55 jili slot
US stocks experience mixed fortunes on quiet day of tradingHoustonian Mark Swidan to be released from Chinese imprisonment
Stock indexes drifted to a mixed finish on Wall Street on Thursday as some heavyweight technology and communications sector stocks offset gains elsewhere in the market. The S&P 500 fell less than 0.1% after spending the day wavering between small gains and losses. The tiny loss ended the benchmark index’s three-day winning streak. Advertisement The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.1% and the Nasdaq composite fell 0.1%. Trading volume was lighter than usual as US markets reopened following the Christmas holiday. Semiconductor giant Nvidia, whose enormous valuation gives it an outsize influence on indexes, slipped 0.2%. Meta Platforms fell 0.7%, and Amazon and Netflix each fell 0.9%. Tesla was among the biggest decliners in the S&P 500, finishing 1.8% lower. Advertisement Some tech companies fared better. Chip company Broadcom rose 2.4%, Micron Technology added 0.6% and Adobe gained 0.5%. Health care stocks were a bright spot. CVS Health rose 1.5% and Walgreens Boots Alliance added 5.3% for the biggest gain among S&P 500 stocks. Several retailers also gained ground. Target rose 3%, Ross Stores added 2.3%, Best Buy rose 2.9% and Dollar Tree gained 3.8%. Traders are watching to see whether retailers have a strong holiday season. The day after Christmas traditionally ranks among the top 10 biggest shopping days of the year, as consumers go online or rush to stores to cash in gift cards and raid bargain bins. Advertisement US-listed shares in Honda and Nissan rose 4.1% and 16.4% respectively. The Japanese car makers announced earlier this week that the two companies are in talks to combine. All told, the S&P 500 fell 2.45 points to 6,037.59. The Dow added 28.77 points to 43,325.80. The Nasdaq fell 10.77 points to close at 20,020.36. Wall Street also got a labour market update. US applications for unemployment benefits held steady last week, though continuing claims rose to the highest level in three years, the Labour Department reported. Treasury yields mostly fell in the bond market. The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 4.58% from 4.59% late on Tuesday. Advertisement Major European markets were closed, as well as Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and Indonesia. Trading was expected to be subdued this week with a thin slate of economic data on the calendar.
Hiring and retaining neurodivergent talent is a crucial step toward fostering a more inclusive and innovative workforce in cybersecurity. But traditional hiring processes and standardized training programs can often create barriers for these individuals and lead companies to lose out on talent. Here are tips for making your hiring and training processes more inclusive and ensuring neurodivergent candidates can succeed and thrive within your organization once they are on the job. Traditional interviews may not showcase a neurodivergent candidate’s full potential. Instead, use performance-based interviews where candidates can demonstrate their skills in a comfortable, simulated work environment. This provides a better insight into their capabilities and reduces stress related to social interactions. "Sitting in a room answering questions, especially when you're seeking a job that is going to have less social interaction, is not the way to do it. When it comes to showing my skill set, I'm going to be doing that on a computer, in an environment I'm comfortable with," says Megan Roddie-Fonseca, a senior security engineer at Datadog and a neurodivergent person with autism and ADHD. Clarity is key when working with neurodivergent candidates. During interviews and onboarding, provide clear instructions and explain expectations thoroughly. Avoid using metaphors or vague language, which can create confusion for some candidates. “Due to my auditory processing disorder, I often rely on written communication to fully process information,” says Meghan Maneval, senior director of product marketing at LogicGate. Allowing candidates to complete tasks at their own pace and in familiar environments can help them showcase their strengths without the added pressure of time constraints or sensory distractions. “Many neurodivergent employees I have spoken with tell me they are at their best when they have time and mental space to solve a problem on their own, in their own way, and then bring it back to the team,” says Dr. Jodi Asbell-Clarke, a senior researcher in neurodiversity in STEM education at the non-profit TERC, and author of Reaching and Teaching Neurodivergent Learners in STEM. Neurodivergent employees often benefit from tailored training programs . Rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, offer flexible training options, such as self-paced modules, to accommodate different learning styles. "Giving neurodivergent employees space for autonomy of thought during training can be beneficial,” says Asbell-Clarke Foster open dialogue about neurodiversity and encourage conversations about the needs of neurodivergent employees. Create Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) to provide a platform for neurodivergent voices and ensure they feel heard. “It's a culture shift because a lot of people are afraid to bring up those things because people think they're silly or they'll feel like, you know, they're going to get fired or not be a candidate for hire because they made a request like this," says Roddie-Fonseca. Adopt universal design practices that benefit everyone in the workplace, whether or not they