top 646

Share Tweet Share Share Email In today’s competitive market, understanding what your competitors are doing is key to staying ahead. Competitor analysis is essential for uncovering opportunities, refining strategies, and improving your performance. Mavic’s Competitor Analysis feature helps you track and analyze competitors automatically, making it easier to monitor key metrics like website traffic, social media engagement, and audience behavior. In this blog, we’ll explore the powerful new features of Mavic AI’s competitor analysis tools and how they can help your business stay competitive. What is Competitor Analysis? Competitor analysis involves evaluating your competitors’ strategies, website performance, and engagement tactics. By understanding what works for them and where they fall short, businesses can improve their own approach. With Mavic’s competitor data analysis , you can access real-time insights into competitors’ website traffic, social media performance, and much more. This data is crucial for businesses looking to outperform their competition and identify new growth opportunities. New Features in Mavic’s Competitor Analysis Mavic has recently upgraded its competitor analysis feature with several exciting new tools. Here’s a closer look at what’s now available: Competitors in the Analytics Module The Competitors section is part of Mavic’s Analytics module, providing streamlined access to competitor insights. All competitor data is housed under one tab, making it easier to compare metrics and analyze trends. Upgraded Data Visualization The data visualization features allow you to view competitor visits , unique visitors , average visit duration , pages per visit , and bounce rate on a monthly basis . You can toggle between charts and tables to see competitor data in the format that best suits your analysis. This enhanced view allows you to track and compare competitors’ performance over time. Competitor Scorecards In the near future, Mavic will roll out competitor scorecards that offer a deeper dive into your competitors’ performance. These scorecards will provide an overview of important metrics, allowing businesses to track competitors’ strengths and weaknesses in one comprehensive report. Chat with Competitor Data Mavic now allows you to chat with your competitor data . Simply type in a prompt, like “ Help me analyze my competitors’ website traffic data ” and interact with the data in a conversational way. This feature makes it easier to analyze competitor performance and gain insights without having to manually sift through reports. Manual Input of Competitor Social Channels Mavic AI now lets you manually input missing social media channels for competitors. By adding social media profiles, you can enhance the depth of your analysis and ensure a more complete view of your competitors’ online presence. Benefits of Competitor Analysis for Your Business Using competitor analysis tools like those offered by Mavic can give your business a significant edge. Here are some key benefits: Informed Decision-Making With accurate competitor data , you can make better decisions about your marketing strategies, product offerings, and customer engagement. You’ll have a clearer picture of what’s working for your competitors and where you can outperform them. Identifying Market Trends Tracking competitor data over time lets you identify emerging market trends . Mavic’s competitor analytics tools allow you to spot trends early, giving you the opportunity to act before your competitors do. Improved Marketing Campaigns By analyzing your competitors’ website traffic , bounce rate , and social media engagement, you can adjust your own campaigns for better performance. Use these insights to refine your messaging, target the right audience, and choose the best channels for promotion. Competitive Edge Continuous competitor tracking ensures that you stay ahead of the curve. By regularly monitoring their performance, you can stay proactive and adjust your strategies to keep a competitive edge in your industry. How Mavic’s Competitor Analysis Features Work Mavic’s competitor data analysis tools offer an intuitive way to track and measure your competitors’ performance: Competitor Visits : Track how often competitors’ websites are visited, which can give you an idea of their audience size and engagement. Bounce Rate and Engagement : Analyze how well competitors’ websites are engaging visitors by looking at metrics like bounce rate and average session duration. Social Media Data : Manually add competitors’ social media channels to gather insights into their social strategies. This feature allows you to assess how competitors are engaging with their followers across platforms. Mavic’s competitor website traffic and engagement data allow you to gauge their online presence. By comparing this data with your own, you can uncover areas where your business can improve and identify strategies to help you outperform your competition. Why Competitor Analysis Matters In a highly competitive digital landscape, competitor analysis gives businesses the insights they need to thrive. Understanding your competitors’ strengths, weaknesses, and audience engagement can help you make informed decisions about where to invest your time, energy, and marketing budget. Mavic’s tools automate this process, making it easier to track your competitors and act on insights in real time. Conclusion Mavic’s new competitor analysis feature provides a robust set of tools to help businesses track and analyze their competitors’ performance with ease. With enhanced data visualization, competitor scorecards, and the ability to chat with your data, Mavic makes competitor tracking smarter and more actionable. By utilizing these tools, businesses can stay ahead of the competition, refine their strategies, and drive growth. Start using Mavic’s competitor analytics tools today and gain a competitive advantage by making data-driven decisions