumulative harms often arise from AI applications protected by trade secret laws, victims have no way to detect or trace the harm. This creates a gap in accountability. When a biased hiring decision or a wrongful arrest is made due to an algorithm, how does the victim know? Without transparency, it’s nearly impossible to hold companies accountable. Closing the accountability gap Categorizing the types of algorithmic harms delineates the legal boundaries of AI regulation and presents possible legal reforms to bridge this accountability gap. Changes I believe would help include mandatory algorithmic impact assessments that require companies to document and address the immediate and cumulative harms of an AI application to privacy, autonomy, equality and safety – before and after it’s deployed. For instance, firms using facial recognition systems would need to evaluate these systems’ impacts throughout their life cycle. Another helpful change would be stronger individual rights around the use of AI systems, allowing people to opt out of harmful practices and making certain AI applications opt in. For example, requiring an opt-in regime for data processing by firms’ use of facial recognition systems and allowing users to opt out at any time. Lastly, I suggest requiring companies to disclose the use of AI technology and its anticipated harms. To illustrate, this may include notifying customers about the use of facial recognition systems and the anticipated harms across the domains outlined in the typology. As AI systems become more widely used in critical societal functions – from health care to education and employment – the need to regulate harms they can cause becomes more pressing. Without intervention, these invisible harms are likely to continue to accumulate, affecting nearly everyone and disproportionately hitting the most vulnerable. With generative AI multiplying and exacerbating AI harms, I believe it’s important for policymakers, courts, technology developers and civil society to recognize the legal harms of AI. This requires not just better laws, but a more thoughtful approach to cutting-edge AI technology – one that prioritizes civil rights and justice in the face of rapid technological advancement. The future of AI holds incredible promise, but without the right legal frameworks, it could also entrench inequality and erode the very civil rights it is, in many cases, designed to enhance. Sylvia Lu is a Faculty Fellow and Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

Doctor at the Heart of Türkiye Newborn Baby Deaths Case Says He was a 'Trusted' PhysicianJennings rushes for tiebreaking touchdown and Presbyterian defeats Butler 30-27Bol Bowen 3-4 1-2 7, Ewin 7-10 3-5 17, Holt 1-3 2-4 5, Jackson 3-7 2-2 8, Watkins 5-6 2-4 14, Davis 1-4 3-4 6, Deng 4-6 0-0 10, Swinton 3-4 1-1 8, Thomas 3-3 2-4 10, Maluk 2-7 0-0 4, Nitu 0-1 0-0 0, Mbatch 1-1 0-0 2, Rozakeas 0-1 1-2 1, Jones 0-0 0-0 0, Simpson 0-0 0-0 0, Crawford 0-1 0-0 0. Totals 33-58 17-28 92. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

How to Watch Top 25 Women’s College Basketball Games – Thursday, November 28Arsenal, Manchester City and Bayern Munich all advanced to the Women’s Champions League quarterfinals with with two games to spare on Thursday. Late substitute Lina Hurtig scored the winner in Arsenal's 1-0 victory over Juventus in London. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get updates and player profiles ahead of Friday's high school games, plus a recap Saturday with stories, photos, video Frequency: Seasonal Twice a week