disclose a neurodivergent condition. Simple accommodations like allowing flexible workspaces, reducing sensory distractions, and providing access to tools can help everyone thrive. "Neurodivergence is already present in about 20% of the workforce, but not everyone will disclose it. So it’s important to have support systems in place that everyone can access,” says Liz Green, an occupational therapist and business consultant specializing in neurodiversity and inclusive design, who often works with cybersecurity clients. Create a culture of regular check-ins, where managers and employees can discuss accommodations, work environment preferences, and overall well-being. This ensures neurodivergent employees feel supported and understood. But do it in different ways that also ensure the check ins are not intrusive. This can be done with short check-in surveys, for example. "Quick checks are very helpful,” says Green. “Regular check-ins allow managers to understand how employees are doing and if any accommodations need adjustment." Creating an inclusive environment for neurodivergent employees requires a willingness to learn and adapt. Encourage managers to engage in ongoing training and education on neurodiversity, and foster a workplace culture that supports continuous learning and improvement. Ensure that neurodivergent employees are included in all conversations and initiatives that are centered on inclusion. “The most important thing is bringing forth the voices of the population,” says Green. “It’s about making an effort to listen and then act on what neurodivergent employees are saying.” Joan Goodchild is a veteran journalist, editor, and writer who has been covering security for more than a decade. She has written for several publications and previously served as editor-in-chief for CSO Online.From Desmond Mgboh, Kano Kano State Police Command have warned against obstruction of highways and disruption of public order in the name of content creation, insisting that offenders will be prosecuted henceforth. A statement on Monday by the Command’s Public Relations Officer, Abdullahi Haruna Kiyawa regretted that these obstructions of highways and disruption of public order cause traffic congestion and poise a significant risk to public safety.. “Kano State Police have observed with concern the recent trend of youths blocking roads in Kano, engaging in dancing, washing, singing, and other activities in the name of social media content creation. These actions are not only causing unnecessary traffic congestion but also posing a significant risk to public safety.: he stated. “The Command wishes to remind the public that obstructing highways and disrupting public order are serious offenses under the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Such actions can lead to accidents, injuries, and damage to property” the statement said According to the statement, ” Kano State Police Command hereby warns all individuals and groups involved in these activities to desist immediately. Parents and guardians are also advised to caution their wards against participating in such activities. “The Command is committed to maintaining public safety and order, and will not hesitate to take necessary measures to address this issue. This may include arresting and prosecuting offenders” the statement added The Command urged the public to report any instances of highway obstruction or disruption of public order to the nearest police station. End.
Garrison’s girls basketball team fell to Union Grove Tuesday night 45-32 in a game head coach Gracie Honea said she believes will help prepare her team for what’s ahead. “Union Grove is a great team,” Honea said. We needed to play them to prepare for district, starting next week. I have a lot of respect for their coach and their program. Our girls were challenged like I needed them to be. I’m proud of them as always. They played a good basketball game for four quarters and hustled. We’re never going to stop hustling, that’s for sure.” The Lady Bulldogs now own an overall record of 6-4. Garrison scored the first points of the night when Bri Downs recorded an and-one. Nicole Carloni recorded a three-point play of her own on the other end with a shot from beyond the arc to tie it up at 3-3. That was the start of a 9-0 run to give the Lady Lions a 9-3 lead. AJ Johnson added a field goal but Carlonni drained another three to make the score 12-5. Downs banked in a shot before Johnson tossed it in at the buzzer to put the Lady Bulldogs within six points — 15-9, with one quarter in the books. Mallory Cannon scored the first points of the second quarter but Garrison followed that up with a three from Downs from the top of the key. Union Grove scored the next field goal but that was followed by a Garrison 7-0 run. Aubrey Townsend knocked down a jumper. JK Davis banked in a shot from two and Downs banked in a shot from three. That tied the game at 19 with about 2:35 left to play in the first half. The Lady Lions took control of the remainder of the second quarter, outscoring Garrison 10-3. The Lady Bulldogs’ only remaining three points of the half came on a three-pointer from Downs. Kiera Taylor answered with a three of her own on the other end to give Union Grove a 29-22 halftime lead. Taylor Campbell found Sarah Prince for an assist for the first points of the second half. Carloni came away with a steal and layup and added a free throw to complete the three-point play, extending the Lady Lions’ lead to 34-22. Garrison was held to just two points in the third quarter and trailed 37-24 heading into the fourth. Carloni went 2-for-2 from the free-throw line to score the first points of the fourth quarter. Moments later, Johnson came up with a steal and finished the play off with a jumper. She scored all of Garrison’s fourth-quarter points as the Lady Bulldogs fell 48-32. Downs led her Lady Bulldogs in scoring with 16 points. Next in line was Johnson with 12. Davis and Reece Jasick each scored two points. Carloni was the game’s leading scorer with 19 points. Kiera Taylor scored eight points and Campbell scored six. Garrison is set to compete in tournament play Thursday through Saturday in Slocum.Unwise, unfair to prejudge split-second life-and-death decisions police face