that set you apart from the rest. Related Items: Smarter Competitor Analysis , Smarter Competitor Analysis with Mavic AI Share Tweet Share Share Email CommentsAfter a thrilling conference championship Saturday and a drawn-out reveal show Sunday, the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff field is set. The first true tournament in FBS history has plenty to love -- and elements to loathe. What Went Right: Unique opening-round matchups Whether the first round proves to be more competitive than the four-team Playoff's often lopsided semifinal matchups remains to be seen. Until then, there is at least intrigue in the historic rarity of the four pairings. One opening-round matchup -- ACC automatic qualifier Clemson at Texas -- is a first-time encounter between two programs that combine for seven claimed national championships. Of the other three, the most recent contest occurred in 1996 when Tennessee topped Ohio State in the Citrus Bowl. The Vols and Buckeyes meet as the No. 9 and No. 8 seeds at Ohio State's Horseshoe, with the winner advancing to face top overall seed Oregon. SMU, a perhaps surprising final at-large selection given the Mustangs' dearth of high-profile wins, meets Penn State for the third time ever and first since 1978. The Nittany Lions scored a 26-21 come-from-behind win in Happy Valley, where they will again host SMU. The Penn State victory ended a 30-year stalemate after the first and only meeting in the 1948 Cotton Bowl produced a 13-13 tie. Here's hoping the third part of a 76-year trilogy is as closely contested as the initial two. Meanwhile, the matchup with the most previous installments is the closest in proximity -- less than 200 miles separate in-state counterparts Indiana and Notre Dame -- and the most lopsided. The Fighting Irish and Hoosiers last played in 1991, with Notre Dame's 49-27 win marking its sixth straight victory by multiple scores. Indiana's last win in the series came in 1950, a 20-7 Hoosiers victory in Bloomington. What Went Right: Boise State's big opportunity Although not the first outsider to reach or win a Bowl Championship Series game, Boise State's 2007 Fiesta Bowl victory over Oklahoma was arguably the most pivotal moment in building support for outsiders to compete for the national championship. The Broncos spent two decades knocking on the door, beginning with their perfect 2004 regular season, extending through two Fiesta Bowl wins, and withstanding the heartbreak of late-season losses in 2010 and 2011. The celebration in response to Boise State being part of the bracket -- and not just in, but as the No. 3 seed with a bye into the quarterfinals -- marked a culmination of generations of effort for just this opportunity. What Went Right: ‘Football weather' comes to the postseason From the birth of the bowl system with the first-ever Rose Bowl Game, college football's postseason has resided primarily in warm-weather destinations. This makes sense for the original purpose of bowl games as showcases and celebrations of a team's regular-season performance, but less so for the goal of crowning a national champion. After decades of playing what often amounted to road games in the postseason, northern teams get their opportunity to host. Three of the four first-round contests are in such climates -- though Indiana won't be particularly disadvantaged by weather when playing Notre Dame in South Bend. With average December highs in Pennsylvania in the 30s, SMU will need its heaters on the sideline at Penn State's Beaver Stadium. The more intriguing trip, however, is Tennessee's to Ohio State. Longtime college football fans know the arguments about SEC teams playing in Big Ten country late in the year. Pitting two high-quality teams from the two leagues head-to-head in such conditions is a highlight of this new postseason system. And, given Tennessee and Ohio State have two of the nation's best defenses, expect a style of play befitting what is often described as football weather. What Went Wrong: More teams means more politicking When Mack Brown seemingly spent as much time on TV campaigning in 2004 as that year's presidential candidates, George W. Bush and John Kerry, his Texas Longhorns were among a small collection of teams vying for BCS bids. With the 12-team Playoff opening the top postseason opportunities to as many as 20 teams realistically, the political campaign ads that mercilessly ended in early November were replaced by the politicking of college football figures. Iowa State athletic director Jamie Pollard spent last week taking shots at SMU and other programs over strength of schedule -- a point neglecting that the Cyclones' losses came to unranked Texas Tech and sub-.500 Kansas. Arizona State's thorough dismantling of Iowa State in the Big 12 Championship Game solved that debate at the proverbial ballot box. However, brace yourself for an offseason of recount demands coming out of the SEC. Alabama's exclusion at 9-3, while 11-2 SMU landed the final at-large spot, is sure to play into the same controversy that South Carolina coach Shane Beamer leaned into last week. Beamer told The State (Columbia, S.C.) last week that his program may consider changing its nonconference scheduling in response to its seemingly inevitable Playoff snub. It's an odd position, given South Carolina's three losses all came in-conference, and the Gamecocks' nonleague slate included sub-.500 teams Old Dominion, Akron and FCS Wofford. But then again, how often are political campaign pitches rooted in logic? What Went Wrong: Quantity over quality? A more salient position in Beamer's case for South Carolina is that the Gamecocks scored quality wins during a season-ending, six-game streak. With its Rivalry Week defeat of Clemson, South Carolina added a victory over a Playoff qualifier to complement victories over Texas A&M and Missouri. Alabama, meanwhile, boasts wins over No. 2 overall seed Georgia and that same South Carolina team in contention. SMU's