In an era when information travels at breakneck speed across vast digital networks, the very act of trying to hide certain data often paradoxically ensures its broader dissemination. This ironic dynamic, known as the “Streisand effect,” encapsulates a critical tension at the heart of contemporary media ecosystems: attempts to suppress or censor information frequently result in that information being shared more widely and gaining even greater cultural resonance. Conceptually, the Streisand effect aligns with a set of interrelated theories from communication studies, media ethics, political science, and sociology that explore how power, secrecy, and transparency collide in the digital sphere. The naming of this effect traces back to a high-profile incident involving the American singer and actress Barbra Streisand, who sought to remove an innocuous aerial photograph of her home from a public online archive. Her attempt at legal action not only failed to conceal the image but also propelled it into public consciousness, transforming an obscure photo into a widely recognized symbol of the futility of certain censorship efforts. In the years since, the Streisand effect has been invoked to describe countless scenarios in which a suppression attempt has had precisely the opposite outcome, inadvertently amplifying the visibility of the contested information. The Streisand effect has long-since moved beyond a cultural anecdote into a conceptual lens through which we can examine the interplay between censorship, digital activism, and networked people. It resonates with theoretical frameworks in media studies and cyberlaw that explain how information—once digitized—does not simply vanish at the behest of a single authority figure. Instead, the attempt to stifle speech often triggers counterforces that intensify attention and circulation. More than a curiosity or quirk of the internet age, the Streisand effect raises profound questions about control, audience psychology, viral mechanisms, trust in authoritative institutions, and the ethics of public communication. The Streisand effect sits at the intersection of several core ideas in the study of media and communication. On one side, classical theories of censorship and propaganda have long held that efforts to control what the public sees, hears, and reads run the risk of sparking resistance and curiosity. J.S. Mill’s philosophical arguments about the importance of free speech and John Milton’s “Areopagitica” both highlight that suppressing ideas can inadvertently make them more appealing. Even a five-year-old child interacting with their parents embodies that. While these thinkers operated in pre-digital worlds, their observations resonate powerfully in an internet-driven context. In the digital era, communication occurs within a decentralized web of platforms, forums, and social media channels, allowing information to ricochet from one node to countless others at lightning speed. This distributed network structure makes it inherently more difficult to control narratives. Here, the Streisand effect can be seen as a manifestation of network theory principles, where attempts to remove content from a node can trigger attention from multiple connected nodes. Information becomes replicated and mirrored, spreading like wildfire, often beyond the jurisdictional reach of the initial censor. Conceptually, the effect is in dialogue with ideas about “forbidden fruit” and psychological reactance: when individuals perceive that certain knowledge is being withheld from them, their desire to access and disseminate it intensifies. The cognitive interplay between scarcity, curiosity, and the innate human impetus to resist perceived control fosters conditions ripe for the Streisand effect. Likewise, within political communication and digital activism, the effect dovetails with notions of “information cascades,” wherein social proof and the bandwagon effect drive people to share content precisely because it is being suppressed. In 2003, environmental photographer Kenneth Adelman took thousands of aerial images of the California coastline for the California Coastal Records Project, a public initiative to document coastal erosion. Among these images was a photograph of Barbra Streisand’s home. Although the image was not initially singled out or widely circulated, Streisand’s attempt to sue Adelman and the associated website for $50 million to have the photograph removed brought widespread media attention to it. Before the lawsuit, the image had been downloaded only a handful of times; in the aftermath, its visibility soared as global news outlets covered the story and internet users flocked to view what Streisand wanted hidden. The Streisand effect quickly transcended its origin story. Since then, it has been referenced in relation to a host of incidents spanning entertainment, politics, corporate branding, social justice campaigns, and beyond. WikiLeaks, for example, became a lightning rod for the Streisand effect: when governments and corporations attempted to block access to leaked documents, supporters and activists replicated and redistributed those files across mirror sites, magnifying their reach. Similarly, efforts by authoritarian regimes to tamp down dissenting voices often trigger widespread international attention, human rights reporting, and solidarity campaigns that amplify the suppressed message. More recently, attempts by political figures to remove incriminating tweets or videos have ignited the Streisand effect. The internet’s permanent memory—embodied in archiving tools like the Wayback Machine—thwarts erasure. Efforts to edit history, conceal past statements, or disappear embarrassing content often lead to journalists and activists spotlighting these very attempts at suppression. The effect has even extended into celebrity culture: attempts by public relations teams to quash rumors or scandalous images can inadvertently accelerate their spread, turning minor gossip into major controversy. Moreover, as social media algorithms privilege engagement—likes, shares, and comments—censorship attempts can become their own form of viral currency. The more a piece of content is framed as “secret” or “forbidden,” the more likely users are to engage with it, share it, and comment on its significance. In this environment, trying to stifle discourse can resemble tossing gasoline onto a smoldering fire. Human psychology lies at the heart of the Streisand effect. One key ingredient is the principle of psychological reactance, identified by psychologist Jack Brehm in the 1960s. Reactance posits that when individuals perceive their freedom of choice or access to information is threatened, they experience an emotional drive to restore that freedom. Attempts at censorship, particularly in open societies accustomed to broad speech protections, often ignite a collective reactance. Audiences do not merely consume information passively; they become motivated participants seeking to undermine the censors and affirm their autonomy. Another psychological dimension is the “forbidden fruit” phenomenon, where information labeled as suppressed or secretively removed attains a heightened allure. Social beings are drawn to that which is hidden, as uncovering secrets promises insider knowledge, prestige, or the thrill of rebellion. This dynamic is supercharged in digital spaces, where communities form around discovery, investigation, and sharing. The democratization of communication tools means anyone can become a whistleblower, archivist, or curator of hidden truths. These psychological drivers interact with group identities and in-group/out-group dynamics. When people identify as part of an information community—be it Reddit sleuths, political dissidents, or fandom collectors—they take collective pride in outsmarting suppression efforts. The Streisand effect can thus catalyze a sense of camaraderie and mission. The very networks that censorship attempts aim to disrupt become even tighter-knit and more determined to keep the contested information in circulation. The digital architecture underlying modern communication amplifies the Streisand effect. Unlike traditional, top-down broadcast models, digital platforms function as decentralized, user-driven networks. The spread of information is often organic, fueled by peer-to-peer sharing. However, it is also algorithmically orchestrated, as platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube use recommendation engines designed to boost user engagement. When content is “forbidden,” engagement often skyrockets. Users rush to view, share, and debate it. The algorithms notice this surge and respond by pushing it into more feeds, magnifying its visibility. Each attempt to remove or block the content may prompt a new wave of re-uploads, mirrors, and commentary, ensuring that it remains accessible through a variety of back channels. The Streisand effect also intersects with the darker realms of information warfare. State actors, intelligence agencies, and strategically motivated hackers might plant controversial documents or misinformation online precisely to lure their targets into attempts at suppression. By prompting heavy-handed takedowns, they trigger a wave of viral attention and inadvertently legitimize the content’s significance. In this sense, the Streisand effect can be weaponized as a strategic tool: provoking an opponent into censorial overreach that backfires spectacularly. Through this lens, controlling the narrative in digital spaces becomes an intricate game of psychological manipulation, platform maneuvering, and memetic spread. Corporate entities are increasingly aware of the Streisand effect’s implications. In attempts to manage reputational crises, companies sometimes try to remove negative reviews, unflattering images, or damaging press. Ironically, these efforts can escalate minor issues into public-relations catastrophes. The brand, which intended to appear protective of its image and values, comes across as secretive, manipulative, or untrustworthy. In contrast, some brands have learned to embrace transparent communication policies. Rather than hiding criticism, they publicly address concerns, provide context, and invite dialogue. By doing so, they can transform potential scandals into opportunities for authenticity and trust-building. When customers see that a company is not trying to suppress information, they are more likely to view that company as accountable and honest. The Streisand effect, in this sense, serves as a cautionary tale: attempting censorship in the age of digital