resume might be the most likely to draw ire, given the Mustangs received the last at-large berth. However, SMU beat nine- and eight-win Duke and Louisville, with two losses by a combined six points. Indiana should be the more contentious at-large choice, with the Hoosiers beating only one team that finished above .500: 7-5 Michigan. Indiana's only other matchup with an above-.500 opponent was a 38-15 blowout at Ohio State. That's something Alabama and South Carolina have in common with Indiana, as all three teams lost in routs. Alabama dropped a 24-3 decision late in the season at Oklahoma that presumably doomed the Crimson Tide's chances, while South Carolina lost to Ole Miss 27-3. To that end, there are arguments to be made for and against every team that was on the bubble. No system will ever appease all parties. What Went Wrong: Seeding conundrum Much of the Playoff's very existence flies in the face of college football tradition. One facet of how the field was set that upholds tradition in its own small way is rewarding teams for winning their conferences by reserving the four first-round byes for league champions. When this format was implemented, however, the committee could not have envisioned that two of the top five conference champions would not be ranked in the top 10. Because three-loss Clemson survived a furious SMU comeback in the ACC championship game, and Arizona State caught fire after underwhelming losses to Texas Tech and Cincinnati to win a weak Big 12, the committee was in the unusual position of having to slot a non-power conference champion and double-digit-ranked team in a top-four spot. This first edition of the Playoff seems likely to be the last to use this format, even if this scenario seems like an outlier. --Kyle Kensing, Field Level Media

Dan Bartkowiak: As voters reject marijuana, Pa. policymakers should avoid the failed experiment

Barclays PLC Purchases 107,107 Shares of Select Water Solutions, Inc. (NYSE:WTTR)John Fetterman slams liberal magazine for calling assassination of health insurance boss 'inevitable'

487 Tons of NOx Emissions Reduced, 93% to Benefit Environmental Justice Areas DIAMOND BAR, Calif. , Dec. 6, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) Governing Board approved more than $109 million to accelerate the development of zero-emission charging and hydrogen infrastructure. This funding will deliver heavy-duty electric chargers and hydrogen refueling stations along critical trade corridors, including the San Pedro Bay Ports and major freeways, with a strong focus on environmental justice communities. Once completed, the projects will reduce approximately 487 tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxides (NOx) and seven tons of particulate matter annually, improving air quality for the region's most impacted areas. Of the 30 projects, 12 are located within Assembly Bill (AB) 617 communities, with 93% of the emissions reductions directly benefiting underserved areas. Key infrastructure developments include 21 electric charging stations equipped with more than 800 connectors and fast chargers for heavy-duty trucks and seven hydrogen refueling stations, including a flagship location at California State University, Los Angeles , dedicated to workforce training and community education. "These investments provide critical support needed for heavy-duty vehicle fleet owners to embrace cleaner technologies," said Vanessa Delgado , South Coast AQMD's Governing Board Chair. "By prioritizing projects like these, we're not just addressing pollution, but also ensuring equitable access to the benefits of a zero-emission future." In December 2023 , South Coast AQMD launched a solicitation for zero-emission infrastructure proposals under its Carl Moyer Program and received nearly $400 million in applications, demonstrating the demand for zero emission heavy duty trucks and other equipment. Projects, in part, were selected based on their ability to deliver public access, cost-effectiveness and maximum impact on the South Coast Air Basin's air quality. Additionally, the initiative is fostering collaborations with school districts like Los Angeles Unified and Moreno Valley Unified to advance the adoption of zero-emission school buses. The California State University of Los Angeles hydrogen station will not only serve fuel cell vehicles but also educate and train the next generation on hydrogen technology. For more information on the awarded projects, please visit https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2024/2024-dec6-004.pdf?sfvrsn=2 South Coast AQMD is the regulatory agency responsible for improving air quality for large areas of Los Angeles , Orange , Riverside and San Bernardino counties, including the Coachella Valley. For news, air quality alerts, event updates and more, please visit us at www.aqmd.gov , download our award-winning app, or follow us on Facebook , X (formerly known as Twitter) and Instagram . MEDIA CONTACT: Nahal Mogharabi , (909) 396-3773, Cell: (909) 837-2431 Connie Villanueva (909) 396-2409, Cell: (909) 215-5601 [email protected] SOURCE SOUTH COAST AQMD