empowerment can do more harm than good. Politically, the Streisand effect often plays out when authoritarian regimes try to silence dissent or democratic leaders attempt to manage controversies behind closed doors. For instance, efforts to censor media outlets or online platforms to hide state-sanctioned abuses, leaked corruption files, or embarrassing diplomatic cables can unleash a torrent of attention from international media, human rights organizations, and activist networks. The result is often the opposite of what the censor intended: global scrutiny, condemnation, and sustained coverage of the originally suppressed information. After the French government tried to remove Wikipedia's article on the military radio station Pierre-sur-Haute, the article rocketed to the top of French Wikipedia (attribution: S. RIMBAUD). The Streisand effect is not solely the domain of corporate or political players. Grassroots social justice movements and marginalized communities sometimes leverage the effect to draw attention to issues that powerful actors attempt to hide. When police departments try to suppress video evidence of misconduct, activists seize upon the censorship attempt to highlight systemic issues, circulate the suppressed evidence more widely, and mobilize public outrage. The initial attempt at concealing wrongdoing ironically strengthens the movement’s moral leverage, showing how even clumsy censorship can serve as a catalyst for greater awareness and calls for reform. Social justice campaigns can thus find tactical advantage in understanding how the Streisand effect functions. It encourages a strategic approach: activists anticipate censorship, set traps for attempted suppression, and design their messaging so that any blocking attempt backfires into broader coverage. Here, the effect aligns with the broader ecology of digital activism, where information asymmetries and suppressive tactics often energize rather than deter reformist energies. Academics and thought leaders in communications, cyberlaw, and sociology have helped frame and elaborate the Streisand effect in more formal theoretical terms. Scholars like Ethan Zuckerman have discussed how digital networks facilitate the rapid spread of information in unexpected ways, highlighting the “cute cats” theory of internet content—meaning that platforms designed for innocuous sharing can become powerful tools for political mobilization once censorship attempts occur. Legal theorists such as Lawrence Lessig have pointed to how intellectual property law and content takedown notices can trigger counterproductive amplification. Sociologist Manuel Castells’ theory of networked society also provides a framework for understanding the decentralized power dynamics that foster the Streisand effect. Critical voices in media ethics have explored how content moderation efforts on large platforms can backfire. They emphasize that while some moderation is necessary, overly secretive or draconian measures can lead to a sense of disenfranchisement and erode public trust. Meanwhile, journalists and media watchdogs document case studies that illustrate the Streisand effect’s ubiquity. By cataloging these instances, they contribute to a growing body of evidence that suppression attempts often yield unintended consequences. At its core, the Streisand effect raises pressing moral questions about communication in the digital age. Should all information be freely accessible, regardless of its context or harm potential? What responsibilities do individuals, platforms, and institutions have in shaping the knowledge landscape? On one hand, the effect underscores the value of transparency and openness. It discourages paternalistic attempts to manage public discourse behind closed doors. When the public learns that certain truths are being hidden, trust in those concealing the truth erodes, and skepticism toward authority grows. This dynamic serves as a check on corporate and governmental overreach, potentially strengthening democratic ideals. On the other hand, not all information is innocuous. Certain data might infringe on privacy, promote hate, or endanger vulnerable populations. Complex moral dilemmas arise when preventing the spread of harmful content unintentionally boosts its profile. The Streisand effect forces communicators and regulators to navigate a precarious tightrope, balancing the public’s right to know with the moral imperative to avoid spreading damaging or false information. It also implicates the role of technology platforms, which must decide how to respond to takedown requests without unintentionally fanning the flames of controversy. These moral dimensions invite a reevaluation of censorship policies. If attempts at suppression often fail or backfire, perhaps a more nuanced approach—founded on contextualization, critical literacy, and open debate—is necessary. The Streisand effect nudges us toward transparency as a virtue, but transparency alone is not a panacea. An informed public must be equipped with the media literacy skills to analyze and contextualize the information they encounter. The reality of the Streisand effect means institutions and individuals must be prepared to engage with it. This means: Transparent Communication Policies: Institutions should adopt policies that favor openness and clarity over secrecy. When confronted with unflattering facts, addressing them head-on rather than attempting concealment can build trust. For corporations facing a scandal, a prompt and honest statement acknowledging mistakes and outlining remediation steps is often more effective than a covert takedown strategy. Contextualizing Controversial Content: Instead of deleting or blocking information, communicators can provide context, fact-checking, and expert commentary. By reframing potentially damaging material within a broader narrative, they reduce its allure as “forbidden knowledge.” This approach empowers audiences to engage critically rather than sensationalizing the hidden. Media Literacy Education: An informed public is less susceptible to knee-jerk reactions and the allure of secrecy. By equipping citizens with the tools to evaluate sources, understand media ecosystems, and recognize disinformation tactics, media literacy education can minimize the effectiveness of both censorship and the counterproductive effects of censorship attempts. Proactive Crisis Management: Anticipating controversies before they arise and having a roadmap for ethical, transparent responses can help organizations avoid overreactions. Strategists can rehearse crisis scenarios, developing responses that reduce panic and minimize the temptation to suppress information in the heat of the moment. Critical Discourse Forums: Encouraging open discussion and debate in moderated forums allows contentious topics to be aired without resorting to deletion. By fostering respectful dialogue, platforms and organizations create a public sphere where misinformation can be challenged, and harmful content can be contextualized or debunked. Leveraging the Effect for Good: Activists and social justice groups, aware of the Streisand effect, can leverage suppression attempts to draw attention to critical issues. By documenting censorship attempts and highlighting them as evidence of wrongdoing, they can rally public support and galvanize meaningful change. The Streisand effect also symbolizes a broader cultural shift in how power operates in networked publics. Traditional gatekeepers—governments, mainstream media outlets, powerful companies—no longer enjoy uncontested control over narratives. Instead, networked citizens possess a heightened ability to counter attempts at censorship. The Streisand effect emphasizes that information is not a single, discrete commodity that can be centrally managed. It is a fluid, replicable, crowd-driven phenomenon. The Streisand effect is more than an internet curiosity. It stands as a crucial case study in understanding the unpredictability, interconnectedness, and evolving power relations of the global information landscape. From its origin in a legal battle over a single photograph, this phenomenon has grown into a robust conceptual framework for examining how efforts to silence information can result in louder, more widespread conversation. The effect bridges multiple disciplines—communications theory, psychology, sociology, cyberlaw, political science—and resonates with thinkers who have long warned about the unintended consequences of censorship. In a world where information flows at unprecedented volumes and speeds, attempts to control that flow are often counterproductive. Instead, the Streisand effect encourages a pivot toward transparency, dialogue, and critical engagement. As we navigate a future rife with challenges—misinformation wars, authoritarian clampdowns, corporate PR disasters, and the struggle for digital rights—the Streisand effect remains instructive. It teaches us that the networks we have built thrive on the interplay of curiosity, resistance, and shared identity. Censorship often triggers rebellion, and secrecy can breed discovery. The moral imperative is not merely to acknowledge the effect but to engage thoughtfully with what it implies about power, ethics, and the responsibilities of all communicators, from individual citizens to multinational platforms. The Streisand effect is, at its core, a reminder that information ecosystems have personalities and patterns of their own. Attempts to shape these ecosystems through force or concealment frequently backfire. The more you try to hide something in the digital age, the more it demands to be found. And once found, it spreads uncontrollably, carried along by human curiosity, algorithmic affinities, and the moral heartbeat of a public that will not be kept in the dark. Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.Princess Beatrice's husband appeared to be getting into the Christmas spirit as he appeared to purchase a real festive Christmas tree for his family at the weekend. It comes as Princess Beatrice and her husband will welcome their new baby next year , as the Princess of York continues her second pregnancy. Uploading a festive story to Instagram , Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi shared an image with over 150K followers which consisted of multiple lines of Christmas trees in a row. The property developer had given fans a glimpse into his Saturday morning and an early visit to what looked like a garden centre. While Edoardo didn’t reveal if he managed to get the perfect Christmas tree , the timing - being the first weekend of December, meant he could have had a good selection to choose from. His Instagram story featured a frosty scene, complete with a row of lush green trees to his right and a sign for "Ornamental trees" to his left. Edoardo and Beatrice share a three-year-old daughter together, Sienna Elizabeth Mapelli Mozzi , and Edoardo is also the father to his eight-year-old son Christopher , affectionately known as 'Wolfie'. The stepson of Beatrice's mother is talented architect, Dara Huang, former fiancé of Edoardo . Dara has spoken warmly about their co-parenting arrangement, previously telling Harper's Bazaar: "Wolfie has had two sets of parents trying to help him on both sides, and I just think 'The more, the merrier'. I feel lucky to have such positive people around him, who really embrace him." In 2023, Wolfie joined Beatrice at the Princess of Wales' ' Together at Christmas' carol service at Westminster Abbey. The Royal Family traditionally spends Christmas Day at Sandringham and are pictured walking together to the St Mary Magdalene Church service on the estate. King Charles leads the family, accompanied by Queen Camilla and other extended family members. Royal Family members often include the King's other nieces and nephews, including Zara Tindall, Peter Phillips, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie and their families. Meanwhile, Beatrice's mother, The Duchess of York, 65, is well and truly in the festive spirit and like most grandmothers she is ready to spoil her grandchildren this festive season "with sweets, toys and treats". "Grannies exist to spoil their grandchildren, don't they? I'll be stuffing their stockings with sweets, toys and treats. I think I'm as excited as they are," the Duchess told Hello! Sarah - affectionately dubbed Fergie by fans and friends - is grandmother to Princess Beatrice ’s daughter Sienna, three, and stepson Wolfie, eight, as well as Princess Eugenie ’s sons, August, three, and one-year-old Ernest.Here's How Much Money You Spend Per Minute In Costco
Mumuex Launches The Crypto Education Program of Women, Empowering the Future of BlockchainA heartbroken Sir Rod Stewart has paid a touching tribute to his friend Richard Perry, who passed away at the age of 82. The music producer, who had worked with both Rod and The Beatles, died in a Los Angeles hospital on Tuesday following a cardiac arrest . His friend Daphna Kastner confirmed that Richard "maximized his time here." Upon hearing the tragic news, Sir Rod took to social media to express his grief. "Dearest Richard, farewell, my dear buddy. They say in life a man is lucky if he can count his true friends on one hand, and you were certainly one of them," he penned on his Instagram page. "Now I've lost you, and I'm devastated. We played and worked so closely together for so many years, creating some of the most memorable music together." Sir Rod Stewart no longer embarrassed as he shares passion over new hobby Inside Sir Rod Stewart's lavish mansion with 10 bedrooms and a football field Sir Rod continued: "You were there when Penny and I first started dating, encouraging our relationship. We are both in tears as I post this farewell." Fans also expressed their condolences in the comment section, reports the Mirror . One user wrote: "He was a Prince of a man, as are you, dear Rod... my condolences to you and Penny. With love, Bebe." Another added: "So sorry to read this rod thinking of u all and hes family," while another posted: "Sorry to hear of this loss. Richard Perry had innumerable successes with you, Rod Stewart, and especially, @carlysimonhq His contributions will live and play on for many years to come." Richard's close friend announced the news of his death in a heartbreaking statement. "He was generous, fun, sweet, and made the world a better place," she reminisced. "The world is a little less sweet without him here, but it's a little sweeter in heaven." Richard, who rubbed shoulders with music royalty like Carly Simon, Ringo Starr, and Rod Stewart, was celebrated as a "musician's producer." With a romantic history that includes Hollywood icons Jane Fonda and Elizabeth Taylor, Richard left an indelible mark on the music scene, often being the go-to guru for artists looking to refresh their sound or jumpstart their careers. His illustrious production resume boasts of hits like Rod Stewart's The Great American Songbook series, Carly Simon's iconic track You're So Vain, and Ringo Starr's 1973 hit album Ringo, which soared to No. 2 on the charts. His genius also touched the works of Barbra Streisand, Harry Nilsson, Martha Reeves, Fats Domino, and The Band. Barbra Streisand herself gave Richard his due in her memoir, My Name is Barbra, noting: "Richard had a knack for matching the right song to the right artist." DAILY NEWSLETTER: Sign up here to get the latest news and updates from the Mirror US straight to your inbox with our FREE newsletter.
Justin Baldoni's Lawyer Releases New Statement About Blake Lively LawsuitIn a significant boost to Nigeria’s healthcare sector, Cerba Lancet Nigeria has inaugurated its state-of-the-art reference laboratory in Lagos, setting new standards in medical testing and preventive care. With a focus on early detection and cutting-edge diagnostics, Cerba Lancet Nigeria is poised to reshape the healthcare landscape, offering hope for a system heavily reliant on personal funds and the growing burden of chronic diseases. The Lagos State Commissioner for Health, Professor Akin Abayomi, at the Cerba Lancet Nigeria grand opening and new name unveiling in Lagos, praised the facility for its potential to transform healthcare delivery. “Testing before treatment is crucial. Using laboratories to define treatment strategies ensures we avoid the misuse of antimicrobials and reduce the burden of preventable diseases,” Abayomi stated. He called on Cerba Lancet to expand its local testing capacity to reduce reliance on foreign laboratories, ensuring quicker and more cost-effective diagnostics. “Building local capacity is key to improving healthcare outcomes and addressing the challenges of out-of-pocket spending,” he added. The minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, also commended the initiative, describing it as a “game-changer” for Nigerians. He urged Cerba Lancet Nigeria to partner with universities to enhance medical research and training. CEO of Cerba Lancet Nigeria, Dr. Olayemi Dawodu, emphasised the company’s commitment to preventive healthcare, particularly in early detection of conditions like hypertension and diabetes. “Preventive care not only improves health outcomes but also alleviates the financial strain on individuals and the healthcare system,” Dawodu noted. Cerba Lancet’s CEO further outlined partnerships with Health Management Organizations (HMOs) and local communities to make diagnostics accessible and affordable, reinforcing the company’s mission to extend the average Nigerian lifespan. Operating in 14 African countries, Cerba Lancet Africa’s ambition is to decentralize diagnostics and deliver world-class services locally. Group CEO Matthieu Gogue reiterated this commitment, stating, “Our investment in technology and skilled professionals ensures we meet the healthcare needs of every Nigerian.”None
Inquirer file photo MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court on Tuesday confirmed receipt of an “anonymous” disbarment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte over her recent remarks about exhuming the remains of President Marcos’ father and namesake and having them dumped into the West Philippine Sea. “Actually, there is a pending disbarment case for the VP, which was filed a few years ago when she was still the mayor of Davao. And just this month, the Supreme Court received an anonymous complaint regarding her statements about the late President Ferdinand Marcos,” Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting told reporters. READ: Sara warned Imee: I’ll dig up Marcos Sr.’s body Ting was referring to Duterte’s comments in an interview on Oct. 18, where she said she had warned the Marcos family—through Sen. Imee Marcos—that she would have their father’s remains dug up from Libingan ng mga Bayani if the President and his allies would continue with their political attacks. READ: Sara Duterte slammed over grave desecration threat vs Marcos Sr. “I told Sen. Imee (Marcos), if you don’t stop, I will dig the grave of your father and I will throw him into the WPS (West Philippine Sea). One of these days, I will go there and get his body,” Duterte said, addressing questions about her growing rift with the President. The Vice President also said she “wanted to cut [the President’s] head off” after realizing their relationship had turned toxic. When asked if the high tribunal could act motu proprio on the disbarment case against Duterte, Ting said “it’s always possible that the Supreme Court can take cognizance of anything that’s publicly known.” “But usually, it’s by complaint, so we’ll have to wait and see what the court will do in that case,” she said, adding that the high tribunal had yet to act on the anonymous complaint. Subscribe to our daily newsletter By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy .Will Utah State or Boise State play against San Jose State in the Mountain West semifinals?
Turkey lowers interest rate to 47.5%
Techpump signs with Gataca as Pornhub plays word games with Ofcom
Into the earthCeribell to Participate in the 43rd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare ConferenceShip strikes kill thousands of whales. A study of hot spots could map out solutions
The S&P 500 fell less than 0.1% after spending the day wavering between small gains and losses. The tiny loss ended the benchmark index’s three-day winning streak. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.1% and the Nasdaq composite fell 0.1%. Trading volume was lighter than usual as US markets reopened following the Christmas holiday. Semiconductor giant Nvidia, whose enormous valuation gives it an outsize influence on indexes, slipped 0.2%. Meta Platforms fell 0.7%, and Amazon and Netflix each fell 0.9%. Tesla was among the biggest decliners in the S&P 500, finishing 1.8% lower. Some tech companies fared better. Chip company Broadcom rose 2.4%, Micron Technology added 0.6% and Adobe gained 0.5%. Health care stocks were a bright spot. CVS Health rose 1.5% and Walgreens Boots Alliance added 5.3% for the biggest gain among S&P 500 stocks. Several retailers also gained ground. Target rose 3%, Ross Stores added 2.3%, Best Buy rose 2.9% and Dollar Tree gained 3.8%. Traders are watching to see whether retailers have a strong holiday season. The day after Christmas traditionally ranks among the top 10 biggest shopping days of the year, as consumers go online or rush to stores to cash in gift cards and raid bargain bins. US-listed shares in Honda and Nissan rose 4.1% and 16.4% respectively. The Japanese car makers announced earlier this week that the two companies are in talks to combine. All told, the S&P 500 fell 2.45 points to 6,037.59. The Dow added 28.77 points to 43,325.80. The Nasdaq fell 10.77 points to close at 20,020.36. Wall Street also got a labour market update. US applications for unemployment benefits held steady last week, though continuing claims rose to the highest level in three years, the Labour Department reported. Treasury yields mostly fell in the bond market. The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 4.58% from 4.59% late on Tuesday. Major European markets were closed, as well as Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and Indonesia. Trading was expected to be subdued this week with a thin slate of economic data on the calendar.Ruben Amorim fires four-word 'storm' warning to Man Utd rivals and addresses Arsenal gap
- Previous: jili slot machine
- Next: 337 jili slot login register