Board of Directors declares quarterly dividend OKLAHOMA CITY, Dec. 4, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- OGE Energy Corp. (NYSE: OGE), the parent company of Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company, announced today that Charles Walworth is appointed Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective December 4, 2024. Walworth is a 25-year veteran of the company, holding a variety of finance roles during his tenure. Most recently, Walworth served as treasurer. "Chuck is a respected leader and the architect of one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry," said Sean Trauschke, OGE Energy Corp. Chairman, President and CEO. "He cares about our people, customers, communities and shareholders and I look forward to serving alongside him as we continue to grow the company." Additionally, the Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.42125 per common share of stock, to be paid on January 31, 2025, to shareholders of record on January 6, 2025. View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/oge-energy-corp-appoints-walworth-as-chief-financial-officer-302323141.html SOURCE OGE Energy Corp.Drought, fires and deforestation battered Amazon rainforest in 2024Soccer's global allure is unmatched, yet its history is shadowed by tragedies. At a recent soccer match in Nzérékoré, Guinea, a controversial refereeing decision led to unrest, resulting in crowd violence that claimed more than 50 lives. In 2022, violence at Indonesia's Kanjuruhan stadium during a match led to the deaths of 135 people, as security forces responded to pitch invasions with tear gas, triggering chaos and ultimately a crowd crush. These incidents are stark reminders of the risks tied to violence in sports crowds. They stem from structural failures, poor crowd management, and often complex group dynamics that lead to violent behaviour. Soccer crowds are especially prone to violence, which raises a pressing question: what is it about soccer and its fan culture that makes such incidents more likely to occur? À lire aussi : Dedicated Roman gladiator superfans were the football hooligans of their day Soccer fan violence: a recurring pattern Catastrophic incidents rooted in fan violence have been intertwined with the history of this sport. Perhaps the most extreme case is the Soccer War (more commonly known as the Football War) of 1969, when World Cup qualifiers between El Salvador and Honduras inflamed existing political tensions. Clashes between fans added to the animosity, and within days, the two nations were at war. More than 2,000 people died in the brief conflict. There are other cases throughout the history of the game: Estadio Nacional Disaster (1964, Peru) – Riots broke out after a disallowed goal during a Peru-Argentina match in Lima. Police used tear gas, causing chaos as fans tried to escape through locked exits. More than 300 people died. The Heysel Stadium Disaster (1985, Belgium) – Clashes between Liverpool and Juventus fans before the European Cup final caused a wall to collapse. Thirty-nine people were killed and more than 600 were injured. Port Said Stadium Riot (2012, Egypt) – After a match between Al-Masry and Al-Ahly, fans...NEW YORK (AP) — Geronimo Rubio De La Rosa scored 27 points as Columbia beat Fairfield 85-72 on Saturday night. De La Rosa shot 8 of 15 from the field, including 5 for 11 from 3-point range, and went 6 for 6 from the line for the Lions (11-1). Avery Brown shot 5 of 8 from the field and 5 of 5 from the free-throw line to add 16 points. Kenny Noland went 5 of 12 from the field (3 for 7 from 3-point range) to finish with 15 points. The Stags (5-8, 1-1 Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference) were led by Louis Bleechmore, who recorded 12 points. Fairfield also got 12 points and seven assists from Jamie Bergens. Deon Perry had 12 points and five assists. Columbia's next game is Monday against Rutgers on the road, and Fairfield visits Merrimack on Friday. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

Amy Robach, T.J. Holmes’ exes Andrew Shue and Marilee Fiebig make red carpet debut as a couple after divorcesiShares MSCI Netherlands ETF ( NYSEARCA:EWN – Get Free Report )’s share price passed below its fifty day moving average during trading on Friday . The stock has a fifty day moving average of $46.01 and traded as low as $44.89. iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF shares last traded at $45.10, with a volume of 24,813 shares. iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF Stock Performance The company has a market capitalization of $257.07 million, a P/E ratio of 23.39 and a beta of 1.18. The stock’s fifty day moving average price is $45.94 and its 200-day moving average price is $48.49. Institutional Inflows and Outflows Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the business. Main Management LLC raised its holdings in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF by 103.1% in the 3rd quarter. Main Management LLC now owns 1,379 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $70,000 after acquiring an additional 700 shares during the period. Marotta Asset Management increased its stake in shares of iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF by 0.4% during the third quarter. Marotta Asset Management now owns 165,726 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $8,429,000 after purchasing an additional 704 shares during the period. Mount Lucas Management LP lifted its holdings in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF by 7.0% during the 3rd quarter. Mount Lucas Management LP now owns 14,951 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $760,000 after purchasing an additional 972 shares during the last quarter. Osborne Partners Capital Management LLC boosted its stake in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF by 0.8% in the 3rd quarter. Osborne Partners Capital Management LLC now owns 511,618 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $26,021,000 after purchasing an additional 3,813 shares during the period. Finally, Sunbelt Securities Inc. grew its holdings in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF by 61.2% in the 2nd quarter. Sunbelt Securities Inc. now owns 12,049 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $605,000 after buying an additional 4,576 shares in the last quarter. iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF Company Profile iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF, formerly iShares MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index Fund (the Fund), is an exchange-traded fund. The Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index (the Index). Featured Stories Receive News & Ratings for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .